Hi,
Not sure if it is the right place for this but I'm looking for a way to
imitate the cvs behavior when checking out folders.
In cvs:
cvs co mod1/dir1/dir2/file2
will result in having:
mod1/dir1/dir2/file2
How can I obtain this hierarchical checkout with SVN?
Thanks
Hello;
I'm a regular newbie adminstrating subversion under OS X/Xcode. I successfully
established and have been using an svn repository for a while. I have svnserve
configured on my iMac under Snow Leopard. When trying to access my repository
from my MacBookPro under Xcode, it is now very ver
Hello .
I am trying to write a hook to prevent deletion of elements through a
pre-commit hook.
My Plan is to execute "svn status" and then based on the o/p allow or deny.
But the problem is that the hook is being executed in the server and I see not
now way to get the "working copy" path in th
Hi,
Attaching the svn-crash Log file. Please help to solve the issue.
Thanks,
Devi Nair
DISCLAIMER
This Communication is Private & Confidential. This message and any attachments
may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential and is
Hi my name is will.I was wondering if you could send me that subversion
binary list.
I have a new problem. Not a problem with the software I think this is
sysadmin/user error.
I've read the docs and examples on how to use svnadmin dump and svndumpfilter.
I'm familiar with dumps and loads. But I have a new task appointed to me.
I have a directory structure that looks like this
On Apr 19, 2010, at 17:04, Omar Ousmane Kadry wrote:
> Not sure if it is the right place for this but I’m looking for a way to
> imitate the cvs behavior when checking out folders.
> In cvs:
> cvs co mod1/dir1/dir2/file2
> will result in having:
> mod1/dir1/dir2/file2
>
> How can I
On Apr 19, 2010, at 17:39, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Apr 19, 2010, at 17:04, Omar Ousmane Kadry wrote:
>
>> Not sure if it is the right place for this but I’m looking for a way to
>> imitate the cvs behavior when checking out folders.
>> In cvs:
>>cvs co mod1/dir1/dir2/file2
>>will resul
On 4/19/2010 5:39 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Apr 19, 2010, at 17:04, Omar Ousmane Kadry wrote:
Not sure if it is the right place for this but I’m looking for a way to imitate
the cvs behavior when checking out folders.
In cvs:
cvs co mod1/dir1/dir2/file2
will result in having:
m
On Apr 19, 2010, at 5:50 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Apr 19, 2010, at 17:39, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> On Apr 19, 2010, at 17:04, Omar Ousmane Kadry wrote:
>>
>>> Not sure if it is the right place for this but I’m looking for a way to
>>> imitate the cvs behavior when checking out folders.
Hi Subversion Team:
venture to disturb you, would like to ask, why do not directly generate
Subversion Binary Packages, as Tigris.org the DJ Heap, Branko Cibej and Troy
Simpson them Which will lead, direct compilation with Apache modules can be
attached to it? Because we own the developmen
Hey Guys,
I'm doing research on svn and wondering if anyone might have an ideas
for this. I'm setting up SVN so that I have a SVN repository on my
development machine which will then be able to deploy files to my production
environment.
I'd like to be able to pick and choose which files I want
> I am trying to write a hook to prevent deletion of elements through a
pre-commit hook.
If you're not using the bindings you'd want svnlook, probably svnlook
diff.
But, do you really want such a hook? If a user has permission to add
stuff they should be allowed to also unwind any mistakes, prov
> I am trying to write a hook to prevent deletion of elements through a
pre-commit hook.
>>If you're not using the bindings you'd want svnlook, probably svnlook
diff.
>>But, do you really want such a hook? If a user has permission to add
stuff they should be allowed to also unwind any mistakes,
---
ОК
---
help me.
Igor
Hi,
Client is svn, version 1.6.11 (r934486)
I read the manual, but I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong.
I copied https://mydomain/services/trunk (services) to
https://mydomain/online/trunk (online) at revision 9884.
There were several bugfixes made on services that I wanted to put in online.
Hi,
I am trying execute svn with command "-r", but when I see the help in
terminal, show me:
r [--revision] ARG : ARG (alguns comandos também usam faixa ARG1:ARG2)
Um número de revisão pode ser um entre:
NÚMERO
This issue was fixed in subversion 1.7.8:
* fix crash with --username option on Windows (r1396285)
--
Johan
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Devi Nair
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Attaching the svn-crash Log file. Please help to solve the issue.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Devi Nair
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:08:28AM +, Devi Nair wrote:
> Hi,
> Attaching the svn-crash Log file. Please help to solve the issue.
> Exception: ACCESS_VIOLATION
> Stacktrace:
> #1 0x7fef1637847 in svn_auth_get_username_prompt_provider()
This issue was fixed in 1.7.8. Please
I am compiling Apache 2.4 and SVN 1.7 for the first time. I am getting
the following error:
./apachectl configtest
httpd: Syntax error on line 147 of /etc/apache2/conf/httpd.conf:
Cannot load modules/mod_dav_svn.so into server:
/etc/apache2/modules/mod_dav_svn.so: undefined symbol: ap_log_error
I
hanges are in the repository because I can execute
"svn cat file:///opt/rancid/archives/SVN/CISCO/configs/router1 -r1663" to see
the historical file.
Can someone help me find a way to remove the svn:ignore that has been set at
revision 2041?
Thank you,
Scotty
Guten Tag Freddie Campos,
am Freitag, 13. Dezember 2013 um 17:15 schrieben Sie:
> I was wondering if you could send me that subversion binary list.
What list are you talking about? A list of binaries?
http://subversion.apache.org/packages.html
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Thorsten Schöning
--
Th
On Feb 3, 2016, at 10:49 AM, Eric Antonio Maquiling wrote:
> I have a new problem. Not a problem with the software I think this is
> sysadmin/user error.
>
> I've read the docs and examples on how to use svnadmin dump and svndumpfilter.
>
> I'm familiar with dumps and loads. But I have a new
>
>If the old repository root is svn://x.x.x.x/mainproject and the stuff you want
>to include in the dump is in branch/this_new_stuff in the old repository, then
>you need to run:
>
>svnadmin dump mainproject > mainproject.dump
>svndumpfilter include branch/this_new_stuff < mainproject.dump >
>new
>
>svnadmin dump mainproject > mainproject.dump
>svndumpfilter include branch/this_new_stuff < mainproject.dump >
>new_stuff_only.dmp
I guess I did try it bofore and I got this error:
Revision 2003 committed as 2003.
Revision 2004 committed as 2004.
Revision 2005 committed as 2005.
Revision 2006
On Feb 5, 2016, at 1:04 PM, Eric Antonio Maquiling wrote:
>> svnadmin dump mainproject > mainproject.dump
>> svndumpfilter include branch/this_new_stuff < mainproject.dump >
>> new_stuff_only.dmp
>
> I guess I did try it bofore and I got this error:
>
> Revision 2003 committed as 2003.
> Revis
t's for later.
For starters, I need to know to which extension points should I attach
my code to and which dependencies will my code need. Are you able to
help me? Anything is welcome.
Thanks in advance
Hello，
I'm a new user of subversion.
My version is "svn, version 1.6.11 (r934486)",i have some questions about
svnsync .
I made a svn mirror from server A to server B. it could work first few days
until an accidental power failure.
Now it can't work ,what can i do .
Please help me,
Thank U.
mRoot%\System32\Wbem;%SYSTEMROOT%\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\;
C:\Program Files\subversion-1.6.6;
C:\Program Files\MySQL\MySQL Server 5.1\bin;
%JAVA_HOME%\bin
Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
Lynn
We are currently in the process of converting from PVCS to subversion
using the Polarion PVCS to Subversion conversion tool. The actual
conversion appears to have worked correctly and brought everything over
from our PVCS Repo to the Subversion Repo. But when in subversion we
are having several i
le to invoke an "hook method (exit routine)", which can add some
extra
user required own function.
If possible, could you teach me the way to develop the "hook method (exit
routine)".
It would be grateful.
I'm on the "hook", then need your help.
~~~
Hi Andy,
> venture to disturb you, would like to ask, why do not
> directly generate Subversion Binary Packages, as Tigris.org
> the DJ Heap, Branko Čibej and Troy Simpson them Which will
> lead, direct compilation with Apache modules can be attached
> to it? Because we own the developmen
Sent: 20 July 2010 11:47
To: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: svn deployment help
Hey Guys,
I'm doing research on svn and wondering if anyone might have an ideas for
this. I'm setting up SVN so that I have a SVN repository on my development
machine which will then be able to dep
regarding this incident would be greatly appreciated and help us to
(hopefully) avoid a repeat of this incident.
Our repository was working fine for years but, one afternoon after one
of our developers made a simple commit, nobody else could update from
the repository. we started getting
"Neson Maxmelbin (RBEI/EMT5)" schreef op
21/02/2011 15:54:24:
>
> > I am trying to write a hook to prevent deletion of elements through a
> pre-commit hook.
>
>
> >>If you're not using the bindings you'd want svnlook, probably svnlook
> diff.
>
> >>But, do you really want such a hook? If a u
Hi,
Having problems with merge.
me@localhost /srv/www $ svn ls svn+ssh://example.com/var/svn/svnbugs
me@localhost /srv/www $ svn mkdir svn+ssh://example.com/var/svn/svnbugs/trunk
Log message unchanged or not specified
(a)bort, (c)ontinue, (e)dit:
c
Committed revision 1.
me@localhost /s
Hello Tom,
I am in the same situation as yours. I am starting to develop svn deployment
at my company.
Can you please let me know some sort of documentation or any other links
which will help me to start with.
Thanks
Vinod
Tom Cruickshank wrote:
>
> Hey Guys,
> I'm doing r
ation or any other links
> which will help me to start with.
>
> Thanks
> Vinod
>
>
> Tom Cruickshank wrote:
>>
>> Hey Guys,
>> I'm doing research on svn and wondering if anyone might have an ideas
>> for this. I'm setting up SVN so that I h
seSVN-1.7.0\ext\subversion\subversion\libsvn_wc\entries.c'
> line 1935: assertion failed (svn_checksum_match(entry_md5_checksum,
> found_md5_checksum))
> ---
> ОК
> ---
>
>
> help me.
You need to get a new checkout because your 1.6 working copy is broken.
It cannot be upgraded, sorry.
But if i have a lot of different local modifications in sources, you propose
me to checkout??? You are crazy?
. But it was not found.
Developers cannot fix problems they don't know about. So why do you
call us crazy? If we could fix problems we don't know about, *then*
we'd be crazy :)
Next time, you could help by testing our pre-releases (which have been
available for a long time) to see if o
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>
>> But if i have a lot of different local modifications in sources, you propose
>> me to checkout??? You are crazy?
>
> Sorry, 'svn upgrade' cannot cope with corrupted 1.6 working copies.
> That is simply the way it is.
Someone in another
Guten Tag Igor d,
am Dienstag, 18. Oktober 2011 um 16:20 schrieben Sie:
> But if i have a lot of different local modifications in sources, you propose
> me to checkout??? You are crazy?
No backup, no commit before changing your working copy format?
Sounds...
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Thorsten Sc
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:18:24 +, Les Mikesell wrote:
...
> Someone in another thread mentioned doing fresh checkout, then copying
> the 1.7 .svn directory over to the old workspace and then being able
> to commit the outstanding changes. Is that a reasonable thing to try?
Should omit the .svn
Les Mikesell wrote on Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:18:24 -0500:
> I think there is a bigger question regarding why there are so many
> corrupt 1.6 workspaces around that nothing so far had noticed. Should
> people be concerned about that even if they aren't upgrading yet?
> How can you tell if a worksp
On 18 October 2011 16:33, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote on Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:18:24 -0500:
>> I think there is a bigger question regarding why there are so many
>> corrupt 1.6 workspaces around that nothing so far had noticed. Should
>> people be concerned about that even if they
sebb wrote on Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 16:57:14 +0100:
> On 18 October 2011 16:33, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Les Mikesell wrote on Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:18:24 -0500:
> >> I think there is a bigger question regarding why there are so many
> >> corrupt 1.6 workspaces around that nothing so far had noti
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:33:35 +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
...
> Or, failing that, check all md5's in the working copy. But I expect the
> former option is far simpler for most people.
Especially as we don't know how to find the expected md5 values
within .svn directory. The other parts are easy.
On 18 October 2011 17:10, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> sebb wrote on Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 16:57:14 +0100:
>> On 18 October 2011 16:33, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> > Les Mikesell wrote on Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:18:24 -0500:
>> >> I think there is a bigger question regarding why there are so many
>> >> corr
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:18:24AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> >
> >> But if i have a lot of different local modifications in sources, you
> >> propose
> >> me to checkout??? You are crazy?
> >
> > Sorry, 'svn upgrade' cannot cope with c
sebb writes:
> In that case, either that is an insufficient check, or the upgrade
> fails to act correctly on the results of the check.
In what way? The upgrade detected the problem, stopped the upgrade and
left the 1.6 working copy unchanged apart from some files in .svn/tmp.
--
Philip
On 18.10.11 16:20, Igor d wrote:
> But if i have a lot of different local modifications in sources, you
> propose me to checkout??? You are crazy?
Move your old, existing working copy out of the way, check out a new one
in it's place, use WinMerge to copy the changed source files from the
old to t
On 18 October 2011 17:53, Philip Martin wrote:
> sebb writes:
>
>> In that case, either that is an insufficient check, or the upgrade
>> fails to act correctly on the results of the check.
>
> In what way? The upgrade detected the problem, stopped the upgrade and
> left the 1.6 working copy unch
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 7:20 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 18 October 2011 17:53, Philip Martin wrote:
>> sebb writes:
>>
>>> In that case, either that is an insufficient check, or the upgrade
>>> fails to act correctly on the results of the check.
>>
>> In what way? The upgrade detected the problem, st
> But if i have a lot of different local modifications in
> sources, you propose me to checkout??? You are crazy?
>
Make a fresh checkout to the revision of your current working directory and
copy any file you have modified to the new working copy using a diff tool like
KDiff3 or Beyond Compare.
>
> But if i have a lot of different local modifications in sources, you propose
> me
> to checkout??? You are crazy?
You tried to upgrade a working copy with pending changes in it? Are you crazy?
BOb
Upgrading to svn 1.7 whose principal feature is a major change to the working
copy, with local mods, is just plain dumb.
From: Igor d [mailto:igoro...@gmail.com]
Sent: 18 October 2011 15:20
To: Igor d; users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: Help! Subversion Exception!
But if i have a lot of
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:43:58 +, Bob Archer wrote:
...
> You tried to upgrade a working copy with pending changes in it? Are you crazy?
I'm not aware that you can run two tortoises in parallel, which means
you have no chance of not upgrading an old WC if you want to update
it -> all of our WC h
Bob Archer wrote on Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 09:43:58 -0400:
> >
> > But if i have a lot of different local modifications in sources, you
> > propose me
> > to checkout??? You are crazy?
>
> You tried to upgrade a working copy with pending changes in it? Are you crazy?
Updating a working copy that
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Bob Archer wrote on Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 09:43:58 -0400:
>> >
>> > But if i have a lot of different local modifications in sources, you
>> > propose me
>> > to checkout??? You are crazy?
>>
>> You tried to upgrade a working copy with pendin
Les Mikesell wrote on Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:20:16 -0500:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
> > Bob Archer wrote on Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 09:43:58 -0400:
> >> >
> >> > But if i have a lot of different local modifications in sources, you
> >> > propose me
> >> > to checko
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
>>
>> How is a user supposed to know if his working copy requires cleanup?
>
> You'll get E155021.
But only after it is too late, right? Are there any tools to check
this that don't overwrite the versions that might have still been able
t
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:47:25PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> How is a user supposed to know if his working copy requires cleanup?
> >
> > You'll get E155021.
>
> But only after it is too late, right? Are there any tools
Les Mikesell wrote on Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:47:25 -0500:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> How is a user supposed to know if his working copy requires cleanup?
> >
> > You'll get E155021.
>
> But only after it is too late, right? Are there any tools to
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> >> How is a user supposed to know if his working copy requires cleanup?
>> >
>> > You'll get E155021.
>>
>> But only after it is too late, right? Are there any tools to check
>> this that don't overwrite the versions that might have stil
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 01:01:32PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
> > I don't understand the question. As a rule, when upgrade fails the
> > working copy remains usable by the older version of svn.
>
> Which you won't have any longer if yo
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>
>> > I don't understand the question. As a rule, when upgrade fails the
>> > working copy remains usable by the older version of svn.
>>
>> Which you won't have any longer if you or your system administrator
>> has updated the programs.
>
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 01:30:34PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> >
> >> > I don't understand the question. As a rule, when upgrade fails the
> >> > working copy remains usable by the older version of svn.
> >>
> >> Which you won't have any
Stefan Sperling wrote on Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 20:07:17 +0200:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 01:01:32PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> > wrote:
> > > I don't understand the question. As a rule, when upgrade fails the
> > > working copy remains usable
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 19:26:06 +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
...
> > > Upgrading a working copy that requires cleanup is not.
> >
> > How is a user supposed to know if his working copy requires cleanup?
>
> You'll get E155021.
Which would then mean that I need to reinstall 1.6, cleanup, and
go back
Les Mikesell writes:
> Perhaps it is obvious and known to you. I think the number of error
> reports on the list indicates that the scenarios that cause errors are
> not generally well understood.
The error in this case:
line 1935: assertion failed (svn_checksum_match(entry_md5_checksum,
foun
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>
> The unlucky user should simply get a new working copy.
> Working copies are and have always been considered disposable.
So why bother to upgrade them at all if success is unimportant?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 01:53:19PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> >
> > The unlucky user should simply get a new working copy.
> > Working copies are and have always been considered disposable.
>
> So why bother to upgrade them at all if suc
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> > The unlucky user should simply get a new working copy.
>> > Working copies are and have always been considered disposable.
>>
>> So why bother to upgrade them at all if success is unimportant?
>
> You misunderstood what I meant.
No, I'
local changes over from a corrupt working copy
to a new working copy. Some have been mentioned recently in the various
"help! expection" threads. I'd use rsync.
> > Most reports about failed upgrades so far were due to *corrupt* 1.6
> > working copies. We cannot saf
On Oct 20, 2011, at 2:03 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> No, I'm just being difficult because you didn't seem to care about the
> potential for losing uncommitted changes.
Why would you lose them? The upgrade process doesn't delete or modify your
files, right? It only changes the contents of the .svn
Les Mikesell wrote on Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 14:03:58 -0500:
> Is there any tool that you can run to do a corruption check on a 1.6
> working copy that does not overwrite a needed 1.6 program and does not
> actually do the upgrade? It seems like it would be a good thing to
> know whether or not you
Andreas Krey wrote on Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 20:38:58 +0200:
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 19:26:06 +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Have users always run 'svn cleanup' before they leave for the night on
> > any wc's that they ^C'd during the day?
>
> How about setting a 'busy' flag while svn is executing, a
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Dave Huang wrote:
>
> On Oct 20, 2011, at 2:03 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> No, I'm just being difficult because you didn't seem to care about the
>> potential for losing uncommitted changes.
>
> Why would you lose them? The upgrade process doesn't delete or modify y
Les Mikesell wrote on Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 14:31:21 -0500:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Dave Huang wrote:
> >
> > On Oct 20, 2011, at 2:03 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> >> No, I'm just being difficult because you didn't seem to care about the
> >> potential for losing uncommitted changes.
> >
>
hem, that's exactly how has been working, since years.
Then obviously (and already agreed on elsewhere) svn cleanup is not
sufficient to avoid the checksum problem, and the advice of running
clean up after a ^C doesn't really help.
Which I have the slight impression could be caused by user
Andreas Krey wrote on Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 22:07:42 +0200:
> Which I have the slight impression could be caused by user grepping
> for something and then editing the pristine copy by mistake.
The text-base files have the "read only" permission set. If people edit
them they should consider themsel
I would like to review the SVN mail list archive. The only reference I
have found is on http://subversion.apache.org/packages.html#windows and
it only include an email address. Is there a way to browse the archive?
Per the page "If there are any problems with or questions about the
different bin
rg
Subject: svn merge help
Hi,
Client is svn, version 1.6.11 (r934486)
I read the manual, but I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong.
I copied https://mydomain/services/trunk (services) to
https://mydomain/online/trunk (online) at revision 9884.
There were several bugfixes m
@subversion.apache.org
Subject: RE: svn merge help
I can be wrong because I'm struggling with this myself, but shouldn't rev 9995
already include all the prior changes?
JPM
From: Douglass Davis
[mailto:dda...@northcarolina.edu]<mailto:[mailto:dda...@northcaroli
: svn merge help
Hi,
Client is svn, version 1.6.11 (r934486)
I read the manual, but I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong.
I copied https://mydomain/services/trunk (services) to
https://mydomain/online/trunk (online) at revision 9884.
There were several bugfixes made on services that I
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 05:33:13PM -0300, Vinícius Muniz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying execute svn with command "-r", but when I see the help in
> terminal, show me:
>
> r [--revision] ARG : ARG (alguns comandos também usam faixa ARG1:ARG2)
>
ed "Decompression of svndiff data failed" error.
So, I'm wondering if anyone from the community can help me. I think I
still have all of the original files which got written or amended during
the three broken revisions (in one or more working copies), but one of
these revisions is abo
1.7.x for what x? (while at it, 2.4.y for what y?)
You need x≥5 (and x≥6 to run tests), see our CHANGES file.
Maureen Barger wrote on Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 08:17:17 -0400:
> I am compiling Apache 2.4 and SVN 1.7 for the first time. I am getting
> the following error:
> ./apachectl configtest
> h
SVN 1.7.9
Apache 2.4.4
Apr 1.4.6
Apr-util 1.4.1
Centos x64 6.2
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> 1.7.x for what x? (while at it, 2.4.y for what y?)
>
> You need x≥5 (and x≥6 to run tests), see our CHANGES file.
>
>
> Maureen Barger wrote on Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 08:17:17 -
Maureen Barger wrote on Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 08:17:17 -0400:
> I am compiling Apache 2.4 and SVN 1.7 for the first time. I am getting
> the following error:
> ./apachectl configtest
> httpd: Syntax error on line 147 of /etc/apache2/conf/httpd.conf:
> Cannot load modules/mod_dav_svn.so into server:
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Looking a bit deeper, ap_log_error is implemented as a macro, so
> mod_dav_svn shouldn't be looking it up as a symbol.
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/tags/2.4.4/include/http_log.h
>
> I'm not quite sure why that would be ha
Maureen Barger wrote on Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 12:35:59 -0400:
> On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
> > Is AP_HAVE_C99 defined?
> How do I check?
>
You could look for a '#define AP_HAVE_C99 1' line in files that
http_log.h includes.
> > Did svn's build use the right copy of
Maureen Barger writes:
> Did svn's build use the right copy of http_log.h?
> How do I check?
If you look at the compile commad for one of the mod_dav_svn files you
should see something like:
$ rm subversion/mod_dav_svn/authz.lo
$ make mod_dav_svn
/bin/sh /home/pm/sw/subversion/obj-1.7/libtool -
This is very thorough and I thank you, but I am not finding anything
like that in the subversion dir tree.
Daniel, I am also not finding 'You could look for a '#define
AP_HAVE_C99 1' line in files that
http_log.h includes.'
This is my first time compiling from scratch and I appreciate your
patienc
Maureen Barger writes:
> This is very thorough and I thank you, but I am not finding anything
> like that in the subversion dir tree.
I don't understand this. Are you building on Unix/Linux? If you go to
the directory where you compiled Subversion and run:
>> $ rm subversion/mod_dav_svn/authz
I read it as those lines would be in the source, not that I should run
them. (blush)
I removed authz.lo and ran make with verbose flag.
Here is the output:
[root@svn64 subversion-1.7.9]# /bin/sh
/home/scm/subversion-1.7.9/libtool --tag=CC --verbose --mode=compile
gcc -DLINUX=2 -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_
Maureen Barger writes:
> libtool: compile: gcc -DLINUX=2 -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -g -O2 -g
> -O2 -pthread -Werror=implicit-function-declaration
> -I/etc/apache2/include -I./subversion/include -I./subversion
> -I/etc/apache2/include -I/etc/apache2/include
> -I/usr/local/serf/include/serf-0
> -
Did this, not finding a authz.i file (searched entire disk).
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Maureen Barger writes:
>
>> libtool: compile: gcc -DLINUX=2 -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -g -O2 -g
>> -O2 -pthread -Werror=implicit-function-declaration
>> -I/etc/apache2/include -
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 11:04:17AM -0400, Maureen Barger wrote:
> This is very thorough and I thank you, but I am not finding anything
> like that in the subversion dir tree.
> Daniel, I am also not finding 'You could look for a '#define
> AP_HAVE_C99 1' line in files that
> http_log.h include
1 - 100 of 503 matches
Mail list logo
