Jason Marshall schrieb:
I'm sure I'm not the first one to suggest this, but why NOT always display
the numbers in their entirety? I can't think of any reason why a user
would say please give me less accuracy and a lot more confusion in return
for fewer digits to parse.
But I can - and I
On Freitag, 31. März 2006 14:40 Sander Holthaus wrote:
(almost) full message at http://zmi.at/x/ham01.txt
mfg zmi
Are you sure that is a valid OE-email? Doesn't appear to me as such,
hence I'd say the tests fired correctly.
Hi, I got feedback today that they use Mass Mailer to send their
On Montag, 3. April 2006 14:34 Lars Ringh wrote:
Now, since in each case the source data can come from two different
servers scanning the same kind of mails, should I try to merge the
bayes-data from servers home1 and home2 into the the same myqsl-db
and then merge the data from corp1 and
That was it. Thank you!
Michael Shuler, C.E.O.
OmniLEC And BitWise Communications, Inc.
682 High Point Lane
East Peoria, IL 61611
OmniNumber: (309) 670-0575
Fax: (309) 213-3500
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Customer Service: (877) New-Omni
-Original
Is it possible to manage auto-withelist?
I am testing auto-whitelist and with my check_whitelist I have
-2.8(-2.8/1) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]|ip=none
-2.7(-2.7/4) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]|ip=none
-1.7(-1.7/3) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]|ip=none
-2.3
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, Matt Kettler wrote:
Dave Stern wrote:
I'm trying to get SA working by remote connections and don't see it
consistantly working.
Users kick off SA in their .procmailrc on our mail server which can't
handle
a more recent version of SA so we only have v2.64 installed locally.
Dave Stern wrote:
As to the format spamc -d 1.2.3.4,10 2.3.4.5,10
That was from a google search. I believe that allows you to specify
timeouts
per host rather than a more universal -t.
I'm not aware of that being valid.
In any case, anything beyond a single host would either not fail to
Dave Stern wrote:
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, Matt Kettler wrote:
(who on earth still uses SRV records for anything?)
Actually, I'm told it's used a lot for windoze services (active dir?)
Ok, who that actually uses a real DNS server. :)
Tristan Miller wrote:
Greetings.
I'm using SpamAssassin 3.0.4 with local Bayesian filtering, Vipul's Razor,
and several daily-updated SARE rulesets [1]. Nonetheless, there's one
particular kind of spam lately that always seems to slip through; it
consists of a bunch of random words plus a
There have been numerous threads on
how to have end users drop misclassified mail to spam/ham folders in Exchange,
but I don't recall seeing any mention of a way of doing this with Notes.
Is anyone doing this with Notes that
would care to share the secret?
Thanks
Andy
Tristan Miller wrote:
Greetings.
I'm using SpamAssassin 3.0.4 with local Bayesian filtering, Vipul's Razor,
and several daily-updated SARE rulesets [1]. Nonetheless, there's one
particular kind of spam lately that always seems to slip through; it
consists of a bunch of random words plus a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[ forgot to copy list - d'oh ]
Tristan Miller wrote:
[snip image-only stock pd spam comments]
Does anyone have a filterset or other recommended settings that will block
this kind of spam?
Regards,
Tristan
I ran a couple of those messages
Tristan Miller wrote:
Greetings.
I'm using SpamAssassin 3.0.4 with local Bayesian filtering, Vipul's Razor,
and several daily-updated SARE rulesets [1]. Nonetheless, there's one
particular kind of spam lately that always seems to slip through; it
consists of a bunch of random words plus a
Greetings.
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Doc Schneider wrote:
[1] SARE rulesets: SARE_REDIRECT_POST300 SARE_EVILNUMBERS0
SARE_EVILNUMBERS1 SARE_EVILNUMBERS2 SARE_BAYES_POISON_NXM SARE_HTML
SARE_HEADER SARE_SPECIFIC SARE_ADULT SARE_BML SARE_FRAUD SARE_SPOOF
SARE_RANDOM SARE_SPAMCOP_TOP200
The following headers come from a legitimate message - I have obscured the
sender's name, but that's all. The SlipStream SP Server seems to have
appended the client username and IP address to the message-ID, causing the
FP. See also:
Tristan Miller wrote:
Greetings.
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Doc Schneider wrote:
[1] SARE rulesets: SARE_REDIRECT_POST300 SARE_EVILNUMBERS0
SARE_EVILNUMBERS1 SARE_EVILNUMBERS2 SARE_BAYES_POISON_NXM SARE_HTML
SARE_HEADER SARE_SPECIFIC SARE_ADULT SARE_BML SARE_FRAUD SARE_SPOOF
SARE_RANDOM
Greetings.
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Matt Kettler wrote:
Nonetheless, there's one
particular kind of spam lately that always seems to slip through; it
consists of a bunch of random words plus a graphic attachment. The
graphic is usually a page of text advertising something -- almost
Tristan Miller wrote:
debug: is DNS available? 0
What is the output of
$ cat /etc/resolv.conf
?
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tristan Miller wrote:
debug: is DNS available? 0
What is the output of
$ cat /etc/resolv.conf
?
It's likely that spamd is being called with -L. If on a RedHat/Fedora
system, it'll be set in /etc/sysconfig/spamassassin.
Greetings.
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tristan
Miller wrote:
The first message in that example SHOULD have triggered
RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL and RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL.
As per this header:
Received: from M696P000.adsl.highway.telekom.at
(M696P000.adsl.highway.telekom.at [62.47.246.224])
by
Matt Kettler wrote:
The real answer would be to always display 3-decimal place scores, but that's
rather of ugly and creates a cluttered report. However, you'd always be 100%
accurate.
You'd still have rounding issues, just of a different sort. This is
floating point, right?
-Philip
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
The real answer would be to always display 3-decimal place scores, but
that's
rather of ugly and creates a cluttered report. However, you'd always be 100%
accurate.
You'd still have rounding issues, just of a different sort.
I was looking on the FAQ and the Wiki, but couldn't find this...
How do I filter based on the recipient mailbox address? For instance, I'm
running Linux, so if I get email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
then I know they're bogus...
And can probably block it, even if some of the
23 matches
Mail list logo
