Re: pyzor and failure to parse response

On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 12:54 PM Henrik K wrote: > On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 11:58:31AM -0500, Alex wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm using the latest SA from trunk and trying to get pyzor working. It > runs > > correctly to check a message from the command-line, but SA apparently > fails to > > properly

Re: pyzor and failure to parse response

On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 11:58:31AM -0500, Alex wrote: > Hi, > I'm using the latest SA from trunk and trying to get pyzor working. It runs > correctly to check a message from the command-line, but SA apparently fails to > properly parse the output? > > Nov 20 11:55:21.970 [2531521] dbg: pyzor:

Re: pyzor

On 22 Apr 2021, Eric Broch outgrape: >  pyzor.noarch 0:0.5.0-10.el7 Ah. Upgrade (pyzor moved, and is now found at https://github.com/SpamExperts/pyzor). Pyzor 1.0.* fixes this and many other problems, and is Python 3 compatible.

Re: pyzor

Hello, Stupid questions: What version of OS do you have? pyzor is compiled on install(ex: Gentoo) or comes pre-compiled ? Did you made any python upgrade lately ? All the modules have been upgraded as well ? Did you tried to remove it and install it again ? Best regards, Iulian Stan On

Re: pyzor

 pyzor.noarch 0:0.5.0-10.el7 On 4/22/2021 7:29 AM, iulian stan wrote: Hello, Stupid questions: What version of OS do you have? pyzor is compiled on install(ex: Gentoo) or comes pre-compiled ? Did you made any python upgrade lately ? All the modules have been upgraded as well ? Did you tried

Re: pyzor

Thanks for all the replies. 1) I've removed use_pyzor 1 pyzor_path /usr/bin/pyzor from local.cf (The issue occurred even if commented anyway). 2) I do have v310.pre:# Pyzor - perform Pyzor message checks. v310.pre:loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Pyzor (Which, I think, is where the

Re: pyzor

Eric Broch writes: > From: Eric Broch > Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 09:00:28 -0600 > > Does anyone one have a solution to this: > > spamd[]: pyzor: check failed: internal error, python traceback seen > in response > > I have this in my local.cf > > #pyzor > use_pyzor 1 >

Re: pyzor

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 09:00:28AM -0600, Eric Broch wrote: > Does anyone one have a solution to this: > > spamd[]: pyzor: check failed: internal error, python traceback seen in > response > > I have this in my local.cf > > #pyzor > use_pyzor 1 > pyzor_path /usr/bin/pyzor > > Perusing the

Re: pyzor

On 21/04/2021 16:15, Steve Dondley wrote: On 2021-04-21 11:00 AM, Eric Broch wrote: Does anyone one have a solution to this: spamd[]: pyzor: check failed: internal error, python traceback seen in response I have this in my local.cf #pyzor use_pyzor 1 pyzor_path /usr/bin/pyzor I don't

Re: pyzor

On 2021-04-21 11:00 AM, Eric Broch wrote: Does anyone one have a solution to this: spamd[]: pyzor: check failed: internal error, python traceback seen in response I have this in my local.cf #pyzor use_pyzor 1 pyzor_path /usr/bin/pyzor I don't have this in my config at all. Maybe you are

Re: pyzor

On 01/06/2020 17:02, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 01/06/2020 10:38, RW wrote: bit of bulk mail gets listed. On 01.06.20 12:13, Noel Butler wrote: > That what started all the complaints, lot of users seem to be subscribed > to a few news letters, the most common factor for them was

Re: pyzor

On 01/06/2020 10:38, RW wrote: bit of bulk mail gets listed. On 01.06.20 12:13, Noel Butler wrote: That what started all the complaints, lot of users seem to be subscribed to a few news letters, the most common factor for them was ServetheHome now getting listed by pyzor, checking my own junk

Re: pyzor

On 01/06/2020 10:38, RW wrote: > bit of bulk mail gets listed. That what started all the complaints, lot of users seem to be subscribed to a few news letters, the most common factor for them was ServetheHome now getting listed by pyzor, checking my own junk folder, I found a few general emails

Re: pyzor

On Sun, 31 May 2020 13:35:28 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 31.05.20 10:51, Noel Butler wrote: > >Anyone else noticed it seems to scoring much much higher FP's in past > >few weeks? > > > >Ima disable the damn thing I think. > > not here. > Aren't those e-mails empty or w/o text

Re: pyzor

Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes: >>> On 31.05.20 10:51, Noel Butler wrote: Anyone else noticed it seems to scoring much much higher FP's in past few weeks? Ima disable the damn thing I think. > >>Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes: >>> not here. > > On 31.05.20 08:15, micah anderson

Re: pyzor

On 31.05.20 10:51, Noel Butler wrote: Anyone else noticed it seems to scoring much much higher FP's in past few weeks? Ima disable the damn thing I think. Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes: not here. On 31.05.20 08:15, micah anderson wrote: here either. I've been noticing quite good results

Re: pyzor

Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes: > On 31.05.20 10:51, Noel Butler wrote: >>Anyone else noticed it seems to scoring much much higher FP's in past >>few weeks? >> >>Ima disable the damn thing I think. > > not here. here either. I've been noticing quite good results with pyzor actually, and have

Re: pyzor

On 31.05.20 10:51, Noel Butler wrote: Anyone else noticed it seems to scoring much much higher FP's in past few weeks? Ima disable the damn thing I think. not here. Aren't those e-mails empty or w/o text parts? I hve noticed that fuzzy checks often hit on such mails. -- Matus UHLAR -

Re: pyzor internal error on some messages

Hi, On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:45 AM, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > On 2018-02-20 22:20, Alex wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Does anyone know what could be causing this? This is on fedora with >> pyzor-1.1.0-1.20170904gitd14e980 >> >> Feb 20 22:08:07.475 [28639] dbg: pyzor: network tests

Re: pyzor internal error on some messages

On 2018-02-20 22:20, Alex wrote: > Hi, > > Does anyone know what could be causing this? This is on fedora with > pyzor-1.1.0-1.20170904gitd14e980 > > Feb 20 22:08:07.475 [28639] dbg: pyzor: network tests on, attempting Pyzor > Feb 20 22:08:13.098 [28639] dbg: pyzor: pyzor is available:

Re: pyzor/razor/dcc and empty body

On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 13:52:32 -0500 Alex wrote: > Hi, > > I have a bunch of rules that rely on the results of pyzor, razor or > DCC. The problem is that they also match on an empty or nearly empty > body. You can use pyzor local_whitelist < email.txt at very least it's a good idea to run

Re: pyzor/razor/dcc and empty body

Alex skrev den 2017-12-15 19:52: Other ideas? whitelist ?, dcc have whitelist, pyzor have whitelist if you run own pyzord, razor have whitelist how ?, all the 3 seen before content checkers should know your internal_networks ips just like spamassin does its not relevant imho on empty

Re: pyzor config and sig15

On 2017-09-08 10:56, Steven Conrad Bayer wrote: > is the Pyzor network down again? Works for me now: ahiker!2 itz$ pyzor check < Mail/mail.net.spamassassin.users/new/1504861340.17441_1.ahiker public.pyzor.org:24441 (200, 'OK') 0 0 but it was down earlier this week, as discussed in

Re: pyzor config and sig15

Hi everybody, is the Pyzor network down again? We receiving the following error when we execute 'pyzor ping' public.pyzor.org:24441 (504, 'Reading response timed-out.') Is there anybody which can confirm this too?

Re: pyzor config and sig15

Hi, On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 10:38 AM, RW wrote: > On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 19:36:05 -0400 > Alex wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >> > This is because the public server went offline today, thus the >> >> > client waits until the default timeout which I think is 5 >> >> > seconds. You

Re: pyzor config and sig15

On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 19:36:05 -0400 Alex wrote: > Hi, > > >> > This is because the public server went offline today, thus the > >> > client waits until the default timeout which I think is 5 > >> > seconds. You can configure the timeout to something less. > >> > >> 5 seconds is pyzor's own

Re: pyzor config and sig15

Hi, >> > This is because the public server went offline today, thus the >> > client waits until the default timeout which I think is 5 seconds. >> > You can configure the timeout to something less. >> >> 5 seconds is pyzor's own default timeout (which you can change >> via pyzor_options), but

Re: pyzor config and sig15

On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 17:56:01 +0100 RW wrote: > On Mon, 4 Sep 2017 19:01:55 -0700 > Ian Zimmerman wrote: > > > > This is because the public server went offline today, thus the > > client waits until the default timeout which I think is 5 seconds. > > You can configure the timeout to something

Re: pyzor config and sig15

On Mon, 4 Sep 2017 19:01:55 -0700 Ian Zimmerman wrote: > This is because the public server went offline today, thus the client > waits until the default timeout which I think is 5 seconds. You can > configure the timeout to something less. 5 seconds is pyzor's own default timeout (which you

Re: pyzor config and sig15

On 2017-09-04 20:11, Alex wrote: > I'm curious about the options people use for configuring pyzor with > SA? I've always just had it with --homedir /etc/mail/spamassassin but > I wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something. pyzor works fine without any configuration, or with an empty

Re: pyzor options

On Sat, 11 Feb 2017 15:40:18 -0500 Alex wrote: > It appears to be working. I just hoped someone could confirm there was > nothing further I needed to do. You probably don't even need the --homedir, I just noticed that I don't have a .pyzor directory in my home directory and checking and

Re: pyzor options

Hi, On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 2:37 PM, RW wrote: > On Sat, 11 Feb 2017 11:26:05 -0800 > Ian Zimmerman wrote: > >> On 2017-02-11 18:11, David Jones wrote: >> >> > >pyzor_options --homedir=/usr/local/pyzor >> > >> > >What am I doing wrong? >> > >> > You were close. No

Re: pyzor options

On Sat, 11 Feb 2017 11:26:05 -0800 Ian Zimmerman wrote: > On 2017-02-11 18:11, David Jones wrote: > > > >pyzor_options --homedir=/usr/local/pyzor > > > > >What am I doing wrong? > > > > You were close. No equals sign: > > > > pyzor_options --homedir /usr/local/pyzor > > But the

Re: pyzor options

On 2017-02-11 18:11, David Jones wrote: > >pyzor_options --homedir=/usr/local/pyzor > > >What am I doing wrong? > > You were close. No equals sign: > > pyzor_options --homedir /usr/local/pyzor But the pyzor help text (shown when run without args) tells me there is an equal sign. Besides,

Re: pyzor options

>This may have been part of the reason why I stopped using pyzor.  Taking >a second look now, but the configuration still seems somewhat less than >obvious. >I want to set the pyzor "homedir", that is the directory where the >servers file lives.  I tried (in local.cf): >pyzor_options

Re: pyzor false positives?

On 02/26/2015 01:26 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Hi i just started to play with pyzor according to https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/UsingPyzor which seems to work fine in general *but* i recentyl got an offer with two lines text, a footer.logo and a PDF attachment as well as a twitter-notify

Re: pyzor false positives?

Am 26.02.2015 um 14:01 schrieb Axb: On 02/26/2015 01:26 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: i just started to play with pyzor according to https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/UsingPyzor which seems to work fine in general *but* i recentyl got an offer with two lines text, a footer.logo and a PDF

RE: Pyzor errors after upgrade

From: Chris cpoll...@embarqmail.com Sent: Monday, September 01, 2014 10:25 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Pyzor errors after upgrade System is Ubuntu 14.04 LTS I use fetchmail linked with procmail. Once mail is tossed to my other

Re: Pyzor errors after upgrade

On Mon, 2014-09-01 at 21:17 -0700, John Hardin wrote: On Mon, 1 Sep 2014, Chris wrote: System is Ubuntu 14.04 LTS I use fetchmail linked with procmail. Permissions on the ~/.pyzor/servers files and directory is: drwxr-x--- 2 chris chris 4096 Jul 17 09:28 .pyzor -rw-r- 1

Re: Pyzor errors after upgrade

On Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Chris wrote: On Mon, 2014-09-01 at 21:17 -0700, John Hardin wrote: On Mon, 1 Sep 2014, Chris wrote: System is Ubuntu 14.04 LTS I use fetchmail linked with procmail. Permissions on the ~/.pyzor/servers files and directory is: drwxr-x--- 2 chris chris 4096 Jul 17

Re: Pyzor errors after upgrade

On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 07:20 -0700, John Hardin wrote: On Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Chris wrote: On Mon, 2014-09-01 at 21:17 -0700, John Hardin wrote: On Mon, 1 Sep 2014, Chris wrote: System is Ubuntu 14.04 LTS I use fetchmail linked with procmail. Permissions on the ~/.pyzor/servers files

Re: Pyzor errors after upgrade

On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 07:20 -0700, John Hardin wrote: On Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Chris wrote: On Mon, 2014-09-01 at 21:17 -0700, John Hardin wrote: On Mon, 1 Sep 2014, Chris wrote: System is Ubuntu 14.04 LTS I use fetchmail linked with procmail. Permissions on the ~/.pyzor/servers files

Re: Pyzor errors after upgrade

On Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Chris wrote: On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 07:20 -0700, John Hardin wrote: On Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Chris wrote: On Mon, 2014-09-01 at 21:17 -0700, John Hardin wrote: On Mon, 1 Sep 2014, Chris wrote: System is Ubuntu 14.04 LTS I use fetchmail linked with procmail. Permissions on

Re: Pyzor errors after upgrade

On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 10:30 -0700, John Hardin wrote: On Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Chris wrote: On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 07:20 -0700, John Hardin wrote: On Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Chris wrote: On Mon, 2014-09-01 at 21:17 -0700, John Hardin wrote: On Mon, 1 Sep 2014, Chris wrote: System is Ubuntu

Re: Pyzor errors after upgrade

On Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Chris wrote: ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Pyzor pyzor_path /usr/local/bin/pyzor pyzor_options --homedir /home/chris/.pyzor endif Would it be better if I changed the pyzor home dir to /etc/mail/spamassassin and put the 'servers' file there? In general that's a

Re: Pyzor errors after upgrade

On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 11:27 -0700, John Hardin wrote: On Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Chris wrote: ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Pyzor pyzor_path /usr/local/bin/pyzor pyzor_options --homedir /home/chris/.pyzor endif Would it be better if I changed the pyzor home dir to

Re: Pyzor errors after upgrade

On Mon, 1 Sep 2014, Chris wrote: System is Ubuntu 14.04 LTS I use fetchmail linked with procmail. Permissions on the ~/.pyzor/servers files and directory is: drwxr-x--- 2 chris chris 4096 Jul 17 09:28 .pyzor -rw-r- 1 chris chris 23 Jul 17 09:28 servers Are you using this with

Re: Pyzor with aliases.

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6995 On 07/03/2014 09:38 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: I see you are next person (after me) who encountered this issue. Maybe you could comment (or at least +1) the bug. On 03.07.14 09:57, Steve Bergman wrote: What do you think

Re: Pyzor with aliases.

On 07/04/2014 05:27 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: I repeat: spamass-milter does not (and can not) know about local users. SPAMASS_MILTER(8) -u defaultuser Pass the username part of the first recipient to spamc with the -u flag. This allows user preferences files to be used. If the

Re: Pyzor with aliases.

On 07/04/2014 05:27 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: I repeat: spamass-milter does not (and can not) know about local users. On 04.07.14 06:30, Steve Bergman wrote: SPAMASS_MILTER(8) I have read the man page multiple times. spamass-milter passes the local part of mail recipient to spamd,

Re: Pyzor with aliases.

On 07/04/2014 07:02 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: I have read the man page multiple times. spamass-milter passes the local part of mail recipient to spamd, which is not necessarily a username. spamass-milter even can call sendmail -bv to get the user, but it still may not be local user.

Re: Pyzor with aliases.

On 07/04/2014 07:02 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: I have read the man page multiple times. spamass-milter passes the local part of mail recipient to spamd, which is not necessarily a username. spamass-milter even can call sendmail -bv to get the user, but it still may not be local user.

Re: Pyzor with aliases.

On 07/04/2014 11:21 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: there is no reason why sa-milter should know about users - it would require adding new useless code to it. Especially not when there is no local user, which is something spamd must take care about, so there's no need to duplicate this job

Re: Pyzor with aliases.

On 02.07.14 13:47, Steve Bergman wrote: I've been watching today, and have pretty much confirmed that if you use Pyzor with spamass-milter, and have it run as the recipient user, you do need to include a pyzor --homedir /whateverdir/ in local.cf. pardon me, but spamass-milter uses spamc, so

Re: Pyzor with aliases.

On 07/03/2014 09:31 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 02.07.14 13:47, Steve Bergman wrote: I've been watching today, and have pretty much confirmed that if you use Pyzor with spamass-milter, and have it run as the recipient user, you do need to include a pyzor --homedir /whateverdir/ in

Re: Pyzor with aliases.

On 07/03/2014 02:31 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: pardon me, but spamass-milter uses spamc, so pyzor is called from spamd. That means, the above should apply for spamd, not spamass-milter. The issue seems to be spamc (and thus pyzor) running as the recipient user, when the message is

Re: Pyzor with aliases.

On 07/03/2014 02:31 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: pardon me, but spamass-milter uses spamc, so pyzor is called from spamd. That means, the above should apply for spamd, not spamass-milter. On 03.07.14 07:26, Steve Bergman wrote: The issue seems to be spamc (and thus pyzor) running as the

Re: Pyzor with aliases.

On 07/03/2014 03:52 AM, Axb wrote: and for spamd it only applies IF you don't want to place the Pyzor config in ~/.pyzor in the spamd's user homedir. Actually, it's placing the Pyzor config in a single known directory which I can easily monitor the permissions on. SA does the spam checking,

Re: Pyzor with aliases.

On 07/03/2014 07:53 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: Aha, this seems to be spamd fallback to 'nobody' user, usually with homedir /nonexistent. spamc and spamass-milter have nothing to do with it. I have modified my spamd to use different user as fallback. /nonexistent rings a bell. I can

Re: Pyzor with aliases.

On 07/03/2014 07:53 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: Aha, this seems to be spamd fallback to 'nobody' user, usually with homedir /nonexistent. spamc and spamass-milter have nothing to do with it. I have modified my spamd to use different user as fallback. On 03.07.14 08:43, Steve Bergman

Re: Pyzor with aliases.

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6995 On 07/03/2014 09:17 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: I have explained my position in the bug, link to which you removed. Yes. I saw that you did. https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6995 I try to trim my posts

Re: Pyzor with aliases.

On 03.07.14 09:28, Steve Bergman wrote: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6995 On 07/03/2014 09:17 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: I have explained my position in the bug, link to which you removed. Yes. I saw that you did. then you should understand why I do not

Re: Pyzor with aliases.

On 07/03/2014 09:38 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 03.07.14 09:28, Steve Bergman wrote: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6995 On 07/03/2014 09:17 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: I have explained my position in the bug, link to which you removed. Yes. I saw

Re: pyzor: check failed: internal error, python traceback seen in response

On 06/30/2014 08:58 PM, Steve Bergman wrote: I'm getting: pyzor: check failed: internal error, python traceback seen in response I'm running Ubuntu 10.04 on the server, with the Ubuntu provided packages. On 30.06.14 21:15, Axb wrote: time to update... pyzor 1:0.5.0-0ubuntu2 ancient,

Re: pyzor: check failed: internal error, python traceback seen in response

Hmmm... My original question was where's the traceback. Not whether this or that project chooses to abandon its stable releases. Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Server is supported until May 2015. And similar time-frame releases of SA and Pyzor are supported until 2020 in RHEL/Scientific Linux/Centos. I'm

Re: pyzor: check failed: internal error, python traceback seen in response

pyzor 1:0.5.0-0ubuntu2 ancient, buggy, EOL version Interestingly, pyzor 0.7.0 (the latest stable version) gives the same error. And SA is not preserving the diagnostic output from it for the admin to view, even with debuging turned on in both packages. Looks like the bugs are in

Re: pyzor: check failed: internal error, python traceback seen in response

On 06/30/2014 02:15 PM, Axb wrote: As you don't mention what gue you use with SA it's hard to guess where your Pyzor config files should be. I guess I'm not quite sure what gue I am using with SA. Where would I find that?

Re: pyzor: check failed: internal error, python traceback seen in response

On 07/01/2014 02:57 PM, Steve Bergman wrote: On 06/30/2014 02:15 PM, Axb wrote: As you don't mention what gue you use with SA it's hard to guess where your Pyzor config files should be. I guess I'm not quite sure what gue I am using with SA. Where would I find that? phatfingers meant glue -

Re: pyzor: check failed: internal error (strace to the rescue)

OK. So I replaced pyzor with a dash script to run it under strace and log the output to to a file. What it was complaining about was (drum roll, please) the permissions on /home/pyzor/servers. Which is odd, because I'm pretty sure I set that file to be world readable and world writable for

Re: pyzor: check failed: internal error, python traceback seen in response

On 06/30/2014 08:58 PM, Steve Bergman wrote: Hi, I'm getting: pyzor: check failed: internal error, python traceback seen in response on many Spamassassin generated calls to pyzor. In the case of good emails, at least, the senders report getting a bounce, but the emails make it through to the

Re: Pyzor errors block URIBL lookups?

--On Thursday, March 13, 2014 3:50 PM -0700 John Hardin jhar...@impsec.org wrote: I've moved the discussion over to amavis-users@. It is very clear that current version of Amavis are utterly broken in handling SpamAssassin. --Quanah -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Architect - Server Zimbra, Inc.

Re: Pyzor errors block URIBL lookups?

On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: In looking at why some spam is still making it through, it appears that Pyzor errors block URIBL lookups: I'm working with someone who seems to be having the same problem in 3.3.1 - thanks for noting this, I will take a closer look. -- John

Re: Pyzor errors block URIBL lookups?

--On Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:48 PM -0700 John Hardin jhar...@impsec.org wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: In looking at why some spam is still making it through, it appears that Pyzor errors block URIBL lookups: I'm working with someone who seems to be having the

Re: Pyzor errors block URIBL lookups?

On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: --On Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:48 PM -0700 John Hardin jhar...@impsec.org wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: In looking at why some spam is still making it through, it appears that Pyzor errors block URIBL lookups:

Re: Pyzor errors block URIBL lookups?

--On Thursday, March 13, 2014 3:15 PM -0700 John Hardin jhar...@impsec.org wrote: FWIW they're running amavisd-new, and we're trying to figure out why the scores on MTA-processed messages are so much lower than when the same message is passed through command-line SA in debug mode. Hi John,

Re: Pyzor errors block URIBL lookups?

Just yesterday I manually pushed a piece of spam through spamc and spamassassin and got a different score too. It ended up being caused by time_limit. spamassassin didn't listen to it whereas spamc/spamd did and the email took a lng time to process - triggering the scores to be different I

Re: Pyzor errors block URIBL lookups?

On Fri, 14 Mar 2014, Jason Haar wrote: Just yesterday I manually pushed a piece of spam through spamc and spamassassin and got a different score too. It ended up being caused by time_limit. spamassassin didn't listen to it whereas spamc/spamd did and the email took a lng time to process -

Re: Pyzor errors block URIBL lookups?

--On Thursday, March 13, 2014 3:50 PM -0700 John Hardin jhar...@impsec.org wrote: On Fri, 14 Mar 2014, Jason Haar wrote: Just yesterday I manually pushed a piece of spam through spamc and spamassassin and got a different score too. It ended up being caused by time_limit. spamassassin didn't

Re: Pyzor errors block URIBL lookups?

--On Thursday, March 13, 2014 4:27 PM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount qua...@zimbra.com wrote: This is missing RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI. This email originated on our MTAs, and was delivered going through them. This did too, and correclty has that rule applied: Mar 13 17:00:08 edge02 amavis[39369]:

Re: Pyzor errors block URIBL lookups?

No - I don't use amavis. That's why I said spamc :-) On 14/03/14 10:50, John Hardin wrote: On Fri, 14 Mar 2014, Jason Haar wrote: Just yesterday I manually pushed a piece of spam through spamc and spamassassin and got a different score too. It ended up being caused by time_limit.

Re: Pyzor errors block URIBL lookups?

--On Thursday, March 13, 2014 6:25 PM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount qua...@zimbra.com wrote: And here is another email, from the *same* user to the *same* user that does not have RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI!!! Mar 13 19:21:07 edge02 amavis[3918]: (03918-12) spam-tag, a...@zimbra.com - d...@zimbra.com, No,

Re: Pyzor errors block URIBL lookups?

--On Friday, March 14, 2014 2:28 PM +1300 Jason Haar jason_h...@trimble.com wrote: No - I don't use amavis. That's why I said spamc :-) Well... The docs say time_limit defaults to 300 seconds (5 minutes). The inconsistent scoring I'm seeing is all occuring under 5 seconds, so I don't

Re: pyzor 401/unauthorized?

Same here: $ pyzor discover downloading servers from http://pyzor.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/inform-servers-0-3 $ pyzor ping public.pyzor.org:24441 (401, 'Unauthorized: User is not authorized to request the operation.') $ This explains the Pyzor errors I've had recently. . -- fight apathy or

Re: Pyzor?

On 10/06/2012 12:14 PM, Arthur Dent wrote: I am trying to improve the performance of SA on my small home server. I use the sought rules, but though I would also include Razor and Pyzor. I am no stranger to the command line and not afraid of compiling from source (and that is what I did in the

Re: Pyzor?

On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 12:25 +0200, Axb wrote: On 10/06/2012 12:14 PM, Arthur Dent wrote: I am trying to improve the performance of SA on my small home server. I use the sought rules, but though I would also include Razor and Pyzor. I am no stranger to the command line and not afraid of

Re: Pyzor?

Alex, from Nexus7. Boyaah! Le 6 oct. 2012 06:37, Arthur Dent misc.li...@blueyonder.co.uk a écrit : On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 12:25 +0200, Axb wrote: On 10/06/2012 12:14 PM, Arthur Dent wrote: I am trying to improve the performance of SA on my small home server. I use the sought rules, but

Re: Pyzor?

On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 08:14 -0400, Alexandre Boyer wrote: Alex, from Nexus7. Boyaah! ==8=== Oct 6 11:33:41.959 [11067] dbg: pyzor: network tests on, attempting Pyzor Oct 6 11:33:58.504 [11067] dbg: pyzor: pyzor is

Re: Pyzor?

On 06/10/12 12:35, Arthur Dent wrote: On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 12:25 +0200, Axb wrote: On 10/06/2012 12:14 PM, Arthur Dent wrote: I am trying to improve the performance of SA on my small home server. I use the sought rules, but though I would also include Razor and Pyzor. I am no stranger to the

Re: Pyzor?

On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 15:27 +0200, Tom Hendrikx wrote: Oct 6 11:11:52.056 [10904] dbg: pyzor: opening pipe: /bin/pyzor --homedir /home/mark/.pyzor check /tmp/.spamassassin10904BmyCb9tmp Oct 6 11:11:52.344 [10904] dbg: pyzor: [10906] finished: exit 1 Seems trivial to reproduce the part

Re: Pyzor?

On Sat, 6 Oct 2012, Arthur Dent wrote: On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 15:27 +0200, Tom Hendrikx wrote: Oct 6 11:11:52.056 [10904] dbg: pyzor: opening pipe: /bin/pyzor --homedir /home/mark/.pyzor check /tmp/.spamassassin10904BmyCb9tmp Oct 6 11:11:52.344 [10904] dbg: pyzor: [10906] finished: exit 1

Re: Pyzor?

On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 09:01 -0700, John Hardin wrote: On Sat, 6 Oct 2012, Arthur Dent wrote: On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 15:27 +0200, Tom Hendrikx wrote: Oct 6 11:11:52.056 [10904] dbg: pyzor: opening pipe: /bin/pyzor --homedir /home/mark/.pyzor check /tmp/.spamassassin10904BmyCb9tmp Oct

Re: Pyzor?

On Sat, 6 Oct 2012, Arthur Dent wrote: On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 09:01 -0700, John Hardin wrote: On Sat, 6 Oct 2012, Arthur Dent wrote: OK - I don't know what the output means though!... 8=== $ pyzor -d --homedir /home/mark/.pyzor

Re: Pyzor?

On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 10:51 -0700, John Hardin wrote: On Sat, 6 Oct 2012, Arthur Dent wrote: On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 09:01 -0700, John Hardin wrote: On Sat, 6 Oct 2012, Arthur Dent wrote: OK - I don't know what the output means though!...

Re: Pyzor?

On 10/06/2012 08:47 PM, Arthur Dent wrote: Oct 6 19:34:11.248 [14864] dbg: pyzor: got response: public.pyzor.org:24441 (200, 'OK') 0 0 Tried few different spam messages? Maybe the Pyzor DB doesn't have a hash for one or the other..

Re: Pyzor?

On Sat, 6 Oct 2012, Arthur Dent wrote: On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 10:51 -0700, John Hardin wrote: On Sat, 6 Oct 2012, Arthur Dent wrote: On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 09:01 -0700, John Hardin wrote: On Sat, 6 Oct 2012, Arthur Dent wrote: OK - I don't know what the output means though!...

Re: Pyzor?

On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 12:28 -0700, John Hardin wrote: Ah. That looks a lot better. test isn't a valid email so it's not surprising that pyzor doesn't return a response. The second test, using a valid email, shows that everything is (or at least should be) working properly. SA _is_ seeing

Re: Pyzor?

On Sat, 6 Oct 2012, Arthur Dent wrote: I got fixated on the exit code of 1 which must be hardwired in my brain as an error... Same here. -- John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org key:

Re: Pyzor?

On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 21:26 +0100, Arthur Dent wrote: On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 12:28 -0700, John Hardin wrote: Ah. That looks a lot better. test isn't a valid email so it's not surprising that pyzor doesn't return a response. The second test, using a valid email, shows that everything

Re: Pyzor?

On Sat, 6 Oct 2012, Arthur Dent wrote: Oct 06 23:16:04 sansome.org abrt[16484]: detected unhandled Python exception in '/usr/bin/pyzor' Oct 06 23:16:04 sansome.org abrt[16484]: can't communicate with ABRT daemon, is it running? [Errno 11] Resource temporarily unavailable ABRT (automatic bug

Re: Pyzor Server

On 2/4/2011 7:08 PM, User for SpamAssassin Mail List wrote: Hello, I don't keep constant eye on the mail server logs but did notice that pyzor was not working. I've ping the server that I've been using for years: # pyzor ping 82.94.255.100:24441 TimeoutError: And see it is not

  1   2   3   >