If classification makes sense, you're not getting FPs or tons of spam
with BAYES_00 you have nothing to worry about.
Sometimes you have to trust your gut feeling... don't let wild bayes
theories misguide you...watch your logs, listen to your users and build
up a feel for it.
I will ce
-learn reports the following:
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db
version
0.000 0 8437 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0 495000 0 non-token data: nham
As stated here:
search.cpan.org/dist/Mail-SpamAssassin/lib/Mail
expiration of the
bayesian data. sa-learn reports the following:
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000 0 8437 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0 495000 0 non-token data: nham
As stated here:
search.cpan.org/dist/Mail
following:
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000 0 8437 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0 495000 0 non-token data: nham
As stated here:
search.cpan.org/dist/Mail-SpamAssassin/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore
On 02/25/2015 10:03 PM, Dave Funk wrote:
It looks like you either have a permissions problem or a confusion
problem.
Your run of 'sa-learn --dump magic' is looking at some Bayes which has
enough ham/spam but what ever your spamassasin is looking at doesn't.
Your 'sudo&#x
On February 26, 2015 3:36:02 AM John Hardin wrote:
> Feb 25 21:07:55.366 [27839] dbg: bayes: not available for scanning, only
0 ham(s) in bayes DB < 200
> Why does it say not enough ham?
Because you need to train ham *as well as* spam. How else will it be able
to tell the difference
IS,HTML_MESSAGE,RDNS_DYNAMIC,T_OBFU_JPG_ATTACH autolearn=no
version=3.3.2
$ sudo sa-learn --username=debian-spamd --dump magic
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000 0 5902 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0 4985
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, James wrote:
I don't think I have the Bayesian filter working.
You don't:
Feb 25 21:07:55.366 [27839] dbg: bayes: not available for scanning, only 0 ham(s)
in bayes DB < 200
Why does it say not enough ham?
Because you need to train ham *as well as* s
CH autolearn=no
version=3.3.2
$ sudo sa-learn --username=debian-spamd --dump magic
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000 0 5902 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0 4985 0 non-t
Am 22.02.2015 um 22:31 schrieb @lbutlr:
On 22 Feb 2015, at 07:56 , Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 22.02.2015 um 15:49 schrieb @lbutlr:
plugin: eval failed: bayes: (in learn) locker: safe_lock: cannot create
lockfile /home/kreme/.spamassassin/bayes.mutex: Permission denied
(And yes, that is
On 22 Feb 2015, at 07:56 , Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 22.02.2015 um 15:49 schrieb @lbutlr:
>> plugin: eval failed: bayes: (in learn) locker: safe_lock: cannot create
>> lockfile /home/kreme/.spamassassin/bayes.mutex: Permission denied
>>
>> (And yes, that is correct
Am 22.02.2015 um 15:49 schrieb @lbutlr:
plugin: eval failed: bayes: (in learn) locker: safe_lock: cannot create
lockfile /home/kreme/.spamassassin/bayes.mutex: Permission denied
(And yes, that is correct, the spamassassin files in user’s home are not world
read/writ)
disable autolearning
Am 22.02.2015 um 15:30 schrieb @lbutlr:
On 21 Feb 2015, at 08:34 , LuKreme wrote:
On Feb 18, 2015, at 6:20 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
That is a lot cleaner and more obvious, thank you for sharing
I ran this just after log rotation and got div by zero errors, so here is a
(nearly) compl
On 21 Feb 2015, at 08:34 , LuKreme wrote:
> On Feb 18, 2015, at 6:20 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>
>
> That is a lot cleaner and more obvious, thank you for sharing
I ran this just after log rotation and got div by zero errors, so here is a
(nearly) completely pointless ‘fix’:
BAYES_TOTAL=
On Feb 18, 2015, at 6:20 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
That is a lot cleaner and more obvious, thank you for sharing
--
Once again I teeter at the precipice of the generation gap.
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:27:12 +0100
Olivier CALVANO wrote:
> Hi
>
> i want backup the bayes database of my spamassassin server but
> impossible.
>
> On all server, that's finish at :
>
> locker: safe_unlock: lock on /var/spool/spamassassin/bayes.lock was
> lost d
Hi
i want backup the bayes database of my spamassassin server but impossible.
On all server, that's finish at :
locker: safe_unlock: lock on /var/spool/spamassassin/bayes.lock was lost
due to expiry at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Locker/UnixNFSSafe.pm
line 200.
an
-gw:~]$ bayes-stats.sh
What is bayes-stats.sh?
as simple shell script
nicer version attached as plain-text file
using now bash + bc + printf for % and formatting
removed the su-calls by place it in a worker-dir and call that with "su"
from a script in PATH, well output looks now
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:46:28 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
> according to the documentation *it is* a bug:
That's just a wiki entry.
> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SiteWideBayesSetup
> Please note this directory needs to be RWX for all users that
> SpamAssassin will be executed as, or R-
bayes_learn_during_report 0
rsyslog.conf for now masks it:
:msg, contains, "bayes db update ignored: Read-only file system" stop
Am 29.01.2015 um 18:34 schrieb RW:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 15:58:56 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
* first: it is a bug to write/lock when auto_expire / auto_le
Hi,
Invoked through a plugin in KerioConnect
SpamAssassin 3.3.1
Platform is CentOS 5.10
So, my Bayes.db is corrupt and out of curiosity I just wanted to take a look at
it. I used SQLiteBrowser to do so. Now I have some questions about the
bayes_token table:
1) Is there a reason why the id is n
e.
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 01:03:37 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
> ... even if we decide to kill spam-spamles older than x
> months it needs to be done properly to the 50% spam / 50% ham
> ratio which is the reason the bayes works that good
The ratio doesn't matter; it's a
rvice
"no reason /var can't be mounted read-only" does *not* suggest that
* the initial post makes it pretty clear
* it was even quoted by fantomas first reply on this thread
* i made that clear multiple times
Weitergeleitete Nachricht
Betreff: Re: why does SA wi
On Thu, 29 Jan 2015, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 29.01.2015 um 10:18 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
On 28.01.15 01:03, Reindl Harald wrote:
> if understand you correctly we agree that there is no reason /var
> can't be mounted read-only?
I do not agree. The whole point of /var is to contain
feats the whole purpose of /var.
i am not talking about a own partition
i am talking about a *systemd namespace* and the intention *not* have
anything below /var writeable for a network facing service
frankly - can we stop to dicuss left and right?
i asked for not touch bayes from the spamd se
On 27.01.15 18:49, Reindl Harald wrote:
the intention of this *global bayes* is *not* to learn or expire
anything - the implemented "remove from bayes" method is just remove
the message from the corpus folder and type "sa-learn.sh rebuild"
I believe it's much mor
ities for you:
- move BAYES to a database of any kind
- set up SA to learn to journal, and use overlayfs for the journal
(rememer to set bayes_journal_max_size big enough),
droping it or syncing periodically
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish N
On 01/28/2015 05:00 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
BTW it is not visible which users are core-developers on this list and
which are not - until now i thought you are as example
I am part of the dev team or as you say "core-developers" which doesn't
mean I have to be a Perl monger. There's other task
;ve deleted bayes_seen so bayes has lost
it's record of what it has processed so it will relearn stuff you
already fed it.
no, i explained what happens in the part you stripped from the quote -
it contains randomly complete message parts independent how often i
delete *any file* in the use
Am 28.01.2015 um 16:39 schrieb Axb:
On 01/28/2015 03:58 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
* third: if you would be a smart upstream in case of a company admin
asking for a change instead "write a patch" you could make
a offer talking about money to include the change in the
-- 1 sa-milt sa-milt 98 2014-08-21 17:47 user_prefs
_
something here does NOT make sense
1.3 MB of seen against 40MB tokens.
someone please correct me if I'm wrong:
afaik, this probably means you've deleted bayes_seen so bayes has los
On 01/28/2015 03:58 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
* third: if you would be a smart upstream in case of a company admin
asking for a change instead "write a patch" you could make
a offer talking about money to include the change in the
next upstream version - we sponso
Am 28.01.2015 um 16:24 schrieb Axb:
On 01/28/2015 03:58 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
* first: it is a bug to write/lock when auto_expire / auto_learn is off
bayes_seen
is AFAIK relevant in context of sa-learn to not re-train the same
messages again and again - and it has it's own bugs becau
On 01/28/2015 03:58 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
* first: it is a bug to write/lock when auto_expire / auto_learn is off
bayes_seen
On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 15:04 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> no need for mount own partitions on recent linux systems
> that's what namespaces are for and systemd has easy interfaces
>
Fair enough: I thought you were talking about some sort of site-wide
read-only mount, but using systemd to limit the
Am 28.01.2015 um 15:46 schrieb Axb:
On 01/28/2015 03:18 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 1/28/2015 9:04 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
my main point is that i don't want the locking IO when nothing then
the self developed maintainance scripts for the bayes has a business
to write anything there
On 01/28/2015 03:18 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 1/28/2015 9:04 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
my main point is that i don't want the locking IO when nothing then
the self developed maintainance scripts for the bayes has a business
to write anything there - it should be only read and in the
On 1/28/2015 9:04 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
my main point is that i don't want the locking IO when nothing then
the self developed maintainance scripts for the bayes has a business
to write anything there - it should be only read and in the best case
from each spamc-forker only opened on
cking IO when nothing then the
self developed maintainance scripts for the bayes has a business to
write anything there - it should be only read and in the best case from
each spamc-forker only opened once in his lifetime for best performance
[root@testserver:~]$ cat /etc/systemd/system/spamassas
On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 16:40 -0800, John Hardin wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> > if understand you correctly we agree that there is no reason /var can't be
> > mounted read-only?
>
> Other than the historical practice that /var is intended to contain
> varying data, and t
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Reindl Harald wrote:
Setting bayes_auto_expire 0 doesn't imply the database is not going to
expired. The recommended way to expire is to turn-off auto-expiry and
expire from cron.
don't understand that completly
* bayes_auto_expire 0
* which cronjob would expire
The
Am 28.01.2015 um 00:55 schrieb RW:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 18:49:23 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 27.01.2015 um 17:28 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
nobody expires or updates anything in a hand-maintained bayes
the one you might use, but not without timestamps
the intention of this
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 18:49:23 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 27.01.2015 um 17:28 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
> >> nobody expires or updates anything in a hand-maintained bayes
> >
> > the one you might use, but not without timestamps
>
> the inte
Am 27.01.2015 um 17:28 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
Am 27.01.2015 um 13:44 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
On 27.01.15 03:01, Reindl Harald wrote:
with "bayes_auto_learn 0" there is no reason to lock the bayes
database and the spamd-service should be happy with
"ReadOnlyD
Am 27.01.2015 um 13:44 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
On 27.01.15 03:01, Reindl Harald wrote:
with "bayes_auto_learn 0" there is no reason to lock the bayes
database and the spamd-service should be happy with
"ReadOnlyDirectories=/var/lib"
the bayes databaase contains
Am 27.01.2015 um 14:33 schrieb Axb:
On 01/27/2015 02:23 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 27.01.2015 um 13:44 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
On 27.01.15 03:01, Reindl Harald wrote:
with "bayes_auto_learn 0" there is no reason to lock the bayes
database and the spamd-service should be
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015, Reindl Harald wrote:
nobody expires or updates anything in a hand-maintained bayes
Just amessage from nobody (important) apparently
==John ff
On 01/27/2015 02:23 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 27.01.2015 um 13:44 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
On 27.01.15 03:01, Reindl Harald wrote:
with "bayes_auto_learn 0" there is no reason to lock the bayes
database and the spamd-service should be happy with
"ReadOnlyDirectories=
Am 27.01.2015 um 13:44 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
On 27.01.15 03:01, Reindl Harald wrote:
with "bayes_auto_learn 0" there is no reason to lock the bayes
database and the spamd-service should be happy with
"ReadOnlyDirectories=/var/lib"
the bayes databaase contains
Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2015-01-27 13:44:
On 27.01.15 03:01, Reindl Harald wrote:
with "bayes_auto_learn 0" there is no reason to lock the bayes
database and the spamd-service should be happy with
"ReadOnlyDirectories=/var/lib"
the bayes databaase contains not o
On 27.01.15 03:01, Reindl Harald wrote:
with "bayes_auto_learn 0" there is no reason to lock the bayes
database and the spamd-service should be happy with
"ReadOnlyDirectories=/var/lib"
the bayes databaase contains not only tokens, but also timestamps used for
expiration.
IMHO that is a bug
with "bayes_auto_learn 0" there is no reason to lock the bayes database
and the spamd-service should be happy with "ReadOnlyDirectories=/var/lib"
training and sa-update is done on a shell independent of network aware
services
Jan 27 02:52:58 testserve
Filip Havlíček wrote:
Anybody can help with this? I still cannot find some helpful
information, thanks.
Dne 10.12.2014 v 14:52 Christian Grunfeld napsal(a):
when you run bayes in SQL and does sa-learn --username it will not try
to setuid to that user (in a real system user scenario it will
Anybody can help with this? I still cannot find some helpful
information, thanks.
Dne 10.12.2014 v 14:52 Christian Grunfeld napsal(a):
when you run bayes in SQL and does sa-learn --username it will not try
to setuid to that user (in a real system user scenario it will fail
for non existent
when you run bayes in SQL and does sa-learn --username it will not try to
setuid to that user (in a real system user scenario it will fail for non
existent users). Instead it uses that username to save and recall data from
database. Due to forged addresses your system treat any originating address
Hi,
I have configured spamasssin with bayes user rules with this configuration:
http://pastebin.com/KWW78DJx
I would like to ask you, if everything is correct, because I found in
table bayes_vars lot of (thousands) unknown email addresses like:
a...@hotmail.com
ablewi...@hotmail.com
abl
at way, admins could tune tweak this behavior
to allow more/less auto-learning... (i.e. 1 body points, and 2.5 head
points) Thoughts?
Agreed. Can you work on a patch to provide this?
As for Bayes strategies (and without starting a flamewar), we just
started implementing an IMAP folder in
On Wed, 5 Nov 2014, John Woods wrote:
As for Bayes strategies (and without starting a flamewar), we just
started implementing an IMAP folder in everyone's mailbox called "Learn As
Spam", that gets processed through "sa-learn --spam". It sounds like we may
need
s to allow admins to be
able to affect the $required_body_points and $required_head_points in
AutoLearnThreshold.pm. That way, admins could tune tweak this behavior
to allow more/less auto-learning... (i.e. 1 body points, and 2.5 head
points) Thoughts?
As for Bayes strategies (and without
ur score sets, chosen according to whether
Bayes and network tests are off or on. Auto-training uses the scoreset
that you would have with Bayes turned-off. Also rules marked
noautolearn, learn and userconf are ignored.
configuration, to increase the number of
spam e-mails being auto-learned?
3) Instead, do we need to completely change our strategy for how
we're using Bayes?
I will leave Bayes comments to other experts but in general, I believe
you will find that some sort of NON automated learning will p
ndividual tests.
2) How can we affect the configuration, to increase the number of
spam e-mails being auto-learned?
3) Instead, do we need to completely change our strategy for how
we're using Bayes?
Thanks,
John**
but do you train mail from mass-mailers? Staples? Facebook? Banks?
why not? of course I train if I want such mail to be properly classified
later.
On 22.10.14 14:36, Alex Regan wrote:
The problem I've had with doing this is that it's often so difficult
to determine which bulk message shoul
Hi,
I'm having some trouble with my bayes database, and thought it would
be a good time to just rebuild it. I'm wondering if anyone has any
good suggestions for the type of mail that should be used for training.
be careful about forwarded mail, if possible. if you get many spam fro
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 14:44:24 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 22.10.2014 um 14:30 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
> > On October 22, 2014 1:30:44 PM Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> > wrote:
> >
> >> oh, does BAYES take care about these?
> >> we are still talki
On October 22, 2014 3:05:56 PM Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
>>On October 22, 2014 1:30:44 PM Matus UHLAR - fantomas
>> wrote:
>>>oh, does BAYES take care about these?
>>>we are still talking about manually feeding BAYES, aren't we?
>Am 22.10.2014 um
On October 22, 2014 1:30:44 PM Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
oh, does BAYES take care about these?
we are still talking about manually feeding BAYES, aren't we?
Am 22.10.2014 um 14:30 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
Sorry, yes bayes can be ignore all headers if one dont like it to track
o
Am 22.10.2014 um 14:30 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
On October 22, 2014 1:30:44 PM Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
oh, does BAYES take care about these?
we are still talking about manually feeding BAYES, aren't we?
Sorry, yes bayes can be ignore all headers if one dont like it to track
o
On October 22, 2014 1:30:44 PM Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
oh, does BAYES take care about these?
we are still talking about manually feeding BAYES, aren't we?
Sorry, yes bayes can be ignore all headers if one dont like it to track
origin senders or ips
en wrote:
> >This only correct if internal networks and or trusted networks is
> >not configured correct
>
> oh, does BAYES take care about these?
To a limited extent. It effects the contents of some metadata, but
I don't think affect which headers are tokenized.
be careful about forwarded mail, if possible. if you get many spam from your
old account, it may start to classify ALL mail forwarded through that
On 22.10.14 13:15, Benny Pedersen wrote:
This only correct if internal networks and or trusted networks is not
configured correct
oh, does BAYES
or trusted networks is not
configured correct
what has a forwarding from @gmx.net or so to do with trusted_networks?
the topic was about train the bayes on the Received headers and no
single word about internal hops
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On October 22, 2014 1:08:45 PM Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
be careful about forwarded mail, if possible. if you get many spam from your
old account, it may start to classify ALL mail forwarded through that
This only correct if internal networks and or trusted networks is not
configured co
On 21.10.14 21:29, Alex Regan wrote:
I'm having some trouble with my bayes database, and thought it would
be a good time to just rebuild it. I'm wondering if anyone has any
good suggestions for the type of mail that should be used for
training.
be careful about forwarded mail, i
On 10/22/2014 03:29 AM, Alex Regan wrote:
I have the database in a replicated mysql database for now. I'd like to
go to redis, but it's not quite ready for distributed configurations,
correct?
What do you mean by "distributed configurations"?
- many clients querying a central Redis DB?
- real
Hi all,
I'm having some trouble with my bayes database, and thought it would be
a good time to just rebuild it. I'm wondering if anyone has any good
suggestions for the type of mail that should be used for training.
I understand individually-crafted emails would make the best h
Am 20.10.2014 um 18:03 schrieb RW:
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 20:04:11 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
a perfect trained bayes on the inbound spamfirewall
* after recently a account was hacked and sent spam
(luckily not massive by rate-limits) which would have
been clearly caught by SA
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 20:04:11 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
>
a perfect trained bayes on the inbound spamfirewall
> >> * after recently a account was hacked and sent spam
> >> (luckily not massive by rate-limits) which would have
> >> been clearly caught b
Am 17.10.2014 um 19:45 schrieb RW:
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 11:59:30 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
does SA need anything to recognize a rsynced bayes on similar setups
to load the new version or is it anyways reopened for each connection
by spamd child?
I think so, and I don't recall any sp
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 11:59:30 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
> Hi
>
> does SA need anything to recognize a rsynced bayes on similar setups
> to load the new version or is it anyways reopened for each connection
> by spamd child?
I think so, and I don't recall any special handling
Am 17.10.2014 um 12:02 schrieb Joolee:
File base bayes is actually quite slow. Isn't it an option for you to
use an sql replicated master-slave set or cluster or per haps Redis
master-slave replication?
performance is not a problem here, no high traffic on the submission
servers and o
On 10/17/2014 12:02 PM, Joolee wrote:
It would be nice if we'd be able to use a clustered nosql database though.
nosql like what?
something like Cassandra? CouchDB? for Bayes they're slower than file
DB.(tested, dumped)
If your traffic size justifies it, till Redis cluster i
File base bayes is actually quite slow. Isn't it an option for you to use
an sql replicated master-slave set or cluster or per haps Redis
master-slave replication?
It would be nice if we'd be able to use a clustered nosql database though.
Kind regards,
Peter Overtoom
On 17 October
Hi
does SA need anything to recognize a rsynced bayes on similar setups to
load the new version or is it anyways reopened for each connection by
spamd child?
in case of clamd rsync "/var/lib/clamav/" is enough
background:
* a perfect trained bayes on the inbound spamfirewa
From: Axb
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 23:37:36 +0200
On 10/14/2014 11:08 PM, Adam Katz wrote:
>> On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 16:10:52 +0200 Axb wrote:
>>> and to avoid further discussions of what header may pollute bayes or
>>> not, I've removed all header e
Am 14.10.2014 um 23:37 schrieb Axb:
On 10/14/2014 11:08 PM, Adam Katz wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 16:10:52 +0200 Axb wrote:
and to avoid further discussions of what header may pollute bayes or
not, I've removed all header entries which are not directly related
to AV/filter products.
On 10/14/2014 11:08 PM, Adam Katz wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 16:10:52 +0200 Axb wrote:
and to avoid further discussions of what header may pollute bayes or
not, I've removed all header entries which are not directly related
to AV/filter products.
On 10/14/2014 07:17 AM, David F. Skoll
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 16:10:52 +0200 Axb wrote:
>> and to avoid further discussions of what header may pollute bayes or
>> not, I've removed all header entries which are not directly related
>> to AV/filter products.
On 10/14/2014 07:17 AM, David F. Skoll wrote:
> I&
On 10/14/2014 04:17 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 16:10:52 +0200
Axb wrote:
and to avoid further discussions of what header may pollute bayes or
not, I've removed all header entries which are not directly related
to AV/filter products.
I'm not sure I agree with
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 16:10:52 +0200
Axb wrote:
> and to avoid further discussions of what header may pollute bayes or
> not, I've removed all header entries which are not directly related
> to AV/filter products.
I'm not sure I agree with being too clever about Bayes. Surely
ryone else would benefit from this
user’s actions or, alternatively, that the user’s aggressive tagging
will actually ‘poison’ the bayes db for the other users who maybe do
not think that endless emails from pinterest or some political
candidate are actually spam.
For starters your problem isn&#
that everyone else would benefit from this user’s
actions or, alternatively, that the user’s aggressive tagging will actually
‘poison’ the bayes db for the other users who maybe do not think that endless
emails from pinterest or some political candidate are actually spam.
if nobody trains his
benefit from this user’s
actions or, alternatively, that the user’s aggressive tagging will actually
‘poison’ the bayes db for the other users who maybe do not think that endless
emails from pinterest or some political candidate are actually spam.
--
"You see, in this world there's two
On Fri, 10 Oct 2014, RW wrote:
On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 15:26:25 -0600
LuKreme wrote:
Is it possible to have a site-wide bayes AND individual bayes for
some users (or all users)?
Not as things stand.
Not as things stand, possibly absent a hack like: any user who wants to
use the site-wide
On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 15:26:25 -0600
LuKreme wrote:
> Is it possible to have a site-wide bayes AND individual bayes for
> some users (or all users)?
Not as things stand. You could use Bayes for one and a separate filter
for the other.
> And, if not, is it generally better to do sitewi
A, Sec+ wrote:
I’ve built a gateway server using sa-exim to filter email for our
corporate Microsoft Exchange environment. It’s working pretty good, but
I have Bayes turned off due to the fact that I am unsure on how to train
it in this type of environment. Has someone written a how to article o
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 4:14 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Oct 2014, John Traweek CCNA, Sec+ wrote:
>
> I've built a gateway server using sa-exim to filter email for our
>>
>
> This topic comes up fairly regularly. Did you search the list archives on
&g
On Thu, 9 Oct 2014, John Traweek CCNA, Sec+ wrote:
I've built a gateway server using sa-exim to filter email for our
corporate Microsoft Exchange environment. It's working pretty good, but
I have Bayes turned off due to the fact that I am unsure on how to train
it in this type of e
Am 09.10.2014 um 21:43 schrieb John Traweek CCNA, Sec+:
I’ve built a gateway server using sa-exim to filter email for our
corporate Microsoft Exchange environment. It’s working pretty good, but
I have Bayes turned off due to the fact that I am unsure on how to train
it in this type of
I've built a gateway server using sa-exim to filter email for our
corporate Microsoft Exchange environment. It's working pretty good, but
I have Bayes turned off due to the fact that I am unsure on how to train
it in this type of environment. Has someone written a how to article
901 - 1000 of 4925 matches
Mail list logo
