Michael McCutcheon michael.mccutch...@att.net wrote:
Does Tomcat 7.0.8 support the Servlet 3.0 security annotations?
@RolesAllowed
@DeclareRoles
@ServletSecurity
, etc.?
Yes. Tomcat 7.0.x fully supports the Servlet 3.0 spec. Every release has passed
the TCK.
Mark
On 2/28/2011 8:18 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/security/SecurityListener.java?view=annotate
This is brand new, isn't it? I can't find it in the 7.0.8 sources.
So it may throw a java.lang.Error at Lifecycle.BEFORE_INIT_EVENT
time but
On 01/03/2011 13:52, Olivier Lefevre wrote:
On 2/28/2011 8:18 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/security/SecurityListener.java?view=annotate
This is brand new, isn't it? I can't find it in the 7.0.8 sources.
Yes.
So it may throw a
This is a follow-up on an earlier thread on killing
a servlet at startup. To recap., this is best done
by throwing a suitable exception in its init method,
as per §2.3.2.1 of the servlet spec.
But what if the webapp has several servlets and you
want to abort (or undo) the loading of the whole
From: Olivier Lefevre [mailto:lefev...@yahoo.com]
Subject: Vetoing the start of a webapp
But what if the webapp has several servlets and you
want to abort (or undo) the loading of the whole
collection if any of the members fail to load: is
there already an accepted best practice for that?
Hello. my platform
Debian 5
Tomcat 6 with authbind as described here
http://blogs.mulesoft.org/a-better-tomcat-for-ubuntu-and-debian/
http://blogs.mulesoft.org/a-better-tomcat-for-ubuntu-and-debian/now.. I'm
starting the tomcat with Xmx700m and the /mananger/html shows only 12x as
max
Free
On 3/1/2011 2:57 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Providing you throw an Error, Tomcat is guaranteed not to start.
OK! Just to be 100% clear, this is a Tomcat thing, not a servlet
spec thing, right? Just wondering whether it's portable.
-- O.L.
On 01/03/2011 14:46, Olivier Lefevre wrote:
On 3/1/2011 2:57 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Providing you throw an Error, Tomcat is guaranteed not to start.
OK! Just to be 100% clear, this is a Tomcat thing, not a servlet
spec thing, right? Just wondering whether it's portable.
Yes, this is Tomcat
On 3/1/2011 3:14 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
Normally, you would put such conditional activation code in a
ServletContextListener, and have it throw an exception if things
are not to your liking. Doing so would prevent any further use
of the webapp.
OK but I have the same question as to
From: Olivier Lefevre [mailto:lefev...@yahoo.com]
Subject: Re: Getting the Tomcat shutdown port
Just to be 100% clear, this is a Tomcat thing, not a servlet
spec thing, right? Just wondering whether it's portable.
Anything using an org.apache class is Tomcat-specific, and therefore not
From: Olivier Lefevre [mailto:lefev...@yahoo.com]
Subject: Re: Vetoing the start of a webapp
is this Tomcat-specific or is it spelled out in the
servlet spec somewhere?
It's in the servlet spec.
Yes but that does not make ServletContext a stand-in
for webapps:
Actually, it does; that's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rodrigo,
On 3/1/2011 9:17 AM, Rodrigo Asensio wrote:
Debian 5
Tomcat 6 with authbind as described here
http://blogs.mulesoft.org/a-better-tomcat-for-ubuntu-and-debian/
http://blogs.mulesoft.org/a-better-tomcat-for-ubuntu-and-debian/now.. I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 2/28/2011 2:57 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
Since the memory pointers are larger you may need to increase your heap size
but
you can compress the address pointers.
+1
Also, if you use JNI and it is 32-bit then you will have unexpected
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 2/28/2011 4:21 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
I also use Native APR with Tomcat 7 which eliminates AJP and
supposedly is faster than Apache Web Server
It's probably the same as AWS, as the code is the same :)
On 3/1/2011 3:54 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
Anything using an org.apache class is Tomcat-specific, and
therefore not portable.
Oh, right. I had not picked up that LifecycleListener itself is
a Catalina class.
Still, the basic issue is not about the listener per se but how
the app server
It's in the servlet spec.
Sorry, can you give me the actual section: are you
referring to §11.6?
-- O.L.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
hi,
concerning https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49914.
I have a filter which listens on /. This filter is used to manage
different welcome pages for different urls on a multiurl site.
It works like in (pseudocode)
if (req.getServerName().equals(bla)) forward to blurp;
if
My webapp performs HTTP POST requests to another site. I would like to store
the URL and the port of the remote site in the context.xml. How could I do
this?
So far I have added the following to the context.xml:
Resource name=http/mprm auth=Container
type=java.net.HttpURLConnection;
Just tried, for plain spring managed object which is neither servlet,
nor filter nor listener, @PostConstruct method gets called only once
on Tomcat 7.
Regards,
Stevo.
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Stevo Slavić ssla...@gmail.com wrote:
If I understood spec (servlet-3_0-final-spec.pdf) well,
From: Gehrny [mailto:a1095...@jnxjn.com]
Subject: Put URL in context.xml
I would like to store the URL and the port of the remote
site in the context.xml.
So far I have added the following to the context.xml:
Resource name=http/mprm auth=Container
type=java.net.HttpURLConnection;
From: Olivier Lefevre [mailto:lefev...@yahoo.com]
Subject: Re: Vetoing the start of a webapp
Sorry, can you give me the actual section: are you
referring to §11.6?
In the 3.0 spec, it's in section 11.6 (was 10.6 in the 2.5 version). The key
statements are:
The container may respond to
Hi Chris,
The performance degregation for 64 bit versus 32 bit has been the subject of
much concern in the java community.
Here is the number I mentioned straight from Oracle itself:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/hotspotfaq-138619.html
What are the performance characteristics of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Leon,
On 3/1/2011 11:49 AM, Leon Rosenberg wrote:
concerning https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49914.
I have a filter which listens on /. This filter is used to manage
different welcome pages for different urls on a multiurl
Hi Chris,
I understand it is from the core AWS but the important thing for me was to
eliminate AJP because in a AWS standalone I had used to communicate AJP.
When I enabled ARP I did not have to do anything with AJP.
So does ARP communicate with the servlet conatiner in a more efficiant manner?
Also, I have not programmed in assembly language or in hexadecimal for some
time but I would hope that for a 32-bit java process running on a 64-bit
processor I would fetch a 32-bit pointer and maybe a 32-bit long on a 64-bit
data bus. Remember we are talking about pointers in code coming into
On 02/28/2011 07:15 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Bruce Pease [mailto:bpe...@wth.com]
Subject: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance
In performance tests I have found the configuration runs
dramatically slower than it's corresponding server in 32
bit Windows on 2000 Server and Tomcat 6.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 3/1/2011 2:49 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
I understand it is from the core AWS but the important thing for me was to
eliminate AJP because in a AWS standalone I had used to communicate AJP.
When I enabled ARP I did not have to do anything
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 3/1/2011 3:24 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
Also, I have not programmed in assembly language or in hexadecimal for some
time but I would hope that for a 32-bit java process running on a 64-bit
processor I would fetch a 32-bit pointer and
Thanks Chris I will take a look at it.
I am just trying to figure out what is the fastest was to handle my app. I was
shooting for less than 1msec at Tomcat which I not have done. Now I want to get
to 100 microseconds. Years ago from an logical architecture standpoint It was:
1. Apache web
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
Good thing these are marked as [OT]... we have totally hijacked Bruce's
thread. Maybe we should start another.
On 3/1/2011 4:07 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
I am just trying to figure out what is the fastest was to handle my app. I
was
Hi Chris,
I guess you have not read my last email yet. I think of it as putting two
32-bit pieces of info on a 64-bit data bus whereas for two 64-bit pieces of
information it takes two fetches or twice as long on the same hardware.
Depending upon the number of bytes for each data type for
On 3/1/2011 4:07 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
Thanks Chris I will take a look at it.
I am just trying to figure out what is the fastest was to handle my app. I was
shooting for less than 1msec at Tomcat which I not have done. Now I want to get
to 100 microseconds. Years ago from an logical
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 2/24/2011 3:34 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Tony Anecito [mailto:adanec...@yahoo.com]
Subject: When will SingleThreadModel be removed?
When do you think SingleThreadModel will go from
deprecated to being gone?
Not soon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 2/24/2011 4:16 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Tony Anecito [mailto:adanec...@yahoo.com]
Subject: Re: When will SingleThreadModel be removed?
Either way when Oracle removes it it will be like
Y2K all over again.
My guess is
Hi Chris,
I used Tomcat separately because JBoss was always somewhat behind the current
production version of Tomcat. Eventually I will remove JBoss and use JDBC from
Tomcat to my database to reduce memory footprint and improve performance. I am
only using EJB's in JBoss right now.
Best
I'm just curious if anyone is using a 64 bit version of Linux, and has seen
performance degradation. We are looking to move off the Windows platform
eventually anyway.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Anecito [mailto:adanec...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 4:34 PM
To: Tomcat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 3/1/2011 4:33 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
I used Tomcat separately because JBoss was always somewhat behind the current
production version of Tomcat. Eventually I will remove JBoss and use JDBC
from
Tomcat to my database to reduce memory
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bruce,
On 3/1/2011 4:42 PM, Bruce Pease wrote:
I'm just curious if anyone is using a 64 bit version of Linux, and has seen
performance degradation. We are looking to move off the Windows platform
eventually anyway.
I'm not using 64-bit, but I am
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 3/1/2011 4:19 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
I guess you have not read my last email yet. I think of it as putting two
32-bit pieces of info on a 64-bit data bus whereas for two 64-bit pieces of
information it takes two fetches or twice as
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Subject: Re: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance
Are you saying that a 32-bit JVM running on a 64-bit machine
somehow utilizes the 64-bit bus? Malarkey.
I wouldn't bet on that. Intel goes to great pains to insure all of the
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Subject: Re: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance
I don't understand why communicating a 64-bit value over a
64-bit bus would take longer than communicating a 32-bit
value over a 64-bit bus:
Because you get *two* 32-bit values
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 3/1/2011 5:42 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Subject: Re: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance
Are you saying that a 32-bit JVM running on a 64-bit machine
somehow
There is no code. All I did was create a servlet with a doGet method that had
nothing in it.
I did notice alot of Tomcat code being called. I have not supplied profiling
until I get the separate client machine setup. That will be sometime over the
next few evenings.
-Tony
- Original
I believe the effect of compression is relative. In other words for a big
program with lots of 64-bit pointers and 64-bit longs it is helps but for small
programs it does not.
I would hope the full 64-bit data bus would be used. So you thing 32-pins on
the
processor are not used when running
Thanks Chuck I agree.
I used to design hardware back in the 80-mid 90's so understand what you are
saying but have not kept up with actual designs since then. I jumped over to
software after that.
I know I simplify some things but hope I still am correct. Feel free to correct
me I will try to
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Subject: Re: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance
The question I have is how does the bus controller know
that there are multiple 32-bit values coming down the line,
and that it can send them simultaneously down the bus?
A
I am using tomcat 6.0.16 and windows xp.
So I have been looking on the web for hours trying to find how to enabled
System.out in tomcat 6. I used to have tomcat 5.0.x When I used
System.out.println(text); the text would be written to a stdout.log file.
Now
that I am using tomcat 6, I can't
I got a good laugh with your message.
Security seems to be always in the hands of the wrong people.
Once I asked for the algorithm used to hash the passwords (that
happened to be HMAC SHA-1) into a database, if I was going to
authenticate the users, I needed to use the same algorithm. I did not
yes, you were right, its overriding what I put with this
tomcat6 7788 4.1 21.7 759436 182340 ? Sl Mar01 0:30
/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/bin/java
-Djava.util.logging.config.file=/var/lib/tomcat6/conf/logging.properties
-Djava.awt.headless=true -Xmx128m -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC
From: jason johnson [mailto:jasonjohnson1...@yahoo.com]
Subject: System.out anf tomcat 6
I am using tomcat 6.0.16 and windows xp.
Time to upgrade - that's over three years old (and we won't say anything about
your OS...).
Now that I am using tomcat 6, I can't find the stdout.log
file
From: Rodrigo Asensio [mailto:rasen...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: weird memory
I replaced for my desired amount, restarted everything.. but nothing
changed. Any clue about other file being involved on this ?
One of the problems with these 3rd-party repackaged versions of Tomcat is that
nobody
I'm using Tomcat 7.0.8.
I have a servlet with a doGet method that has a @DenyAll annotation
applied to it.
However, when I run the servlet, it seems to make no difference, and
doGet is still called.
It was my understanding that @DenyAll was supposed to prevent access to
the method on
hi all,
if i want to contribute to the documentation of tomcat, where should i
start?
i saw a lot of contributions are welcomed, patches are welcomed, but
cannot find the end of thread: the where to start
daniel
53 matches
Mail list logo
