On Tue, 2006-11-21 at 12:07 -0500, DAve wrote:
Thomas Lindell wrote:
Att mail servers use his service.
Which means I can't send to mediacom which is an att partner
I couldn't believe att used his service.
What's odd is that my company uses att backhaul bandwidth in the form of
On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 14:16 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
FWIW, Dale's been mailing me privately where I've been answering, but just for
everyone's info:
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 11:04:18AM -0700, Cabell, Dale wrote:
Where do I put the tar? After I untar it, where do I execute the
rpmbuild
-
From: Craig White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 12:00 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Help for beginner
On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 14:16 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
FWIW, Dale's been mailing me privately where I've been answering, but
just
On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 16:02 -0600, Nels Lindquist wrote:
On 25 Jul 2006 at 14:17, Craig White wrote:
snip
http://www.mailscanner.info/linux.html
This is the information page for installing MailScanner on RPM based
Linux system.
If you read this, you will see that even though
On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 19:34 -0700, jdow wrote:
If I was feeling stinky I'd note that I do not like web administration
tools as much as I like editing the files myself by hand doing things
I understand from an overdose of RTFM. And I'm not a Linux guy last
time I checked myself in front of a
On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 09:57 -0500, Michael W Cocke wrote:
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 14:10:26 -, you wrote:
Shane
Have a look at MailScanner as an alternative to amavisd - it's nice to have
a choice isn't it..
My understanding is that mailscanner doesn't work safely with postfix.
(IIRC
On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 17:29 +0100, nick wrote:
Michael W Cocke wrote:
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 15:04:11 -, you wrote:
Works fine with postfix...
http://wiki.mailscanner.info/doku.php?id=documentation:configuration:mta:pos
tfix:politicss=politics
Thanks Martin - very
On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 22:36 +0100, mouss wrote:
Craig White a écrit :
oops...meant to send to list...
and by all means...
setup dovecot for maildir
use IMAP not POP3 for you local email. IMAP frees you from tying your
email experience to one program on one computer
On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 03:27 +0100, mouss wrote:
Gene Heskett a écrit :
Except pipe it through spamc, although I'd assume a shell pipe might be
able to do that, just haven't given it any great amount of thought yet.
it's better to run an MTA, so that fetchmail gets back to sleep
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 01:10 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
Greetings all;
I just stumbled over an announcement on freshmeat about getmail as a
substitute for fetchmail, but from looking at the web page FAQ, its
not clear if getmail can both filter by passing the incoming mail thru
SA, and
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 18:48 -0800, Steve Maller wrote:
OK, I've built and installed MailScanner 4.49 and SpamAssassin 3.1.0
on a mostly stock Fedora Core 4 box. I'm running Sendmail with a
bunch of RBLs and TLS enabled.
Email comes through MailScanner, but whatever I do, I do not seem to
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 22:19 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 01 January 2006 22:51, jdow wrote:
[...]
Anyway, the rule thats applying the 3.8 score is
HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR2.
ATM, I have a grep -R HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR2 * running from /
because that rule isn't present in any of the
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 22:57 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
to my knowledge, fetchmail doesn't remove any headers at all.
Procmail may be doing it or your MTA, depending upon how you are
handling it.
Humm, AFAIK, fetchmail gets it from vz, writing it
to /var/spool/mail/gene
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 20:16 -0800, jdow wrote:
From: Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fetchmail is verbatim in the sense needed. Does fetchmail go through
the tool that fires off SpamAssassin or is this done up in KMail as
it reads? If so KMail may have sanitized off headers in much the same
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 04:04 +0100, mouss wrote:
Kai Schaetzl a écrit :
Mouss wrote on Sat, 17 Dec 2005 22:56:22 +0100:
localhost is an fqdn with no dots
No FQDN.
Prove it.
This is a bit argumentative and I don't wish to feed this but...
On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 05:37 -0800, jdow wrote:
From: Kai Schaetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jdow wrote on Thu, 17 Nov 2005 22:22:40 -0800:
curmudgeon
I learned a new word :-)
My stance on this is that the list-admin should please immediately
unsubscribe everyone who uses a
CentOS 3.4
# rpm -qa spamassassin
spamassassin-3.0.3-1.1.el3.rf
# rpm -qa mailscanner
mailscanner-4.41.3-1
I start with starter db from Fortress Systems since my old bayes db from
2.6x was creamed by this same issue...
# spamassassin -p /etc/MailScanner/spam.assassin.prefs.conf -D --lint
much
17 matches
Mail list logo
