>beta1 binaries
https://ctf.open.collab.net/sf/frs/do/viewRelease/projects.csvn/frs.svn_binaries.windows
But as mentioned the "beta1 binaries" are only running on the server side. On
the client I'm using whatever version is bundled with tortoisesvn nightly build.
>error text as string
---
Hi,
Von: Markus Schaber [mailto:m.scha...@3s-software.com]
> Von: David Myers [mailto:david.myers.24...@gmail.com]
> > What I require is a method where I can make the file truly 'read
only'
> after a certain point.
>
> My suggestion is a special property you invent yourself (like
> FileFrozenRea
Dear folks,
Over the years, I have been getting weird "checksum error"s when committing
changes in certain files.
These ones are NOT related to the common problems of checksum errors with
svn, such as corrupted .svn/entries or .svn/text based, or windows xp sp1.
Setup:
Master on W/xxx
Slave and W
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:58:49AM +0200, Sebastian Brandt wrote:
> That discussion was two years ago; yet, I have been unable to find a
> bug/issue report of this problem, or a documented fix.
> So, before I post the bug report, I ask for feedback here - was the problem
> observed by others, has i
OFF THE SUBJECT OF APACHE, NOW TRYING TO ACCESS SVNSERVE VIA PORT 3690
/var/svn/config/svnserve.conf has been changed from the default to show
*anon-access = none
password-db = passwd
authz-db = authz*
The passwd file contains
*andy = canfield*
The authz file contains:
*[/sample]
andy = rw*
Th
Am 19.07.2011 12:35, schrieb Stefan Sperling:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:58:49AM +0200, Sebastian Brandt wrote:
>> That discussion was two years ago; yet, I have been unable to find a
>> bug/issue report of this problem, or a documented fix.
>> So, before I post the bug report, I ask for feedback
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 06:50, Andy Canfield wrote:
> OFF THE SUBJECT OF APACHE, NOW TRYING TO ACCESS SVNSERVE VIA PORT 3690
>
> /var/svn/config/svnserve.conf has been changed from the default to show
> anon-access = none
> password-db = passwd
> authz-db = authz
>
> The passwd file contains
> and
Guten Tag Andy Canfield,
am Dienstag, 19. Juli 2011 um 12:50 schrieben Sie:
> [1] Why does it ask for the password for "andy", then ask for a user
> name and password?
The svn client first tried the last used user or your current username
on underlying OS.
> [2] What is an authentication realm?
Hi all,
Wow, lots of good thoughts.
@Chris
I like the MD5 idea, I hadn't thought of that but it makes sense.
@Ryan
when I said "svn:properties" I was thinking of things like svn:needs-lock
and svn:executable, from the manual (chapter 3)
In addition to versioning your directories and files, Subv
Hi
When trying to reintegrate a branch into the trunk of my working copy, svn
1.6.17 crashes. The log file reads:
Process info:
Cmd line: svn merge --reintegrate ^/branches/
Version: 1.6.17 (r1128011), compiled May 30 2011, 20:42:10
Platform: Windows OS version 6.1 build 7601 Service Pack 1
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 11:25:33AM +, David Aldrich wrote:
> Hi
>
> When trying to reintegrate a branch into the trunk of my working copy, svn
> 1.6.17 crashes. The log file reads:
>
> Process info:
> Cmd line: svn merge --reintegrate ^/branches/
> Version: 1.6.17 (r1128011), compiled Ma
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 01:51:58PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> This has been reported several times but I don't know if the
> reason is known.
>
> According to http://svn.haxx.se/users/archive-2011-01/0260.shtml
> 1.6.12 does not crash. Can you reproduce this behaviour?
Another question:
Are
Hi,
I want to implement a server side scanning for malicious content in both ways:
when commits arrive and when checkouts updates are send to the client.
The first way is running fine via a pre-commit hook which extracts the content
from the transaction and scan the content with clamav.
My prob
Hi Stefan
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> Sent: 19 July 2011 12:54
> To: David Aldrich
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: merge --reintegrate crash
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 01:51:58PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > This has been re
> Thanks for your reply. Yes, we do have path-based authz rules, but my
> account should have no restrictions on the repository in question. I
> will check...
I have checked. I have full access to the branch and trunk.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:18:05PM +, David Aldrich wrote:
> > Thanks for your reply. Yes, we do have path-based authz rules, but my
> > account should have no restrictions on the repository in question. I
> > will check...
>
> I have checked. I have full access to the branch and trunk.
Good!
Hi everybody,
how can I systematically get rid of very old data, that is not used anymore.
My repository is 300GB large 15000 revs.
Is svnadmin dump ... svndumpfilter ... the only supported way?
Would it be useful to have an svnadmin command deleting a node(recursively)?
regards
Thomas Stümpfi
> -Original Message-
> From: Stuempfig, Thomas
> Sent: 19 July 2011 13:44
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Archiving old Data
>
> Hi everybody,
Hi
> how can I systematically get rid of very old data, that is
> not used anymore.
>
> My repository is 300GB large 15000 revs.
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> Sent: 19 July 2011 13:31
> To: David Aldrich
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: merge --reintegrate crash
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:18:05PM +, David Aldrich wrote:
> > > Thanks for your reply. Yes
Hi,
I am trying to get subversion to work with a smartcard (gemalto
cryptoflex.net), on Windows. The server-side bit of the setup is correct
afaik. At least it works in my browser, I am prompted for a certificate
and then pin.
I am using svn 1.6.15. It looks like I should just specify the pkcs#11
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Echlin, Jamie
wrote:
> I am trying to get subversion to work with a smartcard (gemalto
> cryptoflex.net), on Windows. The server-side bit of the setup is correct
> afaik. At least it works in my browser, I am prompted for a certificate
> and then pin.
>
> I am us
Hi Mark,
> What are you using for your client binaries? Where did you get them?
>
> You need binaries that are compiled with the proper support
> for this from OpenSSL.
Good question... I believe I compiled them myself from the 1.6.15 tag.
> BTW, the OpenSSL approach uses MSCAPI so you get
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Echlin, Jamie
wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
>> What are you using for your client binaries? Where did you get them?
>>
>> You need binaries that are compiled with the proper support
>> for this from OpenSSL.
>
> Good question... I believe I compiled them myself from the 1.
> If building yourself, use a recent version of OpenSSL and
> build it with the MSCAPI support.
Thanks Mark. Having some problems with my build this time but the
collabnet binaries do work as you say. Great.
Except... Is there a facility to get it to remember the last certificate
I selected, a
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Echlin, Jamie <
jamie.ech...@credit-suisse.com> wrote:
>> If building yourself, use a recent version of OpenSSL and
>> build it with the MSCAPI support.
>
> Thanks Mark. Having some problems with my build this time but the
> collabnet binaries do work as you say. G
> Guten Tag Andy Canfield,
> am Dienstag, 19. Juli 2011 um 12:50 schrieben Sie:
>
> > [1] Why does it ask for the password for "andy", then ask for a
> user
> > name and password?
>
> The svn client first tried the last used user or your current
> username
> on underlying OS.
>
> > [2] What is a
> It would be best to ask on the TortoiseSVN list so that they could
tell you definitively
> I know that the TSVN devs have made some custom patches to OpenSSL to
resolve this issue of the constant prompting
Thanks Mark. Looks like you are right in that tsvn will support this in
an upcoming releas
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Echlin, Jamie <
jamie.ech...@credit-suisse.com> wrote:
> > It would be best to ask on the TortoiseSVN list so that they could
> tell you definitively
> > I know that the TSVN devs have made some custom patches to OpenSSL to
> resolve this issue of the constant pro
> I'm wanting to set up networked subversion repositories. This is on
> a
> CentOS linux machine, I've got subversion 1.6.8 installed from rpm
> package.
>
> Due to the access methods needed by my users svnserve would be the
> best option. I've got the directory parent path /var/svn and under
> th
> Ideally the TortoiseSVN team would push their patches and need
upstream to OpenSSL so that it was possible to tell it the cert to use
(not sure how the PIN would be handled). Once that was done, then the
Subversion source code could potentially be modified to use this API as
TortoiseSVN did in i
> The most obvious authorization scheme is that of the host server;
> if
> there is a user named "andy" on that server with a password
> "jackel"
> then I would like to simply be able to talk to the subversion
> server as
> user named "andy" password "jackel". This is how ssh and sftp work.
> But
>
On Jul 19, 2011, at 07:06, Toplak Daniel wrote:
> I want to implement a server side scanning for malicious content in both
> ways: when commits arrive and when checkouts updates are send to the client.
> The first way is running fine via a pre-commit hook which extracts the
> content from the t
Ryan, as you mention the svnhookdispatcher-fake does not block the checkout so
the malicious content is delivered to the client, which I want to avoid.
The scanning on commit is only the half of the security, as you wrote, at the
time of the commit the malicious content could not be detected by
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Toplak Daniel wrote:
> I want to implement a server side scanning for malicious content in both
> ways: when commits arrive and when checkouts updates are send to the client.
>
> The first way is running fine via a pre-commit hook which extracts the
> content fro
Hi All,
I'm encountering some strange behaviour with replacing a symlink with
a real file in the repository and wanted to know if what I was seeing is
a bug or whether I'm doing something wrong. I'd like to replace the
file in one commit, but Subversion objects to changing the file type:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Bob Archer wrote:
>> The most obvious authorization scheme is that of the host server;
>> if
>> there is a user named "andy" on that server with a password
>> "jackel"
>> then I would like to simply be able to talk to the subversion
>> server as
>> user named "and
Hi,
Get an exception/assert in svn 1.7 alpha3.
Easily reproduceable by doing this (the svn repo is public):
---
> svn checkout https://zlibnet.svn.codeplex.com/svn test
Checked out revision 11497.
> svn update test
Updating 'test':
svn: E235000: In file '..\..\..\subversion\libsvn_wc\wc_db.c'
tldr for dev@: assertion that Gunnar and I can both reproduce easily
using 1.7.0-beta1:
% $svn checkout -q https://zlibnet.svn.codeplex.com/svn test
% $svn update test
(asserts)
Gunnar Dalsnes wrote on Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 00:59:38 +0200:
> Hi,
>
> Get an exception/assert in svn 1.7 alpha3.
>
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 12:59:38AM +0200, Gunnar Dalsnes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Get an exception/assert in svn 1.7 alpha3.
>
> Easily reproduceable by doing this (the svn repo is public):
>
> ---
>
> > svn checkout https://zlibnet.svn.codeplex.com/svn test
> Checked out revision 11497.
>
> > svn upd
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
> Sent: woensdag 20 juli 2011 1:19
> To: Gunnar Dalsnes; d...@subversion.apache.org
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 1.7 alpha3 bug (assert/exception) during update
>
> tldr for dev@: assertion th
Gunnar Dalsnes wrote on Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 00:59:38 +0200:
> BTW: Someone mentioned using svn 1.7 beta1 and some said it was not
> released yet. Collabnet disagree as beta1 is listed here:
> https://ctf.open.collab.net/sf/frs/do/viewRelease/projects.csvn/frs.svn_binaries.windows
It /has/ not bee
On Jul 19, 2011, at 12:11, Toplak Daniel wrote:
> My approach via the mod_clamav output filter blocks the content be delivered
> to the client and breaks the checkout/update with a http status 500 and a
> information in the http status line.
I'm still curious: does this really work? For an "sv
On Jul 19, 2011, at 06:23, david myers wrote:
> Also the file is stored on disk somehow, so I thought I may be able to
> directly manipulate the access permissions on a directory / file, I just
> wanted to know if this would work or not. From what I read I understood that
> this was the case,
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 19:18, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>...
>> BTW: Someone mentioned using svn 1.7 beta1 and some said it was not
>> released yet. Collabnet disagree as beta1 is listed here:
>> https://ctf.open.collab.net/sf/frs/do/viewRelease/projects.csvn/frs.svn_binaries.windows
CollabNet should
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 19:23, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
>> Sent: woensdag 20 juli 2011 1:19
>> To: Gunnar Dalsnes; d...@subversion.apache.org
>> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: 1.7 alpha3 bug (asse
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 19:18, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
> >...
> >> BTW: Someone mentioned using svn 1.7 beta1 and some said it was not
> >> released yet. Collabnet disagree as beta1 is listed here:
> >>
> https://ctf.open.collab.net/sf/frs/do/v
On 7/19/2011 7:15 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
CollabNet did not post anything. In an open-source project (mine), on
a hosting site operated by CollabNet, I posted my Windows binaries in
a listing labelled "Development Builds" just as I have been doing from
trunk for months. This is not different
On 07/20/2011 05:24 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Bob Archer wrote:
The most obvious authorization scheme is that of the host server;
if
there is a user named "andy" on that server with a password
"jackel"
then I would like to simply be able to talk to the sub
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy Canfield [mailto:andy.canfi...@pimco.mobi]
> Sent: woensdag 20 juli 2011 4:31
> To: Nico Kadel-Garcia
> Cc: Bob Archer; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Subversion: existing users
>
>
>
> On 07/20/2011 05:24 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > On
One thing has hit my mind today that I don't think you realize ...
*I have never, in my entire life, seen a working Subversion system.
*
Apparently Subversion, as distributed, doesn't work - the access
authentications are deliberately turned off.
It would be really neat if somebody had a s
On 7/19/11 9:30 PM, Andy Canfield wrote:
For example, I am on a Linux box named Lenny, logged in as 'andy'. I can ssh to
hk.pimco.mobi as user 'andy', password 'psuedo'. But I don't want to. Instead, I
would like to run the command:
svn ... http://hk.pimco.mobi/svn/RepoName --username=andy --pas
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Andy Canfield
wrote:
> For example, I am on a Linux box named Lenny, logged in as 'andy'. I can ssh
> to hk.pimco.mobi as user 'andy', password 'psuedo'. But I don't want to.
> Instead, I would like to run the command:
> svn ... http://hk.pimco.mobi/svn/RepoNa
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Andy Canfield
wrote:
> One thing has hit my mind today that I don't think you realize ...
>
> I have never, in my entire life, seen a working Subversion system.
>
> Apparently Subversion, as distributed, doesn't work - the access
> authentications are delibera
53 matches
Mail list logo
