They do if you're offering mail service to a large number of users. They
login to a phished mailbox, send new phishingmails to that mailbox and
check the headers if they can see which rules are hit. Then they adapt
the phishingmail to get a lower score until they are below the spam
threshold. T
. Doesn't help either. Do I
perhaps have to report the SPAM myself? Is this reporting still up to
date
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPAMASSASSIN/Report+spam
The scoring of this type of SPAM is
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.502 tagged_above=2 required=6.31
tests=[BAYES_9
when
you put it at 3
> I have even
> activated HOSTKARMA-black/brown. Doesn't help either. Do I perhaps have
> to report the SPAM myself?
I started creating own dns blacklists. I am flagging a lot as spam and users
can individually unset this.
So there is no solution to this?
Is it possible to add the IP as an argument to a rule's Describe, using
something like $1 for the detected regex value? If so, how would this be
implemented?
An actual exemple is FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT which has a description
such as [sfierds31(at)gmail.c
Thanks, Matus, but that does not work. I'm looking for something that
will show in the spam body or subject so I do not have to view the headers.
On 16.01.24 15:29, Linkcheck via users wrote:
When receiving a report in a spam the reported rules state reason and
score but it would be useful if, either on one of those rules or a
separate rule (or even in the Subject) there could be a report of the
final Received IP. Depending on the IP
When receiving a report in a spam the reported rules state reason and
score but it would be useful if, either on one of those rules or a
separate rule (or even in the Subject) there could be a report of the
final Received IP. Depending on the IP and its country of origin I
sometimes block the
Hello,
perhaps try setting
report_safe 0
Then, according to the documentation at ‘man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf’,
a header ‘X-Spam-Report’ will be added that might just be what you need.
Hi,
It looks like I am using SA 4.0.0 on Ubuntu 23.x. I have looked for an
answer in Google-pedia, and it either does not exist or I am not able to
figure out the correct search term.
Is there a way to get a "spam report" or "expanded spam headers" from
spamassa
going back to 3.4.6 as now until 4.0.1 is released, in amavisd logs hits
is always - with imho means spamtest is skipped, can you verify sa trunk
does work still with amavisd ?
I've got spamassassin setup to report safe on suspected spam. I like the
summary report, but I *really *like when some of the report identifies the
specific rule trigger.
How can I, for example, have the summary report show:
1.0 RELAYCOUNTRY_AWAY Sent through a non-US/CA server [her
On Thu, 15 Oct 2020, Tim Wetterek Andersson wrote:
I am sorry for not really understanding but is what you mean I should
try using like "lang sv " for the whole report template?
Please keep the conversation on the users list so others can potentially
benefit in the future.
Till: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Ämne: Re: Character encoding in Report Templates
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:50:58 -0700 (PDT) John Hardin wrote:
>
> Did you try just pasting in the proper accented text verbatim?
> Explicit hex values shouldn't be needed. See the report lines of this
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:50:58 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin wrote:
>
> Did you try just pasting in the proper accented text verbatim?
> Explicit hex values shouldn't be needed. See the report lines of this
> for example:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPAMASSA
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020, Tim Wetterek Andersson wrote:
I am very new to SpamAssassin and I can not get the following to work:
I am trying to use the swedish characters åäö in the report template I have set
up in my SpamAssasin instances.
FYI, QP encodes that as: the swedish characters =E5=E4=F6
Hi!
I am very new to SpamAssassin and I can not get the following to work:
I am trying to use the swedish characters åäö in the report template I have set
up in my SpamAssasin instances.
I have tried using the ASCII-tables described
here<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/disp
I've submitted a bug report to Ubuntu to get SA upgraded by the newest
version:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/spamassassin/+bug/1856248
--
Chris
31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft)
19:49:22 up 17 days, 10:32, 1 user, load average: 1.20, 0.91, 0.60
Description:Ubuntu 18.04.
On Wed, 28 Aug 2019 10:08:36 -0400
Thierry Lavallee wrote:
> Hi, First post. :)
>
> Is there any way to report on ALL the threshold settings configured
> across ALL users on the server?
>
> I would like to see if users have overridden the default values. And
> I would like
Thierry Lavallee wrote:
Hi, First post. :)
Is there any way to report on ALL the threshold settings configured
across ALL users on the server?
That depends a lot on how SA is integrated and what you mean by a "user".
For the SA cluster at work, I'd do
SELECT * FROM
Hi, First post. :)
Is there any way to report on ALL the threshold settings configured
across ALL users on the server?
I would like to see if users have overridden the default values. And I
would like to make sure I don't override them by changing the default.
Thanks
PS: We are o
I'm trying to use spamassassin's ability to report an email as spam to
various folks who collect that kind of data:
https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ReportingSpam
I'm piping the email to "spamassassin -report", and the result I get is:
Wide character in syswrite a
On Thu, 2018-12-20 at 10:26 -0600, Rick Gutierrez wrote:
> Hi , what would be the correct way to see the spamassassin report?
>
I've added
report_safe 1
to my SA configuration.
This has no effect on ham, but spam is treated the same way bounced e-
mails: a wrapper message
El jue., 20 dic. 2018 a las 10:36, Reindl Harald
() escribió:
>
>
> Am 20.12.18 um 17:26 schrieb Rick Gutierrez:
> >>>>> add_header all Report _REPORT_
>
> you got already the correct answer and since it is a header you need to
> look at the raw-source of the
ec 2018 22:26:17 +0100
> >>> sebast...@debianfan.de wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> I want to have a full report - i.g.: 5 Points for
> >>>> IMG_ONLY_FM_DOM, 5 Points for SURBL_BLOCKED .
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>&
On 12/16/2018 4:35 PM, RW wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Dec 2018 08:30:58 -0500
> Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>
>
>> On Sat, Dec 15, 2018, 17:25 RW >
>>> On Sat, 15 Dec 2018 22:26:17 +0100
>>> sebast...@debianfan.de wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> I wa
On Sun, 16 Dec 2018 08:30:58 -0500
Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2018, 17:25 RW
> > On Sat, 15 Dec 2018 22:26:17 +0100
> > sebast...@debianfan.de wrote:
> >
> >
> > > I want to have a full report - i.g.: 5 Points for
> >
On 2018-12-16 08:30, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> > add_header all Report _REPORT_
> This can cause issues though. That feature is not header safe to my
> knowledge.
_TESTSCORES_
--
Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet,
if you also post the followup to the
This can cause issues though. That feature is not header safe to my
knowledge.
On Sat, Dec 15, 2018, 17:25 RW On Sat, 15 Dec 2018 22:26:17 +0100
> sebast...@debianfan.de wrote:
>
>
> > I want to have a full report - i.g.: 5 Points for IMG_ONLY_FM_DOM, 5
> > Poi
On Sat, 15 Dec 2018 22:26:17 +0100
sebast...@debianfan.de wrote:
> I want to have a full report - i.g.: 5 Points for IMG_ONLY_FM_DOM, 5
> Points for SURBL_BLOCKED .
>
add_header all Report _REPORT_
=3.4.2
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mail.myhost.de
I want to have a full report - i.g.: 5 Points for IMG_ONLY_FM_DOM, 5 Points for
SURBL_BLOCKED .
What do i have to change in the config?
Tnx
It isn't but a path would be welcome to add that feature.
On 8/22/2018 4:12 PM, Namespro.ca wrote:
> Currently, when report_safe is set as 1, the original message is
> included as an attachment with the following headers:
>
> Content-Type: message/rfc822; x-spam-type=original;
> Content-Descriptio
Hi there,
Currently, when report_safe is set as 1, the original message is included
as an attachment with the following headers:
Content-Type: message/rfc822; x-spam-type=original;
Content-Description: original message before SpamAssassin
Content-Disposition: attachment
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
Got it. I thought it was a setup issue on my end. It didn't occur to me
that it could be a bug in hmailserver.
-
FROM: Groach
SENT: Friday, July 27, 2018 8:03 AM
TO: users@spamassassin.apache.org
SUBJECT: Re: Line breaks in X-Spam-Report
https://github.com/hmails
ilserver. Thanks.
>
>
>From: Reindl Harald
>Sent: Friday, July 27, 2018 4:33 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org; ad...@123.dynu.com
>Subject: Re: Line breaks in X-Spam-Report
>
>> they are there
>>
>> let me guess you use dbma
OK. That explains why I've seen it that way in some examples online.
I'm running hmailserver. Thanks.
From: Reindl Harald
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2018 4:33 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org; ad...@123.dynu.com
Subject: Re: Line breaks in X-Spam-Rep
Hello. I was wondering if there is a setting to force line breaks in
X-Spam-Report. It's kind of a trivial issue, but it would be so much easier
to read. Like below as an example (that I manually altered). Many thanks.
X-Spam-Report:
* 1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a rel
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 02:03, Joëlle Pfeffer
wrote:
>Where can I find the cause for the following non delivery notification since
>the Spam scanner report is empty ?
Look into /var/log/mail.log at zim-mta-p01.cg93.fr (Postfix).
On 28 Apr 2018, at 20:03 (-0400), Joëlle Pfeffer wrote:
Where can I find the cause for the following non delivery notification
since the Spam scanner report is empty ?
Content type: Spam
Internal reference code for the message is 01888-01/UNuEjXwqiB3b
First upstream SMTP client IP address
Where can I find the cause for the following non delivery notification since
the Spam scanner report is empty ?
Content type: Spam
Internal reference code for the message is 01888-01/UNuEjXwqiB3b
First upstream SMTP client IP address: [127.0.0.1] localhost
According to a 'Received:&#
Where can I find the cause for the following non delivery notification since
the Spam scanner report is empty ?
Content type: Spam
Internal reference code for the message is 01888-01/UNuEjXwqiB3b
First upstream SMTP client IP address: [127.0.0.1] localhost
According to a 'Received:&#
On 2018-02-21 (06:50 MST), David Jones wrote:
>
> I think it's best if we all report to Spamcop first to concentrate all of
> that information into a single database which increases our effectiveness.
> Then if you want to report directly to the platform/sender's abu
On 02/21/2018 07:35 AM, Karol Augustin wrote:
On 2018-02-21 12:38, @lbutlr wrote:
On 2018-02-21 (05:37 MST), Tom Hendrikx wrote:
How about: https://aws.amazon.com/forms/report-abuse
Isn't amazon SES separate from amazon AWS?
It's not. SES is just a service within Amazon AWS.
On 2018-02-21 12:38, @lbutlr wrote:
> On 2018-02-21 (05:37 MST), Tom Hendrikx wrote:
>>
>> How about: https://aws.amazon.com/forms/report-abuse
>
>
> Isn't amazon SES separate from amazon AWS?
It's not. SES is just a service within Amazon AWS.
k.
--
Kar
On 2018-02-21 (05:37 MST), Tom Hendrikx wrote:
>
> How about: https://aws.amazon.com/forms/report-abuse
Isn't amazon SES separate from amazon AWS?
--
Nothing gold can stay -- Robert Frost Stay gold -- Johnny Cade
On 21-02-18 13:34, @lbutlr wrote:
> I've been trying to find a way to report a spammer to Amazon SES (Simple
> Email Service), but I haven't found anywhere to report this spam.
>
> (SA is tagging the messages, but I'm tired of Amazon allowing this company to
> con
I've been trying to find a way to report a spammer to Amazon SES (Simple Email
Service), but I haven't found anywhere to report this spam.
(SA is tagging the messages, but I'm tired of Amazon allowing this company to
continue doing this).
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.3 req
On Fri, 10 Mar 2017, Rejaine Monteiro wrote:
I'm using spamassassin-3.4.0 in a spam gateway with qmail+simscan and using
always same account (qscand) to scan all msgs.
I performed a simple scan in a spam msg, like this:
# spamc -u qscand -R < /tmp/spammsg.eml
and... score are: Content analys
I'm using spamassassin-3.4.0 in a spam gateway with qmail+simscan and
using always same account (qscand) to scan all msgs.
I performed a simple scan in a spam msg, like this:
# spamc -u qscand -R < /tmp/spammsg.eml
and... score are: Content analysis details: (2.8 points, 5.0 required)
And
On Wed, 03 Feb 2016 05:48:00 +0100
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> note:
>
> __ have no score need
> T_ must have socre, if not defined it defults to 1.0
An ordinary rule defaults to 1.0, a rule that start with T_ defaults to 0.01.
, 2 Feb 2016, Marc Perkel wrote:
Never mind
I found that if I change __ to T_ that it does what I want.
On 02/02/16 18:05, Marc Perkel wrote:
On 02/02/16 17:55, Marc Perkel wrote:
Normally SA creates a header that has a list of the names of rules
that matched. It skips the listing of h
that matched. It skips the listing of hidden rules that start with __
.
Is there a command where I can easily tell SA to include the hidden
rules in the report in the headers so I can see all of it?
I'm also - I suppose asking it to list rules that match that produce
no scores.
kel wrote:
Normally SA creates a header that has a list of the names of rules that
matched. It skips the listing of hidden rules that start with __ .
Is there a command where I can easily tell SA to include the hidden rules
in the report in the headers so I can see all of it?
__ .
Is there a command where I can easily tell SA to include the hidden
rules in the report in the headers so I can see all of it?
I'm also - I suppose asking it to list rules that match that produce
no scores.
body __LATE_RICH_RELATIVE /\blate
.{0,15}(?:father|wife|widow|hu
On 02/02/16 17:55, Marc Perkel wrote:
Normally SA creates a header that has a list of the names of rules
that matched. It skips the listing of hidden rules that start with __ .
Is there a command where I can easily tell SA to include the hidden
rules in the report in the headers so I can see
Normally SA creates a header that has a list of the names of rules that
matched. It skips the listing of hidden rules that start with __ .
Is there a command where I can easily tell SA to include the hidden
rules in the report in the headers so I can see all of it?
--
Marc Perkel - Sales
On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 21:31:57 -0400
Bill Shirley wrote:
> I'm looking into modifying my spam processing script so it will
> report spam to Razor. From the Spamassassin Wiki:
> https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ReportingSpam I should use:
> spamassassin -r < message.
On 21.07.15 21:31, Bill Shirley wrote:
I'm looking into modifying my spam processing script so it will report spam to
Razor.
IIRC Razor says it should only be fed up manually (FYI)
From the Spamassassin Wiki: https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ReportingSpam
I shoul
I'm looking into modifying my spam processing script so it will report spam to
Razor.
From the Spamassassin Wiki: https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ReportingSpam
I should use:
spamassassin -r < message.txt
It states "The message will also be submitted to SpamAssass
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 17:14:37 -0400
Bill Cole wrote:
> You snipped out what I was specifically responding to:
>
> On 22 Jun 2015, at 21:45 , Michael B Allen wrote:
>
> > bayes_file_mode 0777
Ok, I misunderstood. I thought you were referring to things being run as
root.
On 24 Jun 2015, at 16:21, RW wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 22:42:09 -0400
Bill Cole wrote:
On 22 Jun 2015, at 21:45, Michael B Allen wrote:
So with a default install (CentOS 7 in my case and I suspect pretty
much all other systems), bayes will NOT just work by default unless
you explicitly mod
On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 22:42:09 -0400
Bill Cole wrote:
> On 22 Jun 2015, at 21:45, Michael B Allen wrote:
> > So with a default install (CentOS 7 in my case and I suspect pretty
> > much all other systems), bayes will NOT just work by default unless
> > you explicitly modify /etc/mail/spamassassin/l
On 23 Jun 2015, at 14:58, Michael B Allen wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Bill Cole
wrote:
Yes, I want a system-wide bayes db. And I am running spamd and spamc
and I assume that is all working (but of course I have no idea if it
really is).
But I want users to be able to put spams th
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Bill Cole
wrote:
>> Yes, I want a system-wide bayes db. And I am running spamd and spamc
>> and I assume that is all working (but of course I have no idea if it
>> really is).
>>
>> But I want users to be able to put spams that get through into
>> ~/Maildir/.Learn
Am 23.06.2015 um 18:48 schrieb Bill Cole:
* sa-learn IS NOT THE RIGHT TOOL FOR LEARNING MESSAGES INTO A
SYSTEM-WIDE DB
says who? that below is the rsult of a customized sa-learn script for a
ton of users working like a charm on a spamass-milter setup for 10
months now
[root@mail-
On 23 Jun 2015, at 0:05, Michael B Allen wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Bill Cole
wrote:
On 22 Jun 2015, at 21:45, Michael B Allen wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Reindl Harald
wrote:
[root@www .spamassassin]# pwd
/var/log/spamassassin/.spamassassin
[root@www .spamassas
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 02:04:03 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
> oh and independent of not running as root you have only 301 spam
> messages while the docs clearly state you need at least 400 ham as
> well as 400 spam samples
It's 200 of each.
Am 23.06.2015 um 03:45 schrieb Michael B Allen:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
[root@www .spamassassin]# pwd
/var/log/spamassassin/.spamassassin
[root@www .spamassassin]# ls -la
total 1100
drwx-- 2 spamd spamd4096 Jun 22 19:42 .
drwx-- 3 spamd spamd4096
Am 23.06.2015 um 06:05 schrieb Michael B Allen:
Yes, I want a system-wide bayes db. And I am running spamd and spamc
and I assume that is all working (but of course I have no idea if it
really is).
But I want users to be able to put spams that get through into
~/Maildir/.LearnAsSpam and then, e
-token data: last expire
reduction count
I don't see any BAYES_ tags in X-Spam-Report.
how did you incporporate spamassassin to mail flow? Do you run milter,
amavisd, or simply spamc from procmailrc?
the bayes database you have shown belongs to user spamd, but the user does
not get all the
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Bill Cole
wrote:
> On 22 Jun 2015, at 21:45, Michael B Allen wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Reindl Harald
>> wrote:
[root@www .spamassassin]# pwd
/var/log/spamassassin/.spamassassin
[root@www .spamassassin]# ls -la
total 110
On 22 Jun 2015, at 21:45, Michael B Allen wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Reindl Harald
wrote:
[root@www .spamassassin]# pwd
/var/log/spamassassin/.spamassassin
[root@www .spamassassin]# ls -la
total 1100
drwx-- 2 spamd spamd4096 Jun 22 19:42 .
drwx-- 3 spamd spamd4096
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 9:45 PM, Michael B Allen wrote:
> and after running sa-learn again (as root) on ham, my db is now broken:
>
> [root@www .spamassassin]# sa-learn --dump magic
> bayes: bayes db version 0 is not able to be used, aborting! at
> /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Mail/SpamAssassin/Ba
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> [root@www .spamassassin]# pwd
>> /var/log/spamassassin/.spamassassin
>> [root@www .spamassassin]# ls -la
>> total 1100
>> drwx-- 2 spamd spamd4096 Jun 22 19:42 .
>> drwx-- 3 spamd spamd4096 Jun 7 00:41 ..
>> -rw--- 1 spa
0 0 0 non-token data: last expire
again: SA don'trun as root in any sane setup and hence won't use *that*
bayes-db
reduction count
[root@www .spamassassin]# cat ../../maillog | grep BAYES
[root@www .spamassassin]#
I don't see any BAYES_ tags in X-Spa
ssin]# cat ../../maillog | grep BAYES
[root@www .spamassassin]#
I don't see any BAYES_ tags in X-Spam-Report.
see above
I'm using a default SA install on CentOS 7.
what is a "default install"?
it can be spamass-milter or anything else calling SA
Do I need a local.cf? From looking a
.spamassassin]# cat ../../maillog | grep BAYES
[root@www .spamassassin]#
I don't see any BAYES_ tags in X-Spam-Report.
I'm using a default SA install on CentOS 7.
Do I need a local.cf? From looking at the docs, it claims bayes is
enabled by default. How can I check this?
Or maybe I
ing contact form. And it's nice abuse@
also started to work. As for know I can't send samples as arf because I
can't find easy to use and working arf report generator.
agradecido,
Marcin
e, and I have no problem identifying
>> myself when I contact a company. If I'm acting on my own behalf, I'd put
>> "Personal" or "None" or "N/A" into a form, and if it's not accepted, oh
>> well.
>
> Hi!
> In a half of past week I asked them about how should I report spam to
> them. I didn't get any answer yet. I don't expect to get it in future.
> For me they are unreliable as a RBL provider.
>
their choice, now you get to make yours. Personally, I'm
>> quite pleased with their performance, and I have no problem identifying
>> myself when I contact a company. If I'm acting on my own behalf, I'd put
>> "Personal" or "None" or "N/A
problem identifying
> myself when I contact a company. If I'm acting on my own behalf, I'd put
> "Personal" or "None" or "N/A" into a form, and if it's not accepted, oh
> well.
Hi!
In a half of past week I asked them about how should I report spam to
them. I didn't get any answer yet. I don't expect to get it in future.
For me they are unreliable as a RBL provider.
Dave Warren wrote:
On 2014-08-29 02:38, Marcin Mirosław wrote:
So what should I do in your opinion? I'm getting spam to my private
spamtrap so I can't fill fields about company - it doesn't matter where
I'm hired for reporting spam. What if I would be unemployed? Then I
would have to lie about c
On 2014-08-29 02:38, Marcin Mirosław wrote:
So what should I do in your opinion? I'm getting spam to my private
spamtrap so I can't fill fields about company - it doesn't matter where
I'm hired for reporting spam. What if I would be unemployed? Then I
would have to lie about company? IMHO it is t
W dniu 28.08.2014 o 11:20, Reindl Harald pisze:
>
> Am 28.08.2014 um 11:11 schrieb Marcin Mirosław:
>> I've noticed growing volume of emails listed by mailspike. Usually it's
>> spam listed as "good reputation". On his webpage I can see only page
>> http://mailspike.org/contact.html , they want to
Am 28.08.2014 um 22:29 schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
> On Thu, 2014-08-28 at 21:43 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 28.08.2014 um 19:11 schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
>
>>> FWIW, SA even generates the Report header by default with your setting
>>> of report_safe 0.
Am 28.08.2014 um 22:18 schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
> On Thu, 2014-08-28 at 21:43 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 28.08.2014 um 19:11 schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
>
>>> FWIW, SA even generates the Report header by default with your setting
>>> of report_safe 0.
On Thu, 2014-08-28 at 21:43 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 28.08.2014 um 19:11 schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
> > FWIW, SA even generates the Report header by default with your setting
> > of report_safe 0. Not in your case, because you chose to clear_headers
> > and m
On Thu, 2014-08-28 at 21:43 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 28.08.2014 um 19:11 schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
> > FWIW, SA even generates the Report header by default with your setting
> > of report_safe 0. Not in your case, because you chose to clear_headers
> > and m
Am 28.08.2014 um 19:11 schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
> That long _TESTS_ string without line-breaks is due to the very long
> _REPORT_ in that header. If you add a dedicated Report header, the
> Status header and its list of tests will be wrapped appropriately, too.
>
> FWIW, SA
On Thu, 2014-08-28 at 11:08 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> is it somehow possible to get line-breaks in the
> report headers to have them better readable?
SA inserts line-breaks by default, to keep headers below 80 chars wide.
> report_safe 0
> clear_headers
> add_header sp
Am 28.08.2014 um 16:55 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
> On 28.08.14 11:08, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> is it somehow possible to get line-breaks in the
>> report headers to have them better readable?
>
>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.7/5.0,
>&g
On 28.08.14 11:08, Reindl Harald wrote:
is it somehow possible to get line-breaks in the
report headers to have them better readable?
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.7/5.0,
tests=BAYES_50,CUST_DNSWL_5,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,USER_IN_WHITELIST
, report= * -2.5 CUST_DNSWL_5 RBL
Am 28.08.2014 um 11:11 schrieb Marcin Mirosław:
> I've noticed growing volume of emails listed by mailspike. Usually it's
> spam listed as "good reputation". On his webpage I can see only page
> http://mailspike.org/contact.html , they want to fill many personal
> information, I don't want to send
Hi!
I've noticed growing volume of emails listed by mailspike. Usually it's
spam listed as "good reputation". On his webpage I can see only page
http://mailspike.org/contact.html , they want to fill many personal
information, I don't want to send it to them and I don't want to lie.
abuse@ doesn't w
Hi
is it somehow possible to get line-breaks in the
report headers to have them better readable?
given that "Received" and "DKIM" are coming with
more than one line and the additional ones with
a intention it should be technically possible
report_safe 0
clear_headers
On 8/12/2014 10:42 AM, matth wrote:
Oh, right, thanks. It is amavis. I did not realise it was triggering SA.
Thanks for the pointer.
Doing spam scanning with Amavis can be useful. It gives you the ability
to reject high-scoring spam, but you lose some of the per-user
customizations.
If you
Oh, right, thanks. It is amavis. I did not realise it was triggering SA.
Thanks for the pointer.
--
View this message in context:
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/Spam-score-in-headers-does-not-match-the-Content-analysis-report-tp110896p110906.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin
On 8/12/2014 10:05 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 8/12/2014 6:31 AM, matth wrote:
Please have a look at the email below: in the content analysis report (in
the body) the spam score appears as 5.1 points. The email is correctly
identified as spam, the subject line changed to include
On 8/12/2014 6:31 AM, matth wrote:
Please have a look at the email below: in the content analysis report (in
the body) the spam score appears as 5.1 points. The email is correctly
identified as spam, the subject line changed to include "*SPAM*".
However, in the email headers
On 8/12/2014 6:31 AM, matth wrote:
Hello All,
Please have a look at the email below: in the content analysis report (in
the body) the spam score appears as 5.1 points. The email is correctly
identified as spam, the subject line changed to include "*SPAM*".
However, in the ema
Hello All,
Please have a look at the email below: in the content analysis report (in
the body) the spam score appears as 5.1 points. The email is correctly
identified as spam, the subject line changed to include "*SPAM*".
However, in the email headers the score appears as 0.00
1 - 100 of 788 matches
Mail list logo
