Am 07.10.2014 um 02:10 schrieb John Hardin:
On Tue, 7 Oct 2014, Reindl Harald wrote:
P.S.:
it was your "Re: [SPAM] Re: False positive in rule: FUZZY_XPILL" i
refered implicitly as i started that thread - mayb eyou can make clear
that the [SPAM] part was not your personal prefix for the SA list
On Tue, 7 Oct 2014, Reindl Harald wrote:
P.S.:
it was your "Re: [SPAM] Re: False positive in rule: FUZZY_XPILL" i refered
implicitly as i started that thread - mayb eyou can make clear that the
[SPAM] part was not your personal prefix for the SA list as LuKreme repeatly
pretends instead just
Am 07.10.2014 um 01:48 schrieb David Jones:
On Mon, 6 Oct 2014, LuKreme wrote:
On 03 Oct 2014, at 11:42 , Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 03.10.2014 um 19:34 schrieb LuKreme:
[SPAM] is not a spam marker I’ve ever seen so it seems perfectly OK to me
You are assuming, I think wrongly, that the [SP
Am 07.10.2014 um 01:38 schrieb John Hardin:
On Mon, 6 Oct 2014, LuKreme wrote:
On 03 Oct 2014, at 11:42 , Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 03.10.2014 um 19:34 schrieb LuKreme:
[SPAM] is not a spam marker I’ve ever seen so it seems perfectly OK
to me
You are assuming, I think wrongly, that the [SPAM
> On Mon, 6 Oct 2014, LuKreme wrote:
> > On 03 Oct 2014, at 11:42 , Reindl Harald wrote:
> >>
> >> Am 03.10.2014 um 19:34 schrieb LuKreme:
> >>> [SPAM] is not a spam marker I’ve ever seen so it seems perfectly OK to me
> >>> You are assuming, I think wrongly, that the [SPAM] tag is being used
>
On Mon, 6 Oct 2014, LuKreme wrote:
On 03 Oct 2014, at 11:42 , Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 03.10.2014 um 19:34 schrieb LuKreme:
[SPAM] is not a spam marker I’ve ever seen so it seems perfectly OK to me
You are assuming, I think wrongly, that the [SPAM] tag is being used because
of a content filte
On 03 Oct 2014, at 11:42 , Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 03.10.2014 um 19:34 schrieb LuKreme:
>> [SPAM] is not a spam marker I’ve ever seen so it seems perfectly OK to me
>> You are assuming, I think wrongly, that the [SPAM] tag is being used because
>> of a content filter and not simply a tag to
Am 04.10.2014 um 18:27 schrieb jdebert:
My apologies. You are 100,000% correct about changing annoying
behaviours.
thank you very much!
I did not find the message you referred to, perhaps because
of a forgotten convenience filter that strips nuisance tags
from subjects
the intention was no
My apologies. You are 100,000% correct about changing annoying
behaviours.
I did not find the message you referred to, perhaps because of a
forgotten convenience filter that strips nuisance tags from subjects.
On Fri, 03 Oct 2014 19:47:00 +0200
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> FYI, this person is banned from some lists for trolling.
> Might be worthwhile for list-admin to consider that.
>
> https://www.google.de/search?hl=de&as_q=Harald+Reindl+troll
>
Whether or not Herr Reindl is a troll doesn't matter. There
On 9/29/2014 10:54 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
please remove markers like [SPAM] if a mesage was flagged before
reply - they lead often that a message goes to junk- instead the
list-folder :-)
On 03.10.14 11:11, LuKreme wrote:
You should not be filtering on Subject. Scoring on subject is fine, bu
On 10/3/2014 1:47 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
FYI, this person is banned from some lists for trolling.
Might be worthwhile for list-admin to consider that.
https://www.google.de/search?hl=de&as_q=Harald+Reindl+troll
As of yet, I've not seen anything that has stepped to that level and
let's focus on
Am 03.10.2014 um 19:47 schrieb Kai Schaetzl:
> FYI, this person is banned from some lists for trolling.
> Might be worthwhile for list-admin to consider that.
>
> https://www.google.de/search?hl=de&as_q=Harald+Reindl+troll
thank you for your intervention and support of the two
guys which are unha
FYI, this person is banned from some lists for trolling.
Might be worthwhile for list-admin to consider that.
https://www.google.de/search?hl=de&as_q=Harald+Reindl+troll
Kai
Am 03.10.2014 um 19:34 schrieb LuKreme:
> [SPAM] is not a spam marker I’ve ever seen so it seems perfectly OK to me
> You are assuming, I think wrongly, that the [SPAM] tag is being used because
> of a content filter and not simply a tag to identify the name of the list
it is the *default* tag f
> On 03 Oct 2014, at 11:21 , Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 03.10.2014 um 19:11 schrieb LuKreme:
>>> On 29 Sep 2014, at 11:19 , Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 29.09.2014 um 19:14 schrieb Nels Lindquist:
On 9/29/2014 10:54 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> please remove markers like [S
Am 03.10.2014 um 19:11 schrieb LuKreme:
>> On 29 Sep 2014, at 11:19 , Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 29.09.2014 um 19:14 schrieb Nels Lindquist:
>>> On 9/29/2014 10:54 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>
please remove markers like [SPAM] if a mesage was flagged before
reply - they lead often th
> On 29 Sep 2014, at 11:19 , Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 29.09.2014 um 19:14 schrieb Nels Lindquist:
>> On 9/29/2014 10:54 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>> please remove markers like [SPAM] if a mesage was flagged before
>>> reply - they lead often that a message goes to junk- instead the
>>>
Am 03.10.2014 um 17:46 schrieb Nick Edwards:
> thats funny, I could have sworn I replied and addressed to jdebert
if you refer to me you are not in the position to decide that
> oh lookie, so I did, you just cant help yourself fool, I think we know
> who the paranoid delusional stalker is reindl
Oh dear.
Please could you keep your arguments and name-calling off-list? It's not
nice seeing people being so unpleasant.
Thanks!
Anthony
--
www.fonant.com - Quality web sites
Tel. 01903 867 810
Fonant Ltd is registered in England and Wales, company No. 7006596
Registered office: Amelia Hous
On 10/3/14 10:46 AM, "Nick Edwards" wrote:
>On 10/3/14, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 03.10.2014 um 12:56 schrieb Nick Edwards:
May I suggest the two of you either settle this with a machete fight
(offlist!) or by being the bigger person and *not responding* to each
other, including passive-agr
Would it be possible for both of you to knock off this juvenile pissing
contest on a public mailing list? Please?
John
--
I for one welcome our new computer overlords.
-- Ken Jennings a former "Jeopardy!" quiz show champion, writing on his
thats funny, I could have sworn I replied and addressed to jdebert,
oh lookie, so I did, you just cant help yourself fool, I think we know
who the paranoid delusional stalker is reindl, get help, but no one
here is qualified to give you the help you need, and might i remind
you again dumb fuck, I w
Am 03.10.2014 um 12:56 schrieb Nick Edwards:
> jdebert, (since im not reply to the bully troll)
>
> he doesnt learn, worried about flame wars but kicks off by calling
> other people smart asses, just ignore him, most of the rest of the
> internet has done for a while
creep away damned stalker -
jdebert, (since im not reply to the bully troll)
he doesnt learn, worried about flame wars but kicks off by calling
other people smart asses, just ignore him, most of the rest of the
internet has done for a while
On 10/1/14, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 30.09.2014 um 18:12 schrieb jdebert:
>>
Am 30.09.2014 um 18:12 schrieb jdebert:
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 19:19:10 +0200
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 29.09.2014 um 19:14 schrieb Nels Lindquist:
>>> On 9/29/2014 10:54 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>
please remove markers like [SPAM] if a mesage was flagged before
reply - they lea
On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 19:19:10 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 29.09.2014 um 19:14 schrieb Nels Lindquist:
> > On 9/29/2014 10:54 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
> >> please remove markers like [SPAM] if a mesage was flagged before
> >> reply - they lead often that a message goes to junk- instead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9/29/2014 11:19 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 29.09.2014 um 19:14 schrieb Nels Lindquist:
>> On 9/29/2014 10:54 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>> please remove markers like [SPAM] if a mesage was flagged
>>> before reply - they lead often that a m
Am 29.09.2014 um 19:14 schrieb Nels Lindquist:
> On 9/29/2014 10:54 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> please remove markers like [SPAM] if a mesage was flagged before
>> reply - they lead often that a message goes to junk- instead the
>> list-folder :-)
>
> Please teach your users to filter on the L
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9/29/2014 10:54 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> please remove markers like [SPAM] if a mesage was flagged before
> reply - they lead often that a message goes to junk- instead the
> list-folder :-)
Please teach your users to filter on the List-ID: head
please remove markers like [SPAM] if a mesage was flagged
before reply - they lead often that a message goes to junk-
instead the list-folder :-)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
31 matches
Mail list logo
