-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/28/2009 04:32 PM, RobertH wrote:
hello
i have problems with the cabletv.org email list.
it is hosted on a charter static and has wierd reverse dns etc etc blah.
so, almost always scores as spam
here is what it is tripping on...
We're running Spamassasin on three machines, two Fedora 8 and one the
latest CENTOS. We're trying to move all of the SA installations to
CENTOS. These are MX servers that front an Exchange server.
The systems are all set up using the same .cf and init.d files, but
we're seeing a difference. We
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/26/2008 04:14 PM, Sam Ami wrote:
hi all
our current setup.
primary mx for all out email domains installation: qmail,spamassasin,clamav
all email is inline scanned and then relayed to the internal server
for delivery to users mailbox
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/01/2008 01:29 PM, Raymond Jette wrote:
Good afternoon,
I am trying to use sa-learn with a Microsoft Exchange server. The users
move spam / ham message from there Inbox to a Public folder. The public
folder is accessable via IMAP.
I've found Botnet 0.6 and references to Botnet 0.8(ebuild). What's the
preferred version for this plugin?
Marc Perkel wrote:
Need a little help for MySQL users.
I'm running several servers that are using a common MySQL server for
bayes for all the SA servers. What I'm seeing is that MySQL is just
plain unreliable. The database is often corrupted and it does so in a
manner that basically causes
forgetting?.
|
| Thanks.
|
| Steven Stern wrote:
| Crespillo, Matias wrote:
| I apologize in advance for making a lazy question, but is there a quick
| guide somewhere as to how to integrate Spam Assassin with an exchange
| server? Or maybe some way to set it in a way it will get the mails
| before
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/25/2008 06:32 PM, listmail wrote:
| I noticed that the AWL database was getting rather large, so I used the
| check_whitelist script to remove the stale entries. While this seems
to have
| removed a lot of entries from the database, it did not
?
|
| For the moment, I'm trying to find a simple solution, such as locating
a tool
| that is capable of managing whatever database SA uses by default for
the AWL.
|From looking at the scripts, it appears to be something built in to Perl.
|
| On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 18:49:01 -0500, Steven Stern wrote
| On 04/25/2008 06
I'm getting the following error from various perl programs:
$sa-update
Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at
/usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Scalar/Util.pm line 30.
OK... maybe we need an update:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# perl -MCPAN -e shell
cpan install
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/29/2008 03:57 PM, Bill Landry wrote:
| Steven Stern wrote:
| I'm getting the following error from various perl programs:
|
| $sa-update
| Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at
| /usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/28/2008 05:16 PM, fchan wrote:
| Hi,
| I have set my --max-child to 30 but I look at my logs and it appears
| that this is not obeyed.
|
| Here is my spamd options:
| SPAMDOPTIONS=-d -m 30 -H
|
| Here is what I see in the logs:
| Feb 28
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/28/2008 05:16 PM, fchan wrote:
| Hi,
| I have set my --max-child to 30 but I look at my logs and it appears
| that this is not obeyed.
|
| Here is my spamd options:
| SPAMDOPTIONS=-d -m 30 -H
|
| Here is what I see in the logs:
| Feb 28
Michael Parker wrote:
On Jan 23, 2008, at 9:54 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
It's finally started to remove tokens, so I think I'm OK. We use SQL
bayes, so it was an easy matter to use
~ delete from bayes_token where atime UNIX_TIMESTAMP();
to clean up the stuff from the future.
But now
We had a server go crazy last night and reset its date into August of
2277. In any case, we've resolved that, but now I can't get bayes to
expire.
After the clocks was correctly set, I deleted all tokens that had a
lastupdate in the future, and also removed similar bayes_seen rows. I
then
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/23/2008 07:35 PM, Matt Kettler wrote:
| Steven Stern wrote:
| We had a server go crazy last night and reset its date into August of
| 2277. In any case, we've resolved that, but now I can't get bayes to
| expire.
|
| After the clocks
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 03:28:06PM -0600, Steven Stern wrote:
bayes db version 0 indicates your bayes file is corrupt. It should be
version 3. Do you have a backup? SQL or .db?
It doesn't necessarily mean there's corruption,
in fact, since the learning continued
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/15/2008 07:24 AM, Umar Murtaza wrote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Who exactly is blocking this email?
| Can i have a settings to keep a copy/archive of this email, if it is
| blocked?
|
|
| Logs:
| Jan 15 18:18:43 mailserver sendmail[20774]:
Jason Bertoch wrote:
On Thursday, December 20, 2007 5:49 PM Steven Stern wrote:
Jason Holbrook wrote:
Hello all, anyone have an idea of how to get HAM's from an exchange /
Outlook environment back to SA?
I've posted a howto at
http://sstern.ccim.com/2006/07/14/training
Jason Holbrook wrote:
Hello all, anyone have an idea of how to get HAM’s from an exchange /
Outlook environment back to SA?
My incoming is scanned by a SA gateway but outgoing goes straight from
exchange to the cloud.
Best Regards,
Jason Holbrook
Chief Technology Integrator / Partner
Kenneth Porter wrote:
Anyone seen these? text/plain and HTML parts, seem to have same
content, saying there's a virus, please delete, and some gibberish.
I'm guessing it's some kind of probe.
There was a web address hidden by a malformed CSS tag.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/09/2007 03:27 PM, Mark Rigby-Jones wrote:
On 9 Dec 2007, at 21:03, Paweł Sasin wrote:
are you using network tests?
Try to evaluate spamd performance when run with the -L flag.
We are running network tests. Disabling them helps somewhat,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/17/2007 09:35 AM, robgeo730 wrote:
Hello I'm a new user, I have used the search function but wasn't able to find
a situation like mine.
I am fighting an uphill battle against a crappy hosting company that I can't
change from. We have our
We get many, many emails from a Robert Sexton who claims he'll do
wonders with search engine placement. As fast as I add an address to
the blacklist, he comes in with another. For example, from the AWL
tables on one of our MX servers:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/02/2007 11:06 AM, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 10:58:26AM -0500, Steven Stern wrote:
We get many, many emails from a Robert Sexton who claims he'll do
wonders with search engine placement. As fast as I add an address
mfahey wrote:
SpamAssassin-3.2.0
Freebsd6.2
The file bayes_seen has grown in size to 256GB! (274992939008)
How do I cap the size limit of this file? I want to have it not grow larger
then say 800mb at the most!
Thanks.
You can 'rm' the file or use MySQL for your backend and write a
Marc Perkel wrote:
OK - it's interesting that of all of you who responded this is the
only person who is doing it right. I have to say that I'm somewhat
surprised that so few people are preprocessing their email to reduce
the SA load. As we all know SA is very processor and memory expensive.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/16/2007 10:43 AM, Matt wrote:
I'm on Comcast and am having no problems. I set the smarthost for
sendmail to smtp.comcast.net and, at least so far, have not triggered
anything that would block incoming or outgoing mail. All mail from me
Igor Chudov wrote:
I am considering a local deal related to hosting by Comcast cable
(8mbps down, 1 mbps up).
I am concerned, however, with me sending email and being on comcast IP
range, due to bad rap that Comcast has due to spamming by Comcast
hosted zombies.
Do you think that my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Skip Brott wrote:
Using the recommended actions from this list, I run this:
sa-update --channelfile
/etc/mail/spamassassin/saupdate/sare-sa-update-channels.txt -D
I get this result from each channel:
[29610] dbg: gpg: gpg: Signature made
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Rudd wrote:
Further, I as the sender have no obligation to participate in your
anti-spam mechanism. It's YOUR mechanism. You feed it, you configure
it, your CPU cycles are spent on it. I have no obligation to
participate in the program
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wael Shahin wrote:
On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 09:18 +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Stéphane LEPREVOST schrieb:
Hi,
Got one yesterday too here. Seems to be a new way for spammers ...
I have two servers one is running DCC and one is not, the one
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gary V wrote:
I'm running amavisd-new with spamassassin and setup bayes and mysql
earlier
today. It seems to connect to the db fine with user vscan when running
spamassassin -d. I ran sa-learn --spam/ham spam.txt (full email headers
too) a few
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
diptanjan wrote:
Hi Friends,
I am getting an error when ever I am usinf sa-compile. can you please
checkout and tell me the reason behind it?
# sa-compile
[4846] info: generic: base extraction starting. this can take a while...
[4846] info:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My systems all were unable to connect for their daily RDJ update
yesterday. I time out trying to reach http://rulesemporium.com. Does
anyone know what's happening?
- --
Steve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
night duke wrote:
Currently i have this version of spamassassin
SpamAssassin version 3.1.7-deb
Can i update it to the last version?
Apt-get or yum or howto?
Thanks
I prefer to download the .tgz file from spamassassin.apache.org and
create the rpm myself via
rpmbuild -tb
night duke wrote:
I have debian...
*/Steven Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED]/* escribió:
night duke wrote:
Currently i have this version of spamassassin
SpamAssassin version 3.1.7-deb
Can i update it to the last version?
Apt-get or yum or howto
I've set up sa-compile successfully on two of our three servers. The
third gives this error:
Insecure dependency in mkdir while running with -T switch at
/usr/bin/sa-compile line 321, $fh line 1.
Googling around, there are references to editing a perl .pm file, but
this error points to the
Abba Communications - www.abbacomm.net wrote:
Greetings,
We have looked over the 3.2.0 install and upgrade docs as best we can so
far...
Situation:
running a Redhat 4.x or Centos 4.x server
SA 3.1.8
Everything is currently run site-wide and not user configurable
No MySQL in use.
Question(s)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm trying to flag a type of spam that seems to be slipping through with
a very low score
The common factor is that all of the messages have something linke
Just type www [.] pillking [.] org
Just type FONT color=#ffwww/FONT [.]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marc Perkel wrote:
Looking at the bayes_vars table and seeing 2 entries, spamd, and root.
I'd like to get rid of and per user info so that all learing is common.
Not sure why this is happening. What do I need to do to force everything
to one user?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
yossim wrote:
Hi folks, Hi can i learn miss identified junk mail that is store on
exchange or at the otulook clients? Can i simply copy those mails to a
folder on my Linux server and run sa-learn with the required parameters?
Kindly regards, Yossi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
yossim wrote:
Steve, I am not sure that i have anderstand the first script starting
with get_ham_spam were you use fetchmail (where the data is kept?) and
the last one get-ham-spam when you used wget command to get all the
ham.spam emails. Kindly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm having problems whitelisting mail sent through web sites with a from
address supplied by the user.
Case in point, I send an article from huffingtonpost.com to myself. I
used a whitelist from huffingtonpost.com, but that doesn't reduce the
spam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Bickerton wrote:
Thanks, but does this mean I have to keep/maintain a list of all the mail
farms. Keeping this list up to date sounds horrid/impossible.
Matthew
-Original Message-
From: --[ UxBoD ]-- [mailto:[EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- From this morning's log from three of our MX servers running SA 3.1.7.
Does the channel for 3.1.7 have the wrong rules?
config: configuration file
/tmp/.spamassassin8654JTlidztmp/20_advance_fee.cf requires version
3.002000 of SpamAssassin, but this
laradji nacer wrote:
Steven Stern a écrit :
I've been getting lots of these get out of debt messages. It looks
like the last stop before getting here is a gmail server. Could they
have an open relay?
No but gmail host personal domain not only @gmail.com .
Google Apps for Your Domain (GAYD
Andrea Bencini wrote:
I am looking for local.cf documentation to understand which are the
variables to set in this file.
Can you help me?
Thank
Andrea
man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
I've been getting lots of these get out of debt messages. It looks
like the last stop before getting here is a gmail server. Could they
have an open relay?
Received: from ccim-mx2.cciminstitute.com ([10.0.2.10]) by
ccim-exchange.cciminstitute.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, Steven Stern wrote:
I've been getting lots of these get out of debt messages. It
looks like the last stop before getting here is a gmail server.
Could they have an open relay?
Have you notified [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
You betcha! And also
David B Funk wrote:
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, Steven Stern wrote:
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, Steven Stern wrote:
I've been getting lots of these get out of debt messages. It
looks like the last stop before getting here is a gmail server.
Could they have an open relay?
Have you
Thomas Bolioli wrote:
when I run sa-update it puts new copies of the tests in
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.001005/updates_spamassassin_org which I
understand from the docs is the correct location. However, the default
tests remain in /usr/share/spamassassin/ and I believe they are still
being
Bazooka Joe wrote:
rules_du_jour seems to fail on lint. I am trying to figure that out
now but I have a different question. Has channels replaced
rules_du_jour? Should I be using something else to update my sare
rules?
thx
-bazooka
ps I am using SpamAssassin 3.1.4
pps below are
Fajar Priyanto wrote:
Hi all,
I try to upgrade my SA in mandrake 10.1.
I've downloaded the latest SA and build the rpm. But, when I tried to upgrade
it, it errored:
rpm -Uvh spamassassin-3.1.7-1.i586.rpm perl-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.7-1.i586.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
Odhiambo Washington wrote:
Hello List,
I have successfully (I hope) installed and run sa-update, and
I see that it installed files in /var/lib/spamassassin/3.001007/
In my FreeBSD box, I am used to the rules being in
/usr/local/share/spamassassin and /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin.
thekillerbean wrote:
We currently have an Exchange 2003 server that is under heavy burden due to
excessive SPAM. The company is not willing to spend $$$ to resolve the
issue if it can be done on Linux - especially being that we have several
Linux boxes lying idle! Hence, my plan is to
Ron Freidel wrote:
Hi All,
We run a relatively small (amount of clients) freebsd email hosting
server, was running spamassassin: 3.0.2 on a qmail server. We took on a
new client who was recieving alot of spam, as their old provider kept
telling them there was nothing that could be done
The following appears periodically in my maillog. I think it has to do
with an attempt to do a cpan upgrade or SpamAssassin that I had to back
out and replace with the Fedora RPM. In any case, is this anything to
worry about?
Sep 10 11:12:30 mooch spamd[26250]: (?:(?=[\s,]))* matches null
Lint keeps throwing out this line:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there something special about ebay?
Christopher Mills wrote:
Tell me something, is there a pluggin for outlook that would allow me to
train spamassassin on the web server?
Eg, messages come in, end up in my Junk Mail folder, can i somehow
select them, and click a button with this 'addin' and have it find our
web server and
These occur with spamassassin -D --lint. RDJ is up to date, as is
sa-update.
[6837] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has undefined dependency
'DCC_CHECK'
[6837] info: rules: meta test SARE_SPEC_PROLEO_M2a has dependency
'MIME_QP_LONG_LINE' with a zero score
[6837] info: rules: meta test
In our standard spam report, we have a line like
report For more info, see http://our.server/infopage.html
I'm adding content to the page and would like to add links to local anchors
report For more info, see http://our.server/infopage.html#anchor
It appears that SA treats the # as the start
Duane Hill wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006, Steven Stern wrote:
In our standard spam report, we have a line like
report For more info, see http://our.server/infopage.html
I'm adding content to the page and would like to add links to local
anchors
report For more info, see http://our.server
Jack Gostl wrote:
- Original Message -
*From:* Steven Stern mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Cc:* Spamass mailto:users@spamassassin.apache.org
*Sent:* Thursday, July 13, 2006 6:52 PM
*Subject:* Re: Image only spam
Jack Gostl wrote:
- Original Message - From: Steven Stern
Jack Gostl wrote:
- Original Message - From: Steven Stern
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Spamass users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 4:31 PM
Subject: Re: Image only spam
Jack Gostl wrote:
Thanks for the response.
Take it slow with me, spamassassin has been
Jack Gostl wrote:
I'm running SpamAssassin version 3.0.3 running on Perl version 5.8.2
under AIX 5.3. Starting a few months ago, I have been absolutely
inundated with image only spam. I've gone from catching 99% of the
spam with almost no false positives to less than 85%. I asked about this
- From: Steven Stern
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Spamass users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 9:13 AM
Subject: Re: Image only spam
Jack Gostl wrote:
I'm running SpamAssassin version 3.0.3 running on Perl version 5.8.2
under AIX 5.3. Starting a few months ago, I have
Richard E. Bewley, Jr. wrote:
Hi,
I'm using SpamAssassin version 3.1.3 running on Perl version 5.8.0. My
autolearn is enabled, and I'm getting the below headers, which according
to spamassassin documentation means that autolearn is enabled, but not
meeting required criteria to learn. I am
Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
Hi ALL
I have spamassassin-3.0.4-1.el4 installed by default in RHEL4 Linux
box, How do i configure spamassassin and integrate it with Sendmail
Thanks and Regards
Kaushal
Install spamass-milter to link spamassassin and Sendmail.
--
Steve
Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
On 7/3/06, Steven Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
Hi ALL
I have spamassassin-3.0.4-1.el4 installed by default in RHEL4 Linux
box, How do i configure spamassassin and integrate it with Sendmail
Thanks and Regards
Kaushal
Install spamass
jdow wrote:
From: Steven Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
Hi ALL
I have spamassassin-3.0.4-1.el4 installed by default in RHEL4 Linux
box, How do i configure spamassassin and integrate it with Sendmail
Thanks and Regards
Kaushal
Install spamass-milter to link
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, Michael Di Martino wrote:
How does one feed bayes ham and spam on an smpt gateway(no local
deliverey). All sever does is accetp mail for one 2 domains scrub
for virus and spam and then forward it to its nastly littly
exchange server.
Can you set
I've run sa-update and have files in /var/lib/spamassassin/3.001001,
002, and 003.
Am I supposed to move these somewhere?
Should all but the latest directory be deleted?
Is it necessary to run sa-update after installing 3.1.3?
--
Steve
Crespillo, Matias wrote:
I apologize in advance for making a lazy question, but is there a quick
guide somewhere as to how to integrate Spam Assassin with an exchange
server? Or maybe some way to set it in a way it will get the mails before,
filter and then forward them to exchange unchanged?.
Rich Winkel wrote:
According to Andrzej Adam Filip:
How do you deployed spamassassin?
I use a milter ...
If you're using spamass-milter, edit /etc/sysconfig/spamass-milter and
add excluded addresses with the -i paramater:
EXTRA_FLAGS=-i 192.168.1.0/24,127.0.0.1
--
Steve
Pablo Allietti wrote:
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 10:23:04PM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
Saturday 20 May 2006 21:54 skrev Pablo Allietti:
hi all, i have spamassassin for freebsd running in my system and i want
to modify a score but i dont have a 50_score
How i modify this score?
7.5 AWL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, fair enough...i downloaded and ran
rpmbuild -tb Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.1.tar.gz
As descibed on the site. I don't see any changes in the version number, is
there more I have to do ?
That just creates the RPM files in /usr/src/redhat/RPMS. Did you install
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doh, no...can you point me in the direction of how to do that?
on 5/12/06 8:23 AM, Steven Stern at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, fair enough...i downloaded and ran
rpmbuild -tb Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.1.tar.gz
As descibed on the site
Chris Edwards wrote:
Hola,
I have spent two days trying to figure out how to get the following to
work. I have set up Spamassassin and ClamAV, I am running sendmail on
the Solaris 10 platform. I would like to be able to scan for all spam
and virus (in, out and relayed email). Can someone
On a new SA installation that's as identical to the other 3 we have
running as possible, bayes is not running.
spamassassin -D --lint indicates that all is normal. The test message
generates a Bayes score. sa-learn is able to talk to the mysql
database: We're able to update the database using
Andy Spiegl wrote:
[3320] dbg: bayes: corpus size: nspam = 178, nham = 168
Probably because your corpus is still too small.
man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
...
bayes_min_ham_num(Default: 200)
bayes_min_spam_num (Default: 200)
To be accurate, the Bayes
Michael Monnerie wrote:
On Mittwoch, 10. Mai 2006 16:01 Steven Stern wrote:
I imported a corpus of about 2 messages total and it wasn't
working. I blew it all away and started from scratch thinking that
was the problem. For now, local.cf has a minimum of 100 messages of
each type
After installing 3.1.1 by building the RPM from the .tar.gz file, I get
the following in my log:
Mar 11 22:51:52 mooch spamd[15660]: List::Util object version 1.14 does
not match bootstrap parameter 1.18 at
/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi/XSLoader.pm line 92.
Mar 11 22:51:52
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 10:54:50PM -0600, Steven Stern wrote:
After installing 3.1.1 by building the RPM from the .tar.gz file, I get
the following in my log:
Hrm. None of these are SpamAssassin related, fwiw.
Mar 11 22:51:52 mooch spamd[15660]: List::Util object
Webmaster wrote:
Those of you you have used both native DBM and new SQL bayesian,
can you comment on benefits of one versus the other please.
Much appreciated!
I have three MX servers fronting our Exchange box. The fastest of the
MX servers is also handling the MySQL server for both
M. Lewis wrote:
I recently lost a hard drive and have had to setup everything again.
I'm seeing a fair amount of spam that is getting through my filters.
From what I can see in the headers of messages, bayes does not seem to
be used at all. I'm reasonable sure this is the reason I'm seeing
M. Lewis wrote:
Thanks Steve,
# sa-learn --dump magic
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000 0 57468 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0 16419 0 non-token data: nham
0.000 0 181931 0
Original Message
Subject: re: rpm of Spam Assassin
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 12:23:35 -0600
From: Skip [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steven,
Thanks for the reply re: the rpm build of SpamAssassin 3.1.0. I also
did the build on my system, but I can't find the location of where the
build
Al Bogner wrote:
My hoster offers cpanel to configure spamassassin, which has only a few
options to configure, like white and blacklist. But I have shell-access to my
account and maybe I could try out how to delete spam automatically. It looks
like amavis isn't used on this RedHat machine with
Ole Nomann Thomsen wrote:
Hi, can I ask a small favor from some of you running SA with Bayes enabled:
Please run the following perl-oneliner on your SA-log (mine is current):
perl -ne 'if (/result:/) {$n++; $b++ if (/BAYES/);} } print $b/$n,\n; {'
current
(I promise it's not a rootkit :-)
I
I just installed an update for Perl for Fedora 4 and now...
Dec 17 11:08:02 mooch spamd[3144]: List::Util object version 1.14 does
not match bootstrap parameter 1.18 at
/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi/XSLoader.pm line 92.
Dec 17 11:08:02 mooch spamd[3144]: List::Util object
I have one user who insists on seeing all mail sent to her. (OK, it's my
wife.)
I added all_spam_to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to local.cf and that makes it work
for her. However, if there are other recipients bcc'd on the the email,
then the all_spam_to negative score gets applied to the message and
Matt Kettler wrote:
Steven Stern wrote:
I have one user who insists on seeing all mail sent to her. (OK, it's my
wife.)
I added all_spam_to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to local.cf and that makes it work
for her. However, if there are other recipients bcc'd on the the email,
then the all_spam_to
Robert Menschel wrote:
Hello Steven,
Thursday, December 1, 2005, 6:57:45 PM, you wrote:
SS In order to keep our mail flowing to AOL members, I've signed up through
SS the AOL postmaster service to receive TOS reports. Basically, whenever
SS someone reports mail from our domains as spam, AOL
In order to keep our mail flowing to AOL members, I've signed up through
the AOL postmaster service to receive TOS reports. Basically, whenever
someone reports mail from our domains as spam, AOL forwards it to me.
(They delete the addressee from the headers, although not completely so
Justin Mason wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
you should _definitely_ whitelist AOL's scomp source address -- preferably
using whitelist_from_spf, as they publish a reliable SPF record
for aol.net.
- --j.
Thanks. That did the trick:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-94.8
John Woolsey wrote:
Is SA more effective than popfile? And can you manually train it (if you have
root access)?
- thanx - JAW
I set up popfile on clients' computers to help them both with spam and
categorization, but it's not the best solution to spam.
Jason Kratzer wrote:
Do I need to install the module or can I run it from the install
directory. I was unable to find the documentation for it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tools]# ./sa-stats.pl
Can't locate Parse/Syslog.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
perl -MCPAN -e shell
install Parse::Syslog
jdow wrote:
From: Steven Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jason Kratzer wrote:
Do I need to install the module or can I run it from the install
directory. I was unable to find the documentation for it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tools]# ./sa-stats.pl
Can't locate Parse/Syslog.pm in @INC (@INC
Andreas Kotowicz wrote:
attached email doesn't get any score. why is that?
cheers,
andreas
What rules are you using? This is what I got from your email. Seems
like a little bit of bayes training should catch it.
result:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.8 required=5.0
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
