Thanks to everyone for their help...
Charles pointed me in the right direction, I had 2 copies of
spamassassin. But just removing one didn't do the trick. Recompiled
from source after that, and I think it's good to go.
So far spam has been scored above 5, so I'm keeping my fingers crossed.
Evan Platt wrote:
> At 12:58 PM 10/9/2006, you wrote:
>
> > Network tests are definitely missing. There are two ways to turn
> > off network tests. The first is with the '-L' option to spamd. The
> > second is with config options in local.cf. Using the config options
> > should affect both spa
From: "Evan Platt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
At 04:07 PM 10/9/2006, you wrote:
What the are you running spamd from cron for? It is
usually started from your init sequence and runs as a daemon.
I changed that earlier. My mac seems to be ignoring the /Library/StartupItems.
"spamd -d -c -m3 -Hi --
At 04:07 PM 10/9/2006, you wrote:
What the are you running spamd from cron for? It is
usually started from your init sequence and runs as a daemon.
I changed that earlier. My mac seems to be ignoring the /Library/StartupItems.
"spamd -d -c -m3 -Hi --max-conn-per-child=15" is the usual sort
From: "Bowie Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Evan Platt wrote:
At 01:37 PM 10/6/2006, you wrote:
> > > :0fw: spamassassin.lock
> > > |spamd -L -c -s 512000
>
> This should be:
>
> spamc -c -s 512000
>
> > Now it appears spamassassin isn't checking mail at all, as the
> > mail isn't marked up
At 12:58 PM 10/9/2006, you wrote:
Network tests are definitely missing. There are two ways to turn off
network tests. The first is with the '-L' option to spamd. The
second is with config options in local.cf. Using the config options
should affect both spamd and spamassassin, so based on the
Evan Platt wrote:
> At 11:30 AM 10/9/2006, you wrote:
>
> > spamc is a small executable that hands off the message to spamd for
> > processing.
>
> Ahh ok.
>
>
> > You can run it from the command line the same way you do with
> > spamassassin.
> >
> > spamc < inputfile > outputfile
> >
>
At 11:30 AM 10/9/2006, you wrote:
spamc is a small executable that hands off the message to spamd for
processing.
Ahh ok.
You can run it from the command line the same way you do with
spamassassin.
spamc < inputfile > outputfile
You also might want to check the process that is running
Evan Platt wrote:
> > From: Bowie Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > I'm not familiar with the procmail syntax. When you do
> > > "|program", what is the expected output of the command? If it
> > > expects to get the filtered email back from the program, you will
> > > need to leave off the
From: Bowie Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: 2 different scores?
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 10:13:11 -0400
I'm not familiar with the procmail syntax. When you do "|program",
what is the expected output of the command? If it expect
Evan Platt wrote:
> At 01:37 PM 10/6/2006, you wrote:
> > > > :0fw: spamassassin.lock
> > > > |spamd -L -c -s 512000
> >
> > This should be:
> >
> > spamc -c -s 512000
> >
> > > Now it appears spamassassin isn't checking mail at all, as the
> > > mail isn't marked up at all.
> > >
> > > My
To:
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 10:22 PM
Subject: RE: 2 different scores?
At 01:37 PM 10/6/2006, you wrote:
> > 0fw: spamassassin.lock
> > spamd -L -c -s 512000
This should be:
spamc -c -s 512000
> Now it appears spamassassin isn't checking mail at all, as the ma
At 01:37 PM 10/6/2006, you wrote:
> > 0fw: spamassassin.lock
> > spamd -L -c -s 512000
This should be:
spamc -c -s 512000
> Now it appears spamassassin isn't checking mail at all, as the mail
> isn't marked up at all.
>
> My cron entry upon bootup is:
>
> /opt/local/bin/spamd -L
Get rid o
Evan Platt wrote:
> From: "Loren Wilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > The first case obviously isn't using network tests. -L on spamd
> > startup? Permissions problem? Different usercode than what you ran
> > the test under? Different home directory?
> >
> > I'd make a guess at the -L parameter
> From: Evan Platt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...
> I changed my procmailrc to;
>
> :0fw: spamassassin.lock
> | spamd -L -c -s 512000
Shouldn't that be spamc?
From: "Loren Wilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Subject: Re: 2 different scores?
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 01:11:50 -0700
The first case obviously isn't using network tests. -L on spamd
startup? Permissions problem? Different usercode than what you ran
the test under? Dif
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.4 required=5.0
tests=HELO_DYNAMIC_HOME_NL,INFO_TLD,
UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no version=3.1.6
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=20.2 required=5.0 tests=HELO_DYNAMIC_HOME_NL,
INFO_TLD,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RCVD_IN_WHOIS_BOGONS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,
URIBL_AB_SURBL,U
17 matches
Mail list logo
