Re: new problem after upgrade perl modeul to 3.1.4(from 3.1.2)

On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 04:10:45AM -0700, Linda Walsh wrote: > Am I missing some needed configuration somewhere, or is the > above a problem? > > It seems to be happening with every message. It's a bug in Text::Wrap. See http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5056 -- Randomly G

new problem after upgrade perl modeul to 3.1.4(from 3.1.2)

I just updated to a newer version of spamassin a few days ago. Since then I'm getting regular error messages in my spamlog: Sep 2 03:46:03 Ishtar spamd[13106]: (?:(?<=[\s,]))* matches null string many times in regex; marked by <-- HERE in m/\G(?:(?<=[\s,]))* <-- HERE \Z/ at /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.

Re: 3.1.2 issue with UnixNFSSafe.pm ?

Kai Schaetzl writes: > wrote on Wed, 31 May 2006 19:37:54 -0400 (EDT): > > > some > > under the 5.6.1 site_perl, some under 5.005. > > Did you notice that you didn't say anything about this earlier? ;-) It > seems this is the cause of your problem. Yeah -- I would strongly advised making sur

RE: Bayes problem in 3.1.2?

Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Nels Lindquist wrote on Wed, 31 May 2006 10:04:54 -0600: > > > I removed the /var/lib/spamassassin/3.001002 > > directory which was blank > > It shouldn't exist after an install and if you ran sa-update it should > have content. Maybe an sa-update that got interrupted? I ha

Re: 3.1.2 issue with UnixNFSSafe.pm ?

wrote on Wed, 31 May 2006 19:37:54 -0400 (EDT): > some > under the 5.6.1 site_perl, some under 5.005. Did you notice that you didn't say anything about this earlier? ;-) It seems this is the cause of your problem. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Servic

Re: Bayes problem in 3.1.2?

Nels Lindquist wrote on Wed, 31 May 2006 10:04:54 -0600: > I removed the /var/lib/spamassassin/3.001002 > directory which was blank It shouldn't exist after an install and if you ran sa-update it should have content. Maybe an sa-update that got interrupted? Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, German

Re: 3.1.2 issue with UnixNFSSafe.pm ?

On Wed, 31 May 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, 31 May 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > On Wed, 31 May 2006, Justin Mason wrote: > > > > > > Can you get output of > > > > > > strace -f -o trace > > > > > > on the affected processes? (easy way: just stop spamd, then strace the > > >

Re: Re: 3.1.2 --lint -D warn: config: could not find userprefs file

On the plus side the manual fix is pretty simple and now it's in the lists it should make it a little easier for others to find a solution. I wouldn't beat yourself up too much, if it was perfect every time where would the entertainment value be? ;-) KR Nigel On Wed, 31 May 2006 17:16:56 -0400,

Re: 3.1.2 --lint -D warn: config: could not find userprefs file

On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 03:09:55PM -0600, Gary V wrote: > looks like there is a patch, and will be fixed in 3.1.3 > http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4932 Actually that patch doesn't fix the problem, assuming the user doesn't have a ~/.spamassassin directory already and they're

Re: 3.1.2 --lint -D warn: config: could not find userprefs file

I submitted a bug on this, or is this a "feature"?: http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4923 Gary V looks like there is a patch, and will be fixed in 3.1.3 http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4932

Re: 3.1.2 --lint -D warn: config: could not find userprefs file

Hi All, Problem resolved. The creation of a dir /root/.spamassassin with a file user_prefs in it has resolved the issue. After adding the above it now lint's clean. I'm not sure why it didn't get created at install - but at least now it's fixed. Nigel I submitted a bug on this, or is this

Re: 3.1.2 --lint -D warn: config: could not find userprefs file

allo for his correct suggestions. Kind regards Nigel On Wed, 31 May 2006 18:39:10 +0100, Nigel Frankcom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hi, > >I've run in 3.1.2 on a test server before letting it loose live. > >When running --lint -D I get the following output: > >info: c

Re: 3.1.2 issue with UnixNFSSafe.pm ?

On Wed, 31 May 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, 31 May 2006, Justin Mason wrote: > > > > Can you get output of > > > > strace -f -o trace > > > > on the affected processes? (easy way: just stop spamd, then strace the > > spamd startup script.) > > Ok, that's going without any output as

Re: 3.1.2 issue with UnixNFSSafe.pm ?

On Wed, 31 May 2006, Justin Mason wrote: > > Can you get output of > > strace -f -o trace > > on the affected processes? (easy way: just stop spamd, then strace the > spamd startup script.) Ok, that's going without any output as of yet. I did notice from the console log that a perl dumped co

3.1.2 --lint -D warn: config: could not find userprefs file

Hi, I've run in 3.1.2 on a test server before letting it loose live. When running --lint -D I get the following output: info: config: can not determine userstate dir warn: config: could not find userprefs file My SPAMDOPTIONS are set as: SPAMDOPTIONS="-d -c -m5 -H -i0.0.0.0 -A192.16

Re: 3.1.2 issue with UnixNFSSafe.pm ?

Can you get output of strace -f -o trace on the affected processes? (easy way: just stop spamd, then strace the spamd startup script.) --j. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > On Wed, 31 May 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > On Wed, 31 May 2006, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > > > > > On Wed, May 31

Re: 3.1.2 issue with UnixNFSSafe.pm ?

On Wed, 31 May 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, 31 May 2006, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > > > On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 11:12:03AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > May 31 07:53:52 mail spamd[59117]: Use of uninitialized value in > > > > > subtraction (-) at > > > > /usr/local/lib/perl5/s

RE: 3.1.2 issue with UnixNFSSafe.pm ?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Ugh...I have seen some locking errors while I wasn't before. WOuld > simply turning off auto-learning accomplish the same thing? Possibly. > If it needs to be turned off altogether, will just commenting out > bayes_path in local.cf do it? I don't see any other referen

Re: 3.1.2 issue with UnixNFSSafe.pm ?

On Wed, 31 May 2006, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 11:12:03AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > May 31 07:53:52 mail spamd[59117]: Use of uninitialized value in > > > > subtraction (-) at > > > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/Locker/UnixNFSSafe.pm >

Re: Bayes problem in 3.1.2?

On 31 May 2006 at 11:50, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 09:46:52AM -0600, Nels Lindquist wrote: > > I tried upgrading from 3.1.1 to 3.1.2 today, but "spamassassin -- > > lint" turned up the following errors: > > > > [766] warn: config: war

RE: 3.1.2 issue with UnixNFSSafe.pm ?

On Wed, 31 May 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > A couple of days after an upgrade from 3.0.4 to 3.1.2, I'm noticing > > that it seems alot slower. I turned off most network tests, > > including DCC, Pyzor and Razor and it still looks like th

Re: Bayes problem in 3.1.2?

On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 09:46:52AM -0600, Nels Lindquist wrote: > I tried upgrading from 3.1.1 to 3.1.2 today, but "spamassassin -- > lint" turned up the following errors: > > [766] warn: config: warning: score set for non-existent rule BAYES_80 [...] > 3.1.1). Is the

Re: 3.1.2 issue with UnixNFSSafe.pm ?

On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 11:12:03AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > May 31 07:53:52 mail spamd[59117]: Use of uninitialized value in > > > subtraction (-) at > > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/Locker/UnixNFSSafe.pm > > > line 102, line 46. Hrm. That's not good. Seem

Bayes problem in 3.1.2?

Hi there. I tried upgrading from 3.1.1 to 3.1.2 today, but "spamassassin -- lint" turned up the following errors: [766] warn: config: warning: score set for non-existent rule BAYES_80 [766] warn: config: warning: score set for non-existent rule BAYES_95 [766] warn: config: warning: sco

RE: 3.1.2 issue with UnixNFSSafe.pm ?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > A couple of days after an upgrade from 3.0.4 to 3.1.2, I'm noticing > that it seems alot slower. I turned off most network tests, > including DCC, Pyzor and Razor and it still looks like there's an > issue. Is it possible that you're loc

RE: 3.1.2 issue with UnixNFSSafe.pm ?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, 31 May 2006, Bowie Bailey wrote: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > A couple of days after an upgrade from 3.0.4 to 3.1.2, I'm > > > noticing that it seems alot slower. I turned off most network > > > tests, inclu

RE: 3.1.2 issue with UnixNFSSafe.pm ?

On Wed, 31 May 2006, Bowie Bailey wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > A couple of days after an upgrade from 3.0.4 to 3.1.2, I'm noticing > > that it seems alot slower. I turned off most network tests, > > including DCC, Pyzor and Razor and it still looks like there

RE: 3.1.2 issue with UnixNFSSafe.pm ?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > A couple of days after an upgrade from 3.0.4 to 3.1.2, I'm noticing > that it seems alot slower. I turned off most network tests, > including DCC, Pyzor and Razor and it still looks like there's an > issue. > > I raised max children from

3.1.2 issue with UnixNFSSafe.pm ?

A couple of days after an upgrade from 3.0.4 to 3.1.2, I'm noticing that it seems alot slower. I turned off most network tests, including DCC, Pyzor and Razor and it still looks like there's an issue. I raised max children from 15 to 25, yet it still seems to be spending most of it&#x

Re: 3.1.2-Windows, exit codes broken?

A reminder: if you don't bug that it won't get fixed. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

Re: SA 3.1.2 - warnings in syslog from spamd [permission denied, etc]

> > > Hi all, > > Hope you can help. Just upgraded my SpamAssassin to 3.1.2 from 3.0.2 and > I'm now seeing warnings in syslog that weren't appearing before. > > They seem to relate to spamd running as user 'antispam', yet it wants > ac

SA 3.1.2 - warnings in syslog from spamd [permission denied, etc]

Hi all, Hope you can help. Just upgraded my SpamAssassin to 3.1.2 from 3.0.2 and I'm now seeing warnings in syslog that weren't appearing before. They seem to relate to spamd running as user 'antispam', yet it wants access to read/write files in $HOME/.spamassassin: Ma

RE: 3.1.2-Windows, exit codes broken?

ion. I had some time over the weekend to install 3.1.2 on a second Windows box and had the same result, exit code always zero with -e option and messages determined by spamassassin to be spam. Oh well, back to 3.1.1 for me. The ability to script spamassassin as an MTA pickup event and process th

Re: 3.1.2 spamd dies without warning

On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 10:31:27AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > BTW, can anybody tell me whether or not spamd re-reads the .pre files if > you just give it a SIG HUP, or do you have to kill and restart it (I did > that this time anyway)? A HUP should cause spamd to re-exec (basically killing

Re: 3.1.2 spamd dies without warning

see if that may have been the culprit? > > --j. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > I upgraded from 3.0.4 yesterday without too much trouble...once I got > > 3.1.2 online, I noticed a nice reduction in false negatives, and cpu > > remained low (holiday here in US). > >

Re: 3.1.2 spamd dies without warning

eek. There were changes made to the DCC support; could you try turning that off again, to see if that may have been the culprit? --j. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I upgraded from 3.0.4 yesterday without too much trouble...once I got > 3.1.2 online, I noticed a nice reduction in false neg

3.1.2 spamd dies without warning

I upgraded from 3.0.4 yesterday without too much trouble...once I got 3.1.2 online, I noticed a nice reduction in false negatives, and cpu remained low (holiday here in US). This morning, spamd died with no warning, except of course a huge increase in spam. Nothing in /var/log/messages, and

Re: quick 3.1.2 questions

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just upgraded from 3.0.4 and everything went ok, except: LINT complains about one thing it never did before in local.cf: bayes_path /var/spamassassin/ Hi, bayes_path /var/spamassassin/bayes Regards, Rick

quick 3.1.2 questions

I just upgraded from 3.0.4 and everything went ok, except: LINT complains about one thing it never did before in local.cf: bayes_path /var/spamassassin/ produces: [15987] warn: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, "/var/spamassassin/" is not valid for "bayes_path", skipping: bayes_p

Re: lint failure with 3.1.2

> Thanks Loren, so I guess the best rule would be to upgrade each time a new > version is released whether its minor or major that way something like this > shouldn't happen again. Well I don't know about that. You would have hit this complaint in lint one release sooner, and might have had more

Re: lint failure with 3.1.2

ked fine' and 'linted clean' may be two different things. It linted > clean in 3.1.0 because the checks weren't as good as they should have > been. Daryl improved them for 3.1.2, so now you are seeing an error or > warning or whatever it is. > > I don't rec

Re: lint failure with 3.1.2

inted clean in 3.1.0 because the checks weren't as good as they should have been. Daryl improved them for 3.1.2, so now you are seeing an error or warning or whatever it is. I don't recall if the internal usage also got stricter on 3.1.2, so it might have worked before but would stop working on 3.1.2, Loren

Re: lint failure with 3.1.2

On 5/27/2006 11:44 PM, Loren Wilton wrote: From: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [9324] warn: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, "MY_LRGROD .85" is not valid for "score", skipping: score MY_LRGROD .85 I thought this was required in 3.1.0 (but not 3.0.x) too, but anyway,

Re: lint failure with 3.1.2

> From: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > [9324] warn: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, "MY_LRGROD .85" is > > not valid for "score", skipping: score MY_LRGROD .85 > > I thought this was required in 3.1.0 (but not 3.0.x) too, but anyway, > all of these scores require a leading

Re: lint failure with 3.1.2

On Saturday 27 May 2006 5:50 pm, jdow wrote: > > Yeah, you'll need those hosts' IPs along with any intermediate relays > > such as the IP(s) of any POP3 servers your mail might go through. > > trusted_networks 127/8 192.168/16 207.217.121/24 209.86.93/24 > > That works here on earlier versions nic

Re: lint failure with 3.1.2

From: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Chris wrote: On Saturday 27 May 2006 4:33 pm, you wrote: Any why did --lint work fine every time in 3.1.0? Commenting out the internal_networks entry and restarting SA, --lint shows no errorrs now, why? We're continuously improving the config

Re: lint failure with 3.1.2

Chris wrote: On Saturday 27 May 2006 4:33 pm, you wrote: Any why did --lint work fine every time in 3.1.0? Commenting out the internal_networks entry and restarting SA, --lint shows no errorrs now, why? We're continuously improving the config parser's ability to detect configuration *logic*

Re: lint failure with 3.1.2

Chris wrote: On Saturday 27 May 2006 12:21 pm, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: [9324] warn: trusted_networks doesn't contain internal_networks entry '192.168/16' [9324] warn: lint: 7 issues detected, please rerun with debug enabled for more information Here is my local.cf entry for trusted_networks:

Re: lint failure with 3.1.2

here are 'trusted' hosts > > that are not MXes or internal relays for your domain(s) they should > > only be specified in trusted_networks. > > As for why this linted OK before, couldn't tell ya. Haven't looked at > 3.1.2 yet. > > --Sandy Thanks,

Re[2]: lint failure with 3.1.2

nly be specified in trusted_networks. As for why this linted OK before, couldn't tell ya. Haven't looked at 3.1.2 yet. --Sandy

Re: lint failure with 3.1.2

On Saturday 27 May 2006 12:21 pm, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: > > [9324] warn: trusted_networks doesn't contain internal_networks entry > > '192.168/16' > > [9324] warn: lint: 7 issues detected, please rerun with debug enabled > > for more information > > > > Here is my local.cf entry for trusted_ne

Re: lint failure with 3.1.2

Chris wrote: During the CPAN upgrade from 3.1.0 to 3.1.2 last night I could have swore I saw --lint being ran as a test. However, when I got up this morning I found this in my RDJ output email folder: [9324] warn: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, "MAKEPENIBIG .33" is not

Re: lint failure with 3.1.2

On Saturday 27 May 2006 10:31 am, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Chris wrote on Sat, 27 May 2006 09:12:36 -0500: > > The others above appear to be from the 'adult.cf' rule file, which has > > been running fine with 3.1.0. Any suggestions? > > Contact the maintainer of that r

Re: lint failure with 3.1.2

On Saturday 27 May 2006 10:31 am, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Chris wrote on Sat, 27 May 2006 09:12:36 -0500: > > The others above appear to be from the 'adult.cf' rule file, which has > > been running fine with 3.1.0. Any suggestions? > > Contact the maintainer of that r

Re: lint failure with 3.1.2

Chris wrote on Sat, 27 May 2006 09:12:36 -0500: > The others above appear to be from the 'adult.cf' rule file, which has been > running fine with 3.1.0. Any suggestions? Contact the maintainer of that ruleset. I suspect 3.1.2 doesn't like scores that start with "

lint failure with 3.1.2

During the CPAN upgrade from 3.1.0 to 3.1.2 last night I could have swore I saw --lint being ran as a test. However, when I got up this morning I found this in my RDJ output email folder: [9324] warn: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, "MAKEPENIBIG .33" is not valid

Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.1.2 available!

Theo Van Dinter wrote on Thu, 25 May 2006 20:42:47 -0400: > Apache SpamAssassin 3.1.2 is now available! rpm built, installed, linted, checked, running fine it seems. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

Re: 3.1.2-Windows, exit codes broken?

Craig Emmitt wrote on Fri, 26 May 2006 12:02:57 -0500: > I had checked the changelog and didn't see anything obviously relevant. I mean this: - bug 3754: if there's a problem opening a file via sa-learn or spamassassin, return an error exit value. It indicates there might have been changes t

RE: 3.1.2-Windows, exit codes broken?

>> 3.1.2 is not setting a non-zero exit code when a message is classified >> as spam (spamassassin.bat -e < mailfilein > mailfileout) Known >> issue/bug? >There is something about exit codes in the changelog. I had checked the changelog and didn't see anything obviously relevant. Craig

Re: 3.1.2-Windows, exit codes broken?

Craig Emmitt wrote on Fri, 26 May 2006 11:01:53 -0500: > 3.1.2 is not setting a non-zero exit code when a message is classified > as spam (spamassassin.bat -e < mailfilein > mailfileout) Known > issue/bug? There is something about exit codes in the changelog. Kai -- Kai

3.1.2-Windows, exit codes broken?

Windows Server 2003 SP1 ActivePerl 5.8.8.817 Upgrade from a working 3.1.1 installation 3.1.2 is not setting a non-zero exit code when a message is classified as spam (spamassassin.bat -e < mailfilein > mailfileout) Known issue/bug? Craig

Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.1.2 available!

jdow writes: > From: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Apache SpamAssassin 3.1.2 is now available! This is a maintainance > > release of the 3.1.x branch. > > Whine, you mean I have to put in the special print code that Loren > needs for pro

Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.1.2 available!

From: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Apache SpamAssassin 3.1.2 is now available! This is a maintainance release of the 3.1.x branch. Whine, you mean I have to put in the special print code that Loren needs for properly creating rules in yet ANOTHER release? {^_-}

ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.1.2 available!

Apache SpamAssassin 3.1.2 is now available! This is a maintainance release of the 3.1.x branch. Downloads are available from: http://spamassassin.apache.org/downloads.cgi?update=200605251700 The release file will also be available via CPAN in the near future. md5sum of archive files

Re: 3.1.2?

o create/review patches, etc. > > Any word on this? Same motivations here... :-/ Crap, did I say "early next month (May)" ? Oops. Time flies and all of that. :( There are still 3 tickets in the 3.1.2 queue. 2 have patches and are waiting for some more reviews. 1 may be punted to 3

Re: 3.1.2?

On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 05:32:45PM -0400, Joe Flowers wrote: > > Any educated guesses on when 3.1.2 will be released? > > From a selfish point of view, I'm trying to kill several upgrades with > > one stone. > > I was

Re: Re: 3.1.2?

ssage- From: Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 14:05:25 -0400 Subject: Re: 3.1.2? On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 05:32:45PM -0400, Joe Flowers wrote: > Any educated guesses on when 3.1.2 will be released? > From a selfish point

Re: 3.1.2?

On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 02:02:27PM -0700, Steve Thomas wrote: > Any word on whether or not it includes a fix for bug #4590? > That ticket doesn't have a patch associated with it yet, so ... > Thanks for your efforts - you guys rock. :)

Re: 3.1.2?

> On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 05:32:45PM -0400, Joe Flowers wrote: >> Any educated guesses on when 3.1.2 will be released? > > I was hoping to get it out this month, but I think it'll probably be next > early month before it's all ready to go. Any word on whether or n

Re: 3.1.2?

On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 05:32:45PM -0400, Joe Flowers wrote: > Any educated guesses on when 3.1.2 will be released? > From a selfish point of view, I'm trying to kill several upgrades with > one stone. I was hoping to get it out this month, but I think it'll probably be next

3.1.2?

I guess I'll ask this question and then run like heck Any educated guesses on when 3.1.2 will be released? From a selfish point of view, I'm trying to kill several upgrades with one stone. Thanks! Joe

sasql 3.1.2 released

Hi all, I am pleased to annouce the release of SpamAssassin+SQL 3.1.2 for SquirrelMail. sasql is a plugin that lets users change personal SpamAssassin settings stored in a SQL database. This release has only minor bug fixes and changes to fully support gettext translations. sasql-3.1.2 may be