I think the easiest way to implement that is to use auto-building and to
just declare each service dependencies in it's implementation class.
See the Binding and Autobuilding and Injecting Dependencies for
Autobuilt Services section here
Hi,
I have a sort of general question about tapestry-ioc. In fact, I would like
it to manage all the services of my webapp. In theory it should be the case,
shouldn't be?
So to provides services to my MVC, no problem the syntax @Inject MyService
_myService; work perfectly. But, to provide
m, i think there's something missing here
If i'm understanding correctly you want tapestry-ioc to manage all your
services (either presentation stuf, db stuff, etc) and you don't want it
to be intrusive. You don't want to reference any tapestry-ioc API inside
you service classes. Does
hi michael,
@Inject only works in Tapestry pages and components (and mixins).
By default Tapestry will use the field type as an id and lookup the
corresponding ioc service.
I assume your Web Service Container was not started by the ioc
container so it runs outside its control. Therefore you
So I have to call the current Registry (or to manage it myself) and call the
myRegistry.getService(MyService.class);
Hum, I think it's not ioc anymore if I have to setup my containers (Axis2,
Hibernate) to call the tapestry-ioc or I have to create a sort of middle
layer between the layer and the
Ok I'm going to investigate about that Registry.
So, what's the interrest to use tapestry-ioc instead of Spring ioc? If I
need my ioc to provide all the services I need, I cannot use tapestry-ioc
unless I need my other layers to call explicitely the ioc which is not
recommended when you want
generally there are no differences in the basic concepts between
spring ioc and tapestry-ioc. the only difference in this case is that
spring already offers a ready to use integration layer for Web
Services and spring ioc tapestry-ioc does not yet :)
i think choosing spring or
UNSUBSCRIBE
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 08:45:56 -0200, Kristian Marinkovic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i think choosing spring or tapestry-ioc is just a matter of taste. I do
use tapestry-ioc a lot because i develop tapestry 5 applications
and sometimes i do not need spring.
I beg to differ. Howard haven't used
I think it was my mail and in fact there was no clear date/plan to
upgrade to 1.0 (but maybe I misunderstood...).
In fact it would be a great thing upgrading to 1.0 we tapestry4ers are
quite scared by the t5 only list traffic lately ;-)
On Dec 14, 2007 1:46 PM, Matt Brock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I did this for my application, which needed rows with some totals. I didn't
want the totals row to get sorted with the other data, and I also wanted it
to look different. You can't put this in an outside table, because it won't
line up!
So can extend Grid and in the html part simply allow a
Hello everyone!
Is there a way to add extra rows to a BeanEditForm and extra columns to
a Grid - rows / columns which doesn't represent a property of the given
model? I need it to edit or show values which are relevant for the
model, but like I said not included in it, as well as present
Hello Thiago,
great, works fine! Thank you very much - seems I overlooked the this
may be null for a synthetic or placeholder property in the JavaDoc
completly.
Is there any way to get the grid to not display any name in the header
of my synthetic column? I know how to change it, but giving
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:44:11 -0200, Tobias Wehrum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello Thiago,
great, works fine! Thank you very much - seems I overlooked the this
may be null for a synthetic or placeholder property in the JavaDoc
completly.
You're welcome! :)
Is there any way to get the
That's great Andreas! Is there a plan to also provide a standard
adapter to dojo 1.0? the fact that this is called beyonddojo is
confusing :-)
On Dec 14, 2007 7:08 PM, Andreas Andreou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just uploaded the docs, so you can now see what is possible with
4.1.4-SNAPSHOT at:
If you'd like to see a new.site based on t5 goto www.wingmanfinder.com its 100
percent free, so its just an example of what t5 can do
Sent via BlackBerry by ATT
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
I just uploaded the docs, so you can now see what is possible with
4.1.4-SNAPSHOT at:
http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry4.1/ajax/beyonddojo.html
The adapter javascript file mentioned is:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tapestry/tapestry4/trunk/tapestry-framework/src/js/tapestry/skeleton/core.js
Hi,
I just tried the new Zone component which is just about great!
But when I tried to return a Block from my ActionListener that
contains a Grid, I get the following Exception
org.apache.tapestry.runtime.ComponentEventException: No object of type
org.apache.tapestry.services.Heartbeat is
Hi all,
I've reworked JumpStart to address Tapestry 5, and I need feedback on
how to make it as good as it can be...
If you don't know JumpStart, its purpose is to get newcomers up-to-
speed with Tapestry as fast as possible. It's aim is to dispel the
myth of Tapestry's steep learning
Andreas Andreou wrote:
I just uploaded the docs, so you can now see what is possible with
4.1.4-SNAPSHOT at:
http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry4.1/ajax/beyonddojo.html
The adapter javascript file mentioned is:
All,
I'd like to use Quartz with tapestry. As such, I'd like to get a
reference to the Registry and pass it into a Tapestry service (so that I
can use it in my Quartz jobs to instantiate all of my DAOs and Hibernate
Sessions).
I saw some discussion here on the list a few days ago about the
And is that all T5 can do? This is very embarrassing indeed.
On Dec 14, 2007 7:01 PM, Jonathan Glanz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you'd like to see a new.site based on t5 goto www.wingmanfinder.com its
100 percent free, so its just an example of what t5 can do
Sent via BlackBerry by ATT
22 matches
Mail list logo
