Re: spamassassin learn spam

Hi Harald, yes i execute this as the root user. but with which user i have to execute sa-lean --spam if i use amavisd? per default you can't switch to the amavis user to execute the learn command. cheers

spamassassin learn spam

hi, i have spamassassin on my centos7 system. sometimes i received spammails and i would like to learn this mails as spam with sa-learn --spam. but it doesn't seem to work, because the spamscore is before and after the same. what i did?: i have a spammail in my inbox as maildir format. when i

RE: The quality of the squidblacklist.org blacklists

GUI for easy administration and management of your incoming and ougoing email for your organization. Anti-spam, anti-virus and anti-malware protection, encrypted S/MIME, encrypted PDF and SMTP TLS support, built-in email archiving, end-user self-service web gui. Download the free open-source

Re: Problem with SPF plugin and MX2

You are totally right, fixed! Thank you! 2016-05-25 13:24 GMT+02:00 RW : > > It sounds like you haven't setup internal_networks and trusted_networks. > > https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/TrustPath > >

Problem with SPF plugin and MX2

Hi, We are expecting a problem when emails are coming from our MX2 with the SPF plugin, because the SPF test is made on the last "Received" IP and not the first one (as we can expect for a SPF test). So if the domain is one of our domain, the result is always SPF_PASS when the email arrived from

AW: howto do re-scoring of rules with a custom channel?

files. (e.g. to xsaInternalChannel) Best regards, Harald Binkle Von: Kevin A. McGrail [mailto:kmcgr...@pccc.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. Juli 2015 11:27 An: Support SpamAssassin; users@spamassassin.apache.org Betreff: Re: howto do re-scoring of rules with a custom channel? On 7/16/2015 5:21 AM

howto do re-scoring of rules with a custom channel?

Hi, We created our own internal channel to feed our SpamAssassin installations with some custom rules. Recently tried to re-score a SpamAssassin rule using the channel files, but it does not work. When the channel is updated it correctly downloads the saInternalChannel_mydoamin_com.cf

Re: Spam messages autolearned as ham

On 9/25/2014 6:31 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 24.09.14 14:03, Deeztek Support wrote: score BAYES_000.000 why 0? current is -1.5 without and -1.9 with network checks... Do you mean that the default is supposed to be -1.5 without networks tests and -1.9 with network tests? X

Re: Spam messages autolearned as ham

On 9/25/2014 9:26 AM, Deeztek Support wrote: On 9/25/2014 6:31 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 24.09.14 14:03, Deeztek Support wrote: score BAYES_000.000 why 0? current is -1.5 without and -1.9 with network checks... Do you mean that the default is supposed to be -1.5 without

Re: Spam messages autolearned as ham

thoughts? you changed a score and SA did what you told it to. I changed it as per the suggestion of Matus UHLAR - fantomas What are you trying to achieve (other than using the SA list as your changes log) Is that a trick question? I'm trying to ensure that spam messages are indeed

Re: Spam messages autolearned as ham

On 9/25/2014 10:51 AM, John Hardin wrote: If BAYES_00 hits on a spam, that indicates training issues. I understand. Since you're reporting problems with autolearn, that's not at all surprising. Your bayes database is probably polluted. You are probably going to have to wipe and retrain

Re: Spam messages autolearned as ham

On 9/25/2014 1:25 PM, John Hardin wrote:. While your Postfix may be doing DNS blocklist checks on the sending MTA, I sincerely doubt that Postfix is parsing message bodies to pull out URI domains and checking them. That's what URIBL is. Is there a place to configure the URIBLs that SA uses

Spam messages autolearned as ham

Hello, I'm using the following spamassassin: SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 running on Perl version 5.10.1 On Ubuntu 10.04 LTS. I'm having a strange problem with messages being autolearned as ham even though they don't score low enough. Here's my local.cf config: use_bayes 1 use_bayes_rules

RE: A SpamAssassin Crash Course for Admins

Hi there, There isn't really much documentation for any Windows related topics since Michael Bell's tutorial site is offline as well as SpamAssassin for Win32 project being discontinued. However, while compiling an own version of native (so not Cygwin based) Windows SpamAssassin, I've written

Re: spamassassin - more children / faster scanning

I have had many helpful responses and I appreciate it. Some simple answers : The system is a Linode 512 which is a virtual server hosted on a larger system of which I don't have the true specifications. Howerver, it runs as a 4 CPU/Core system with 512M of memory. I am looking at adding

Re: spamassassin - more children / faster scanning

That sound great! We are using PostFix Thank You Russ Ned Slider wrote: On 01/11/10 13:17, John Hardin wrote: On Mon, 1 Nov 2010, Russ Sanders wrote: Suggestions will be appreciated. You want to do things at SMTP time to reduce your email volume. Greylisting has been suggested; I

Re: spamassassin - more children / faster scanning

Great! -- thank you! I appreciate all advice ... and will start reading Thanks Russ Ned Slider wrote: On 01/11/10 19:12, EACSI Support wrote: That sound great! We are using PostFix Thank You Russ Ah, great. Here's a couple guides I wrote for greylisting and postfix

RE: [SpamAssassin] Re: First run score: 25.7 Second: 2.6

From: Emin Akbulut [mailto:eminakbu...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 1:54 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org P.S: In my case all tests done in same input, but outputs have different scores. Does not spamd 3.3.1 (JAM) support logging? I want to log some info

RE: [SpamAssassin] Re: First run score: 25.7 Second: 2.6

From: Emin Akbulut [mailto:eminakbu...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 1:54 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org P.S: In my case all tests done in same input, but outputs have different scores. Does not spamd 3.3.1 (JAM) support logging? I want to log some info... My recent scores

Re: First run score: 25.7 Second: 2.6

-Original Message- From: Charles Gregory Now if I have to GUESS on insufficient data, I would suspect that the 'port' of spamd to Windows(?) does not properly tidy up its children when finished. The fact that it crashes certainly points in this direction. May I presume that you

Re: Problem with faked return-path or something like that...!

a Communigate problem. Present this issue to your support resources for that product. The basics of what you want to do are something like this: When a message is arriving from the internet, and has your own domain in the Return-path, it should be REJECTED immediately. The detection

Re: Spam slipping through

On Sat, 2008-12-06 at 23:45 -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote: On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 08:00:10PM -0800, John Hardin wrote: mechanism for. Devs: there've been wishes for this before; how hard would it be to add the ability to match on the substring match captured by another rule? Add a flag to

Re: Spam slipping through

On Sat, 2008-12-06 at 10:17 -0700, Mike Cisar wrote: Have recently been having 1000's of spam slipping past Spamassassin... they all seem to be pretty much identical in format but Spamassassin isn't scoring them even high enough to be tagged. - they are all flagged as important - a single

Re: Spam slipping through

On Sat, 2008-12-06 at 11:48 -0800, John Hardin wrote: On Sat, 6 Dec 2008, Mike Cisar wrote: - the from always matches the to (so it always looks like its coming from yourself) Silly, basic question: have you whitelist_from'd yourself? Baaad idea. SPF checks would catch that if you

RE: New free blacklist: BRBL - Barracuda Reputation Block List

On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 11:24 +0100, Chris Russell wrote: The problem is in false positives - you won't get any mail with it I've had servers listed on Barracuda before, despite 17 emails to their support systems we never had any response, and had to change a customers mail architecture

Re: New free blacklist: BRBL - Barracuda Reputation Block List

Err, the default behaviour is NDR's are off, in fact. On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 10:08 -0700, fchan wrote: You can set up Barracuda to not to reply to spam which is default behavior, which I hate. This is the backscatter we all experienced from Barracuda devices. I set one up for a friend but it

open of auto-whitelist file failed

Hi SA 3.2.4 on FC3 spamd is started by script and is running as root. maillog shows various users with spamd[5648]: auto-whitelist: open of auto-whitelist file failed: auto-whitelist: cannot open auto_whitelist_path /home/domain/domain71/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist No such file or

Re: open of auto-whitelist file failed

- Original Message - From: Obantec Support [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 8:12 AM Subject: open of auto-whitelist file failed Hi SA 3.2.4 on FC3 spamd is started by script and is running as root. maillog shows various users

config: not parsing, 'allow_user_rules' is 0

Hi a list user offered an fix to help sort out bounce messages. in my mail logs i see Jun 16 10:23:54 proteus2 spamd[14855]: config: not parsing, 'allow_user_rules' is 0: meta BOUNCED_SPAM (ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE BAYES_99) meta BOUNCED_SPAM (ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE BAYES_99) is in user_prefs for

Re: Undeliverable mails

- Original Message - From: John Hardin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Obantec Support [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 6:06 PM Subject: Re: Undeliverable mails On Wed, 4 Jun 2008, Obantec Support wrote: i looked over the above and my server

Re: Undeliverable mails

- Original Message - From: Benny Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 3:17 PM Subject: Re: Undeliverable mails On Wed, June 4, 2008 16:04, Jack Gostl wrote: Does anyone have any suggestions?

SA 3.2.4 --lint errors?

Hi Just built SA3.2.4 on FC3 and running spamassassin --lint i get [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.4]# spamassassin --lint [29374] warn: plugin: failed to parse plugin (from @INC): Bareword Mail::SpamAssassin::Constants::CHARSETS_LIKELY_TO_FP_AS_CAPS not allowed while strict subs in

mass bounced emails

Hi Running SA3.2.3 but seeing a lot of bounced emails being sent to my customers. (not emails they are sending out but faked returns) various subjects From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mail Delivery System) Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Delivery Status

Re: SA date on 2 tmp file 1970

- Original Message - From: Martin.Hepworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: SpamAssassin Users users@spamassassin.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 7:15 AM Subject: Re: SA date on 2 tmp file 1970 Mark you mean 3.2.3 rather than 2.3.2??? ;-) -- martin Yes! snip

SA date on 2 tmp file 1970

Hi SA 2.3.2 on FC3 time and date on server is correct but during routine checks i found to files in /tmp .spamassassin12592Gefj53tmp .spamassassin12592PV3qZLtmp both dated Jan/70 gone now but should i worry about the date? Mark

Re: sa-update

- Original Message - From: Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Obantec Support [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 11:29 PM Subject: Re: sa-update Obantec Support wrote: Hi i run sa-update from cron and last update seems to be Oct18 2007

sa-update

Hi i run sa-update from cron and last update seems to be Oct18 2007 running spamassassin 3.2.3 on FC3 /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002003 updates_spamassassin_org.cf first line is # UPDATE version 585505 not seen any reports on list of sa-update issues any pointers welcomed. Mark

Re: is lock needed when using spamd/c combo

- Original Message - From: Matthias Häker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: spamassassin-users users@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 4:49 PM Subject: Re: is lock needed when using spamd/c combo John D. Hardin schrieb: On Mon, 1 Oct 2007, Obantec Support wrote

is lock needed when using spamd/c combo

Hi 3.2.3 SA on FC3 just need to ensure i have the master .procmailrc syntax correct for spamc i am using DROPPRIVS=yes :0fw * 512000 | /usr/bin/spamc :0: * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes $HOME/mail/spam do i need to use the lock as per the procmail.example which uses :0fw: spamassassin.lock *

prefork: child states: II

Hi just upgraded to 3.2.3 from 3.1.3 now using spamd seeing this in maillog Sep 29 10:37:18 proteus2 spamd[6801]: rules: meta test FM__TIMES_2 has dependency 'FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D' with a zero score Sep 29 10:37:18 proteus2 spamd[6801]: rules: meta test FM_SEX_HOST has dependency

SA 3.1.3 scores 0.0

Hi i just received a few emails with no body but subject Subject: tsg SAVE 82%: VIAGR*, AMBIE*, CIALI*, XANA*, RIVOTRI*, LEVITR*,CIPRO, MERIDI*, CELEBRE*, VALIU* thought X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=4.5 tests=none autolearn=failed version=3.1.3 any idea how to trap this sort of spam.

spam not caught

Hi this is the first spam i have seen with this header cut down version X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on proteus2.obantec.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=4.5 tests=none autolearn=failed version=3.1.3 Subject: Fwd: You Need a Better Degree,{}

image spam where is plugin directory on FC3 using SA3.1.3

Hi i am reading the link http://www.rulesemporium.com/plugins.htm#imageinfo then the .pm file and do not have a plugins directory. where does the .pm file go? i assume the .cf goes in /etc/mail/spamassassin and i edit v310.pre then restart spamd Mark

Re: 0451.com

- Original Message - From: Hamish Marson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Duncan Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 3:11 PM Subject: Re: 0451.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Duncan Hill wrote: On Monday 07 August 2006

Re: 0451.com

- Original Message - From: Ben Wylie [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: Saturday, August 05, 2006 2:38 PM Subject: 0451.com A question for those of you who have large databases of spam and ham to check, do genuine emails come from the domain 0451.com or whether

Re: sa-update (sa v 3.1.4)

:18 3.001003 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Aug 3 14:38 updates_spamassassin_org -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2151 Aug 3 14:38 updates_spamassassin_org.cf i.e. put the udates above the current version directory. once the 3.001003 is created should i add it to the updatedr path? Mark -- Obantec Support

Re: sa-update (sa v 3.1.4)

- Original Message - From: Theo Van Dinter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 3:01 PM Subject: Re: sa-update (sa v 3.1.4) Hi Theo your right i just ran sa-update and it updated the /var/lib/spamassassin/3.001003 folder files. Mark

Re: spam not detected

- Original Message - From: Beast [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 9:08 AM Subject: Re: spam not detected Loren Wilton wrote: *X-Spam-Status:* No, score=3.8 required=5.2 tests=BAYES_99,FORGED_RCVD_HELO, HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE

Re: SA 3.1.0 spamd error

- Original Message - From: Theo Van Dinter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 5:13 PM Subject: Re: SA 3.1.0 spamd error thanks for the link http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RuleUpdates it helped a bit. how often should i run sa-update?

bayes sitewide

Hi i added the lines bayes_path /etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes bayes_file_mode 0770 to local.cf and restarted spamd maillog shows config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, /etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes is not valid for bayes_path, skipping: bayes_path /etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes Mark

Re: bayes sitewide

- Original Message - From: Michael Scheidell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Obantec Support [EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2006 12:27 PM Subject: RE: bayes sitewide -Original Message- From: Obantec Support [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent

Re: bayes sitewide

- Original Message - From: Logan Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2006 5:03 PM Subject: Re: bayes sitewide On Sun, 23 Jul 2006, Obantec Support wrote: /etc/mail/spamassassin exists and is chown root.root and chmod 755 bayes dir

Re: bayes sitewide

- Original Message - From: Theo Van Dinter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2006 6:30 PM Subject: Re: bayes sitewide Hi just changing the bayes line to bayes_path /etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes/bayes worked as i no longer see an error on

SA 3.1.0 spamd error

Hi i have just built 3.1.0 using perl Makefile.PL PREFIX=/usr/local make make install trying to use the start-up script as root i get [EMAIL PROTECTED] spamd]# /etc/rc.d/init.d/spamassassin start Starting spamd: ERROR! spamassassin script is v3.00, but using modules v3.001003! SA 3.0.0 is

Re: SA 3.1.0 spamd error

- Original Message - From: Ralf Hildebrandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 12:06 PM Subject: Re: SA 3.1.0 spamd error * Obantec Support [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi i have just built 3.1.0 using perl Makefile.PL PREFIX=/usr/local

Re: SA 3.1.0 spamd error

- Original Message - From: jdow [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 2:01 PM Subject: Re: SA 3.1.0 spamd error From: Ralf Hildebrandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Obantec Support [EMAIL PROTECTED]: i was being over curious so if 3.1.0 failed i

3.0.0 to 3.1.3 upgrade

Hi is they anything i need to watch out for or can i just stop SA and build the newer version. i am thinking of bayes database files. (not using Mysql). i have read the upgrade file but just want to cross the i's and dot the t's before jumping in. Mark

upgrade path

Hi currently i run SA3.0.0 on FC3 with stock perl 5.8.5 and sendmail 8.13.x should i upgrade to the 3.1 path or continue on the 3.0 path Mark

blank emails

Hi lately i am seeing a few blank emails either 0Kb or 1Kb size. No body or subject. SA 3.0.0 header X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.7 required=4.5 tests=HELO_DYNAMIC_DIALIN, MISSING_SUBJECT,MSGID_FROM_MTA_ID autolearn=no version=3.0.0 anyone else getting these? Mark -- No virus found in this

koko petrol spams

Hi SA3.0.0 on FC3 anyone got a way of scoring these spam's (randomchars.gif) i assume others have received them on this list. Mark -- Obantec Support www.obantec.net 0845 458 3121 WebHosting and Domains Nominet UK Member IPStag Holder CentralNic Accredited Reseller

Re: koko petrol spams

- Original Message - From: Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 10:48 AM Subject: Re: koko petrol spams Hi Mark Obantec Support wrote: anyone got a way of scoring these spam's (randomchars.gif) i assume others have received them

Re: koko petrol spams

- Original Message - From: Loren Wilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 1:02 PM Subject: Re: koko petrol spams anyone got a way of scoring these spam's (randomchars.gif) i assume others have received them on this list.

looking for advice for best setup using SA

Hi FC3 I am running SA 3.0 clamav 0.87.1 clamav-milter 0.87 (the addition of the latter has cut back on the virus emails big-time. what else can i add to reduce spam and viruses. Mark

Re: seeing a few new spams with low SA scoring

@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 5:20 PM Subject: RE: seeing a few new spams with low SA scoring From: Obantec Support [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Example Spam (trimmed to the basics) ] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: You visit illegal websites Dear

spam file ownership

Hi i have SA3.0 on FC3 with spam delivered to $HOME/mail/spam quota's enabled for /home where users live /var where users mail lives. problem is the ownership is $uid.$gid of said user which means it eats into the quota of the user if they don't read and delete the spam. normal mail is

Re: Low detection rate

Greetings Martin: Use surbl. Thank you. At 04:18 PM 4/25/2005, you wrote: Hi All, We have been using SA for the past year and a half with detection rates around 95% or better (based on client feedback). Over the past couple days (since Thursday April 21st) we have been getting lots of spam

Re: connect(AF_INET) to spamd failed

Greetings Pat: Check the following: 1. /tmp is not full. 2. The directory where the spamd socket is created has the correct ownership (uid, guid) and permissions; if it is not in the /tmp area, then also make sure the area the socket is created is not full. Thank you. At 07:46 AM

Is it possible to use SURBL without enabling all network tests?

SURBL -- http://www.surbl.org/ -- to be the most productive. Is there a way to enable network tests for just SURBL (we have a local, kept up to date with rsync, copy)? Thank you. Peter M. Abraham Support and Customer Care Department Dynamic Net

Spam Assassin pattern help for regular expression

used? Specifically the directory pattern right after the domain name. Thank you. Peter M. Abraham Support and Customer Care Department Dynamic Net, Inc. Helping companies do business on the Net 420 Park Road; Suite 201 Wyomissing PA 19610 Toll

Re: Spam Assassin pattern help for regular expression

. Abraham Support and Customer Care Department Dynamic Net, Inc. Helping companies do business on the Net 420 Park Road; Suite 201 Wyomissing PA 19610 Toll Free Voice:1-888-887-6727 International: 1-610-736-3795 FAX:1-610-736-3798 Support Email: [EMAIL

Re: Is it possible to use SURBL without enabling all network tests?

Support Department wrote: Is there a way to enable network tests for just SURBL (we have a local, kept up to date with rsync, copy)? One possible problem with doing this is that it will switch you to the network score sets giving you lower scores for other tests. Without the other network tests

Re: Is it possible to use SURBL without enabling all network tests?

of the subl.org URI lookups. -- Martin Hepworth Snr Systems Administrator Solid State Logic Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300 Peter M. Abraham Support and Customer Care Department Dynamic Net, Inc. Helping companies do business on the Net 420 Park Road; Suite 201

bayes_journal problem

18:05:13 proteus2a spamd[7352]: write failed to Bayes journal /var/spamd/.spamassassin/bayes_journal (0 of 1960)! Mark -- Obantec Support www.obantec.net 0845 458 3121 WebHosting and Domains Nominet UK Tag Holder CentralNic Accredited Reseller

Re: Shared Bayes but users own user_prefs

- Original Message - From: Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Obantec Support [EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 9:10 PM Subject: Re: Shared Bayes but users own user_prefs At 03:58 PM 10/27/2004, Obantec Support wrote: Thanks but it does

Re: SA2.63 On RH8.0

that does effect the users quota. he has 8MB of auto_whitlist which is not helping his quota Mark - Original Message - From: Martin Hepworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Obantec Support [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 11:26 AM Subject: Re: SA2.63 On RH8.0 Hi try deleting the file

SA2.3 bayes failure

Hi Earlier i had a customers bayes_* files look like they could not write but this turned out to be quota's Now i am getting same error on my test domain Oct 26 22:11:14 proteus2a spamd[867]: connection from localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1] at port 46241 Oct 26 22:11:14 proteus2a spamd[3011]:

**Bounced** folder setting help

-- Obantec Support www.obantec.net 0845 458 3121 WebHosting and Domains Nominet UK Tag Holder CentralNic Accredited Reseller

Re: **Bounced** folder setting help

@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2004 10:04 PM Subject: Re: **Bounced** folder setting help Obantec Support wrote on Sat, 11 Sep 2004 20:03:10 +0100: Since there is no path etc where is the config for this Folder? in the .procmailrc ? It's got really nothing to do with SA. Kai

spamassassin 2.60 to 2.64 initial nonspam test fails

Hi I have upgraded from 2.60 to 2.64 but the test spamassassin -t sample-nonspam.txt nonspam.out locks up. spamassassin -t sample-spam.txt spam.out works as expected. Any ideas? Mark