unsubscribe
Mike Yrabedra wrote:
unsubscribe
If you look at the message headers, there's a header explaining where to
send unsubscribe messages to (this is the RFC standard header for doing
this, so look for it in other mailing lists):
List-Unsubscribe: mailto:users-unsubscr...@spamassassin.apache.org
Paolo,
You need to send the email to this address
users-unsubscr...@spamassassin.apache.org
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Paolo Toninpaolo.to...@gmail.com wrote:
--
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally
On Fri, June 12, 2009 14:37, Matt Kettler wrote:
If you look at the message headers, there's a header explaining where to
send unsubscribe messages to (this is the RFC standard header for doing
this, so look for it in other mailing lists):
google webmail does not support it :/
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Fri, June 12, 2009 14:37, Matt Kettler wrote:
If you look at the message headers, there's a header explaining where to
send unsubscribe messages to (this is the RFC standard header for doing
this, so look for it in other mailing lists):
google webmail does
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, Michael Scheidell wrote:
the spamassassin mailing list does violate (technically) the US (you)
CAN-SPAM laws.
#1, no easy unsubscribe (if you are on gmail, you really can't unless you
know how to)
#2, no full physical address of sender.
Since CAN-SPAM only covers email
I'm curious why you can't see the unsubscribe link in the header with
Gmail. I can.
Curtis LaMasters
http://www.curtis-lamasters.com
http://www.builtnetworks.com
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Shane Williamssha...@shanew.net wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, Michael Scheidell wrote:
the
and when all fails:
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=unsubscribe+spamassassin+mailing+list
On 6/12/2009 4:07 PM, Curtis LaMasters wrote:
I'm curious why you can't see the unsubscribe link in the header with
Gmail. I can.
Curtis LaMasters
http://www.curtis-lamasters.com
http://www.builtnetworks.com
Shane Williams wrote:
Since CAN-SPAM only covers email whose primary purpose is advertising
or promoting a commercial product or service, the SA mailing list
isn't even address by the law, much less in violation of it.
Guess I never caught that part. I knew the lawyers who drafted it made
maybe i lean towards if you are not smart enough to find
the headers you shouldn't have subscribed in the first place.
Actually, it's worse than that. In order to FIND the list and the
link/insruction to subscribe to it, you go to the website, and the two
links for subscribing and
Charles Gregory wrote:
maybe i lean towards if you are not smart enough to find
the headers you shouldn't have subscribed in the first place.
Actually, it's worse than that. In order to FIND the list and the
link/insruction to subscribe to it, you go to the website, and the two
links
Could even just send an autoresponse back to the sender advising them
where they should look in order to find out the unsubscribe instructions.
Or run a script to unsubscribe them :-)
Could look for 'out of office' and 'on vacation' also.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
|SECNAP Network Security
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:47:21 -0400 (EDT)
Charles Gregory cgreg...@hwcn.org wrote:
maybe i lean towards if you are not smart enough to find
the headers you shouldn't have subscribed in the first place.
Actually, it's worse than that. In order to FIND the list and the
link/insruction
At 06:43 12-06-2009, Michael Scheidell wrote:
SA mailing list folks: you might want to include both automatically
in the footer of your emails. Yes, they will break dkim signing for
many people, but maybe we should lead by example.
The people that footer is intended for won't read it
On 11-Jun-2009, at 13:45, Charles Gregory wrote:
2) I disagree that another person could/should 'fork' the botnet
plug-in.
This would cause confusion even if care was taken to rename the
plug-in
or otherwise distinguish the two versions for the newbie looking to
download a recommended
On 12-Jun-2009, at 07:25, Benny Pedersen wrote:
google webmail does not support it :/
Yes it does. Look under something like Original Message
--
I am by nature made for my won good, not my own evil
On 12-Jun-2009, at 07:43, Michael Scheidell wrote:
the spamassassin mailing list does violate (technically) the US
(you) CAN-SPAM laws.
No one cares, and it's not true. The unsubscribe link is right there
in plain sight. Whether Gmail conceals it from you has nothing to do
with it. If
On 12-Jun-2009, at 10:36, Raquel wrote:
It's called double opt-in
No it's not. It's called 'subscription confirmation'.
Double opt-in is a spammer phrase invented to imply that a form on a
web page asking for an email address is opt-in.
--
Look, that's why there's rules, understand? So
Excerpts from Charles Gregory's message of Thu Jun 11 07:13:02 -0700 2009:
How many accounts are we talking about here?
If it is just one or two addresses, and the user(s) being 'spoofed' have
distinctive *names* on their genuine 'From' headers, then you can
test for quoted messages in the
LuKreme,
I agree that one should be able to read the mail headers, but unless
you knew to look there, you wouldn't really ever care to. Especially
when wanting to unsubscribe. I don't think it has ever come across my
mind to look there. RFC's aside...a link at the bottom of the email
is the
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 07:39:58PM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
But I would never guess from the package that a patch was available
or
useful.
It is useful for SOME people under SOME conditions. It is not
*universally* useful.
It's not universally useful to have some *basic* sanity
At 07:16 PM 6/12/2009, you wrote:
LuKreme,
I agree that one should be able to read the mail headers, but unless
you knew to look there, you wouldn't really ever care to. Especially
when wanting to unsubscribe. I don't think it has ever come across my
mind to look there. RFC's aside...a link
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 19:47:21 -0600
LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote:
On 12-Jun-2009, at 10:36, Raquel wrote:
It's called double opt-in
No it's not. It's called 'subscription confirmation'.
Double opt-in is a spammer phrase invented to imply that a form
on a web page asking for an email
On 12-Jun-2009, at 20:16, Curtis LaMasters wrote:
RFC's aside...a link at the bottom of the email is the easiest. I
don't plan on unsubscribing so I don't really care, but being bull
headed is pointless in this case.
Modifying the message body breaks things. If you can figure out how to
On Sat, June 13, 2009 03:42, LuKreme wrote:
On 12-Jun-2009, at 07:25, Benny Pedersen wrote:
google webmail does not support it :/
Yes it does. Look under something like Original Message
it was a leading q a from my side and i am not using it :)
--
http://localhost/ 100% uptime and 100%
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, LuKreme wrote:
So if I may recommend: Why not include the patch as a separate file in your
download,
John explained why. This patch does not represent the direction he
wants to go with Botnet. Remember that comment about design philosophy?
When he GOES in that direction,
27 matches
Mail list logo
