I've been in touch with a former developer of pyzor. Bottom line is that
the company that had it was acquired, and pyzor is not being maintained
by the new owners.
I'm still trying to get a contact who might be able to pass on the
maintenance ownership of the GitHub repository, bu
On 2024-06-08 14:45:34, Bill Cole wrote:
I went looking for a better fix and found a reported issue at
https://github.com/SpamExperts/pyzor/issues/155 matching my original
symptoms in which a workaround was provided: install directly from
the GitHub project's master.zip link, i.e. a sna
.apache.org
Subject: Re: Warning: Your Pyzor may be broken.
On 10-06-2024 15:05, giova...@paclan.it wrote:
> On 6/9/24 7:31 PM, John Hardin wrote:
>> On Sun, 9 Jun 2024, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>>
>>> On 2024-06-08 14:45:34, Bill Cole wrote:
>>>
>>>> I wen
On 10-06-2024 15:05, giova...@paclan.it wrote:
On 6/9/24 7:31 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 9 Jun 2024, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 2024-06-08 14:45:34, Bill Cole wrote:
I went looking for a better fix and found a reported issue at
https://github.com/SpamExperts/pyzor/issues/155 matching
On 6/9/24 7:31 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 9 Jun 2024, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 2024-06-08 14:45:34, Bill Cole wrote:
I went looking for a better fix and found a reported issue at
https://github.com/SpamExperts/pyzor/issues/155 matching my original
symptoms in which a workaround was
On Sun, 9 Jun 2024, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 2024-06-08 14:45:34, Bill Cole wrote:
I went looking for a better fix and found a reported issue at
https://github.com/SpamExperts/pyzor/issues/155 matching my original
symptoms in which a workaround was provided: install directly from
the GitHub
On 2024-06-08 14:45:34, Bill Cole wrote:
> I went looking for a better fix and found a reported issue at
> https://github.com/SpamExperts/pyzor/issues/155 matching my original
> symptoms in which a workaround was provided: install directly from
> the GitHub project's master
On 2024-06-08 at 15:35:01 UTC-0400 (Sat, 08 Jun 2024 21:35:01 +0200)
Benny Pedersen
is rumored to have said:
> Bill Cole skrev den 2024-06-08 20:45:
>
>> I've chosen #3 for myself, but it's not great.
>
> is why cpanel provided a perl pyzor client ?
I had forgotten
Bill Cole skrev den 2024-06-08 20:45:
I've chosen #3 for myself, but it's not great.
is why cpanel provided a perl pyzor client ?
ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Pyzor
use_pyzor 1
pyzor_count_min 1
pyzor_welcomelist_min 1
pyzor_welcomelist_factor 0.2
py
I was working on a mail system today and inadvertently noticed that its Pyzor
was broken. When I tried to reinstall Pyzor according to the web documentation
with "pip3 install pyzor" I got what claimed to be v1.0.0 and no complaints
from the installer but when running the pyzor clien
On Wed, 28 Jun 2023 23:58:24 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
> > Because quite a lot of junk passes while the junk is detected by
> > Pyzor. Just a try to see if that works ;-)
>
> "score RULE_NAME number" is genric and that was my point
>
> Pyzor BTW don't
Richard Lucassen skrev den 2023-06-28 10:46:
Is it possible to increase the weight of PYZOR_CHECK score?
sure its opensource, just do it :=)
but only in local.cf file, or sql/ldap user prefs
local.cf will be global, while sql/ldap can be global or pr user
in userpref file pr system pam user
On Wed, 28 Jun 2023 12:50:28 +0200
Tom Hendrikx wrote:
> > Is it possible to increase the weight of PYZOR_CHECK score?
>
> Yes,
>
> This works the same as a regular score (it is a regular score of
> course). See
> https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/4.0.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html#SCOR
ECK 1.0
Because quite a lot of junk passes while the junk is detected by Pyzor.
Just a try to see if that works ;-)
--
richard lucassen
http://contact.xaq.nl/
On 28-06-2023 10:46, Richard Lucassen wrote:
Hello list,
Is it possible to increase the weight of PYZOR_CHECK score?
R.
Yes,
This works the same as a regular score (it is a regular score of
course). See
https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/4.0.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html#SCORING-OPT
Hello list,
Is it possible to increase the weight of PYZOR_CHECK score?
R.
--
richard lucassen
http://contact.xaq.nl/
On 31.01.23 18:03, spamassassin.us...@ml.karotte.org wrote:
I use spamc -C report to report spam mails. I only want to report them
to Pyzor. How do I disable reporting the mails to Razor (which fails
anyways as I'm not registered)?
looks like it's not configurable.
You can submit a
Hi,
I use spamc -C report to report spam mails. I only want to report them
to Pyzor. How do I disable reporting the mails to Razor (which fails
anyways as I'm not registered)?
Also as I see it using spamc -C report also marks the mail as spam in
the bayes database, is this correct? There
On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 12:54 PM Henrik K wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 11:58:31AM -0500, Alex wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm using the latest SA from trunk and trying to get pyzor working. It
> runs
> > correctly to check a message from the command-line, but SA appar
On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 11:58:31AM -0500, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm using the latest SA from trunk and trying to get pyzor working. It runs
> correctly to check a message from the command-line, but SA apparently fails to
> properly parse the output?
>
> Nov 20 11:55:21.9
Hi,
I'm using the latest SA from trunk and trying to get pyzor working. It runs
correctly to check a message from the command-line, but SA apparently fails
to properly parse the output?
Nov 20 11:55:13.213 [2531397] dbg: pyzor: network tests on, attempting Pyzor
Nov 20 11:55:15.756 [2531397
On 8/29/22 19:39, Avram-Teodor Berindeie wrote:
I compiled Apache SpamAssassin -- Version 4.0.0-RC1 from sources and in the
testing phase I have the following problem.
When running the command:
/usr/local/src/Mail-SpamAssassin-4.0.0# spamassassin -t < sample-spam.txt >
spam.out
I get
Aug 29 20:
Thanks. We're working on digest issues as well with the pure perl pyzor
implementation too.
On 8/29/2022 1:39 PM, Avram-Teodor Berindeie wrote:
I compiled Apache SpamAssassin -- Version 4.0.0-RC1 from sources and
in the testing phase I have the following problem.
When running the co
I compiled Apache SpamAssassin -- Version 4.0.0-RC1 from sources and in the
testing phase I have the following problem.
When running the command:
/usr/local/src/Mail-SpamAssassin-4.0.0# spamassassin -t < sample-spam.txt >
spam.out
I get
Aug 29 20:27:42.299 [28229] warn: rules: failed to run PYZOR_C
), thx for that suggestion. Let's hope it works to
remove this minor inconvenience :)
razor, pyzor, dcc is detecting if mails is mailed to more then one
recipients, is does not detect as so if its spam or not, so only
massmailed is sure
for bayes training it aswell needs to know ham mails, only sp
re of course bulk spam, but it's also not uncommon to see Pyzor
as well. I've been wondering if there are realistic cases where both
DCC and Pyzor would mark as spam while the message was ham.
this is likely to happen if the message is empty or learly empty.
some people are stupid, sen
mon to see Pyzor
as well. I've been wondering if there are realistic cases where both
DCC and Pyzor would mark as spam while the message was ham.
this is likely to happen if the message is empty or learly empty.
some people are stupid, send one-two words or a short link in message
without S
Hi everyone,
A few times a month we have spam messages getting through, often in
German, that have some spam score but not enough to be marked/discarded.
Always these messages are marked by DCC, since they're of course bulk
spam, but it's also not uncommon to see Pyzor as well.
On 14.03.22 20:15, Alex wrote:
I'm seeing a lot of DCC/pyzor mail being marked as spam that shouldn't
be, and want to see what can be done to prevent that.
DCC contains fuzzy checksums of bulk messages, which means they have been
seen on the internet multiple times. This inclu
starts with the string Hex followed a checksum type, and
a string of four hexadecimal numbers obtained from a DCC
log file or the dccproc(8) command using -CQ. The check-
sum type is body, Fuz1, or Fuz2 or one of the preceding
checksum types such as env_From."
> Same with pyzor?
p
Hi,
I'm seeing a lot of DCC/pyzor mail being marked as spam that shouldn't
be, and want to see what can be done to prevent that.
For example, many emails with just an image attachment and an empty
body are hitting DCC. I thought I recalled a way to create a checksum
of these empty me
On 22 Apr 2021, Eric Broch outgrape:
> pyzor.noarch 0:0.5.0-10.el7
Ah. Upgrade (pyzor moved, and is now found at
https://github.com/SpamExperts/pyzor). Pyzor 1.0.* fixes this and many
other problems, and is Python 3 compatible.
Hello,
Stupid questions:
What version of OS do you have? pyzor is compiled on install(ex: Gentoo)
or comes pre-compiled ?
Did you made any python upgrade lately ? All the modules have been
upgraded as well ?
Did you tried to remove it and install it again ?
Best regards,
Iulian Stan
On
pyzor.noarch 0:0.5.0-10.el7
On 4/22/2021 7:29 AM, iulian stan wrote:
Hello,
Stupid questions:
What version of OS do you have? pyzor is compiled on install(ex:
Gentoo) or comes pre-compiled ?
Did you made any python upgrade lately ? All the modules have been
upgraded as well ?
Did you tried
Thanks for all the replies.
1) I've removed
use_pyzor 1
pyzor_path /usr/bin/pyzor
from local.cf (The issue occurred even if commented anyway).
2) I do have
v310.pre:# Pyzor - perform Pyzor message checks.
v310.pre:loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Pyzor (Which, I think, is where
Eric Broch writes:
> From: Eric Broch
> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 09:00:28 -0600
>
> Does anyone one have a solution to this:
>
> spamd[]: pyzor: check failed: internal error, python traceback seen
> in response
>
> I have this in my local.cf
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 09:00:28AM -0600, Eric Broch wrote:
> Does anyone one have a solution to this:
>
> spamd[xxxx]: pyzor: check failed: internal error, python traceback seen in
> response
>
> I have this in my local.cf
>
> #pyzor
> use_pyzor 1
> pyzor_path /u
On 21/04/2021 16:15, Steve Dondley wrote:
On 2021-04-21 11:00 AM, Eric Broch wrote:
Does anyone one have a solution to this:
spamd[]: pyzor: check failed: internal error, python traceback
seen in response
I have this in my local.cf
#pyzor
use_pyzor 1
pyzor_path /usr/bin/pyzor
I don&#
On 2021-04-21 11:00 AM, Eric Broch wrote:
Does anyone one have a solution to this:
spamd[]: pyzor: check failed: internal error, python traceback
seen in response
I have this in my local.cf
#pyzor
use_pyzor 1
pyzor_path /usr/bin/pyzor
I don't have this in my config at all. Maybe yo
Does anyone one have a solution to this:
spamd[]: pyzor: check failed: internal error, python traceback seen
in response
I have this in my local.cf
#pyzor
use_pyzor 1
pyzor_path /usr/bin/pyzor
Perusing the internet it seems this has been around for a while. Is
there a simple fix?
On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 14:10:02 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> pyzor was originally razor rewritten in python, but now uses own
> servers, with the same intention AFAIK.
It's not just a matter of servers they do very different things. Pyzor
hashes selected lines from a preproces
my point is valid as writed, remote pyzor servers dont know what is spam or not
localy, but it
could share results if wanted, but this was never implemented into pyzord or
pyzor client
On Sun, April 11, 2021 17:44, Antony Stone wrote:
I must be confused then - what do you believe *is* the
On 2021-04-12 18:21, John Capo wrote:
On Sun, April 11, 2021 17:44, Antony Stone wrote:
my point is valid as writed, remote pyzor servers dont know what is
spam or not localy, but it
could share results if wanted, but this was never implemented into
pyzord or pyzor client
I must be confused
On Sun, April 11, 2021 17:44, Antony Stone wrote:
>> my point is valid as writed, remote pyzor servers dont know what is spam or
>> not localy, but it
>> could share results if wanted, but this was never implemented into pyzord or
>> pyzor client
>
> I must be confu
On Sunday 11 April 2021 at 23:27:26, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On 2021-04-11 23:20, RW wrote:
> >
> > I don't see the advantage. You might just as well submit to the shared
> > server so everyone benefits.
> >
> > Pyzor is not a realistic substitute for Baye
I wouldn't expect it to work at all. "report_safe" encapsulation
> > creates a new email which isn't a spam.
>
> From what I read on pyzor's home page and how it works, pyzor strips
> off all headers. So I would assume it doesn't matter if it's
On 2021-04-11 23:20, RW wrote:
On Sun, 11 Apr 2021 10:04:03 -0400
Steve Dondley wrote:
On 2021-04-11 09:34 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On 2021-04-11 15:13, Steve Dondley wrote:
>
>> What do you think?
>
> pyzor is usefull if running pyzord localy, design of pyzor was imho
On Sun, 11 Apr 2021 10:04:03 -0400
Steve Dondley wrote:
> On 2021-04-11 09:34 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> > On 2021-04-11 15:13, Steve Dondley wrote:
> >
> >> What do you think?
> >
> > pyzor is usefull if running pyzord localy, design of pyzor was imho
;t a spam.
From what I read on pyzor's home page and how it works, pyzor strips off
all headers. So I would assume it doesn't matter if it's encapsulated. I
could be, and quite likely am, totally wrong about this, of course.
On Sun, 11 Apr 2021 09:13:26 -0400
Steve Dondley wrote:
> Second, I'm not sure if my tests will work on my spam samples which
> have the spam encapsulated with the "report_safe" setting set to a
> value of "1".
I wouldn't expect it to work at all. "report_safe" encapsulation
creates a new emai
On 2021-04-11 03:09 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
On 11 Apr 2021, at 13:21, Steve Dondley wrote:
value of "1". By the way, anyone know of a CLI utility for extracting
the original spam email from these files?
spamassassin -d < wrappedspam.eml
Ah, ok. I was familiar with the -d option but did not kno
On 11 Apr 2021, at 13:21, Steve Dondley wrote:
value of "1". By the way, anyone know of a CLI utility for extracting
the original spam email from these files?
spamassassin -d < wrappedspam.eml
As documented in the spamassassin-run man page or by running
'spamassassin --help'
Here's a ver
value of "1". By the way, anyone know of a CLI utility for extracting
the original spam email from these files?
Here's a very crude perl script that does the trick:
#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use warnings;
my $email;
while (<>) {
$email .= $_;
}
my ($boundary) = $email =~ /boundary="(.
On 11.04.21 09:13, Steve Dondley wrote:
I just installed pyzor and did a random spot check of about 10 spam
emails to try to evaluate it using this command:
pyzor check < some_spam
Only one message gave me a hit on pyzor.
I have pyzor enabled and for sure I have changes pyzor_timeout t
On 2021-04-11 16:04, Steve Dondley wrote:
Interesting. I wonder if it might be worth it to set up my own pyzor
server for my own network of mail servers. That's probably going to be
easier than sharing spam/ham samples around between users.
yes its more light in sieve scripting to use it
On 2021-04-11 09:34 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2021-04-11 15:13, Steve Dondley wrote:
What do you think?
pyzor is usefull if running pyzord localy, design of pyzor was imho
ment to be local pyzord and have the pyzor client query local, but
pyzord could be get results from other pyzord
On 2021-04-11 15:13, Steve Dondley wrote:
What do you think?
pyzor is usefull if running pyzord localy, design of pyzor was imho ment
to be local pyzord and have the pyzor client query local, but pyzord
could be get results from other pyzord server farms, but this have never
happended
I just installed pyzor and did a random spot check of about 10 spam
emails to try to evaluate it using this command:
pyzor check < some_spam
Only one message gave me a hit on pyzor.
But I take my results with a grain of salt because I may not have pyzor
configured optimally.
For one,
them was ServetheHome
> now getting listed by pyzor, checking my own junk folder, I found a few
> general emails listed, some other news letters, from different
> senders/networks, only over in past 2 weeks, ones that usually dont
> trigger anything, a quick look at shows no change in format
On 01/06/2020 10:38, RW wrote:
bit of bulk mail gets listed.
On 01.06.20 12:13, Noel Butler wrote:
That what started all the complaints, lot of users seem to be subscribed
to a few news letters, the most common factor for them was ServetheHome
now getting listed by pyzor, checking my own junk
On 01/06/2020 10:38, RW wrote:
> bit of bulk mail gets listed.
That what started all the complaints, lot of users seem to be subscribed
to a few news letters, the most common factor for them was ServetheHome
now getting listed by pyzor, checking my own junk folder, I found a few
general ema
t; Aren't those e-mails empty or w/o text parts?
> I hve noticed that fuzzy checks often hit on such mails.
It's not just empty parts, it's also text that preprocesses
down to something generic. Also a little bit of bulk mail gets listed.
I periodically run my local ham corpus throug
- fantomas writes:
>>> not here.
>
> On 31.05.20 08:15, micah anderson wrote:
>>here either. I've been noticing quite good results with pyzor
>>actually, and have thought it should be scored higher.
>>
>>I have seen messages reported 89 times, anyone seen more?
>
> how do you check this?
add_header all Pyzor _PYZOR_
--
micah
od results with pyzor
actually, and have thought it should be scored higher.
I have seen messages reported 89 times, anyone seen more?
how do you check this?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
> On 31.05.20 10:51, Noel Butler wrote:
>>Anyone else noticed it seems to scoring much much higher FP's in past
>>few weeks?
>>
>>Ima disable the damn thing I think.
>
> not here.
here either. I've been noticing quite
On 31.05.20 10:51, Noel Butler wrote:
Anyone else noticed it seems to scoring much much higher FP's in past
few weeks?
Ima disable the damn thing I think.
not here.
Aren't those e-mails empty or w/o text parts?
I hve noticed that fuzzy checks often hit on such mails.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas,
Anyone else noticed it seems to scoring much much higher FP's in past
few weeks?
Ima disable the damn thing I think.
--
Kind Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including attachments, may contain legally
privileged
information, therefore remains confidential and subject to co
On 22.10.19 16:24, hg user wrote:
I'm wondering if the plugins listed in the subject may help with messages
that are not in english...
yes.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tut
Hi,
I'm wondering if the plugins listed in the subject may help with messages
that are not in english...
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:45 AM, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2018-02-20 22:20, Alex wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Does anyone know what could be causing this? This is on fedora with
>> pyzor-1.1.0-1.20170904gitd14e980
>>
>> Feb 20 22:08:07.475 [28639] dbg:
On 2018-02-20 22:20, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know what could be causing this? This is on fedora with
> pyzor-1.1.0-1.20170904gitd14e980
>
> Feb 20 22:08:07.475 [28639] dbg: pyzor: network tests on, attempting Pyzor
> Feb 20 22:08:13.098 [28639] dbg: pyzor: pyzor i
Hi,
Does anyone know what could be causing this? This is on fedora with
pyzor-1.1.0-1.20170904gitd14e980
Feb 20 22:08:07.475 [28639] dbg: pyzor: network tests on, attempting Pyzor
Feb 20 22:08:13.098 [28639] dbg: pyzor: pyzor is available: /usr/bin/pyzor
Feb 20 22:08:13.100 [28639] dbg: pyzor
On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 13:52:32 -0500
Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a bunch of rules that rely on the results of pyzor, razor or
> DCC. The problem is that they also match on an empty or nearly empty
> body.
You can use
pyzor local_whitelist < email.txt
at very least it&#x
Alex skrev den 2017-12-15 19:52:
Other ideas?
whitelist ?, dcc have whitelist, pyzor have whitelist if you run own
pyzord, razor have whitelist
how ?, all the 3 seen before content checkers should know your
internal_networks ips just like spamassin does
its not relevant imho on empty
Hi,
I have a bunch of rules that rely on the results of pyzor, razor or
DCC. The problem is that they also match on an empty or nearly empty
body.
I believe we may have discussed something similar in the past, but is
there a way to avoid these digest rules from hitting on empty emails
or emails
On 12/09/17 12:33, RW wrote:
On Tue, 12 Sep 2017 08:41:01 +0100
Sebastian Arcus wrote:
The confusing part is that left to its devices, Pyzor creates
a .pyzor dir in the home dir of the user it is run as. But if
--homedir is specified, it dumps stuff directly there, instead of
creating a
On 2017-09-12 12:33, RW wrote:
> It is a bit confusing, but it's not that the .pyzor directory is use
> inconsistently, it's that pyzor defines
>
> --homedir=HOMEDIR configuration directory
The confusing part is the spelling of the option. The mistake is clear
fro
On Tue, 12 Sep 2017 08:41:01 +0100
Sebastian Arcus wrote:
> The confusing part is that left to its devices, Pyzor creates
> a .pyzor dir in the home dir of the user it is run as. But if
> --homedir is specified, it dumps stuff directly there, instead of
> creating a .pyzor dir.In t
On 12/09/17 00:56, RW wrote:
On Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:37:40 +0100
Sebastian Arcus wrote:
On 11/09/17 20:20, RW wrote:
This is why pyzor has the local_whitelist command. At very least
it's a good idea to pipe an empty string through
"pyzor local_whitelist" (probably as t
On Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:37:40 +0100
Sebastian Arcus wrote:
> On 11/09/17 20:20, RW wrote:
> > This is why pyzor has the local_whitelist command. At very least
> > it's a good idea to pipe an empty string through
> > "pyzor local_whitelist" (probably
On 11/09/17 20:20, RW wrote:
On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 17:39:16 +0100
Sebastian Arcus wrote:
Is there any way to tell SA to skip pyzor checks on emails with an
empty body (even if there are attachments). I've noticed for a while
now that emails which don't contain any text in their bodi
On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 17:39:16 +0100
Sebastian Arcus wrote:
> Is there any way to tell SA to skip pyzor checks on emails with an
> empty body (even if there are attachments). I've noticed for a while
> now that emails which don't contain any text in their bodies seem to
>
On 09/11/2017 11:39 AM, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
Is there any way to tell SA to skip pyzor checks on emails with an empty
body (even if there are attachments). I've noticed for a while now that
emails which don't contain any text in their bodies seem to
automatically trigger PYZOR_C
Is there any way to tell SA to skip pyzor checks on emails with an empty
body (even if there are attachments). I've noticed for a while now that
emails which don't contain any text in their bodies seem to
automatically trigger PYZOR_CHECK (even if they have an attachment) -
althoug
On 2017-09-08 10:56, Steven Conrad Bayer wrote:
> is the Pyzor network down again?
Works for me now:
ahiker!2 itz$ pyzor check <
Mail/mail.net.spamassassin.users/new/1504861340.17441_1.ahiker
public.pyzor.org:24441 (200, 'OK') 0 0
but it was down earlier this week,
Hi everybody,
is the Pyzor network down again?
We receiving the following error when we execute 'pyzor ping'
public.pyzor.org:24441 (504, 'Reading response timed-out.')
Is there anybody which can confirm this too?
ctions of a second.
>>
>> I'm noticing the values are either 4003 or very close to that
>> throughout at least the last 48 hours. Perhaps the reason it's
>> SIGTERMd is because it's hit some timeout limit while it retries?
>
> As I already said SA has i
the last 48 hours. Perhaps the reason it's
> SIGTERMd is because it's hit some timeout limit while it retries?
As I already said SA has its own timeout that terminates the pyzor
process i.e. sends it a SIGTERM.
The point about its being 4 seconds is that it's supposed to be 3.5, so
it looks like it's being rounded. Looking at Timeout.pm it says that
it based on alarm(2), so generally SA timeouts wont support
fractions of a second.
Timeout.pm
> actually supports fractions of a second.
I'm noticing the values are either 4003 or very close to that
throughout at least the last 48 hours. Perhaps the reason it's
SIGTERMd is because it's hit some timeout limit while it retries?
Is the pyzor network current
On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 17:56:01 +0100
RW wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Sep 2017 19:01:55 -0700
> Ian Zimmerman wrote:
>
>
> > This is because the public server went offline today, thus the
> > client waits until the default timeout which I think is 5 seconds.
> > You can configure the timeout to something less
On Mon, 4 Sep 2017 19:01:55 -0700
Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> This is because the public server went offline today, thus the client
> waits until the default timeout which I think is 5 seconds. You can
> configure the timeout to something less.
5 seconds is pyzor's own default timeout (which you ca
On 2017-09-04 20:11, Alex wrote:
> I'm curious about the options people use for configuring pyzor with
> SA? I've always just had it with --homedir /etc/mail/spamassassin but
> I wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something.
pyzor works fine without any configu
Hi,
I'm curious about the options people use for configuring pyzor with
SA? I've always just had it with --homedir /etc/mail/spamassassin but
I wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something. I've also noticed it
always exits with SIGTERM. It appears to be working properly w
On Sat, 11 Feb 2017 15:40:18 -0500
Alex wrote:
> It appears to be working. I just hoped someone could confirm there was
> nothing further I needed to do.
You probably don't even need the --homedir, I just noticed
that I don't have a .pyzor directory in my home directory
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 2:37 PM, RW wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Feb 2017 11:26:05 -0800
> Ian Zimmerman wrote:
>
>> On 2017-02-11 18:11, David Jones wrote:
>>
>> > >pyzor_options --homedir=/usr/local/pyzor
>> >
>> > >What am I
On Sat, 11 Feb 2017 11:26:05 -0800
Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2017-02-11 18:11, David Jones wrote:
>
> > >pyzor_options --homedir=/usr/local/pyzor
> >
> > >What am I doing wrong?
> >
> > You were close. No equals sign:
> >
> > p
On 2017-02-11 18:11, David Jones wrote:
> >pyzor_options --homedir=/usr/local/pyzor
>
> >What am I doing wrong?
>
> You were close. No equals sign:
>
> pyzor_options --homedir /usr/local/pyzor
But the pyzor help text (shown when run without args) tells me there
>This may have been part of the reason why I stopped using pyzor. Taking
>a second look now, but the configuration still seems somewhat less than
>obvious.
>I want to set the pyzor "homedir", that is the directory where the
>servers file lives. I tried (in l
This may have been part of the reason why I stopped using pyzor. Taking
a second look now, but the configuration still seems somewhat less than
obvious.
I want to set the pyzor "homedir", that is the directory where the
servers file lives. I tried (in local.cf):
pyzor_options --ho
I experimented with pyzor and set these in
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf, after installing pyzor
use_pyzor 1
pyzor_path /usr/bin/pyzor
pyzor_options --homedir /etc/spamassassin
I've since commented them out and discontinued the experiment. I
assumed that would be the end of
1 - 100 of 519 matches
Mail list logo
