Re: Spamassassin and SPF records with +all

worthless but I think the -all option should be considered as valid, because at least the sys-admin gives instruction to reject what is not defined by his SPF record. So it should be treated by the receiver MTA as it is meant. Hans -- XTrade Assessory International Facilitator BR - US - CA

Re: why don't banks do more against phishing?

Martin Gregorie wrote: On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 14:25 +0100, RW wrote: On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 01:20:13 -0300 xTrade Assessory wrote: no serious bank, as any other serious company, would ever send out emails asking for user details the user who believes that, is or incredible ingenious

Re: why don't banks do more against phishing?

not review the content and web admins who do not have a clew about what they are doing Hans -- XTrade Assessory International Facilitator BR - US - CA - DE - GB - RU - UK +55 (11) 4249. http://xtrade.matik.com.br

Re: Slip thu's

or OR, you should not do that and better hang on to content analysis for evaluation/scoring Hans -- XTrade Assessory International Facilitator BR - US - CA - DE - GB - RU - UK +55 (11) 4249. http://xtrade.matik.com.br

Re: New versions of Perl are slower

from 32400 processed msgs, daily average for last week for one of my midsize server I do not see any difference between machines with perl 5.8 or 5.14 Hans -- XTrade Assessory International Facilitator BR - US - CA - DE - GB - RU - UK +55 (11) 4249. http://xtrade.matik.com.br

Re: New versions of Perl are slower

about perl performance IMO, if you really have scan times over 20 seconds (as you query your log for) you may have other problems, not perl related problems but as always, only my opinion Hans -- XTrade Assessory International Facilitator BR - US - CA - DE - GB - RU - UK +55 (11) 4249. http

Re: sa-update

you nned to run sa-update, then sa-compile and then restart spamd ... and check the log if it comes up clean Hans -- XTrade Assessory International Facilitator BR - US - CA - DE - GB - RU - UK +55 (11) 4249. http://xtrade.matik.com.br

Re: was: Allowing IMAP users to train spam/ham is:simplify training of misclassified emails

got on certain accounts 50 SPAMS per day, now 2 maybe 3 and that numbers are for mservers with each of them having +50.000 accounts going through Hans -- XTrade Assessory International Facilitator BR - US - CA - DE - GB - RU - UK +55 (11) 4249. http://xtrade.matik.com.br

Re: A flood of new domains ?

is probably not relevant for europe Hans -- XTrade Assessory International Facilitator BR - US - CA - DE - GB - RU - UK +55 (11) 4249. http://xtrade.matik.com.br

Re: A flood of new domains ?

as possible in order to get still to the endpoint Hans -- XTrade Assessory International Facilitator BR - US - CA - DE - GB - RU - UK +55 (11) 4249. http://xtrade.matik.com.br

Re: SPF_FAIL

, SPF would be taken much more serious by the ~admins and life could be a little better :) Hans -- XTrade Assessory International Facilitator BR - US - CA - DE - GB - RU - UK +55 (11) 4249. http://xtrade.matik.com.br

Re: does bayes_auto_learn expire bayes

and also, of course sending a real pizza over here :) cheers Hans -- XTrade Assessory International Facilitator BR - US - CA - DE - GB - RU - UK +55 (11) 4249. http://xtrade.matik.com.br

Re: Σχετ: Mark message as spam from Postfix Queue

for each step ... that eventually gets your machine real busy ... at least join all this greps into one grep -e pattern -e pattern or egrep pattern1|pattern2 but then when you have the score what do you do with it? Hans -- XTrade Assessory International Facilitator BR - US - CA - DE - GB - RU

Re: Σχετ: Mark message as spam from Postfix Queue

Bowie Bailey wrote: On 3/8/2012 5:19 AM, xTrade Assessory wrote: Tom Kinghorn wrote: You can then grep through the spam files and search for a common string, eg score. e.g # cd /amavis/virusmails # # ls -la | grep spam | grep Mar 8 | awk '{print $9}' | xargs zgrep -i score= wow 5

Re: dccifd error

LuKreme wrote: On Mar 4, 2012, at 21:34, xTrade Assessory xtr...@matik.com.br wrote: you can disable the plugin or setup use_dcc 0 in local.cf The plugin *was* disabled in v310, but the errors still showed up in the maillog, which is what started this. As far as I can see, dcc was never

Re: Allowing IMAP users to train spam/ham

, other than throwing more iron at the problem, is there something I can do to make this process a little smarter? Make it work with the virtual users without generating a massive db file? -- XTrade Assessory International Facilitator BR - US - CA - DE - GB - RU - UK +55 (11) 4249. http

Re: dccifd error

-servers.net,- RTT+1000 ms anon dcc4.dcc-servers.net,- RTT+1000 ms anon dcc5.dcc-servers.net,- RTT+1000 ms anon not sure but probably the dccifd is the remote daemon and since DCC is a commerial service you might not have a account there, so you cannot connect ... ? Hans -- XTrade

Re: dccifd error

LuKreme wrote: On 04 Mar 2012, at 05:38 , xTrade Assessory wrote: not sure but probably the dccifd is the remote daemon and since DCC is a commerial service you might not have a account there, so you cannot connect ... ? http://www.rhyolite.com/dcc/ The non-commercial DCC software

Re: Spamassassin detect my mails as spam

Michelle Konzack wrote: Hello xTrade Assessory, Am 2012-03-01 16:27:41, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: your domain has no A Record --[ command 'dig ANY tamay-dogan.net' ]- ;; Truncated, retrying in TCP mode. tamay-dogan.net. 3600IN SOA dns1

Re: Spamassassin detect my mails as spam

Michelle Konzack wrote: Hello xTrade Assessory, Am 2012-03-03 14:59:16, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: not quite ... your domain has no A record Ehm: tamay-dogan.net. 3600IN MX 10 mail.tamay-dogan.net. mail.tamay-dogan.net. 3600IN A 78.47.247.21 Do I

Re: Spamassassin detect my mails as spam

Benny Pedersen wrote: Den 2012-03-03 19:25, xTrade Assessory skrev: the A record for a domain is the fall back for MTAs if no MX is available what mta do try this ? any , what rfc says there must be a A for every hostname pr MX ? firstable what you wrote here does not make any sense

Re: Spamassassin detect my mails as spam

Benny Pedersen wrote: Den 2012-03-03 18:59, xTrade Assessory skrev: not quite ... your domain has no A record dig ANY www.tamay-dogan.net a dig ANY www.tamay-dogan.net both works here first BS is querying the www record second, BS is both works, what firstable is no answer at all

Re: Spamassassin detect my mails as spam

if it has an MX the missing A Record may be a cause of msgs being rejected on certain mailservers, most probably after HELO before any antispam hooks in, but if it goes through, it might be possible that there are antispams (custom or not) looking for the domain A Record as well Hans -- XTrade

T_DKIM_INVALID + missing SPF_PASS

X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD -- XTrade Assessory International Facilitator BR - US - CA - DE - GB - RU - UK +55 (11) 4249. http://xtrade.matik.com.br