I will be out of the office until 05.09.2005.
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 03:54:19PM -0700, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> I doubt this will work any better than just working on it incrementally
> in SVN.
Well, I think anything that lowers the bar for submissions is going to
help somewhat. It's much more of a hassle to submit a bug report for a
minor ty
jdow wrote the following on 26/08/2005 22:08:
Ask an amavisd-new expert. It's already part of SpamAssassin. Perhaps
amavisd-new overrides some of the SpamAssassin configurations? Good
luck with it.
{^_^}
From: "Thomas Deliduka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
But what configuration do I need to do to add
Ask an amavisd-new expert. It's already part of SpamAssassin. Perhaps
amavisd-new overrides some of the SpamAssassin configurations? Good
luck with it.
{^_^}
From: "Thomas Deliduka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
But what configuration do I need to do to add it?
On 8/26/05 5:01 PM this was written:
Fr
From: "Thomas Deliduka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I couldn't find an answer to this in the archives. My apologies if this is
there.
I ran a test on a spam (spamassassin -t ) and within the rules that
matched it outputted these:
0.6 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist
3
But what configuration do I need to do to add it?
On 8/26/05 5:01 PM this was written:
> From: "Thomas Deliduka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> I couldn't find an answer to this in the archives. My apologies if this is
>> there.
>>
>> I ran a test on a spam (spamassassin -t ) and within the rules tha
I couldn't find an answer to this in the archives. My apologies if this is
there.
I ran a test on a spam (spamassassin -t ) and within the rules that
matched it outputted these:
0.6 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist
3.9 URIBL_SC_SURBL Contains an URL liste
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
At 06:49 PM 8/25/2005, satalk (sent by Nabble.com) wrote:
MY question is as follows:
Given that so many valid tokens from ebay/paypal sites
exist in phish emails, am I correct in saying that it is
imperative to avoid phish emails entering the bayes datab
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 02:03:53PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 09:58 AM 8/26/2005, Bob McClure Jr wrote:
> >Umm, why do you want to do that? spamd is supposed to be started as
> >root, after which it changes ID to a non-priveledged user, like
> >nobody.
>
> Erm, bob.. Patrick IS starting it a
In fact, if the header is correctly writtren
(the relevant part is =?ISO-8859-something?B?text?= or
=?IOS-8859-something?Q?text?= for
base64 or quoted printable, and the something can range from 1 to 15), it would
be a sure
indication of a european sender.
The b and q can be lowercase, and probab
How about "70_sare_header.cf" and "99_OBFU_drugs.cf"? Slap it down GOOD.
{^_-}
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Deliduka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Perhaps someone on the list can give me a suggestion then. Here is 5
e-mails
and how the subject line is done. (different every time) perhap
At 09:58 AM 8/26/2005, Bob McClure Jr wrote:
Umm, why do you want to do that? spamd is supposed to be started as
root, after which it changes ID to a non-priveledged user, like
nobody.
Erm, bob.. Patrick IS starting it as root.. he's just using spamd -u to get
spamd to setuid to a non-privile
At 06:49 PM 8/25/2005, satalk (sent by Nabble.com) wrote:
MY question is as follows:
Given that so many valid tokens from ebay/paypal sites
exist in phish emails, am I correct in saying that it is
imperative to avoid phish emails entering the bayes database?
I would say it's imperative NOT to a
Perhaps someone on the list can give me a suggestion then. Here is 5 e-mails
and how the subject line is done. (different every time) perhaps a pattern
can be found that I haven't found?
Subject: =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=D4od_pro_CI=C2IS_VI=E1GRRA?=
Subject: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Go=F6d_offr_C=EFAIS_VI=E3GRRA?=
From: "Kris Deugau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thomas Deliduka wrote:
I have been dealing with a spammer that seems to defy every option to
limit him. So, I decided to create a final rule that should kill him.
I noticed that the subject in the text file always looks like
=3D?iso-8859-1?blah blha blah
Thomas Deliduka wrote:
> I have been dealing with a spammer that seems to defy every option to
> limit him. So, I decided to create a final rule that should kill him.
> I noticed that the subject in the text file always looks like
>
> =3D?iso-8859-1?blah blha blah
>
> It may or may not have 3D so
I have been dealing with a spammer that seems to defy every option to limit
him. So, I decided to create a final rule that should kill him. I noticed
that the subject in the text file always looks like
=3D?iso-8859-1?blah blha blah
It may or may not have 3D sometimes it's P3 or something so I ma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dan Mahoney, System Admin writes:
> On Sat, 20 Aug 2005, Rick Macdougall wrote:
>
> > Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> >
> >> Hey all,
> >>
> >> I'd like to run one spamd box for many clients, using SQL user prefs. Is
> >> there a way to have sp
At 09:25 AM 8/26/2005, John Horne wrote:
Hello,
We have had a complaint from a user that some of his Japanese mail
(being received by us) is always marked by SA as spam. As a University
it is natural for us to receive foreign mail messages.
However, what I am unsure about is how does SA detect
If there's someone here in control of the list, this user's "vacation"
responder is sending these to those who post to the list.
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Subject: Bruno Della Ducata is out of the office.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 26-Aug-2005 1
Please update your address book. The current address is
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 10:23:57AM +0200, Patrick Steiner wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have the problem that i can't start spamd under another user
Umm, why do you want to do that? spamd is supposed to be started as
root, after wh
Hello,
We have had a complaint from a user that some of his Japanese mail
(being received by us) is always marked by SA as spam. As a University
it is natural for us to receive foreign mail messages.
However, what I am unsure about is how does SA detect a foreign
(non-English) language?
The user
Hi there.
Thanks for the response(s), upgrading to > 2.44, all the way to 3.0.4 in fact,
did the trick.
Thanks
Daniel
On Friday 26 August 2005 13:54, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 11:07:06AM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> > > I'm using Spamassassin 2.44 on a RH9 box (postfix us
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 11:07:06AM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> > I'm using Spamassassin 2.44 on a RH9 box (postfix uses maildrop as a
>
> See "report_safe". Setting this to 0 will cause SA to do a headers-only tag
> with
> no body tagging at all.
Actually, if he's actually running 2.44, there
Hi
I have the problem that i can't start spamd under another user
Here the debug output:
Here when i start normal:
mybag:/tmp# spamd -D
trying to connect to syslog/unix...
no error connecting to syslog/unix
logging enabled:
facility: mail
socket:
>MY question is as follows: Given that so many valid tokens from
ebay/paypal sites exist in phish emails, am I correct in saying that it is
imperative to avoid phish emails entering the bayes database?
Probably not. A lot of them use links from ebay/paypal/whoever, but a
lot of them pick up
On Sat, 20 Aug 2005, Rick Macdougall wrote:
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Hey all,
I'd like to run one spamd box for many clients, using SQL user prefs. Is
there a way to have spamd use different domain names -- or have spamc pass
the `hostname' of the machine along?
basically I will
27 matches
Mail list logo
