Marc (et all) -
Thank you for the reply. I will first admit that my SA skills are
very dated. I have not actively managed the product in over ten years.
I distributed the 9 messages as a ZIP file because there were so many
immediate instances. I typically refrain from trying to redact an
forwarding. Please discard if no interest.
TNX - JimF
-
James T. Fortney, Principal
CSC Consulting Services
E-mail: fort...@cscconsulting.com
Snail:P.O. Box 12589
Prescott AZ 86304-2589
-- <>
I’m thinking about using the EBL from msbl.org with SA.
Can anyone tell me what detection rate they are getting with it? Is it worth
using, or would the spam be trapped by other methods (RBL, etc) anyway?
Pretty hard to find much information about how useful it is.
Thanks,
James.
smime.p7s
k.
Is this worth raising as a bug (or improvement request)? Could someone
try variants of the ADVANCE_FEE rules without __FRAUD_JBU and see if
it performs better?
Unfortunately, I can't see enough of the original email, and would be
unlikely to have permission to supply it if I did.
Thanks,
James.
On 2019-03-20 12:07 p.m., Dave Warren wrote:
What is the result when you train inbound spam as ham first, then as
spam? As I understand it, forgetting is not required, SpamAssassin will
handle this automatically. So as long as users move spam into the spam
training folder (not deleting spam di
On 2019-03-18 7:40 p.m., @lbutlr wrote:
On 18 Mar 2019, at 13:59, James wrote:
The documentation says to use your inbox. :-)
It does not.
The example shows using your inbox.
if possible. This will make it more accurate for your incoming mail.
Do this using the "sa-learn" t
On 2019-03-17 5:43 p.m., @lbutlr wrote:
On 17 Mar 2019, at 15:03, James wrote:
I run sa-learn --ham on my inboxes.
You inboxes likely contain spam messages that haven't been caught, so training
on inbox will poison your bayes in favor of more spam. Unless your inbox is
perfect (ent
On 2019-03-17 5:46 p.m., John Capo wrote:
On Sun, March 17, 2019 17:03, James wrote:
I've been getting a lot of spam so I'm thinking of lowering the
"required" number.
About 50 % spam gets a 4.4 so my required=4.5 is a tiny bit high.
I run an IMAP server with my own
On 2019-03-17 5:45 p.m., John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 17 Mar 2019, James wrote:
I've been getting a lot of spam so I'm thinking of lowering the
"required" number.
About 50 % spam gets a 4.4 so my required=4.5 is a tiny bit high.
I run sa-learn --ham on my inboxes.
Are
I've been getting a lot of spam so I'm thinking of lowering the
"required" number.
About 50 % spam gets a 4.4 so my required=4.5 is a tiny bit high.
I run sa-learn --ham on my inboxes.
Is there a way to whitelist all the email addresses in my inboxes?
RED.BY
<http://95.216.24.32/updates/MIRRORED.BY>
you get a not found.
I copied the MIRRORED.BY file from the 3.004001 directory then re-ran
sa-update. It pulled down rules and I'm in business.
Kevin, thanks for the patch. It works. Sorry for the extra noise and perhaps
we need to
a PID file: %s",
$pid, exit_status_str($child_stat,0)) unless $serverstarted;
However, there's no waiting for things to start. I'm investigating this now.
--James
> On Sep 17, 2018, at 4:53 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>
> This patch was added for wind
ake: Fatal error: Command failed for target `spamc/spamc'
Current working directory /export/src/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.4.2
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `spamc/spamc'
--James
Thanks very much for everyone's quick responses (and sanity checks). :)
I love this .cf file, Kevin. A more advanced and sophisticated version of the
one I've been accumulating for a few years!
Thanks again!
--James
> On Apr 6, 2017, at 10:12 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>
n.org =>
1786640, parsed as 1786640
Apr 6 09:19:55.594 [10506] dbg: channel: current version is 1786853, new
version is 1786640, skipping channel
Apr 6 09:19:55.594 [10506] dbg: diag: updates complete, exiting with code 1
Update finished, no fresh updates were available
superchicken#
Any insights appreciated. Thanks!
--James
On 07/12/15 17:15, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 12.07.2015 um 21:40 schrieb Bill Cole:
On 12 Jul 2015, at 11:28, James wrote:
The problem is finding out which directory the running spamassassin
uses, I can't seen to train the one it expects.
I put this in my /etc/spamassassin/loc
On 07/12/15 00:22, ch...@antennex.com wrote:
Why not run:
sa-learn --dump magic
And you'll see the number of spams vs tyhe number of hams learned?
The problem is finding out which directory the running spamassassin
uses, I can't seen to train the one it expects.
I put this i
On 07/11/15 19:55, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 11.07.2015 um 17:36 schrieb James:
Does Bayes catch them?
===
I don't know since I don't get any non-english emails. But, you
could collect and feed them to "sa-
English sender and body
*From:* RW <mailto:rwmailli...@googlemail.com>
*Date:* 2015-07-11 08:28
*To:* users <mailto:users@spamassassin.apache.org>
*Subject:* Re: non-English sender and body
On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 22:00:10 -0400
James wrote:
lish sender and body
> On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 22:00:10 -0400
> James wrote:
>
> > I get a lot of spam from Chinese senders and Chinese subjects but
> > only an image for the body.
> > I want to mark as spam any non-English sender names and subjects.
On 07/11/15 09:32, ch...@antennex.com wrote:
*From:* RW <mailto:rwmailli...@googlemail.com>
*Date:* 2015-07-11 08:28
*To:* users <mailto:users@spamassassin.apache.org>
*Subject:* Re: non-English sender and body
On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 22:00:10 -0400
James wr
I get a lot of spam from Chinese senders and Chinese subjects but only
an image for the body.
I want to mark as spam any non-English sender names and subjects.
I tried TextCat but either I did it wrong or it only looks at the Body.
last expire
atime delta
0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: last expire
reduction count
Obvious issues if users leave spam sitting in their inbox, but if they
move to the spam folder it will get relearned correctly.In this case
I trust the users with well behaved mail
On 02/25/2015 10:03 PM, Dave Funk wrote:
It looks like you either have a permissions problem or a confusion
problem.
Your run of 'sa-learn --dump magic' is looking at some Bayes which has
enough ham/spam but what ever your spamassasin is looking at doesn't.
Your 'sudo' isn't running that sa-l
I don't think I have the Bayesian filter working.
This is some spam that wasn't marked as spam, shouldn't one of the tests be
BAYES_00?
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLYTO,
FSL_MY_NAME_IS,HTML_MESSAGE,RDNS_DYNAMIC,T_OBFU_JPG_ATTACH autolearn=no
are in the 20s or higher and would be
rejected otherwise, assuming they made it past greylisting deferrals.
For thew few low deferrals that did retry they eventually got over 5.0
after whitelisting due to the RBLs updating in the mean time.
--
-James
On Fri, August 8, 2014 09:14, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 06.08.14 16:19, James B. Byrne wrote:
>>OS=CentOS-6.5
>>SA=3.3.1
>>
>>I ran spamassassin -D -llint and see this in the output:
>>
>>Aug 6 15:59:03.983 [4533] dbg: config: warning: score set fo
On Thu, August 7, 2014 15:53, Bob Proulx wrote:
> James B. Byrne wrote:
>> Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
>> > Policies such as this show a complete lack of understanding on how to run
>> > production infrastructure. RH will never update SA in RHEL6 to any new
>>
On Wed, August 6, 2014 17:30, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Wednesday, August 06, 2014 6:24 PM -0400 "James B. Byrne"
> wrote:
>
>> I am constrained to run the version provided by the upstream distro
>> packager (RedHat). When they update SA then, and only
e (http://mailspike.org/usage.html) and read a
brief introduction to the service. Am I to infer that one places the
suggested configuration into ones own local.cf? If so then how do the scores
get on my system without the associated rules?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James
with the distribution packages.
Does anyone have an idea as to why I have scores for non-existent rules?
What is MSPIKE?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.
* E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
Postfix. Nonetheless, it has a
MISSING_FROM tag.
Thank you for your assistance. Any further help in explaining this situation
to me will is most welcome.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & L
cut out the SA
headers from the messages that I pass to it on the command line.
Has anyone else run into this?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Broc
y
lines
* 1.8 MISSING_DATE Missing Date: header
;
I do not know why this is happening. Is there some switch I am supposed to
pass spamassasin when I use it on a message text file?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...
e.ca with HTTP;
> Mon, 2 Jun 2014 10:59:07 -0400
> Message-ID: <6f60bcdbaaa72e02b4633a40eb76a68e.squir...@webmail.harte-lyne.ca>
> Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 10:59:07 -0400
> Subject: PKTA01453294 Guardian Drug PU#655787
> From: "James Byrne (Exports)"
> To: . . .
As f
say about the registrar's
ethics and the domains it hosts? Should such companies and their clients be
boycotted and thereby coerced into dealing with these frauds?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte &a
apparently is not going to happen any time soon.
On a related note, what is the difference between 'body' and 'rawbody' rules?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limite
Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
even though the body of that message has 18 consecutive blank
lines, also consisting of nothing but \n characters.
So what is it about the regexp I am using that I evidently do not understand?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn
00 SW 1st Avenue
Suite 440
Portland
OR
97201
US
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive
egistrar and be done with it. Is there a spamassassin
whois plug-in that can parse and check the registrar and the domain creation
date?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://w
is only by
paid subscription? If it is not then paid then how long is the window between
registration and inclusion in the RBL?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.h
space in most cases.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561
***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
we
handle this?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
bin/sa-learn --username=Debian-exim --no-sync
--dbpath=/var/spool/exim4/.spamassassin/bayes -
-folders=/etc/spamassassin/sa-learn-folders.conf >>
/var/log/sa-learn-run.log
root@omega:/etc/cron.d#
--
-James
been just keeping the local config file since then.
I have made your suggested modifications to local.cf. Thank you again for
your assistance.
Regards,
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyn
/32
trusted_networks 192.168.0.0/16
. . .
auto_whitelist_factor 1
num_check_received 10
. . .
Are these directives deprecated? What misconfiguration is causing the
warnings to appear?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
mails with just hi! will be spam. I have
people/friends, that send mails like that to me, just to see if i'm
there/available.
Spammers would most likely have more than just "Hi!" in the mail body.
--
James Griffin: jmz at kontrol.kode5.net
A4B9 E875 A18C 6E11 F46D B788 BEE6 1251 1D31 DC38
s? A quick
> >scan of the usual sources did not satisfy.
>
> man spamc should say it:
>
>-s max_size, --max-size=max_size
Are you invoking spamc with procmail, which may specify a file size in
the procmail recipe?
--
James Griffin: jmz at kontrol.kode5.net
A4B9 E875 A18C 6E11 F46D B788 BEE6 1251 1D31 DC38
Sat 3.Aug'13 at 9:19:49 +0530, N. Raghavendra
> At 2013-08-02T09:38:42+01:00, James Griffin wrote:
>
> > Yes, of course you can. You can put SA on any machine that processes
> > mail no matter if it's been scanned prior to arriving at
Fri 2.Aug'13 at 12:55:40 +0530, N. Raghavendra
> At 2013-08-02T01:39:45+05:30, N. Raghavendra wrote:
>
> > I work in a setup where the external mail server (say,
> > extmail.example.com) in a DMZ runs Spamassassin as soon as mail arrives
> > from the Internet, and
Thu 25.Jul'13 at 1:31:16 +0200, Karsten
Bräckelmann
[ ... ]
> NOTE: Be careful of using sa-learn in different environments or ways in
> parallel. For example via the dovecot anti-spam plugin, from a cron job
> harvesting mbox files, maildir, processed through f
On 09/23/12 18:28, John Hardin wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Sep 2012, James wrote:
>
>> I wrote this little script to update the bayes rules. I can do this on my
>> imap account but my pop3 account gets way more spam and the messages are no
>> longer on the machine with sa once I
On 09/22/12 22:38, John Hardin wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Sep 2012, James wrote:
>> On 09/22/12 20:50, Glenn Sieb wrote:
>>> On 9/22/12 8:36 PM, Glenn Sieb wrote:
>>>> On 9/22/12 8:32 PM, James wrote:
>>>>> It didn't help. :-(
>>>>> I got s
On 09/22/12 20:50, Glenn Sieb wrote:
> On 9/22/12 8:36 PM, Glenn Sieb wrote:
>> On 9/22/12 8:32 PM, James wrote:
>>> It didn't help. :-(
>>> I got spam with a low score.
>>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
>
On 09/22/12 17:11, Daniel McDonald wrote:
>
>
>
> On 9/22/12 3:31 PM, "James" wrote:
>
>> Great thanks.
>>
>> I am lowering the required score to 3.
>
> That is generally not a desirable practice.
It didn't help. :-(
I got spam with
On 09/22/12 15:38, Martin Hepworth wrote:
> Itll use the lastest rule you downloaded as these are your core rules now
>
> Martin
>
> On Saturday, 22 September 2012, James wrote:
>
> I've been getting more spam recently so I did sa-update for the first
> tim
I've been getting more spam recently so I did sa-update for the first time in a
year (I thought it was automatic :-()).
I restarted the spamassassin service (Ubuntu).
$ /var/lib/spamassassin$ ll
total 16
drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Oct 15 2011 ./
drwxr-xr-x 45 root root 4096 Jun 12 06:40 ../
d
s for having an address removed.
One list manager's opinion.
- JimF
-
James T. Fortney, Principal
CSC Consulting Services
E-mail: fort...@cscconsulting.com
Snail:P.O. Box 3419
Camarillo, CA 93011-3419
--
On 2/25/11 6:32 AM, "Giles Coochey" wrote:
>On 25/02/2011 14:31, Giles Coochey wrote:
>> On 25/02/2011 14:18, James Lay wrote:
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> SoI was sent an email that was pretty much all in Chineseheaders
>>> below:
&g
Any way to tag this stuff as spam? Thanks folks!
James
On 1/29/11 5:15 PM, "Mark Martinec" wrote:
>On Saturday January 29 2011 15:51:25 James Lay wrote:
>> Just did a new install and I'm seeing the below when spamassassin is
>> checking an email:
>>
>> Jan 29 07:47:42 gateway spamd[15540]: dns: sendto(
teway spamd[15540]: Use of uninitialized value in string
ne at /usr/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.10.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/AsyncLoop.pm line
174, line 158.
DNS is working fine on the machine, resolve.conf is set with the right
information as well. Any hints on to why this is happening? Thanks all.
James
On 1/14/11 6:38 AM, "Jason Bertoch" wrote:
>On 2011/01/14 7:28 AM, James Lay wrote:
>> Hey All!
>>
>> Been a while since I did a full blown install of SpamAssassin, and as
>> I'm looking at my old setup, I see a fair amount of changes. I have the
&g
files (the bulk of
which are in /var/lib/spamassassin/3.003001/). Have rules been optimized or
something? Should I copy over all the SARE rules and setup RulesDuJour to
update, or leave as is? Thanks for the input.
James
iler also works great for stopping targeted phishing attacks, too,
which as a university we get a lot of.
Scamnailer is at http://www.scamnailer.info/
Thanks,
James
__
James Kelly
Network Administrator
IS&T Network Operations
Chapman University
Phone: 714-744-7833
Email: jake...@chapman.edu
---
On 2010-05-21 at 03:09+02 Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> 3.2.x is in maintenance, and gets emergency rule updates
> *exclusively*. As it has been for quite a long time.
>
> 3.3.x uses a new rule update model, and gets frequent updates. IFF
> the mass-check corpus is large enough.
And exactly whe
We are using the CommuniGate Pro mail server, which allows Outlook user
to submit messages using the Microsoft's MAPI protocol to submit
messages across the IMAP port. The problem that we are having is that
although the messages are submitted directly from an authenticated
client connection, sp
Yes I'm using amavisd-new, this got me on the right track.
Thanks,
James
On Mar 23, 2010, at 7:39 PM, Mark Martinec wrote:
James,
I have a few emails from internal servers that got flagged as SPAM.
I added trusted_networks 10.10.10.0/24 to my local.cf so that emails from
those servers a
there
a way I can reprocess those emails so they are delivered?
SpamAssassin V. 3.002005
Thanks,
James
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, LuKreme wrote:
On 04-Mar-10 21:41, James Smallacombe wrote:
I tried to upgrade from SA 3.2.5 to 3.3.0 by installing the newer one
from FreeBSD Ports.
Really? I just did a update of the port tree and yet
$ portversion p5-Mail-SpamAssassin
p5-Mail-SpamAssassin
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, RW wrote:
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 10:21:28 -0500 (EST)
James Smallacombe wrote:
I actually meant spamc's that had no spamd children to talk to. It
seems the ports version of SA replaced my original sa-spamd startup
script, which raised the max children from (default?) of
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 3/4/10 11:41 PM, James Smallacombe wrote:
I tried to upgrade from SA 3.2.5 to 3.3.0 by installing the newer one from
FreeBSD Ports. It seems that at least the Ports version thinks that the
latest SA requires perl 5.10.x, rather than 5.8.9
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, RW wrote:
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 23:41:38 -0500 (EST)
James Smallacombe wrote:
Installing from ports automatically installs perl
5.10.1 which causes spamc children to run wild and basically, spamd
can't cope with it.
I don't need or w
, but SA just
keeps looking for 510 and installing it when it doesn't find it.
Reading the SA docs, it doesn't seem to require anything later than
5.8.8...can anyone clue me in as to how to tell the ports version of it to
use 5.8.9? Or should I just use the source
Charles Gregory wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jan 2010, James Butler wrote:
>> . Gibberish in the form is just a probe.
>
> My experience has been that the gibberish gets around simplistic tests
> for 'empty' fields. That's why I advocate the use of a field that
> *
Jason Bertoch wrote:
> On 1/29/2010 12:44 PM, te...@cnysupport.com wrote:
>>
>> Really, I was just trying to figure out what the point would be for
>> someone to fill out the form with obviously invalid data.
>>
>
> My guess is that it's a spammer's bot looking for a broken web form to
> abuse.
>
M
laying the Klingons) on the mainframe side. The game
ended up being installed on HP calculators, where it undoubtedly played
better than during our mainframe sessions. Talk about network latency!
Fire a photon torpedo and wait about 5 minutes to find out if you hit
anything. Good times. Sorry about the sidetrack ... carry on!
James Butler
Oh yes ... there's no denying its complexity. But the desire to use
one's native tongue is quite simple.
James Butler
Pete McNeil wrote:
> James Butler wrote:
>> We've fielded many, many inquiries about the availability of Arabic
>> domain names over the past seve
We've fielded many, many inquiries about the availability of Arabic
domain names over the past several years. Don't underestimate the
backlash against everything being in English for so long ... there are
hordes (sorry) of folks who want to be able to use their native
charactersets.
Ja
wo countries, and probably doesn’t include email from other countries
where this takes place.
But by this definition, false positives do occur, and my company’s
SpamAssassin installation has to try to handle them.
James.
¹ Fortunately, they’re also unaware that signatures should be removed
when re
means that AWL really does work as an auto-white-list for us.
James.
--
E-mail: james@ | ... clueless he is not. He's just selective about which
aprilcottage.co.uk | clues to pay attention to.
| -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
name.
>
>>> full /Content-Type: image\/gif;\n[^a-z]+name=""/
I think you’ll find that’s one header on two lines, and mimeheader copes
with it.
Hope this helps,
James.
--
E-mail: james@ | “As for Nitel, the state telephone monopoly, the less
aprilcottage.co.uk | s
of a spam
>
> --=_NextPart_000_0075_01C9C5DF.A7950570
> Content-Type: image/png;
>name="DSL6672.png"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
> Content-ID:
> Content-Disposition: inline
>
> Any ideas ?
mimeheader LOCAL_DSL_ATTACHMENT Content-Type =~ /name=
ndows Mail be counted as a variant of
Outlook/Outlook Express? It’s not caught in __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA: should it
be?
Hope this helps,
James.
--
E-mail: james@ | ... a sign carefully conveying in pictograms the fact
aprilcottage.co.uk | that you should not leave wheelchairs on a certain river
hashes, and is inherently present in the naming scheme Justin as chosen.
James.
--
E-mail: james@ | top! to bottom from or backwards read not do I, post top
aprilcottage.co.uk | not do Please
| -- Jeff Vian
on the names being derived from the string.
Thanks,
James.
--
E-mail: james@ | Humans are humans. No one grouping is all good or all
aprilcottage.co.uk | bad, no one group has a monopoly on honour, decency or
| truth. Anyone that claims to have one is a
James Butler wrote:
> System: Fedora 10, Spamassassin 3.2.5, Perl 5.10.0
>
> The following error is preceded by log entry:
> spamc[PID]: skipped message, greater than max message size (512000 bytes)
>
> Error: spamc[PID]: oops! message_dump of 8192 returned different
> (there
this?
(I understand the error is related to spamc reading in one size and
writing out another. What I don't understand is why it is trying to
check the >512kb attachment after it claims to be skipping it.)
Thank you.
James
for this rule.
I’m not sure it’s worth putting these emails in a corpus: once you start
cherrypicking emails to make a point, the automatic score generation is
no longer statistically relevant.
James.
--
E-mail: james@ | “The duke had a mind that ticked like a clock and, like a
aprilcottage
by default: see
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/v310.pre?r1=563527&r2=759790&pathrev=759790
James.
--
E-mail: james@ | Q. "Why can't I print?"
aprilcottage.co.uk | A. "Because you're not a printer."
| -- Stephen Judd
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6059) one can do
a crude approximation by periodically resetting it.
Yes, you lose a lot of history. But it’s no worse than not having it at
all, which is what is due for 3.3.0.
James.
¹ Unless one uses a real SQL database.
--
E-mail: j
John Hardin wrote:
> No reason it shouldn't be. I'd suggest something like a rawbody match on
> /]/i meta'd with HTML_MESSAGE should be worth a few (dozen)
> points.
This would seem to FP on Microsoft HTML generated by certain versions of
Word. One example:
one or two DNSBLs?
And you’re missing the possibility of doing reverse DNS lookups, too.
James.
--
E-mail: james@ | A: Because people don’t normally read bottom to top.
aprilcottage.co.uk | Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
| A: Top-posting.
| Q:
Ricardo Kleemann wrote:
> Are SBL/XBL tests automatically enabled or is there a plugin I need to enable?
SBL/XBL are tested as part of the SpamAssassin ZEN list for 3.2.x if you
have network tests enabled.
Hope this helps,
James.
--
E-mail: james@ | “Sir, they’ve taken Mr. Rim
Kban35 wrote:
> I just upgraded my SA to 3.2.5 and now when I look in my /etc/init.d I do not
> see spamassassin listed anywhere in there.
Which OS? How did you upgrade – cpan? yum? apt-get? From where did you
get 3.2.5?
Thanks,
James.
--
E-mail: james@ | “Drums must never stop. Ve
ate links to Usenet posts, too – make sure that the group
name doesn’t contain a dot.
James.
--
E-mail: james@ | Q. "Why can't I print?"
aprilcottage.co.uk | A. "Because you're not a printer."
| -- Stephen Judd
les aimed at them can be very effective.
Alternatively, you could post sightings on
news.admin.net-abuse.sightings and see if Spamhaus pick up on them. That
way, more people can be spared their spam.
James.
--
E-mail: james@ | Remember, half-measures can be very effective if all you
aprilcotta
1 - 100 of 359 matches
Mail list logo
