On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 11:37:22PM -, Kyle Silfer wrote:
> command:
> su spamfilter -D -c '/usr/bin/sa-learn --spam ./unham/1.'
I don't know what -D passed to su will do.
> So it's the same message ID, but the journal line indicates different entry
> counts. What does that mean?
Journal coun
Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> If you put it after the --spam, the "./unham/1." will be considered an option
> to -D.
That was indeed my problem. Thanks.
> Verify the DBs in use, and what msgid is being learnt.
The DBs and msgid are the same each time, but I am getting different j
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Today I'm attempting to upgrade spamassassin from 2.x to 3.0.2,
and I'm experiencing issues surrounding the new database format.
I've read both UPGRADE and
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/BayesUpgradeError, but
apparently to no avail.
Running
Hi,
I've been feeding spamassassin spam and ham. But the Bayesian filter is
not having any effect on my e-mail account. Now, I've been feeding the
bayesian filter logged in as one user "A" on my server and the soft
linking the 'bayes_seen', 'bayes_toks' and 'user_prefs' files for user
"B" ove
Since upgrading to 3.02 from 2.63 and tweaking some rules, I've had
problems with smtp connections skyrocketing at times. I have raised the
limit (qmail-smtpd with tcpserver) to 400 connections so there would
always be an smtp connection available for legitimate relaying, but it
occasionally hits
> cornelius:/tmp # su spamfilter -c '/usr/bin/sa-learn --spam ./unham/1.'
> Learned from 1 message(s) (1 message(s) examined).
>
> cornelius:/tmp # su spamfilter -c '/usr/bin/sa-learn --spam ./unham/1.'
> Learned from 1 message(s) (1 message(s) examined).
When in doubt, run with -D.
> When re-ru
Hello Filip,
Thank you for your script! I have been looking up several alternative
paths now, and yours seem to be the better way to go.
I had not noticed before that /usr/sbin/sendmail in fact only was a
symlink. I have been testing your script, and it is necessary for me to
modify it.
This is
Kyle Silfer wrote:
I am a little surprised nobody has any advice for me. Let me restate this as a
yes/no question:
If sa-learn is relearning the same messages over and over again and can't
forget them (details below), is my Bayesian database just hosed beyond repair?
/k
I would try moving (not dele
I am a little surprised nobody has any advice for me. Let me restate this as a
yes/no question:
If sa-learn is relearning the same messages over and over again and can't
forget them (details below), is my Bayesian database just hosed beyond repair?
/k
> Clearly something is broken, but I'm not s
When I run spamassassin --lint, I get the following error:
# spamassassin --lint
config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: smtp inet
- y - - smtpd
config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: pickupfifo
- y 60 1 picku
First, I had understood that Bayes can learn previously tagged emails without
stripping Spamassassin tags. Has this changed?
Second, all of my users use a webmail client, though they can use OE if they
wish. It is probably best for them to use IMAP so that server-side scanning
can better be setup.
> -Original Message-
> From: Stuart Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 7:35 PM
> To: Peter Marshall; SpamAssassin Users
> Subject: Re: Manually training SpamAssassin by forwarding mail
>
> Peter Marshall wrote:
> > Stuart Johnston wrote:
> >
> >> Pete
Peter Marshall wrote:
Stuart Johnston wrote:
Peter Marshall wrote:
Kevin Sullivan wrote:
--On 02/03/05 01:59:21 +0100 Sander Holthaus - Orange XL wrote:
I've been interested in offering customers to train manually train the
SpamAssassin Bayes filter for ham and spam (to reduce false
positives and
Stuart Johnston wrote:
Peter Marshall wrote:
Kevin Sullivan wrote:
--On 02/03/05 01:59:21 +0100 Sander Holthaus - Orange XL wrote:
I've been interested in offering customers to train manually train the
SpamAssassin Bayes filter for ham and spam (to reduce false
positives and
negatives). However, I
> -Original Message-
> From: Stuart Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 5:20 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Cc: Peter Marshall
> Subject: Re: Manually training SpamAssassin by forwarding mail
>
> Peter Marshall wrote:
> > Kevin Sullivan wrote:
Hi all,
I seem to be getting some new spam that includes the content in an
attached .html file. here is the header information.
Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0
Received: from removed ([xxx.xxx.xxx.xx]) by removed with Microsoft
SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
Fri, 4 Feb 2005 09:40:
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 10:57:28AM -, Dermot Paikkos wrote:
> tripped on and adjust the scores. For example I want to increase all the
> URIBL type scores and I keep seeing new ones.
$ grep URIBL /usr/share/spamassassin/[2-4]*.cf
everything else, RTFM. :)
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"Yo
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 05:44 PM 2/2/2005, Alan Munday wrote:
> >Matt Kettler wrote the following on 02/02/2005 22:02:
> > > Actually, it's limit in SA's header generation that I forgot about.
> > > I
> > forgot that it forces X-Spam as a prefix.
> > >
> >
> >Does that mean I
Peter Marshall wrote:
Kevin Sullivan wrote:
--On 02/03/05 01:59:21 +0100 Sander Holthaus - Orange XL wrote:
I've been interested in offering customers to train manually train the
SpamAssassin Bayes filter for ham and spam (to reduce false positives
and
negatives). However, I can only find document
> --On 02/04/05 16:08:53 +0100 Sander Holthaus - Orange XL wrote:
> > Basically, I've got two option. All mail that is received
> is backupped
> > on the mailserver before adding any headers. I could match
> those with
> > mail received in the spam-learn and ham-learn accounts.
> However, mail
Don't know if it's related, but I'm seeing a SIGNIFICANT increase in
SMTP REJECTs, something to the tune of a 10- to 15-fold increase. I
started seeing it simultaneously on both my primary and secondary boxes,
starting around 7:AM EST yesterday (Thursday). I log RBL rejects as
'spam' so this is som
--On 02/04/05 16:08:53 +0100 Sander Holthaus - Orange XL wrote:
Basically, I've got two option. All mail that is received is backupped on
the mailserver before adding any headers. I could match those with mail
received in the spam-learn and ham-learn accounts. However, mail is
backupped only for a
> What does one need to do to activate the relay country tests?
> We have the CPAN module installed and added this line to local.cf
>
> loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::RelayCountry
>
> Do we need to add any scores or tests?
>
> We are not yet seeing any evidence that the test is bein
Jeff Koch wrote:
What does one need to do to activate the relay country tests? We have
the CPAN module installed and added this line to local.cf
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::RelayCountry
I do not use that plugin, but I would uncomment the entry in init.pre
and not touch local.cf.
> --On 02/04/05 09:17:55 -0400 Peter Marshall wrote:
> > My question is the same as Henrik, I have a bunch of email that is
> > spam (either tagged by spam assassin or not tagged at all.
> I forwared
> > it as an attachment to a "spam" mail box. What do I have to do now
> > before I can get b
What does one need to do to activate the relay country tests? We have the
CPAN module installed and added this line to local.cf
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::RelayCountry
Do we need to add any scores or tests?
We are not yet seeing any evidence that the test is being used.
Best Rega
Hello Daniel,
Thursday, February 3, 2005, 6:58:47 PM, you wrote:
DQ> Something close to this will be in 3.1, so you'll want to remove
DQ> the rule then, maybe name it something else too.
DQ> uri URI_SCHEME_MIXED_CASE /^(?![a-z]{3,6}:|[A-Z]{3,6})[A-Za-z]{3,6}:\//
DQ> describe URI_SCHEME_MIXE
Hi all,
Apologies for cross posting this on the SA and exim list but there are
many years of experienced linux email managers on the two lists.
I am still frequently getting an error from our cron job. The cron entry
is
service spamd restart
and the log entry is
Feb 4 14:15:00 bill spamd: sp
--On 02/04/05 09:17:55 -0400 Peter Marshall wrote:
My question is the same as Henrik, I have a bunch of email that is spam
(either tagged by spam assassin or not tagged at all. I forwared it as
an attachment to a "spam" mail box. What do I have to do now before I
can get bayes to learn the messag
Kevin Sullivan wrote:
--On 02/03/05 01:59:21 +0100 Sander Holthaus - Orange XL wrote:
I've been interested in offering customers to train manually train the
SpamAssassin Bayes filter for ham and spam (to reduce false positives
and
negatives). However, I can only find documentation to this for loca
After many suggestions from this group, I have come up with the following rule.
It works great!!!
headerSR_SUB_STOCKS Subject =~
/0[tT[cC]|[pP]erf0rmance|[fF]r0[mM]|[wW]a\|\||[aA]\|ert|[gG]r0wth|[pP]\|ay|[yY]0[uU]|[sS]tOck|[sS]t0ck|[iI]nvest0r|[iI]nvestOr|[pP]OwerhOuse|[pP]0ssib\|e|[
In my maillogfile's
I came across the following line:
spamd[11786]:
result: Y 76 -
BAYES_99,J_CHICKENPOX_101,J_CHICKENPOX_12,J_CHICKENPOX_13,J_CHICKENPOX_14,J_CHICKENPOX_15,J_CHICKENPOX_16,J_CHICKENPOX_21,J_CHICKENPOX_210,J_CHICKENPOX_22,J_CHICKENPOX_23,J_CHICKENPOX_24,J_CHICKENPOX_25,J_CHI
Hi,
It there somewhere I can find a list of the SYMBOLIC_TEST_NAMEs
and hopefully there definition so I can edit their scores. At the moment
I am having to wait for spam to get through and look at the tests it
tripped on and adjust the scores. For example I want to increase all the
URIBL typ
Hi Laurent
Here is the dcc stats output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# cdcc stats
dcc2.dcc-servers.net 212.95.66.24,6277
server-ID 1179 /var/dcc/map 09:45:36
version 1.2.50 tracing ANON CLNT
13860861 hash entries 7654642 used 418517136 DB bytes
51 ms delay 219262 NOPs 175 ADMN 6
Daniel
What would a suggested initial score be?
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
Daniel Quinlan wrote:
Something close to this will be in 3.1, so you'll want to remove the
rule then, maybe name it something else too.
uri URI_SCHEME_MIXED_CASE
hi,
i have tried every possible comkbination in the local.cf file but
the subject is just not getting taggwed whatever i do.
here are the spamassassin headers for a recent junk mail:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.8 required=2.0
X-Spam-Level: +
Received: from xx.xxx.xx.xx by mantra (envelope
--On 02/03/05 01:59:21 +0100 Sander Holthaus - Orange XL wrote:
I've been interested in offering customers to train manually train the
SpamAssassin Bayes filter for ham and spam (to reduce false positives and
negatives). However, I can only find documentation to this for local
mailboxes and IMAP. M
> > "Better st0ck perfOrmance fr0m 0tc helpline"
> >
> > Does anyone have a rule for these yet?
>
> There are rules for those, however, they only seem to exist for the body.
> Mangled, Chickpox and SARE_adult all hit on that line.
But keep in mind that body rules also get fed the Subject, so they
Something close to this will be in 3.1, so you'll want to remove the
rule then, maybe name it something else too.
uri URI_SCHEME_MIXED_CASE /^(?![a-z]{3,6}:|[A-Z]{3,6})[A-Za-z]{3,6}:\//
describe URI_SCHEME_MIXED_CASEURI scheme has mixed uppercase and
lowercase
The mass-check resu
Henrik wrote:
Thank you Matt,
Matt Kettler wrote:
spam_level_stars 1
So, if I want the spam_level_stars-function added in every incoming
email, what should be written in the local.cf-file for this?
I searched the man-pages and got this for the star-labeling;
"add_header all Level _STARS(*)_"
..a
Thank you Matt,
Matt Kettler wrote:
spam_level_stars 1
So, if I want the spam_level_stars-function added in every incoming
email, what should be written in the local.cf-file for this?
..and what should I put in there to get the spam-word report to go
inside the headers, folded and all, instead
At 07:27 PM 2/3/2005, Henrik wrote:
I want the "X-Spam-Flag:" header to show either "yes" or "no" for spam
resp. no-spam labeled emails, in all emails labeled as spam, there should
be a full report in the email-header with the words that Spam Assassin
reacted upon. In the present state Spam Assa
Hello,
This is my first post to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've got this
problem where I can not get Spam Assassin (3.0) to modify the headers of
all incoming email in the right way.
I want the "X-Spam-Flag:" header to show either "yes" or "no" for spam
resp. no-spam labeled emails, in all emails label
43 matches
Mail list logo
