Am 03.10.2014 um 19:11 schrieb LuKreme: >> On 29 Sep 2014, at 11:19 , Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote: >> >> Am 29.09.2014 um 19:14 schrieb Nels Lindquist: >>> On 9/29/2014 10:54 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> >>>> please remove markers like [SPAM] if a mesage was flagged before >>>> reply - they lead often that a message goes to junk- instead the >>>> list-folder :-) >>> >>> Please teach your users to filter on the List-ID: header rather than >>> Subject: for this list. The issue can be entirely avoided without >>> requiring everyone else in the world to alter their behaviour >> >> the [SPAM] marker comes *before* all other sieve-filters >> otherwise it would not catch faked From-Headers > > You should not be filtering on Subject. Scoring on subject is fine, > but filtering on it is a terrible idea
i try to explain the intention of the thread a last time: * what i filter or not don't matter, i look in my junk-folder * it was meant as friendly reminder if somebody don't whitelist the SA list which is the reason [SPAM] appears in *his* incoming mail it is a good idea after press "reply" remove that marker * i just don't get what needs a discussion about such a hint * it is a bad idea to write mails with spam-markers in the subject because you never know how they are treated in case of the different RCPT's on a mailing list and since *your intention as sender* is that the list-members reveive your mail *it is in your intention* to not put things in the subject making that more unlikely again: it is not a matter of talking about spam on the SA list it is just a matter if you already made the mistake pass the list mail through your contentfilter don't amplify it by bounce back the marker in your response do i personally care? no - why should i? it's not my mail which may get not the attention the sender likes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
