Re: Whitelisting local domain (spamassassin & qmail)

Sorry for the confusion. I am talking about connecting from an untrusted IP. We do have authentication enabled on our SMTP server to disable relaying for unknown users but as far as I can tell there's nothing in the headers that seems to show this. ie: pc -> smtp1 -> inbox (just shows the PCs IP

Re: Whitelisting local domain (spamassassin & qmail)

On 27.04.10 02:26, Martin Caine wrote: > Sorry for the confusion. > > I am talking about connecting from an untrusted IP. We do have > authentication enabled on our SMTP server to disable relaying for unknown > users but as far as I can tell there's nothing in the headers that seems to > show this

Re: Whitelisting local domain (spamassassin & qmail)

We're using qmail with qmail-scanner (personally I'd prefer switching to postfix but it's not practical to do that at the moment. I'll see if I can find out how to add the auth information into the headers. Thanks -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Whitelisting-local-domain-

Re: new kind of spam (apparently from mailer daemon)

On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Joseph Brennan wrote: empty and there was a single attachment "transcript.zip". Very old-school, using pif and scr file extensions and the name with a lot of spaces in it (actually more spaces than I show here). After posting, I found that a few other passed through, an

Re: IP reputation DB vendors

Hi Jernej, - "Jernej Porenta" wrote: > Heya, > > I am searching for commercial IP reputation DB access which I could > use with SpamAssassin. > > I know that there is DCC with IP reputation, but there aren't many > others that I could use with SA (or frontend postfix server). I also > fou

Score overriding and behaviour

Hi everybody. Recently I updated my Gentoo installations to spamassassin-3.3.1-r1 (the 'r1' thing means a 'stock' SA-3.3.1 with some -often few - patches applied). Everything worked fine after upgrading, but now I see that some rules I have in my local.cf doesn't seem to work anymore. Since they

Re: Score overriding and behaviour

On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 14:21 +0200, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: > Everything worked fine after upgrading, but now I see that some rules I have > in my local.cf doesn't seem to work anymore. > The second problem is that the FRT_SOMA and FRT_SOMA2 score override don't > work too: I see they respective

RE: Score overriding and behaviour

> > Both the effects are quite weird to me. Maybe I didn't pay attention > to some > > post in this list announcing a different behaviour of the body rules > and a > > new score override mechanism? > > No change in this logic and behavior. > > Did you --lint check? Does it complain perhaps? To se

Re: new kind of spam (apparently from mailer daemon)

On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Lucio Chiappetti wrote: On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Joseph Brennan wrote: > empty and there was a single attachment "transcript.zip". Very old-school, using pif and scr file extensions and the name with a lot of spaces in it (actually more spaces than I show here). After

Re: new kind of spam (apparently from mailer daemon)

On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, John Hardin wrote: On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Lucio Chiappetti wrote: On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Joseph Brennan wrote: > > empty and there was a single attachment "transcript.zip". > Very old-school, using pif and scr file extensions and the name with > a lot of spaces in it

Re: Score overriding and behaviour

On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: Also, why body __SOMMA m'\Wsomma\W'i doesn't fire? I have the Rule2XSBody plugin active. Maybe somehow it wasn't compiled? But why, then? Do ANY of the rules in your local.cf fire? Try putting a test rule that will 'always' fire (like

RE: Score overriding and behaviour

> Do ANY of the rules in your local.cf fire? Yes, they do. The __IN_ITALIAN rule referred by SOMMA and SOMMA2, in example. However, > Try putting a test rule that > will 'always' fire (like 'header From =~ /\@/') at the end of local.cf, > then if it doesn't fire, start moving it up, to see if y

Never mind... (Was: RE: Score overriding and behaviour)

It turn out I put this and other stuff in a if(0) endif block, such that it of course didn't fire... Thanks everybody! Giampaolo

Re: [sa] RE: Score overriding and behaviour

On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: Do ANY of the rules in your local.cf fire? Yes, they do. The __IN_ITALIAN rule referred by SOMMA and SOMMA2, in example. Just a side thought, but are we checking for SOMMA or SOMA? One 'm' or two? FRT_SOMA2 Try 'retyping' the __SOMMA rule with

RE: [sa] RE: Score overriding and behaviour

> On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: > >> Do ANY of the rules in your local.cf fire? > > Yes, they do. The __IN_ITALIAN rule referred by SOMMA and SOMMA2, in > > example. > > Just a side thought, but are we checking for SOMMA or SOMA? One 'm' or > two? FRT_SOMA2 > > Try 'retyping' th

Re: Filtering zip spam

Hi, >> Might as well just block all of \.fr at smtp time for that matter :-) >> Poor France :( > > I mostly do... au revoir Le France Somewhat off-topic, but in the interest of increasing awareness, India reportedly ranks first: http://www.dnaindia.com/mumbai/report_india-ranks-first-in-

spamc output

Hi, Using SA v3.3.1 spamc command-line client : the message analyzed being either spam or ham, can I have the message left untouched except for the X-Spam headers ? For example, in case of a spam message, I'd like to have: From: "Test" To: Subject: Test Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 01:10:09 -0600 X-

Re: Filtering zip spam

On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 11:08 -0400, Alex wrote: > Hi, > > >> Might as well just block all of \.fr at smtp time for that matter :-) > >> Poor France :( > > > > I mostly do... au revoir Le France > > Somewhat off-topic, but in the interest of increasing awareness, India > reportedly ranks fi

Re: spamc output

On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 16:35 +, Christian Gregoire wrote: > Using SA v3.3.1 spamc command-line client : the message analyzed being > either spam or ham, can I have the message left untouched except for > the X-Spam headers ? > When a spam, since the message is rewritten, my X-Custom headers are

Re: spamc output

Christian Gregoire wrote: > Hi, > > Using SA v3.3.1 spamc command-line client : the message analyzed being either > spam or ham, can I have the message left untouched except for the X-Spam > headers ? For example, in case of a spam message, I'd like to have: > > From: "Test" > To: > Subject: Te

Re: Score overriding and behaviour

On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: Also, why body __SOMMA m'\Wsomma\W'i doesn't fire? This is more a sylistic comment, but: you don't need to alter the delimiters on that RE. Does this behave any better? body __SOMMA /\Wsomma\W/i That also won't hit

RE: Score overriding and behaviour

> On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: > > Also, why > > body __SOMMA m'\Wsomma\W'i > > > > doesn't fire? > > This is more a sylistic comment, but: you don't need to alter the > delimiters on that RE. Does this behave any better? > > body __SOMMA /\Wsomma\W

RE: Score overriding and behaviour

On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: Also, why body __SOMMA m'\Wsomma\W'i doesn't fire? This is more a sylistic comment, but: you don't need to alter the delimiters on that RE. Does this behave any better? body

Re : spamc output

Great, that's it. Thanks you both Bowie and Karsten. - Message d'origine De : Bowie Bailey À : users@spamassassin.apache.org Envoyé le : Mar 27 avril 2010, 18 h 59 min 07 s Objet : Re: spamc output Christian Gregoire wrote: > Hi, > > Using SA v3.3.1 spamc command-line client : the me

Spamd children sporadically aborting with glibc error

Hello, We are experiencing a sporadic error running SA 3.3.1 on an Ubuntu distro, with the following behavior: a message is being processed and a spamd child dies allowing the spam message to go through to the qmail queue. The spam goes through, unfortunately, but then processing continues norma

Re: Spamd children sporadically aborting with glibc error

On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 13:43 -0700, PaulYo wrote: > We are experiencing a sporadic error running SA 3.3.1 on an Ubuntu distro, > with the following behavior: a message is being processed and a spamd child > dies allowing the spam message to go through to the qmail queue. [...] > required_hits 2 T

Re: Postifx and Spamassassin w/o Clamav/Amavis-new

> On 4/26/10, Christian Gonzalez wrote: > >> Hence I had to disable Amavis-new/Clamav in order to keep receiving my >> emails but this also disabled SpamAssassin. I would like to keep at >> least >> SpamAssassin working, I found some howtos and guides [1][2] about it but >> none of them worked for

Re: Postifx and Spamassassin w/o Clamav/Amavis-new

>From David B Funk > Suggestions; completely kill and restart Amavis-new, see if it loads and > uses the new LibClamAV library. If that doesn't fix it, find -all- > instances of LibClamAV on your system, remove them, re-do the 0.96 > install and restart. If it still isn't working, ask your questio

Re: REMOVE my email , Thanks

Dear Sir, Please REMOVE my email address from your list, everyday have too many email forward to me. Thanks & Best Regards, Billy Lau Direct Line:(852) 3969 0684 / Cell Phone:(852) 9220 1286 Email: sal...@fashionable.com.hk Nicer Fashion Ltd. Tel:(852) 3969 0688 FAX:(852) 2361 9964 URL: www

Re: REMOVE my email , Thanks

On ons 28 apr 2010 03:25:26 CEST, BILLY/NICER wrote Please REMOVE my email address from your list, everyday have too many email forward to me. List-Help: users-h...@spamassassin.apache.org List-Unsubscribe: users-unsubscr...@spamassassin.apache.org List-Post: users@spamassassin

Re: Spamassassin rewriting headers of messages that are not marked Spam

On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Sitapati wrote: My spamassassin installation suddenly (since March) starting rewriting the headers of messages that are not spam. Here's an example: X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS,FH_DATE_PAST_20XX,HTML_MESSAGE,URG_BIZ auto

Re: Spamassassin rewriting headers of messages that are not marked Spam

Hi, > My spamassassin installation suddenly (since March) starting rewriting the > headers of messages that are not spam. March isn't so suddenly. Why is it a problem now and not last month? Are you sure it is your system that is rewriting the headers? Is it happening on every email? > X-Spam-St

spamd[18549]: config: failed to parse line, skipping, in "/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf": use_auto_whitelist 1

Hi i have recently update from 3.2.X to 3.3.X when i restart i get this message spamd[18549]: config: failed to parse line, skipping, in "/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf": use_auto_whitelist 1 any suggestions Ram

Re: spamd[18549]: config: failed to parse line, skipping, in "/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf": use_auto_whitelist 1

ram schrieb: > Hi > > i have recently update from 3.2.X to 3.3.X > > when i restart i get this message > > spamd[18549]: config: failed to parse line, skipping, in > "/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf ": use_auto_whitelist 1 > any suggestions > > Ram As far as I remember th

Re: spamd[18549]: config: failed to parse line, skipping, in "/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf": use_auto_whitelist 1

Hi thanks but i rerun next time i have not seen that error is that normal behaviour ? Ram On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:29 AM, C.M. Burns wrote: > > ram schrieb: > > Hi > > > > i have recently update from 3.2.X to 3.3.X > > > > when i restart i get this message > > > > spamd[18549]: config: faile

Re: spamd[18549]: config: failed to parse line, skipping, in "/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf": use_auto_whitelist 1

after update also still it shows old version why ? X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG,MIME_HTML_ONLY, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB autolearn=no version=3.2.5 On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:36 AM, ram wrote: > Hi > > thanks >

Re: Top Ten Rules

On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Alex wrote: > Hi, > > >> How many entries? Does it just keep growing? We have a local one too, > >> and every so often correlate it with the public RBLs so as to not > >> duplicate the check and overhead. > > > > They expire in 2 weeks. They should make it into a

Re: spamd[18549]: config: failed to parse line, skipping, in "/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf": use_auto_whitelist 1

On 28.4.2010 9:10, ram wrote: > after update also still it shows old version why ? > > X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, > DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG,MIME_HTML_ONLY, > RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB autolearn=no version=3.2.5 > Maybe you used to use

Re: Spamassassin rewriting headers of messages that are not marked Spam

Thanks for your reply Alex! Alex-325 wrote: > > Hi, > >> My spamassassin installation suddenly (since March) starting rewriting >> the >> headers of messages that are not spam. > > March isn't so suddenly. Why is it a problem now and not last month? > I'm tolerant. However, my tolerance has