CentOS 3.4
# rpm -qa spamassassin
spamassassin-3.0.3-1.1.el3.rf
# rpm -qa mailscanner
mailscanner-4.41.3-1
I start with starter db from Fortress Systems since my old bayes db from
2.6x was creamed by this same issue...
# spamassassin -p /etc/MailScanner/spam.assassin.prefs.conf -D --lint
much
When linting my rules with debug, I get the following in the output:
debug: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL=HASH(0x8c0d3a4)
implements 'parse_config'
debug: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Hashcash=HASH(0x8bf0e74)
implements 'parse_config' Argument isn't numeric in addition (+)
Thanks, Matt!
Yes, your right. I have it exacliy you discribe. With SQL
My only problem was to get the right message. But it's solved. All running
up.
Ingo
- Original Message -
From: Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ingo Reinhart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Hi
I'm new for spamassassin , when modify the local.cf file after restart
sendmail or what ?
Thanks
:: IT Manager ::
El.mo. S.p.a.
Andrea Soccal
Tel. +39 049 920
Web : http://www.elmo.it
Ok
If i want block german spam what write in local.cf file ?
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Philipp Snizek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inviato: mercoledì 18 maggio 2005 9.36
A: Netmail
Oggetto: RE: German Spam
I'm new for spamassassin , when modify the local.cf file
after restart
On Wednesday, May 18, 2005, 12:05:13 AM, Monty Ree wrote:
Hello, all.
When I see maillog, I can see lots of logs like below..
Some spammer send spam mails from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED], I
guess.
So mail server load is high to accept this spam and reply withUser
unknown.
Is
Craig
best to install Spamassassin from source or CPAN. I've seen lots of
problems with the RPM based install. No specifically bayes but
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
Craig White wrote:
CentOS 3.4
# rpm -qa spamassassin
Netmail wrote:
Hi
I'm new for spamassassin , when modify the local.cf file after restart
sendmail or what ?
If you are using spamc/spamd you need to restart spamd in order to
activate new rules.
If you are simply calling spamassassin executable from sendmail (highly
inefficient), no restart is
Ok
Now this is my config file
# This is the right place to customize your installation of SpamAssassin.
# See 'perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf' for details of what can be
# tweaked.
#
###
#
rewrite_subject 1
#report_safe 1
Hi,
I have a suspicion that my bayes DB has wrong entries because of the way I
previously use to train it. I used to use Outlook to bounce spam messages,
but for some reason Microsoft do not seem to implement the 'ReSent'
Header...as a result I think the bayes DB may be using my own email address
I ama student and testingSA for my
project.
Thus, I change sub tokenize_line to produce an
output that i want. Now my Bayes was learnt about 350 hams and 350 spams but it
has only 650 tokens.
When I use spamassassin -t command to test my mail,
Bayes was working properly. Itgive a spam
Netmail wrote:
Ok
Now this is my config file
# This is the right place to customize your installation of SpamAssassin.
# See 'perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf' for details of what can be
# tweaked.
#
###
#
rewrite_subject 1
Jeff Chan wrote:
IIRC Sober P advertised free World Cup tickets or something like
that. That would tend to get people to open the virus spams in
Europe, but probably wouldn't mean sh!t here in the U.S. where
probably fewer than 1 in 10 people has any idea what a World
Cup is. Superbowl they've
From: Bill Maidment [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeff Chan wrote:
IIRC Sober P advertised free World Cup tickets or something like
that. That would tend to get people to open the virus spams in
Europe, but probably wouldn't mean sh!t here in the U.S. where
probably fewer than 1 in 10 people has
Gee, I wish there was a way I could tell spamassassin I want a 0.2
score on a given test for each time it is hit within a message. I
have some spams I could drive up over 20 points with such a rule
that might hit in half the hams I receive all of one or two times.
{O.O}
What I currently do is install the same version of SA on the other
machine, use sa-learn, and then do a backup. I then go to the other
machine and do a restore. This seems to work great.
Steve
Ingo Reinhart wrote:
Hello!
I want to use sa-learn on a diffrent server than spamd is running. How
Bob,
On Tue, 17 May 2005, Robert Menschel wrote:
Hello John,
Tuesday, May 17, 2005, 2:02:16 PM, you wrote:
J Hi,
J I have been searching around with no luck. I have been playing with
J mass-checks on my corpus using some the SARE rules sets and wanted to do a
J sanity check against
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 6:17 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Bombarded by German political spam
On Tuesday, May 17, 2005, 3:42:09 PM, David Funk wrote:
So the intensity of the spam bombing is
On Wed, 18 May 2005, Stephen M. Przepiora wrote:
What I currently do is install the same version of SA on the other machine,
use sa-learn, and then do a backup. I then go to the other machine and do a
restore. This seems to work great.
Steve
Ingo Reinhart wrote:
Hello!
I want to use sa-learn on
I want to connect spamc in IP 172.19.3.1 to spamd in IP 172.19.2.1
spamd is running in 2.1 with the following options:
# ps -ef | grep spamd
root 11192 1 0 14:20 ?00:00:00 /usr/sbin/spamd -m 10 -A
172.19.3.1 -A 172.19.3.2 -A 127.0.0.1 -d --pidfile=/var/run/spamd.pid
root
Paco Yepes wrote:
I want to connect spamc in IP 172.19.3.1 to spamd in IP 172.19.2.1
spamd is running in 2.1 with the following options:
# ps -ef | grep spamd
root 11192 1 0 14:20 ?00:00:00 /usr/sbin/spamd -m 10 -A
172.19.3.1 -A 172.19.3.2 -A 127.0.0.1 -d
another newbie here... how do I block a URL with SpamAssassin?
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties by an
authorized county official. If you have received this communication in
error ,
How and where can
I change the Manual Whitelist and/or Blacklist
scores?
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 15:05, Thomas Deaton typed:
another newbie here... how do I block a URL with SpamAssassin?
The most SA will ever do is tag your mail for you saying a URL was present.
uri rules do this. You can then filter based on the headers added by SA.
If you never want to ever
Jeffrey N. Miller wrote:
How and where can I change the Manual Whitelist and/or Blacklist scores?
score rule score
in your local.cf to override.
--
Thanks,
James
# This is the right place to customize your installation of SpamAssassin.
# See 'perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf' for details of what can be
# tweaked.
#
###
#
rewrite_subject 1
#report_safe 1
header SUBJ_RETHANKS Subject
Jeff Chan wrote:
On Wednesday, May 18, 2005, 12:05:13 AM, Monty Ree wrote:
Hello, all.
When I see maillog, I can see lots of logs like below..
Some spammer send spam mails from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED], I guess.
So mail server load is high to accept this spam and reply withUser
Jeffrey N. Miller wrote:
can u give me an example?
would you put:
blacklist_to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
score 10.0
-Original Message-
From: James R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 10:00 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Whitelist and Blacklist default
Paco Yepes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 05/18/2005
08:16:09 AM:
I want to connect spamc in IP 172.19.3.1 to spamd in IP 172.19.2.1
spamd is running in 2.1 with the following options:
# ps -ef | grep spamd
root 11192 1 0 14:20 ?
00:00:00 /usr/sbin/spamd -m 10 -A
172.19.3.1 -A
Jeff Chan wrote:
On Tuesday, May 17, 2005, 3:42:09 PM, David Funk wrote:
So the intensity of the spam bombing is inversely proportional to
the local computer community 'clue level'. This tends to indicate
that there are more clue-less American windows llusers than there
are German. No surprise
Make sure that the URIDNSBL plugin is loaded in
/etc/mail/spamassassin/init.pre
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL
Scott Schaffer wrote:
OK, I uninstalled SA 3.0.0 and did a clean install of 3.0.3, downloaded new SARE rules and tried again. I am still not getting any URI results. Can
A couple days ago, I set up AOL's feedback loop (though the loop part is a
misnomer, since you can't actually respond to the messages) so I could
monitor complaints against my employer's servers. Looking through the
messages AOL says their members reported as spam, I noticed that none of
them
Thomas Deaton wrote:
another newbie here... how do I block a URL with SpamAssassin?
You'd have to write a uri rule. There's no quick-and-dirty 'blacklist_url, but
writing URI rules isn't hard.
A simple intro to basic and intermediate rules can be found at:
forum wrote:
I am a student and testing SA for my project.
Thus, I change sub tokenize_line to produce an output that i want. Now
my Bayes was learnt about 350 hams and 350 spams but it has only 650 tokens.
When I use spamassassin -t command to test my mail, Bayes was working
properly. It
On Wednesday, May 18, 2005, 7:25:28 AM, Duncan Hill wrote:
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 15:05, Thomas Deaton typed:
another newbie here... how do I block a URL with SpamAssassin?
The most SA will ever do is tag your mail for you saying a URL was present.
uri rules do this. You can then filter
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 09:16:15AM -0700, Mike Jackson wrote:
A couple days ago, I set up AOL's feedback loop (though the loop part is
a misnomer, since you can't actually respond to the messages) so I could
monitor complaints against my employer's servers. Looking through the
messages AOL
Mike Jackson wrote:
* Invoking a policy of not forwarding to AOL accounts, but we're a web
design/hosting firm with about 200 domains, and a handful of customers have
AOL addresses, and that sort of policy wouldn't stand.
This doesn't directly address your question, but we have found that the
On Wed, 18 May 2005, Mike Jackson wrote:
* Invoking a policy of not forwarding to AOL accounts, but we're a web
design/hosting firm with about 200 domains, and a handful of customers have
AOL addresses, and that sort of policy wouldn't stand.
Variation of this -- inform then they can not use
On Wed, 18 May 2005, Bob McClure Jr wrote:
As I understand it, once you have your server listed on the AOL
feedback loop, it is whitelisted, so that may solve the immediate
problem.
Not really. I can tell you the magic number is 10. As in, if someone goes
on vacation, gets back, and reports
Bob McClure Jr wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 09:16:15AM -0700, Mike Jackson wrote:
A couple days ago, I set up AOL's feedback loop (though the loop part is
a misnomer, since you can't actually respond to the messages) so I could
monitor complaints against my employer's servers. Looking through
Jeff Chan wrote:
On Wednesday, May 18, 2005, 12:05:13 AM, Monty Ree wrote:
Hello, all.
When I see maillog, I can see lots of logs like below..
Some spammer send spam mails from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
I guess.
So mail server load is high to accept this spam and
Thanks to everyone who helped!
I've got everything working and have successfully added a few extra rules.
Lint returns no errors! (I had to some fixing on the bayes db's but they are
now being read correctly!
Jim Sheffer,
OmniPilot Softwarehttp://www.omnipilot.com
Systems
Mike Jackson wrote:
A couple days ago, I set up AOL's feedback loop (though the loop
part is a misnomer, since you can't actually respond to the messages)
so I could monitor complaints against my employer's servers. Looking
through the messages AOL says their members reported as spam, I
Ok-
I've got bayes db's all working, lint runs with no errors.
Now I need to feed the beast spam/ham messages!
2 questions:
I've set up 2 email accounts- ham and spam.
I've connected to these accounts via imap, and took several hundred of each
and dragged them into these folders. Will this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Hepworth wrote:
Fred wrote:
Ben Hanson wrote:
Shortly after the first of the year, I noticed the percentage
of spam messages for our organization dropped consistently by
10-15%. Ben
I see between 83-85% spam. We use SARE rules +
I use
Spamassassinwith Sendmail and I am thinking about going to Exim.
Does it make a difference to Spamassassin with
mimedefang?
Hamie wrote:
How do you count 'unknown users'? Accurately I mean...
Assuming you don't accept email in the first place if the user is
unknown (Or you might I guess, but it seems like un-necessary
processing to me) most spammers that I can see in our logs just keep
re-trying again again
From: Rick Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday, May 17, 2005, 3:42:09 PM, David Funk wrote:
So the intensity of the spam bombing is inversely proportional to
the local computer community 'clue level'. This tends to
I want to setup a
SMTP relay filtering SPAM and viruses. The relay will relay the mail to my
Exchange server. Is there well documented HOWTOs on setting this up using
Exim, Spamassassin, Mimedefang and a good virus scanning software? I see
HOWTOs using sendmail but I want to switch to Exim
From: Mike Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A couple days ago, I set up AOL's feedback loop (though the loop part is
a
misnomer, since you can't actually respond to the messages) so I could
monitor complaints against my employer's servers. Looking through the
messages AOL says their members reported
On Wed, 18 May 2005, Jeff Chan wrote:
On Wednesday, May 18, 2005, 12:05:13 AM, Monty Ree wrote:
Hello, all.
When I see maillog, I can see lots of logs like below..
Some spammer send spam mails from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED], I
guess.
So mail server load is high to accept
Get your no cost Feng Shui starter kit now
I can use stuff from it in my complaints to Chinese spam relay and
spam source sites. That REALLY seems to get their attention.
{^_-} (Gotta do something about this nasty streak of mine.)
jimsheffer wrote:
Ok-
Root# sa-learn --spam -C /etc/mail/spamassassin --showdots --dir
/var/CommuniGate/Accounts/spam.macnt/INBOX.mbox
Use of uninitialized value in quotemeta at
///Library/Perl/5.8.1/Mail/SpamAssassin.pm line 928.
.
Learned from 1 message(s) (1 message(s) examined).
RTM :) Just kidding... Use the --mbox switch when running sa-learn.
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/doc/sa-learn.html
--mboxInput sources are in mbox format
--mbx Input sources are in mbx format
- Ryan Sorensen
jimsheffer
Mike Jackson wrote:
A couple days ago, I set up AOL's feedback loop (though the loop
part is a misnomer, since you can't actually respond to the messages)
so I could monitor complaints against my employer's servers. Looking
through the messages AOL says their members reported as spam, I
Er, turn off your open relay as a starter. What you described is typical
open relay performance. And of course it taints you. The spammers are
simply relaying off your system. Until you stop the spam relays you
have no leg to stand on.
I'm not sure I agree with you a hundred percent on your police
jdow wrote:
Er, turn off your open relay as a starter. What you described is typical
open relay performance. And of course it taints you. The spammers are
simply relaying off your system. Until you stop the spam relays you
have no leg to stand on.
...Or maybe he has particular users whose accounts
On Wed, 18 May 2005, Jeffrey N. Miller wrote:
I want to setup a SMTP relay filtering SPAM and viruses. The relay will
relay the mail to my Exchange server. Is there well documented HOWTOs
on setting this up using Exim, Spamassassin, Mimedefang and a good virus
scanning software? I see HOWTOs
In an older episode (Thursday 19 May 2005 00:48), Ken Goods wrote:
jimsheffer wrote:
Any idea what I need to do? (there are over 200 emails in each
account, but it lookes like it read only 1)
Jim, how about reading the sa-learn manpage?
man sa-learn
IIRC there's a --mbox switch to tell it
hello all.can sa-learn learning spam from file that quarantine by
amavisd-new?, i think this file isn't original.
cheers,
-Gie-
_
On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how to
get there!
From: Ryan Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike Jackson wrote:
A couple days ago, I set up AOL's feedback loop (though the loop
part is a misnomer, since you can't actually respond to the messages)
so I could monitor complaints against my employer's servers. Looking
through the messages
At 01:43 19-5-2005, Ryan Sorensen wrote:
My biggest concern though is messages that come in from spammers, get
filtered by spam assassin (they have ***SPAM*** tags in the subject) and
then go on to the AOL forwards. These are defanged messages that still get
reported as spam. I have to believe
At 03:25 19-5-2005, David Velásquez Restrepo wrote:
Q) With spamassassin you need about 20 to 30 seconds per email message and
LOTS of RAM and CPU:
a) TRUE
b) FALSE
False. It depends on your settings and custom rulesets, but scanning a
single message takes about 4-5 seconds on Athlon 800
If you are going with exim, you'll want to run sa-exim which allows for sa
scanning at smtp. It's also a hell of alot faster than piping the messages
through spamassassin with a transport. there are several how-tos out there
for setting it up with amavis virus scanner.
-Rocky
On Wed, May 18,
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 08:25:53PM -0500, David Velásquez Restrepo wrote:
Q) With spamassassin you need about 20 to 30 seconds per email message and
LOTS of RAM and CPU:
a) TRUE
b) FALSE
Can't answer this question with the information provided. As a general
answer, though, b, due to
SA-Exim is a port of exim4 that has the spamc client built in. There are
debs, rpms, and source available.
homepage is here: http://marc.merlins.org/linux/exim/sa.html
We've been running it on our 12machine mail cluster for some time now
without problem and it cut load down drastically.
-Rocky
From: David Velásquez Restrepo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I'm user of spamassassin to reviw a lot (a lot!) of incoming mails with
spamassassin lot time ago. Today i have a machine just running
spamassassin,
due the high CPU and MEM requirements. Just to be clear (may be i have
something bad)
From: Marcel Veldhuizen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 03:25 19-5-2005, David Velásquez Restrepo wrote:
Q) With spamassassin you need about 20 to 30 seconds per email message and
LOTS of RAM and CPU:
a) TRUE
b) FALSE
False. It depends on your settings and custom rulesets, but scanning a
single
The question is:
No, the questionS ARE:
Q) With spamassassin you need about 20 to 30 seconds per email message
b) FALSE
and LOTS of RAM
a) TRUE
and LOTS of CPU:
b) FALSE
Software:
--
A perl script wich takes some file and test it using Mail::SpamAssassin to
get it´s spam score level
OS: gentoo 2005.0
MTA: postfix
SpamAssassin:
--
Using: Net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marcel Veldhuizen writes:
At 03:25 19-5-2005, David Velásquez Restrepo wrote:
Q) With spamassassin you need about 20 to 30 seconds per email message and
LOTS of RAM and CPU:
a) TRUE
b) FALSE
False. It depends on your settings and
Hi David,
A few quick tips to help performance...
David Velásquez Restrepo said:
SNIP
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/bigevil.cf
Do not, I repeat do not use this file, it grew way to big. This type of test is
better handled by SURBL.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
use spamd.
- --j.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS
iD8DBQFCjBz0MJF5cimLx9ARArJbAKCzDKjKCODdwTWx+OBBCp6lY7B9rgCdEo7C
+IGtZtyPQpOgYxB22dSrQIg=
=KUEV
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
73 matches
Mail list logo
