wrote on Wed, 31 May 2006 19:37:54 -0400 (EDT):
some
under the 5.6.1 site_perl, some under 5.005.
Did you notice that you didn't say anything about this earlier? ;-) It
seems this is the cause of your problem.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A couple of days after an upgrade from 3.0.4 to 3.1.2, I'm noticing
that it seems alot slower. I turned off most network tests,
including DCC, Pyzor and Razor and it still looks like there's an
issue.
I raised max children from 15 to 25, yet it still seems to be
On Wed, 31 May 2006, Bowie Bailey wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A couple of days after an upgrade from 3.0.4 to 3.1.2, I'm noticing
that it seems alot slower. I turned off most network tests,
including DCC, Pyzor and Razor and it still looks like there's an
issue.
I raised max
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 31 May 2006, Bowie Bailey wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A couple of days after an upgrade from 3.0.4 to 3.1.2, I'm
noticing that it seems alot slower. I turned off most network
tests, including DCC, Pyzor and Razor and it still looks like
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A couple of days after an upgrade from 3.0.4 to 3.1.2, I'm noticing
that it seems alot slower. I turned off most network tests,
including DCC, Pyzor and Razor and it still looks like there's an
issue.
Is it possible that you're locking on a Bayes write? Try
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 11:12:03AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
May 31 07:53:52 mail spamd[59117]: Use of uninitialized value in
subtraction (-) at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/Locker/UnixNFSSafe.pm
line 102, GEN108 line 46.
Hrm. That's not good. Seems
On Wed, 31 May 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A couple of days after an upgrade from 3.0.4 to 3.1.2, I'm noticing
that it seems alot slower. I turned off most network tests,
including DCC, Pyzor and Razor and it still looks like there's an
issue.
Is it possible
On Wed, 31 May 2006, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 11:12:03AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
May 31 07:53:52 mail spamd[59117]: Use of uninitialized value in
subtraction (-) at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/Locker/UnixNFSSafe.pm
line 102,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ugh...I have seen some locking errors while I wasn't before. WOuld
simply turning off auto-learning accomplish the same thing?
Possibly.
If it needs to be turned off altogether, will just commenting out
bayes_path in local.cf do it? I don't see any other reference
On Wed, 31 May 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 31 May 2006, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 11:12:03AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
May 31 07:53:52 mail spamd[59117]: Use of uninitialized value in
subtraction (-) at
Can you get output of
strace -f -o trace
on the affected processes? (easy way: just stop spamd, then strace the
spamd startup script.)
--j.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 31 May 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 31 May 2006, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2006
Hi All,
Problem resolved.
The creation of a dir /root/.spamassassin with a file user_prefs in it
has resolved the issue.
After adding the above it now lint's clean.
I'm not sure why it didn't get created at install - but at least now
it's fixed.
Many thanks to James Rallo for his correct
On the plus side the manual fix is pretty simple and now it's in the
lists it should make it a little easier for others to find a solution.
I wouldn't beat yourself up too much, if it was perfect every time
where would the entertainment value be? ;-)
KR
Nigel
On Wed, 31 May 2006 17:16:56
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 10:31:27AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, can anybody tell me whether or not spamd re-reads the .pre files if
you just give it a SIG HUP, or do you have to kill and restart it (I did
that this time anyway)?
A HUP should cause spamd to re-exec (basically killing
I mean this:
- bug 3754: if there's a problem opening a file via sa-learn or
spamassassin, return an error exit value.
It indicates there might have been changes to that area of the code
which concerns your problem.
Kai
I understand, thanks for the clarification.
I had some time over the
A reminder: if you don't bug that it won't get fixed.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
Craig Emmitt wrote on Fri, 26 May 2006 11:01:53 -0500:
3.1.2 is not setting a non-zero exit code when a message is classified
as spam (spamassassin.bat -e mailfilein mailfileout) Known
issue/bug?
There is something about exit codes in the changelog.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
3.1.2 is not setting a non-zero exit code when a message is
classified
as spam (spamassassin.bat -e mailfilein mailfileout) Known
issue/bug?
There is something about exit codes in the changelog.
I had checked the changelog and didn't see anything obviously relevant.
Craig
Craig Emmitt wrote on Fri, 26 May 2006 12:02:57 -0500:
I had checked the changelog and didn't see anything obviously relevant.
I mean this:
- bug 3754: if there's a problem opening a file via sa-learn or
spamassassin, return an error exit value.
It indicates there might have been changes
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 12:50:41PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was hoping to get it out this month, but I think it'll probably be next
early month before it's all ready to go. ie: hopefully a week or two,
depending on how much time people have to create/review patches, etc.
Any
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 05:32:45PM -0400, Joe Flowers wrote:
Any educated guesses on when 3.1.2 will be released?
From a selfish point of view, I'm trying to kill several upgrades with
one stone.
I was hoping to get it out this month, but I
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 05:32:45PM -0400, Joe Flowers wrote:
Any educated guesses on when 3.1.2 will be released?
I was hoping to get it out this month, but I think it'll probably be next
early month before it's all ready to go.
Any word on whether or not it includes a fix for bug #4590?
: Theo Van Dinter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 14:05:25 -0400
Subject: Re: 3.1.2?
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 05:32:45PM -0400, Joe Flowers wrote:
Any educated guesses on when 3.1.2 will be released?
From a selfish point of view, I'm trying to kill several
23 matches
Mail list logo
