Hi All,
Apologies if this has been covered, an admittedly fairly cursory
Google showed nothing new. My local sa-update hasn't updated in the
better part of a month. Is it that there have been no updates or do I
need to dig into my systems to see what I broke, how and when?
Regards to all
Nigel
On 3/10/2011 1:41 PM, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
Is it that there have been no updates or do I
need to dig into my systems to see what I broke, how and when?
Regards to all
Nigel
Why fix whats not broken :o)
regards
Tom
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 18:50 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Open Office might be worth it for him. It is what I use most of the
time
In that case one of you should suck a plain text newsletter body into
oowriter, make it look tidy, save it as HTML and then run it through a
validatoy, such
On 3/10/2011 1:41 AM, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
Hi All,
Apologies if this has been covered, an admittedly fairly cursory
Google showed nothing new. My local sa-update hasn't updated in the
better part of a month. Is it that there have been no updates or do I
need to dig into my systems to see what
On 2011/03/10 6:41 AM, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
Hi All,
Apologies if this has been covered, an admittedly fairly cursory
Google showed nothing new. My local sa-update hasn't updated in the
better part of a month. Is it that there have been no updates or do I
need to dig into my systems to see what
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 18:50 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Open Office might be worth it for him. It is what I use most of the
time
In that case one of you should suck a plain text newsletter body into
oowriter, make it look tidy, save it as
On 3/9/11 6:50 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 03/09/2011 06:33 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 17:33 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
It is almost better to build the html and have OE send it than to
let OE
do its own HTML building.
I couldn't agree more - provided he uses
...it is a very serious problem...
Test , from 11 to 13 today...
I've configured our central system filter (before
transfering mail to receipients)
...logging X-Sam-Score/X-SPAM-Report if Score 5
there were 160 mails with only such
MISSING_HEADERS ...but all of them were
On 3/10/11 9:34 AM, Margrit Lottmann wrote:
...it is a very serious problem...
Test , from 11 to 13 today...
you have been told more than once. this is not a spamassassin problem.
this is a problem with how you are calling spamassassin from your MTA.
Why do you ignore the experts?
Best way
Margrit,
...it is a very serious problem...
Test , from 11 to 13 today...
I've configured our central system filter (before
transfering mail to receipients)
...logging X-Sam-Score/X-SPAM-Report if Score 5
there were 160 mails with only such
MISSING_HEADERS ...but all of
Discussion on the dev list points to a lack of sufficient ham in the
corpus which is necessary to generate score updates and publish new
rules. There was a recent drive for new submitters, but I'm still
trying to figure out how I can rearrange my configuration in order to
help.
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Adam Moffett wrote:
Discussion on the dev list points to a lack of sufficient ham in the
corpus which is necessary to generate score updates and publish new rules.
There was a recent drive for new submitters, but I'm still trying to
figure out how I can rearrange my
On 2011/03/10 10:59 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:
Discussion on the dev list points to a lack of sufficient ham in the
corpus which is necessary to generate score updates and publish new
rules. There was a recent drive for new submitters, but I'm still
trying to figure out how I can rearrange my
On 03/10, Jason Bertoch wrote:
Discussion on the dev list points to a lack of sufficient ham in the
corpus which is necessary to generate score updates and publish new
rules. There was a recent drive for new submitters, but I'm still
trying to figure out how I can rearrange my configuration
On 03/10/2011 07:59 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:
I'd be happy to contribute, but we bounce or outright delete high
scoring spam.
After Reading these wiki articles:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/HandClassifiedCorpora
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CorpusCleaning
I get the impression
On 2011/03/10 2:17 PM, Adam Katz wrote:
On 03/10/2011 07:59 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:
I'd be happy to contribute, but we bounce or outright delete high
scoring spam.
After Reading these wiki articles:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/HandClassifiedCorpora
On 03/10, Jason Bertoch wrote:
Wouldn't spam already scored at 15+ be considered a little redundant
to the corpus? If not, I'm certain I could modify my config to keep
a copy for processing in the mass checks.
No. If all spams scored 15+ hit similar tests, and none of those spams are
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
Actually I believe the problem is currently insufficient spam:
HAM: 188008 (15 required)
SPAM: 51330 (15 required)
Insufficient spam corpus to generate scores; aborting.
-
On 03/10, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 03/10, John Hardin wrote:
Spam is easy to get, diverse ham much less so.
That's funny, since the sa-updates are currently not happening due to a
lack of spam.
Odd. Those stats aren't reflected on the
I've been using spamassassin as a pre-queue filter with postfix for a
while. This has the advantage of rejecting everything spamassassin thinks
is spam during the smtp transaction, so you have no spam folder to check
for false positives, and you don't cause any backscatter, since the sending
On 03/10/2011 11:49 AM, Jason Bertoch wrote:
On 2011/03/10 2:17 PM, Adam Katz wrote:
I figure spam capped at 15+ points would be fine, but you'll need
developer consensus on that.
Wouldn't spam already scored at 15+ be considered a little redundant
to the corpus? If not, I'm certain I
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:01:34 -0500
dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 03/10, Jason Bertoch wrote:
Wouldn't spam already scored at 15+ be considered a little redundant
to the corpus? If not, I'm certain I could modify my config to keep
a copy for processing in the mass checks.
No. If all
22 matches
Mail list logo
