sage as
> non-spam and then ham a few minutes later? As I understand it you do not
> need to explicitly --forget, SpamAssassin is smart enough to handle this
> situation, no? And if so, learning your Inbox should be fine as long as
> you move messages to Spam (and don't just delete) when appropriate.
non-spam and ham are the exact same. Therefore, it would not make any
difference. According to documentation, the --ham switch means to learn as ham
(non-spam). Therefore, the same thing.
--
Best regards,
Duane Hill
l the subjects.
Check out
https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.3.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html#basic_message_tagging_options
--
Best regards,
Duane Hill
ar for examples).
>
Have you confirmed in your server logs the message was received by the
SA server? If so, there would have been a message coming back to your
server shortly thereafter.
I just sent an unsubscribe request:
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 21:03:35 -0500
From: Duane Hill
On Wednesday, October 8, 2014, 6:31:08 PM, Martin confabulated:
> On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 16:46 -0600, Amir Caspi wrote:
>> On Oct 8, 2014, at 4:23 PM, Duane Hill wrote:
>> >
>> > No. && is a way of chaining commands together. Your cron says run
>&g
On Wednesday, October 8, 2014, 5:38:20 PM, John wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Oct 2014, Duane Hill wrote:
>> No. && is a way of chaining commands together.
> ...where the second command is only executed if the first command exited
> with a zero status. && stops on failur
On Wednesday, October 8, 2014, 5:31:07 PM, Dave wrote:
> On 2014-10-08 15:23, Duane Hill wrote:
>> No. && is a way of chaining commands together. Your cron says run
>> sa-update and then restart spamd. In other words, when sa-update
>> finishes running,
On Wednesday, October 8, 2014, 3:11:06 PM, LuKreme wrote:
>> On 08 Oct 2014, at 04:56 , Duane Hill wrote:
>>
>> On Tuesday, October 7, 2014, 10:56:54 PM, LuKreme wrote:
>>
>>> On 07 Oct 2014, at 11:45 , Jari Fredrisson wrote:
>>>> I ran sa-update &
else
exit 0
fi
This way, sa-compile is ran and spamd is restarted only when there is
an update. I then use the script in a cron which runs once per day.
I believe the way you have it, spamd will get restarted every time
your cron is ran whether there is an update or not.
--
Duane Hil
Monday, January 6, 2014, 3:14:56 PM, you wrote:
> On 06.01.14 09:02, Mark Chaney wrote:
>>I sure I hope I didnt fail to bad on searching for this answer, but
>>when simply using spamassasin with postfix as an incoming smtp relay
>>server and not using anything like amavis or mailscanner, is ther
On Friday, October 19, 2012 at 20:21:13 UTC, t...@ipinc.net confabulated:
> Hi All,
>Last month I put in a new mailserver, here are the specs:
> FreeBSD 8.3 amd64bit
> 8GB ram
> 2TB mirrored disk space
> dual Xeon E5310s
> Intel motherboard
> top output:
> last pid: 82946; load averages:
Try your testing from somewhere else. Your test appears to have been
performed from the server itself. Your logs below show ALL_TRUSTED in
the spamassassin results.
On Saturday, June 30, 2012 at 05:48:15 UTC, jayanta.gh...@rp-sg.in confabulated:
> Dear List,
> We are trying to configure Spama
On Saturday, June 30, 2012 at 11:00:54 UTC, mar...@gregorie.org confabulated:
> On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 22:48 -0700, Jayanta Ghosh wrote:
>> Dear List,
>>
>> We are trying to configure Spamassassin (Version 3.3.1-2) with postfix
>> (Version 2.6.6-2.1) on RHEL 6.1 (64 bit). In order to integrate pos
On Friday, May 25, 2012 at 21:26:45 UTC, jida...@jidanni.org confabulated:
> Isn't it bad that X-Spam-Checker-Version doesn't report what sa-update
> we are up to so far, and that there is no additional other variable that
> we can toggle on in reports to do that.
The version header shows the ve
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 at 02:48:08 UTC, jer...@fluxlabs.net confabulated:
> Sa-update should reload SA, therefore reloading rules. What error are you
> getting ?
You have to reload spamd after sa-update if any rules were updated to
activate the changes.
> --
> Jeremy McSpadden
> On Mar 26
erriding this setting?
> Thank you!
I forgot you are using amavisd. Amavisd doesn't use SA's spamd. You
have to restart amavisd whenever you make changes.
> 2012/2/22 Duane Hill
>> On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 at 12:36:31 UTC,
>> agutierr@gmail.comco
ES_50=0.001,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001
> :??
Did you disable (comment out) the AWL line in the config file
v310.pre?
> 2012/2/21 Duane Hill
>> On Tuesday, February 21, 2012 at 15:18:30 UTC,
>> michael.scheid...@secnap.com confabulated:
>>
>> > On 2/21/12 10:11 AM, Anto
On Tuesday, February 21, 2012 at 21:25:08 UTC, michael.scheid...@secnap.com
confabulated:
> On 2/21/12 4:09 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>> Den 2012-02-21 16:29, Duane Hill skrev:
>>
>>>
>>> http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.3.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_AW
On Tuesday, February 21, 2012 at 15:18:30 UTC, michael.scheid...@secnap.com
confabulated:
> On 2/21/12 10:11 AM, Antonio Gutiérrez Mayoral wrote:
>> rule AWL is triggered with a negative score. Reading the documentation
>> I think that the problem
>> was a wrong auto-learn thresold for HAM, the
On Tuesday, December 20, 2011 at 17:06:36 UTC, rwmailli...@googlemail.com
confabulated:
> On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:38:58 +
> Duane Hill wrote:
>> On Tuesday, December 20, 2011 at 15:26:06 UTC, bowie_bai...@buc.com
>> confabulated:
>>
>> >> Should I ope
On Tuesday, December 20, 2011 at 15:26:06 UTC, bowie_bai...@buc.com
confabulated:
> On 12/19/2011 4:03 AM, Jonas wrote:
I've never seen spam larger than 3 MB.
>>> which is much bigger than the 256 kB limit in sa-learn that the OP is
>>> having a
>>> problem with.
>> Indeed, of course I agre
Friday, August 5, 2011, 11:01:04 PM, Anil wrote:
> I am using sun (oracle) messaging server.
> Anyone have an idea for this?
The report_safe config option tells SA what type of reporting is to be
used:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.3.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html#report_safe
> On Th
Friday, August 5, 2011, 12:54:35 PM, you wrote:
>> Most here score along this:
>>
>> X-Spam-Status: Reqd:5.0 Hits:14.6 Tests:BODY_8BITS=1.5
>> CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2 HTML_MESSAGE=0.001
>> MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45
>> MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.105 MISSING_HEADERS=1.207 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEX
Friday, August 5, 2011, 11:08:29 AM, you wrote:
> Most seem to get through for me. What are you doing to catch them?
> I added this too local.conf and it did not help at all:
> #ok_languages en es fr de cs da lv nl pl sv
> ok_languages en
> TextCat appears to be enabled in v310.pre:
> # TextC
Friday, August 5, 2011, 7:48:09 AM, you wrote:
> Been getting a LOT of Chinese language spam lately with Chinese named
> attached spreadsheets or .doc files.
> Anyone else seeing this?
Yeah. And it's nice to see SA has not missed one yet that has made it
through ClamAV.
--
Best regards,
Duan
Hello Giampaolo,
Wednesday, August 3, 2011, 4:09:57 PM, you wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Duane Hill [mailto:du...@duanemail.org]
>>
>> Wednesday, August 3, 2011, 3:58:28 PM, you wrote:
>>
>> >> -----Original Message-
>>
Wednesday, August 3, 2011, 3:58:28 PM, you wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Duane Hill [mailto:du...@duanemail.org]
>>
>> Hello David,
>>
>> Wednesday, August 3, 2011, 2:23:28 PM, you wrote:
>>
>> I set MySQL to log all SQL queries.
Hello David,
Wednesday, August 3, 2011, 2:23:28 PM, you wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Aug 2011 21:15:16 +0200
> "Giampaolo Tomassoni" wrote:
>> > Except that in real life, the write transaction lasts much longer,
>> What is it? 60ms? Granted. It is still a 1/100 of 6s.
> No, write transactions are expens
Monday, July 25, 2011, 1:26:22 PM, you wrote:
> On 7/25/11 2:24 PM, Duane Hill wrote:
>> Monday, July 25, 2011, 1:16:54 PM, you wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/25/11 2:13 PM, Duane Hill wrote:
>>>> Should this even be an issue if one is using an SQL backend and has it
Monday, July 25, 2011, 1:16:54 PM, you wrote:
> On 7/25/11 2:13 PM, Duane Hill wrote:
>> Should this even be an issue if one is using an SQL backend and has it
>> configured to handle the extra processing? The OP is using MySQL as
>> the backend. I've had MySQL config
Hello Michael,
Monday, July 25, 2011, 9:30:11 AM, you wrote:
> On 7/25/11 10:24 AM, Jason Ede wrote:
>>
>> We’ve 2 reasonably powerful mail servers handling incoming email and
>> sharing the load. We’ve moved to a single bayes database (to make
>> training easier) and its stored in mariadb and
Wednesday, July 13, 2011, 3:14:53 AM, Kristian wrote:
> Is it nessacary needed? When i start spamd in debug mode saw the
> /usr/share/spamassassin/10_default_prefs.cf is proceeded.
You shouldn't make any changes in the /usr/share/spamassassin
directory as they could be overwritten when you upgrad
Wednesday, July 13, 2011, 1:23:51 AM, Kristian wrote:
> Hello im using spamassassin and user prefs in mysql database, i have
> successfully setting up mysql table and all about correct work of
> squirelmail plugin and from client site everything is ok. The problem is
> spamassassin can't handle us
Friday, June 24, 2011, 7:21:09 AM, you wrote:
> I am the official port maintainer for the Freebsd port for SpamAssassin.
> I have uploaded a test port for anyone who wants to try it.
> http://www.secnap.com/downloads/sa332_unofficial.tgz
> to install and compile:
> cd /(your ports dir: /usr/ports
Tuesday, June 7, 2011, 1:36:24 AM, Matus wrote:
> Postfix can't use spamassassin directly, you _need_ to use something
> and that somethink
FYI: You can pipe to SpamAssassin directly from Postfix:
master.cf:
...
spamass unix - n n - 15 pipe
user=spamd argv=/usr/
Hello asimhafeez,
Monday, June 6, 2011, 10:10:55 AM, you wrote:
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>>
>>> > On Sun, 5 Jun 2011 07:00:02 -0700 (PDT), asimhafeez
>>>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >> Is there any possibility to delete spam instead of marking (rewriting)
>>> >> the
>>> >> emails as [SPAM] in su
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009, Ryan Thoryk wrote:
Hi,
We're rebuilding a mail server and are having some issues with SQL-based
SA preference lookups. We're running Postfix 2.5.5 and SA 3.2.5 (Debian
Lenny version) - here's our Postfix config from master.cf:
spamassassin unix - n n -
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009, Duane Hill wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009, Ben Whyte wrote:
Based on what you've told me so far, it is not. It is pointing to
/home/.spamassassin/
What's the exact bayes_path statement you used, and what file is it in?
(please post the exact one.. bayes_path
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009, Ben Whyte wrote:
Based on what you've told me so far, it is not. It is pointing to
/home/.spamassassin/
What's the exact bayes_path statement you used, and what file is it in?
(please post the exact one.. bayes_path is a VERY tricky option to use,
because it requires more
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009, Gary Smith wrote:
Aug 19 15:03:11 hsoakmsa03l02 spamd[28319]: spamd: result: Y 4 -
BAYES_50,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,SPF_HELO_PASS,URIBL_BLACK,URIBL_RH
S_DOB
scantime=0.2,size=4543,user=filter,uid=124,required_score=0.0,rhost=10.
80.65.9,raddr=10.80.65.9,rport=53097,
On Tue, 5 May 2009, Alejandro Cabrera Obed wrote:
People, I've followed your advice and I've noticed that spamc is called from
Postfix in /etc/postfix/master.cf:
spamassassinunix- n n - - pipe
user=nobody argv=/usr/bin/spamc -d 127.0.0.1 -e /usr/sbin/sendm
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Matt Kettler wrote:
Duane Hill wrote:
Additional comment below. I should have checked docs before I
initially responded.
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Duane Hill wrote:
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Matt Kettler wrote:
Interesting. use_auto_whitelist used to be an admin-only option
Additional comment below. I should have checked docs before I initially
responded.
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Duane Hill wrote:
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Matt Kettler wrote:
Interesting. use_auto_whitelist used to be an admin-only option (valid
only in local.cf). But I guess if the admin wants to make
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Matt Kettler wrote:
Interesting. use_auto_whitelist used to be an admin-only option (valid
only in local.cf). But I guess if the admin wants to make sure no users
can turn it on, then they can comment out the loadplugin.
It probably changed when AWL became a plugin. Our se
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, sebast...@debianfan.de wrote:
how to deactivate the AWL for the whole server ?
Place:
use_auto_whitelist 0
in the local.cf. By default it is turned on. Therefore you may not see the
entry. Otherwise, if you do, just set it to zero. You will have to restart
whatever is
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009, martes wrote:
I also want to know how to pipe the logs from spamd
into /var/log/spamd.log.
I have newsyslog.conf and syslog.conf set up to shoot those logs to that
log file, however, nothing gets sent there. I guess everything is
getting picked up by the maillog.info direct
On Sun, 5 Apr 2009, Jeremy Morton wrote:
mouss wrote:
Jeremy Morton a ?crit :
mouss wrote:
the recipient of the bounce is the sender of the original message. so if
you use BATV, you could block bounces sent to a non BATV address.
Again, maybe I'm missing something here, but let's go back to
Actually, disregard. I see what you are stating.
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009, Duane Hill wrote:
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009, Neil Schwartzman wrote:
On 04/04/09 4:22 PM, "RobertH" wrote:
0.2 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009, Neil Schwartzman wrote:
On 04/04/09 4:22 PM, "RobertH" wrote:
0.2 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP
address
[209.92.22.130 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
That would be incorrect. The IP is static, not dynamic.
wh
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Karsten Br?ckelmann wrote:
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 23:14 +, Duane Hill wrote:
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Ricardo Kleemann wrote:
This can be done for a particular user?
You should be able to modify scores at a user level by enabling user rules
in local.cf:
allow_user_rules
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Ricardo Kleemann wrote:
This can be done for a particular user?
You should be able to modify scores at a user level by enabling user rules
in local.cf:
allow_user_rules 1
By default it is turned off.
Reference:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/Mail_SpamAs
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Jason Bertoch wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Arthur Kerpician [mailto:art...@bluechip.ro]
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 12:43 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: New kind of spam part 2
Hi,
I've been following the latest messages on this list regarding ne
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Paul Houselander (SME) wrote:
On 25.02.09 10:03, Paul Houselander (SME) wrote:
I use the SARE rules and have been asked to explain why a certain
email got
caught as spam.
IMPORTANT: Due to Ninjas being busy with lives, wives & hockey matches,
SARE
rules aren't being upd
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Gene Heskett wrote:
I've seen both. but I didn't see a Bcc: line at all.
There is no Bcc: line (email header). Therefore, a Bcc: is supplied as a
RCPT TO during SMTP time and that is it.
On Sat, 14 Feb 2009, Marc Perkel wrote:
Hi,
I have a quick bind question. I want to set the MX records on a domain to
something normal but I want to set the MX for all subdomains to something
else.
example.com mail.example.com
xxx.example.com blackhole.example.com
So do just that:
exampl
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Steve Freegard wrote:
5) Privacy concerns; potentially a domains entire mail stream for the
last 5 days could be held on your mail spool. This has obvious privacy
implications for most people particularly as there is no contract
between you and the end-user. How does the
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009, Simone Morandini wrote:
Er.. isn't it
bayes_auto_learn 1
??
Actually, I do have "auto_learn 1"... is it something meaningless?
By default is turned on. Therefore, one doesn't even have it configured.
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, fbpc wrote:
...
X-FBPC-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, ORDB-RBL, SpamAssassin (not cached,
...
In light of all the other comments already given, I couldn't help to
notice the 'ORDB-RBL' in the MailScanner header. I'm assuming that is the
ordb.org RBL that's been dead for qui
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
Hi all,
again me, with more doubts. I've setup SA with spamd-spamc daemon-client. I
also I use sa-compile. does spamd takes advantaje of compiled rules or it is
only for spamassassin executable.
spamd sure does take advantage of compiled rul
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Ons, December 17, 2008 07:35, ram wrote:
I would like to remove the SURBL lookups from our servers since they
are no longer free (and their charges are unreasonable )
show links where this is stated or make a bug on it :)
else:
score *_SURBL 0
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, ram wrote:
I would like to remove the SURBL lookups from our servers since they are
no longer free (and their charges are unreasonable )
I would just put a 0.0 score in local.cf for all their rules , but I
guess when the rules are removed from the actual cf files by sa-upd
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, LuKreme wrote:
(where did you find/get the 6C6191E3?).
Not too hard:
Do a search for 'sought' on the SA wiki page (which is linked off of
http://spamassassin.apache.org/):
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/
The very first link provided this:
http://wiki.apac
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Ray Jette wrote:
Good morning,
I am trying to write a negative scoring rule that files on the following:
PO
PO#
PO #
Following is the rule I am using:
header PO_AND_ORDERSSubject =~ /\bPO*?#?/i
score PO_AND_ORDERS-0.50
describe PO_AND_ORDERSA negative sc
On Sat, 15 Nov 2008, Troy Settle wrote:
Sujit Acharyya-Choudhury wrote:
I have been modifying local.cf so that report_safe is 0 or 1. Can not see
any change. For my sin, my exim config has the following entry:
warncondition = ${if or{\
{eq {${substr_0_6:$
On Thu, 6 Nov 2008, Mark Martinec wrote:
Luis,
I was doing some tests with all the recommendations you sent me...
and I can make to work the server correctly... I was filtering spam with
no problems and my performances troubles dissapeard...
I just configured 5 procs for amavis and
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Koopmann, Jan-Peter wrote:
Spamers are using MY E-Mail spaming
russian servers and now Ihave gotten nearly
200.000 backscatters which make my account unusable
specialy for my customers and peoples which
urgently need my help without passing over mailinglists...
So
You must have something incorrectly set up with your filtering. I received
a bounce stating I do not have FCrDNS set up:
http://ipadmin.junkemailfilter.com/rdns.php?ip=65.124.230.214
when I do IN FACT:
%host 65.124.230.214
214.230.124.65.in-addr.arpa is an alias for
214.192-223.230.124.65.in-
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Clayton Cottingham wrote:
hi all
trying to figure a way to filter out, or better yet score charset koi8-r
down some
ok_locales and ok_languages do not work as expected
inactive_languages is a no go as well
any help appreciated
For ok_languages, do you have the TextCat p
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, mathiasadsl wrote:
Hi all,
I'm currently running a postfix server and spamassassin under Fedora Core 8.
Everyhting is OK but i'd like to redirect tagged [SPAM] mails to a mailbox.
I did the following:
#Edit /etc/postfix/main.cf
header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/header_c
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Duane Hill schrieb:
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
McDonald, Dan schrieb:
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 12:07 +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I have a mail setup, where the SMTP server (Postfix) is running on a
machine with a public IP
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
McDonald, Dan schrieb:
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 12:07 +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I have a mail setup, where the SMTP server (Postfix) is running on a
machine with a public IP address, and amavisd-new and spamassassin are
running on a "filter" s
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
how do i include external config files for example i want to integrate my own
rulesets - from
/home/username/my_ruleset.txt
From 'perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf':
include filename
Include configuration lines from filename. Rel
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Karl Pearson wrote:
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Marc Perkel wrote:
McDonald, Dan wrote:
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 15:44 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
Ken A wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
I don't know how this will work but I'm building the data now. For
those of you who are familiar
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Dave Koontz wrote:
Rose, Bobby wrote ... (9/22/2008 10:24 AM):
I had the same issue and found that the system that's relaying
(216.129.105.40) those confirmation emails doesn't have a PTR record.
You'd think someone selling a antispam/email appliance would be familiar
with
On Sat, 13 Sep 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gentlemen, I am frustrated by the duplication of information in:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
3.2.5-mon_sep__8_23_53_29_2008.jidanni2.jidanni.org (2008-06-10) on
jidanni2.jidanni.org
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=1.9 t
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Karl Pearson wrote:
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, fchan wrote:
Hi,
Sorry I don't have experience with this product.
I do have limited experience with Barracuda Networks appliance and I think
is a great product for an e-mail filter which I had experienced with my
friend to set up
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, PileOfMush wrote:
Can someone help me understand why a message can come through and get one
score, then I can scan it again 1 minute later and get a
much higher score? Here's the message. http://slexy.org/raw/s2JoVC8OlP The top
copy of the message was how it was scanned com
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You know, it is a 1000 times easier to just do
$ sa-update --nogpg
than to try to figure our the right way from the messages that
surround "channel: GPG validation failed, channel failed", or the
sa-update man page, or writing this group and asking wh
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Bill Gunty wrote:
I recently did a --force-expire on my bayesian database as I was getting some
false positives with it and the information it in was getting to be over a
year old. Since then, when automatically scanning, bayesian tests are not
being run. This can be seen
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Skip wrote:
Scored well here:
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10)
X-Spam-Level: x
X-Spam-Status: Reqd:5.0 Hits:17.1 Learn:disabled Tests:JM_SOUGHT_2=4,
JM_SOUGHT_3=4,SG_EXECUTABLE_URI=3,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001,
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Skip wrote:
http://pastebin.com/m5b376775
I have the botnet rules enabled and they trigger on a lot of my spam, as well
as the sought rules. But not this message. This spam however only triggered
two rules, however I feel it should have triggered more. Yeah, it passed
to
come from your MTA. SA has nothing to do with redirecting messages.
-Original Message-
From: Duane Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 10:15 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Report Safe
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Denise Ricerra wrote:
Hi!
S
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Denise Ricerra wrote:
Hi!
Sorry I am a newbie here at spam assassin. I just have a question, when I set
the report safe to ?1? the message gets altered,
even for the important message being tagged as SPAM. How do I get the original
message. Is there some sort of directory
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Camron W. Fox wrote:
Alle,
We are running SA V3.2.4 on RHEL5.1. We would like to whitelist mail
coming from inside our network. Spamassassin is located on our DMZ servers.
Users use the internal SMTP relay to send mail. The internal domain is
foo.ac.jp. The external dom
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, mouss wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
And - I'm putting this out for those who are interested. You are not
interested so this doesn't affect you.
Mark,
This debate can continue until the end of time (assuming time has an end
;-p). How about creating a dedicated mailing li
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008, Bob Gereford wrote:
I've received a message with a Subject of
"Be Serious and Have Fun!"
Looking at the headers
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Level: !!!
X-Spam-Status: score=7.8/4.0 autolearn=spam
X-Spam-Report:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, theWoosh wrote:
/etc/postfix/main had mailbox_size_limit set to 11 megs - can't believe this
is the default! All 3 users are on holiday, so this is the first time this
limit had been reached...
upped it to half a gig and now the mail is getting through
11 messages? T
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008, Brett Millett wrote:
I've been googling quite a bit today to find the answer to what I'm
seeing that is happening on my mail server. However, I just can't seem
to find a definitive answer. When looking at my mail logs I see a number
of autolearn=spam, however when I run "sa-l
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, Ron Smith wrote:
When I reinstituted the blocklists in CommuniGate Pro, the spam load falls
dramatically and SA continues to function. And yet I'm still getting tmp
files in the Submitted folder that have multiple .tmp extensions as though
spamd was being respawned by the
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008, mouss wrote:
Duane Hill wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008, Yves Goergen wrote:
On 20.07.2008 17:10 CE(S)T, mouss wrote:
on the host running SA, try
$ host 1.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org
It says:
1.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org does not exist (Authoritative answer)
The server is
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008, Yves Goergen wrote:
On 20.07.2008 17:10 CE(S)T, mouss wrote:
on the host running SA, try
$ host 1.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org
It says:
1.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org does not exist (Authoritative answer)
The server is located in a well-known computing centre in Nuremberg, Germ
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Marc Perkel wrote:
Just a quick sendmail question I'm asking for a friend. If they want to make
sendmail listen on port 2525 instead of 25 - what do they meed to change?
Email me privately off list.
Thanks in advance
Google for:
"sendmail" +alternate port
Very first
On Thu, 3 Jul 2008, Sujit Acharyya-Choudhury wrote:
Dear All,
We are using clamAV 0.93.1 as our virus checker on SLES9 using exim as MTA. It
catches lot of virus+phishing. However, lot of
phishing mails are recently getting through. Our spamassassin is version 3.1.7
(a bit old), but running
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008, Dj Helmes wrote:
Where can I find the url to download the FreeMail Plugin?
Right on the plugins wiki page:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomPlugins
It's toward the bottom of the page.
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008, Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
Received: from n75.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([10.10.10.21]) by
EXCHANGE02.norddeutsche.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:58:44 +0200
huh? what's that weird IP doing there?
It's a version.
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008, Arthur Dent wrote:
Hello all.
I have just upgraded from SA 3.2.4 to 3.2.5 and ran sa-update to get the
latest rulesets (which also happens every night via a cronjob).
I got the following errors:
[errors chopped]
Stopping spamd:
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, phil89 wrote:
Hi
We receive some mails with EuroPharmacie
How could i avoid theses
SCORE is only 5.9
Only 5.9? 5.0 is the SA default score. You must have changed that.
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, almaren wrote:
Is it possible to somehow tell spamassassin to move all messages marked as
spam directly into the spam/ham/trash folders ?
The thing is I'm running backups on my mailbox and although I omit
spam/ham/trash I do collect the mails from my inbox, and in most case
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:02:11 -0800
Bob Amen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Scheidell wrote:
> > >Works fine for me. Are you sure you weren't blocked?
> >
> >
> > In fact, I found several sites (different networks, not mine) where
> > it doesn't work.
> > (I don't query more than 10,000
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:02:11 -0800
Bob Amen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Scheidell wrote:
> > >Works fine for me. Are you sure you weren't blocked?
> >
> >
> > In fact, I found several sites (different networks, not mine) where
> > it doesn't work.
> > (I don't query more than 10,000
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:25:41 -0500 (EST)
Andy Dills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It appears (from email recently sent to the admins of a few small
> mailservers I help admin) that the people in charge of uribl.com have
> decided to set a pretty low threshold for blacklisting DNS servers
> fro
1 - 100 of 321 matches
Mail list logo
