Peter
Here's the rules that triggered on my system...(3.1.0)
1.0 L_DRUGS12 L_DRUGS12
1.1 EXTRA_MPART_TYPE Header has extraneous Content-type:...type=
entry
1.1 HELO_EQ_LT4_SA HELO_EQ_LT4_SA
1.1 SPF_NEUTRALSPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral)
Hi,
I'm investigating the bayesian filtering in Spam assassin and although a lot
of info is available on it, no full story is available. I've tried to gather
all info and created my full story. Can anyone correct my if I'm wrong? And
can somebody answer the question at the bottem ?
Thanks,
Strftime does not exist either. Windows is DUMB. It IS found in VC++'s
documentation, though.
{^_-}
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 23:26
Subject: RE: INVALID_DATE
jdow wrote:
c:\man strftime
'man' is not
From: Pieter Vanmeerbeek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
???
QUESTION : I could not find if manually learning still respects the
tresholds above ?? In other words if a mail is delivered with score 6, can
it be added to the bayes db by manuallt learning it
???
jdow Of course it can. Do it all the time.
Greetings Martin:
May I have the complete (match, describe, score) rules for the following:
HELO_EQ_LT4_SA
MISSING_HB_SEP
FR_BR_AFTER_HTML
FM_NO_STYLE
FM_MULTI_ODD2
Thank you.
At 04:10 AM 3/23/2006, Martin Hepworth wrote:
Peter
Here's the rules that
Peter
HELO_EQ_LT4_SA is in 88_FVGT_headers.cf
MISSING_HB_SEP is in the standard 3.1.0 tests
FR_BR_AFTER_HTML is in 88_FVGT_rawbody.cf
FM_NO_STYLE and FM_MULTI_ODD2 are in 99_FVGT_meta.cf
The FVGT rules can be obtained from...
http://www.rulesemporium.com/other-rules.htm
which also has
Jeferson Pessoa Santana wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Jeferson Pessoa Santana wrote:
I'm back with new doubts hehehe. I've been reading a lot of articles
and e-mails from the list about SPF and Domain Keys but I don't know
how to use they in
c:\man strftime
'man' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
The mere fact that documentation is less accessible on windows should not be
taken as an excuse by programmers to reinvent the wheel as an egg-shaped thingy
Wolfgang Hamann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
c:\man strftime
'man' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
The mere fact that documentation is less accessible on windows should not be
taken as an excuse by programmers to reinvent the wheel as an egg-shaped thingy
jdow wrote:
From: "Liam-PrintingAutomation"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I installed spamassassin not long ago on our
server, and it worked great!
Then sometime in the last couple of weeks it appears to have just
stopped working. No incoming e-mails are being tagged with spamassassin
headers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Lee wrote:
Thanks for trying to bring it back on-topic.
The topic was about the legality of a timezone: GMT Standard Time
in: Date: Wed, 22 Mar 06 12:00:00 GMT Standard Time
being applied by an ISP to their outbound email. Nothing to do
David Lee wrote:
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Craig Morrison wrote:
At any rate and to try and bring this discussion somewhat back on topic,
strftime makes it trivial to change date formats merely by changing the
format string given as one of its arguments. Any debate regarding
difficulty of change by
Ok..
Iam trying to do a spamassassin upgrade..
using tha last stable one version. 3.1.1
when i try to run the make test with mbayes into mysql enabled i
received this errors..
The mysql user that have the access for this database is ROOT, so i
dont thing it is a permission problem..
the SQL
Ok, more one error
Now with the night build..
t/bayessql.ok 1/53plugin: failed to create instance of
plugin validuserplugin: Can't locate object method new via package
validuserplugin (perhaps you forgot to load validuserplugin?) at (eval
722) line 1.
I stil blinf in
Using in a direct way the test
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/package/spamassassin/t# ./bayessql.t
1..53
# Running under perl version 5.008007 for linux
# Current time local: Thu Mar 23 16:50:22 2006
# Current time GMT: Thu Mar 23 19:50:22 2006
# Using Test.pm version 1.25
ok 1
ok 2
Segmentation
Jeferson Pessoa Santana wrote:
Does anyone have the link of this Domain Keys patch for the version
3.1.0? Doing a Google Search I found some information about this
patch but any file or text to create the file.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=3210
--
BMWrider wrote on Wed, 22 Mar 2006 22:57:57 -0500:
What I would like to do is uninstall SA and start fresh.
That depends entirely on how it was installed. If it came included with OS
X I suggest you better ask on a OS X Mailing List what's the standard way
of uninstalling if it is not
Hi, people. This started as a plea for help but ended as a report of
an investigation, so hopefully it will be a useful addition to the
archives.
About 1% of my scans were taking more than 300 seconds. Extra
debugging in spamd showed me that the Bayes checks were the culprit:
13:38:05
Hello,
Does anyone know if there is a webadmin tool to admistor Spamassassin
via a web page?
Abel Jeffcoat
Liam-PrintingAutomation a écrit :
I uhm, er, have no idea
How do I find out? I can't find anything in the Sendmail settings to indicate.
I use Webmin for server management, and since you mentioned Procmail I took a
look at the Webmin GUI for that, and found this:
Set variable DROPPRIVS
On Mittwoch, 22. März 2006 00:11 Sander Holthaus wrote:
and it wouldn't surprise me
if actively rejecting SPF-fails has the similar effects as strict
RFC-enforcement or double reverse DNS-lookup. Lots less spam and lots
more false positives.
No, because
1) by forcing strict RFC, lots of HAM
On Mittwoch, 22. März 2006 18:47 Bazooka Joe wrote:
with isp's blocking port 25 and requireing you to use thier mail
server how are business going to enable spf of thier domain when
thier employees could be sending mail from hundreds of different mail
servers??
Use VPNs. Never allow anybody
David Lee wrote:
If, conversely, it is not in breach, then SA has a problem: it shouldn't
be marking it INVALID_DATE. Incidentally, it is this aspect (rather
than any other) of the date that is triggering this SA rule, isn't it?
I guess we could fix it by renaming the rule
Jeferson Pessoa Santana wrote:
Does anyone have the link of this Domain Keys patch for the version
3.1.0? Doing a Google Search I found some information about this patch
but any file or text to create the file.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4623
Note that it is only
On Mittwoch, 22. März 2006 01:16 List Mail User wrote:
Do you have URIBL enabled?
Anyway, the best bet to block these is a combination of DUL checks,
BAYES and digests (DCC, Razor and Pyzor). *And* make sure to feed it
back to sa-learn if it slipped through to begin with.
I have a very hard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeferson Pessoa Santana wrote:
Does anyone have the link of this Domain Keys patch for the version
3.1.0? Doing a Google Search I found some information about this
patch but any file or text to create the file.
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=3210
I'd actually use attachment 3212 -- the one we applied to, and tested
against, the 3.1 branch.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=3312
Oops. That's what I
Craig Morrison a écrit :
I guess 'man strftime' is too difficult to manage. ;-D
sure, but unix and C are obsolete.
(sure, this calls for war, but I didn't start it).
All,
I have gotten a couple of replies, (thank you) but I thought I could be
more clear.
I'm looking for a tool that will all users to adminstor their blacklist
and/or whitelist. I use Qmail and have mail delivered to a Spam folder.
I would like my users to be able to login to a website and
Just a mild - un-warlike comment, but - there are a few of us out here
that use win-based servers; I freely admit win have a skewed idea of
dates, but that doesn't change the problem.
Craig kindly wrote an awk that did the date conversion for my (squid)
logs so that I can get some sanity from my
Can I blacklist a domain but make an exception for one person in that
domain?
Like;
blacklist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the exception of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks
BTW;
SpamAssassin version 3.1.0
running on Perl version 5.8.5
on linux
Thanks again
--
LINUX is simple. It just
Daryl C. W. O'Shea a écrit :
David Lee wrote:
If, conversely, it is not in breach, then SA has a problem: it shouldn't
be marking it INVALID_DATE. Incidentally, it is this aspect (rather
than any other) of the date that is triggering this SA rule, isn't it?
I guess we could fix it by
Nigel Frankcom a écrit :
Just a mild - un-warlike comment, but - there are a few of us out here
that use win-based servers; I freely admit win have a skewed idea of
dates, but that doesn't change the problem.
Craig kindly wrote an awk that did the date conversion for my (squid)
logs so that
Edward Diener a écrit :
Does anybody know the instructions for training SA with the contents of
the Thunderbird Junk folder ?
My web host, where SA is tunning, suggests I do this in order to reduce
the amount of spam I get, and I can login to my web host, transfer files
from my local
mouss wrote:
I here mean that you can't go as a std crusader and at the same time
break the standards by tagging std compliant mail. statistics are no
excuse for rejecting/tagging mail.
I'm not being a std crusader. I'm simply pointing out that someone
going there own way shouldn't expect
Larry wrote:
Can I blacklist a domain but make an exception for one person in that
domain?
Like;
blacklist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the exception of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
blacklist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] won't blacklist [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now blacklist_from [EMAIL
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Larry wrote:
Can I blacklist a domain but make an exception for one person in that
domain?
Like;
blacklist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the exception of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
blacklist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] won't blacklist [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mouss wrote:
what I would like to see is a plugin to J a message...
AOL
Me Too!
/AOL
If anyone is a Thunderbird plugin wizard and interested in doing a
plugin that will report/learn to spamd speak up, I'm very interested.
Michael
Daryl C. W. O'Shea a écrit :
I'm not being a std crusader. I'm simply pointing out that someone
going there own way shouldn't expect everyone to accept their way,
especially when there's an established majority going the other way.
Just because a mail is standards compliant doesn't mean
Such a mechanism would still depend upon some organization on the server
side... as far as I can tell, it's very much to the local sysadmin (ie:
aliases to send to, forward or attach properly, etc).
Would this even work well potentially?
Might be interesting if there were somehow a way to
Forrest Aldrich a écrit :
Such a mechanism would still depend upon some organization on the server
side... as far as I can tell, it's very much to the local sysadmin (ie:
aliases to send to, forward or attach properly, etc).
Would this even work well potentially?
oh I'm not asking for that
Forrest Aldrich wrote:
Such a mechanism would still depend upon some organization on the server
side... as far as I can tell, it's very much to the local sysadmin (ie:
aliases to send to, forward or attach properly, etc).
Would this even work well potentially?
You don't need any of that in
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
c:\man strftime
'man' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
The mere fact that documentation is less accessible on windows should not be
taken as an excuse by programmers to reinvent the wheel as an egg-shaped thingy
From: mouss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I lately saw an FP with RCVD illegal IP, because of a 127.0.0.80 IP.
while this rarely used, it's not illegal. so the rule is just bogus IMHO.
50_scores.cf:score RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP 1.585 0.234 1.813 0.288
With a set 3 score of 0.288, I'd say this isn't a big
From: Liam-PrintingAutomation [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jdow wrote:
From: Liam-PrintingAutomation [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I installed spamassassin not long ago on our server, and it worked
great!
Then sometime in the last couple of weeks it appears to have just
stopped working. No incoming e-mails are
Anybody else got this problem? Lots of warnings suddenly.
mfg zmi
-- Forwarded message from root: --
Subject: RulesDuJour/power2u: 'spamassassin --lint' failed. Please fix
your SpamAssassin configuration.
Date: Freitag, 24. März 2006 05:08
***NOTICE***: spamassassin --lint
46 matches
Mail list logo
