Miles Fidelman wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to figure out how to whitelist control messages generated
by our list manager (Sympa) - which are generated on the localhost and
sent to addresses on the localhost.
In particular, here's a specific example:
*From: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL
Bob Proulx wrote:
I am still trying to figure out why Bayes is giving so many false
positives.
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000 0 101467 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0 39694 0 non-token data: nham
I am re-submitting this question for help:I have searched for several hours and can't seem to find the answer to this. I've found close answers, but not complete.I have SA set up as individual users. When a new user is created SA creates a new user_prefs file for them. This file contains
twofers wrote:
I am re-submitting this question for help:
I have searched for several hours and can't seem to find the answer to
this. I've found close answers, but not complete.
I have SA set up as individual users. When a new user is created SA
creates a new user_prefs file for them.
I just upgraded SA from 3.1.0 to the current 3.1.7 via CPAN and am finding
that a huge increase in the amount of spam that's coming in. On the order
of almost 10 times the number that leaked into my inbox.
Has anyone else run into this behavior? If so, what can I do?
Configurations are
Hoover Chan skrev:
I just upgraded SA from 3.1.0 to the current 3.1.7 via CPAN and am
finding that a huge increase in the amount of spam that's coming in. On
the order of almost 10 times the number that leaked into my inbox.
Has anyone else run into this behavior? If so, what can I do?
Thanks Karl and Nick,Yes, the new account user_prefs is being created (I'm creating it from Plesk BTW) however the new user_prefs seems to be created with default values from I don't know where and not those values in either of thetwo.template files.That's my problem in a nut shell. Maybe
Can someone help me understand what this means? Whats broken?[EMAIL PROTECTED] .spamassassin]# sa-learn --dump data bayes: bayes db version 0 is not able to be used, aborting! at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore/DBM.pm line 196. bayes: bayes db version 0 is not
Hi,
I'm having a problem with CGPSA and MySQL Userprefs settings.
For the record, this *was* working a few days ago when I was testing to
set it up, but somehow it stopped working suddenly. Just in time for me
to implement it into a working system.
Well, my problem is that it only reacts on
On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 06:38:42 +0100 (CET)
Benny Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, November 11, 2006 20:47, Dirk Bonengel wrote:
The fine thing is that you can use the iXhash plugin along razor, pyzor and
dcc. (I don't know if it's possible to use two pyzor servers from within
On Saturday 11 November 2006 22:49, Michael Scheidell wrote:
What happens with this:
user=${recipient} argv=/usr/bin/spamc -e /usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f
${sender} ${recipient}
Does not work. But I found that postfix knows serveral variables for each
incoming mail, one of them being the
On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 12:59:33 +0100, Magnus Anderson wrote:
Hi,
I'm having a problem with CGPSA and MySQL Userprefs settings.
For the record, this *was* working a few days ago when I was testing to
set it up, but somehow it stopped working suddenly. Just in time for me
to implement it
Matt Kettler wrote:
Miles Fidelman wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to figure out how to whitelist control messages generated
by our list manager (Sympa) - which are generated on the localhost and
sent to addresses on the localhost.
In particular, here's a specific example:
*From: * [EMAIL
I just upgraded SA from 3.1.0 to the current 3.1.7 via CPAN and
am finding
that a huge increase in the amount of spam that's coming in. On the order
of almost 10 times the number that leaked into my inbox.
Has anyone else run into this behavior? If so, what can I do?
Configurations are
I'm not clear if I need to run spamd as a specific user or run as root
and use spamd -H dir.
This is a single mail server running Debian Stable with the packages
listed below. SA configuration is system-wide, that is, there's no
user-specific configurations to worry about.
ii exim4-daemon-h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello all,
for those that are not on the devel-spam Mailing list, I'd like to
announce a new development release here.
If you are interested, our new website is located at
http://fuzzyocr.own-hero.net/
The branch has been tested by me and some
Well I took this idea and also tried to create a single bayes database but it doesn't seem to be working.In local.cf I added bayes_path /var/spool/bayes_db/ and bayes_file_mode 0770 and allow_user_rules 1I also created mkdir /var/spool/bayes_db and chmod 0770 /var/spool/bayes_dbThen I
The Doctor wrote:
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 06:06:15PM -0600, Stuart Johnston wrote:
Robert Nicholson wrote:
When will the Shortcircuit feature be made available in a release?
The Shortcircuit plugin should be available in 3.2.0. Recent messages
have suggested that this might be released
Are the configuration files backward compatible?
If I add short circuit entries to my config file will that file only
work with the trunk code?
ie. are unrecognised configuration directives simply ignored?
I want to try the trunk code and I can setup some symlinks for the
perl modules but
Also since the Changes file doesn't appear to have been updated in a
long while how can I learn the differences b/w each release/trunk code?
On Nov 12, 2006, at 11:28 AM, Stuart Johnston wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 06:06:15PM -0600, Stuart Johnston wrote:
Robert
Exim does not actually run spamc, it connects directly to spamd.
spamd does run as root. Exim can connect as nobody depending on your
configuration. Generally though, you want to have a writable home
directory so it is easiest to create a user for this purpose that Exim
can connect as.
Is anybody using SpamAssassin in conjunction with OSX Server 10.4 and
is it simply to simply upgrade the SA release independent of what
ships with OSX Server and keep all the GUI configuration working?
If you want to try the trunk version, I would suggest you keep it on a
separate server.
Robert Nicholson wrote:
Are the configuration files backward compatible?
If I add short circuit entries to my config file will that file only
work with the trunk code?
ie. are unrecognised configuration
You could browse the messages on the dev list or the commit logs from svn.
Robert Nicholson wrote:
Also since the Changes file doesn't appear to have been updated in a
long while how can I learn the differences b/w each release/trunk code?
On Nov 12, 2006, at 11:28 AM, Stuart Johnston wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
I am still trying to figure out why Bayes is giving so many false
positives.
It is really starting to perform badly. I am about to the point of
resetting the database. But then I expect that it will trip into the
current state again. So I am trying to
David Cottle wrote:
I am using spamassassin 3.1.6 Its working fine except I cant get
DCC, Pyzor, Razor 2 and spamcop tests to work, when I lint the rules
it just complains its in local mode.
Run a test message through with debugging turned on.
| spamassassin -d -t -D 21 | less
Then look
Matt Kettler wrote:
Tom H wrote:
Hi,
I was getting hit by a great deal of spam that only hits the BAYES_99
I would be grateful for any ideas on this...
Sounds like the message contains a URI that is now listed in many of the
SURBL and URIBL lists.
It may be that this got listed
twofers wrote:
[22325] dbg: bayes: tie-ing to DB file R/O /root/.spamassassin/bayes_toks
[22325] dbg: bayes: tie-ing to DB file R/O /root/.spamassassin/bayes_seen
[22325] dbg: bayes: found bayes db version 0
bayes: bayes db version 0 is not able to be used, aborting! at
-Original Message-
From: Stuart Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: zondag 12 november 2006 18:35
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Exim4 / spamd --username question
Exim does not actually run spamc, it connects directly to
spamd.
Slightly OT, I guess; but
Matt Kettler wrote:
Miles Fidelman wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to figure out how to whitelist control messages generated
by our list manager (Sympa) - which are generated on the localhost and
sent to addresses on the localhost.
In particular, here's a specific example:
*From: * [EMAIL
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 11:41:34AM -0600, Stuart Johnston wrote:
Exim does not actually run spamc, it connects directly to spamd.
spamd does run as root. Exim can connect as nobody depending on your
configuration. Generally though, you want to have a writable home
directory so it is
Well I invoke SA from a perlscript via .qmail so theoretically I can
install another version in another directory under PERL5LIB but I
need to make sure bayes and all config is separate from my existing
version.
On Nov 12, 2006, at 11:47 AM, Stuart Johnston wrote:
If you want to try the
On Sun, November 12, 2006 13:26, Dirk Bonengel wrote:
That's interesting, didn't know that.
thats what maillists are for imho :-)
But that means I get still get one test
yes from spamassassin it will be one test to 2 pyzord servers
I can't have different tests/scores for different pyzords
So, Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin says, in the doc section for
parse_config, that I should store my config data in a
Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf object (and that the one I should use is both
passed into the options for parse_config and can be accessed as
$plugin-{main}-{conf}).
But,
Hello All!
SoI'm thinking about trying sa-update. My rules are
in /etc/mail/spamassassin. Are there any gotchas or things I need to
be wary of before I plunge ahead? Just curious as I see a lot of
traffic on this topic in here. Thanks.
James
John Rudd writes:
So, Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin says, in the doc section for
parse_config, that I should store my config data in a
Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf object (and that the one I should use is both
passed into the options for parse_config and can be accessed as
Michael Frotscher wrote:
On Saturday 11 November 2006 22:49, Michael Scheidell wrote:
What happens with this:
user=${recipient} argv=/usr/bin/spamc -e /usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f
${sender} ${recipient}
Does not work.
are you after
user=${user}
But I found that postfix knows
Miles Fidelman wrote:
Do you *really* need to pass locally generated mail through
Spamassassin? Most likely not.
*Received: * from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
server1.neighborhoods.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CDE2B6C2F0 for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED];
Not as easily done as said.
Matthias Leisi wrote:
Miles Fidelman wrote:
Do you *really* need to pass locally generated mail through
Spamassassin? Most likely not.
I prefer to, since I have a number of users who use my machine as their
SMTP route to the world - and you never know when a
Bob Proulx wrote:
I am guessing that H*c is a header and some specific token.
If there a key somewhere that will help decode these?
From Bayes.pm:
%HEADER_NAME_COMPRESSION = (
'Message-Id' = '*m',
'Message-ID' = '*M',
'Received'= '*r',
'User-Agent'
Tom H wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
Tom H wrote:
Hi,
I was getting hit by a great deal of spam that only hits the BAYES_99
I would be grateful for any ideas on this...
Sounds like the message contains a URI that is now listed in many of the
SURBL and URIBL lists.
It may be that
[6858] dbg: rules: ran eval rule TVD_SPACE_RATIO == got hit (1)
rules: failed to run CHARSET_FARAWAY test, skipping:
(Can't locate object method are_more_high_bits_set via
package Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus at /home/robert/TRUNK/lib/
Where is EvalTests.pm now then?
On Nov 12, 2006, at 5:46 PM, Robert Nicholson wrote:
[6858] dbg: rules: ran eval rule TVD_SPACE_RATIO == got hit (1)
rules: failed to run CHARSET_FARAWAY test, skipping:
(Can't locate object method are_more_high_bits_set via
package
twofers wrote:
Can someone help me understand what this means? Whats broken?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .spamassassin]# sa-learn --dump data
bayes: bayes db version 0 is not able to be used, aborting! at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore/DBM.pm
line 196.
bayes: bayes db
New version of RelayChecker.
http://people.ucsc.edu/~jrudd/spamassassin/RelayChecker.tar
Changes:
- It's now in a single tar file. Put the tar file into your plugin
directory, expand it, and all should be good. The tar file includes:
COPYING- the GPL
RelayChecker.txt
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 05:26:10PM -0800, John Rudd wrote:
New version of RelayChecker.
http://people.ucsc.edu/~jrudd/spamassassin/RelayChecker.tar
Changes:
- It's now in a single tar file. Put the tar file into your plugin
directory, expand it, and all should be good. The tar
The Doctor wrote:
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 05:26:10PM -0800, John Rudd wrote:
New version of RelayChecker.
http://people.ucsc.edu/~jrudd/spamassassin/RelayChecker.tar
Changes:
- It's now in a single tar file. Put the tar file into your plugin
directory, expand it, and all should be good.
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 05:51:10PM -0600, Robert Nicholson wrote:
Where is EvalTests.pm now then?
There is no EvalTests.pm in 3.2. All of the functions got moved to plugins.
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
When the outcome of a meeting is to have another meeting, it has been
a lousy meeting.
On Nov 12, 2006, at 8:29 PM, Robert Nicholson wrote:
Correct but before
It use to be
$body = join(\n, @$body);
if ($self-are_more_high_bits_set ($body)) {
return 1;
}
and now it's
$body = join(\n, @$body);
if ($pms-are_more_high_bits_set ($body)) {
return 1;
Am I missing something or is the use of Sys::Syslog not necessary?
I can't find a compatible Win32 build.. Though I didn't look all that
hard for it, as the module seems to work correctly without it (from my
limited testing).
Thanks,
Steven
-Original Message-
From: John Rudd
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 06:06:53PM -0800, John Rudd wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 05:26:10PM -0800, John Rudd wrote:
New version of RelayChecker.
http://people.ucsc.edu/~jrudd/spamassassin/RelayChecker.tar
Changes:
- It's now in a single tar file. Put the tar file
The Doctor wrote:
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 06:06:53PM -0800, John Rudd wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 05:26:10PM -0800, John Rudd wrote:
New version of RelayChecker.
http://people.ucsc.edu/~jrudd/spamassassin/RelayChecker.tar
Changes:
- It's now in a single tar file. Put
You're right. Not necessary. Must have been something I had intended
to use and use the SA debug output instead.
I've taken it out of my sources. Wont be in the next release.
Thanks!
Steven Manross wrote:
Am I missing something or is the use of Sys::Syslog not necessary?
I can't
53 matches
Mail list logo
