> They no longer hit enough spam to be worth keeping, so they were removed.
> Just remove the scores when you upgrade.
>
> Loren
Thanks,
I've suspected that :)
Leon
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 21:52:28 -0700, Evan Platt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>At 08:19 PM 8/12/2007, lynk wrote:
>
>>I'm totally confused re this spamassassin thingy... i can't seem to get MS
>>outlook to read the email i received (spam/ham) after spamassassin(3.1.9)
>>scanned the message.
>
>You pos
At 08:19 PM 8/12/2007, lynk wrote:
I'm totally confused re this spamassassin thingy... i can't seem to get MS
outlook to read the email i received (spam/ham) after spamassassin(3.1.9)
scanned the message.
You posted this 2 days ago. If no one answers again, I have two suggestions:
First would
hi,everyone!
I want use "rewrite_header To" rewrite the spam mail "rcpt to:" address
to one accont named "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", I know there's private problem,
but the mail box is for business use only, the user ask
administrator(me) to pick up normal mail from spam mark mails, I really
hate this wo
On Sunday 12 August 2007, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>Gene Heskett wrote on Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:43:38 -0400:
>> 1: sa-update is NOT pulling new PDFInfo.pm or pdfinfo.cf files even when
>> they are available.
>
>of course not!
>
And why not? They've been announced as available, so one would assume a
simp
I was wondering how to modify Lorens rule for the follwing type of emails
which I have been getting a lot of:
In the subject I get: "some word[s]-userid" or "some word[s]-some
word[s]-userid"
You aren't too specific about the subject form, and you aren't specific
about the To: form. That lea
I was wondering how to modify Lorens rule for the follwing type of emails
which I have been getting a lot of:
In the subject I get: "some word[s]-userid" or "some word[s]-some
word[s]-userid"
> >
> > Loren answered that a month ago. Is in the archives. You may use:
> >
> > header RULE_NA
I was wondering how to modify Lorens rule for the follwing type of emails
which I have been getting a lot of:
In the subject I get: "some word[s]-userid" or "some word[s]-some
word[s]-userid"
> >
> > Loren answered that a month ago. Is in the archives. You may use:
> >
> > header RULE_NAME AL
> > I want to be able to make SA rotate DNS servers.
>
> Apparently that is a limitation of Net::DNS. There was some
> discussion of it on-list a few weeks back; I don't clearly remember the
> details.
>
> You might want check the current status of Net::DNS w/r/t fallback,
> rotation, etc., and wo
> > I want to be able to make SA rotate DNS servers.
>
> Apparently that is a limitation of Net::DNS. There was some
> discussion of it on-list a few weeks back; I don't clearly remember the
> details.
>
> You might want check the current status of Net::DNS w/r/t fallback,
> rotation, etc., an
[ repost: obfusicating domains to avoid the apache.org SMTP filter... ]
Hi John,
John Rudd wrote:
I'm a prophet now!?
:-)
Hm. So, I'm sure I can figure this out eventually, but does anyone know
the right Net::DNS way to extract the TTL?
I could probably set it up as a value in Botnet.cf,
"John D. Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > After "chmod 777" the logfile,
>
> Bad practice.
I know. I did this only to make the logfile working
for a short time. Since I know that my plugin works,
I deleted the logfile.
Paul Lenz
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, Paul Lenz wrote:
> After "chmod 777" the logfile,
Bad practice. Bad practice. Please don't develop the habit of
reflexively "chmod 777"ing things. I dealt with that from my firm's
support department for five years and I still have the twitch.
(1) It completely turns o
Quoting Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thomas Raef wrote on Sun, 12 Aug 2007 06:19:43 -0500:
>
> > a dnsbl is the way to go.
>
> On first look I disagree. We already have SURBL and URIBL. I don't see how
> this would add any benefit on top of that. We are talking about URI's in
> mail, not ab
Yes you are correct. I got so focused on the improper identification of
fast-flux that I lost sight of the details.
I stand, maybe not corrected, but at least with a broader understanding of the
real issue.
There must be some way of better identifying these domains in a URI.
Thank you for poin
Kai Schaetzl wrote on Sun, 12 Aug 2007 14:31:15 +0200:
> SA is all about storing
SA is all about *scoring*
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
But I send them to people who are building public blocklists. I've
expanded my delivery system so I can keep up with the load. If anyone
out there is running a public black lists and wants a free feed contact
me privately and I'll set it up.
I have 2 main feeds. One is mostly messages determin
Loren Wilton writes:
> Ok. Sounds like they removed some base rules we were depending on. Maybe
> time to remove those rules based on them, or recreate the base rules as our
> own.
Feel free to recreate them; 3.2.x will efficiently merge duplicates
anyway so it won't have any runtime effect.
Thomas Raef wrote on Sun, 12 Aug 2007 06:19:43 -0500:
> a dnsbl is the way to go.
On first look I disagree. We already have SURBL and URIBL. I don't see how
this would add any benefit on top of that. We are talking about URI's in
mail, not about hostnames of mailservers or email adresses. The o
Paul Lenz wrote on Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:23:52 +0300:
> PS. Sorry for multiple postings, I only saved my message during
> editing, but it seems to be sent every time
BTW, it looks like you are using an outdated version of your mail client,
upgrade!
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your
"Alex Woick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is already very good. You have it. That text is the text
> of the internal test message that is processed on every
> SpamAssassin startup or --lint.
Ah! It does not come from an email, only from the startup!
Now I got it. I stored the log file in
Paul Lenz wrote on 12.08.2007 11:23:
Actually I write Perl programs since many years, but I am not
so familiar with the object oriented programming and I can not
discover the secrets of Spamassassin. Contretely: I was not able
to access the body of a mail.
You should consult "man perltoot" fir
I agree. To catch the fast-flux servers you have to check not only low
ttl values but ALSO how frequently the IP addresses assigned to that
domain change.
I think everyone is looking for a fast fast-flux fix. I believe, and
this is just my opinion, that a dnsbl is the way to go. That way if the
pe
From: "Paul Lenz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Actually I write Perl programs since many years, but I am not
so familiar with the object oriented programming and I can not
discover the secrets of Spamassassin. Contretely: I was not able
to access the body of a mail.
I included Plugin\Test.pm into my con
From: "Paul Lenz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PS. Sorry for multiple postings, I only saved my message during
editing, but it seems to be sent every time :(
Control-S save draft.
Alt-S send.
Easy way to make the mistake.
Control-Enter is an instant send, which is annoying when you
fat finger and hit
Gene Heskett wrote on Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:43:38 -0400:
> 1: sa-update is NOT pulling new PDFInfo.pm or pdfinfo.cf files even when they
> are available.
of course not!
> 2: spamassassin --lint -D ignores these rules when we install them by hand.
which means you probably haven't installed PDFInf
John D. Hardin wrote on Sat, 11 Aug 2007 18:21:35 -0700 (PPT):
> I think there was some consensus about using that in concert with an
> excessive number of A records as a spam sign. Check the thread
> history. I don't think anyone is suggesting by itself it's a useful
> indicator.
This is what I
Actually I write Perl programs since many years, but I am not
so familiar with the object oriented programming and I can not
discover the secrets of Spamassassin. Contretely: I was not able
to access the body of a mail.
I included Plugin\Test.pm into my configuration:
loadplugin Mail::SpamAss
Actually I write Perl programs since many years, but I am not
so familiar with the object oriented programming and I can not
discover the secrets of Spamassassin. Contretely: I was not able
to access the body of a mail.
I included Plugin\Test.pm into my configuration:
loadplugin Mail::SpamAss
Actually I write Perl programs since many years, but I am not
so familiar with the object oriented programming and I can not
discover the secrets of Spamassassin. Contretely: I was not able
to access the body of a mail.
I included Plugin\Test.pm into my configuration and gave it a score
of 0.1. Th
Actually I write Perl programs since many years, but I am not so
familiar
with the object oriented programming and I can not discover the
secrets
of Spamassassin. Contretely: I was not able to access the body of a
mail.
I included Plugin\Test.pm into my configuration and gave it a score of
0.1.
Th
31 matches
Mail list logo
