On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 4:08 AM, Konstantin Kolinko
wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Caldarale, Charles R <
> > chuck.caldar...@unisys.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> At least you've got the right mailing list this time. No idea where you
> >> were looking, but the 5.0 and 5.5 are pretty obvious
Hi Konstantin/Daniel,
We are using Java 1.6. The gnu.xml has not been installed separately. It must
have been a part of the Tomcat installation.
The XML parser is whatever comes default with Tomcat.
We did a copy of the working copy of Tomcat (7.0.50) from the Development box
to the produc
Cookie handling is fundamentally a complete mess. Specifications exist
but are not fully implemented, are not consistent with related
specifications, etc.
Having tried to sort this out the last time around and having read
Jeremy's great work on documenting where we stand at the present moment,
it
Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2014-02-04 André Warnier :
Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2014-02-03 André Warnier :
André Warnier wrote:
Chris,
a note :
Christopher Schultz wrote:
...
Without quoting, unquoted Cookie names and values may be any US-ASCII
character from 0x32 - 0x7e except for any of
Two corrections to what Chris wrote
2014-01-30 Christopher Schultz :
> On 1/30/14, 12:53 PM, vicky007aggar...@yahoo.co.in wrote:
>> how work & temp is being used by a Tomcat ??
>
> The temp dir is required by the servlet spec. I don't believe Tomcat
> uses it for anything. The work directory is us
2014-02-04 André Warnier :
> Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>>
>> 2014-02-03 André Warnier :
>>>
>>> André Warnier wrote:
Chris,
a note :
Christopher Schultz wrote:
...
> Without quoting, unquoted Cookie names and values may be any US-ASCII
> characte
Christopher,
Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Ragini,
On 2/3/14, 4:19 PM, Singh, Ragini wrote:
I upgraded Java 1.6.45 to Java 1.7.51 using
java-1.7.0-oracle.x86_64 : Oracle Java Runtime Environment on RHEL
5. Used the "alternatives" command to make th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Ragini,
On 2/3/14, 4:19 PM, Singh, Ragini wrote:
> I upgraded Java 1.6.45 to Java 1.7.51 using
> java-1.7.0-oracle.x86_64 : Oracle Java Runtime Environment on RHEL
> 5. Used the "alternatives" command to make the Java 7 as Java
> version. Now in my
Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2014-02-03 André Warnier :
André Warnier wrote:
Chris,
a note :
Christopher Schultz wrote:
...
Without quoting, unquoted Cookie names and values may be any US-ASCII
character from 0x32 - 0x7e except for any of ("(" | ")" | "<" | ">" |
"@" | "," | ";" | ":" | "\" |
Hello,
I upgraded Java 1.6.45 to Java 1.7.51 using java-1.7.0-oracle.x86_64 : Oracle
Java Runtime Environment on RHEL 5. Used the "alternatives" command to make the
Java 7 as Java version.
Now in my custom startup script if I define JAVA_HOME as
JAVA_HOME="/usr/lib/jvm/java" tomcat 7 recognizes
2014-01-31 Ja kub :
> changing logging level in logging properties works fine, but my custom
> logger is not visible in jconsole under java.util.logging -> loggerNames, I
> can't change logging level dynamically by jconsole
>
> I add into logging properties
> test.logging.LoggingTest .level = FINE
2014-02-03 André Warnier :
> André Warnier wrote:
>>
>> Chris,
>>
>> a note :
>>
>> Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> ...
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Without quoting, unquoted Cookie names and values may be any US-ASCII
>>> character from 0x32 - 0x7e except for any of ("(" | ")" | "<" | ">" |
>>> "@" | "," | ";" | "
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Caldarale, Charles R <
> chuck.caldar...@unisys.com> wrote:
>>
>> At least you've got the right mailing list this time. No idea where you
>> were looking, but the 5.0 and 5.5 are pretty obvious when you look in the
>> places linked to from the Tomcat home page:
>
LS,
Native apache WebDAV implementation is unable to reroute the root
directory
to another location.
The error returned was induced by experimenting with aliases in
different
directories outside the tomcat context, the logging revealed that on
that
specific url (via the alias) the webdav
2014-02-03 Mark Thomas :
> On 03/02/2014 12:46, walter.heesterm...@toyota-europe.com wrote:
>> I can't reproduce it with simple web application, it happens in one of our
>> applications, SDL WorldServer application which we bought for
>> translations. Even there the issue is random.
1. When respon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Konstantin,
On 2/3/14, 7:40 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2014-02-03 Maor Yosef :
>> Hi.
>>
>
> Please read the rules and do not top-post, as it is hard to
> follow. http://tomcat.apache.org/lists.html#tomcat-users
>
>> 4. Can you point me to a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Daniel,
On 2/3/14, 7:10 AM, Daniel Mikusa wrote:
> On Feb 3, 2014, at 3:30 AM, Maor Yosef
> wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>>
>> 1. We are aware that 6.0.26 is old, but since there is a large
>> operational impact, we wont upgrade the tomcat until we will know
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 2/3/14, 7:39 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 03/02/2014 11:32, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 03/02/2014 10:43, Sampers, Ruud wrote:
>>> Tomcat 7.047. Default setup form web.
>>>
>>> Added an webapp with webdav enabled
>>>
>>> readonly = false;
>>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Walter,
On 2/3/14, 6:31 AM, walter.heesterm...@toyota-europe.com wrote:
> Here the text format of the traffic
>
> GET
> /ws/ws_ext?servlet=upload_file_project_attributes&fileAttr=CompletedDTPCaptionKit&project=30452&token=1358616358&random=0.53084
On Feb 3, 2014, at 9:00 AM, Maor Yosef wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Daniel Mikusa wrote:
>
>> On Feb 3, 2014, at 3:30 AM, Maor Yosef wrote:
>>
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> 1. We are aware that 6.0.26 is old, but since there is a large
>> operational
>>> impact, we wont upgrade the tomcat unti
Mark Thomas wrote:
On 03/02/2014 11:32, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 03/02/2014 10:43, Sampers, Ruud wrote:
Tomcat 7.047. Default setup form web.
Added an webapp with webdav enabled
readonly = false;
Windows 7:
Mapped a drive to the specific folder:
View content OK, put creating a new file/folder r
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Daniel Mikusa wrote:
> On Feb 3, 2014, at 3:30 AM, Maor Yosef wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > 1. We are aware that 6.0.26 is old, but since there is a large
> operational
> > impact, we wont upgrade the tomcat until we will know its definetly an
> > issue in this specifi
We don't have the source code
Walter
From: Mark Thomas
To: Tomcat Users List ,
Date: 03/02/2014 13:50
Subject:Re: Tomcat and "Chunked Transfer-Encoding"
On 03/02/2014 12:46, walter.heesterm...@toyota-europe.com wrote:
> I can't reproduce it with simple web application, it h
On 03/02/2014 12:46, walter.heesterm...@toyota-europe.com wrote:
> I can't reproduce it with simple web application, it happens in one of our
> applications, SDL WorldServer application which we bought for
> translations. Even there the issue is random.
Do the affected requests pass through any
On 03/02/2014 11:59, Ja kub wrote:
> Ok, thx,
>
> 2 questions:
>
> 1) If I will have only one very large session (about 100Mb), will memory
> increase only on one backup node, and on 2 other nodes in cluster memory
> will not increase ?
You should see an increase on the primary and the backup no
I can't reproduce it with simple web application, it happens in one of our
applications, SDL WorldServer application which we bought for
translations. Even there the issue is random.
Walter
From: Mark Thomas
To: Tomcat Users List ,
Date: 03/02/2014 13:43
Subject:Re: Tomcat
On 03/02/2014 11:21, walter.heesterm...@toyota-europe.com wrote:
> If it can't be disabled, who is then generating the issue, can it be
> tomcat issue or issue application relatd, not using correct response?
As per my original response, this is most likely an application issue.
Can you reproduce
2014-02-03 Maor Yosef :
> Hi.
>
Please read the rules and do not top-post, as it is hard to follow.
http://tomcat.apache.org/lists.html#tomcat-users
> 4. Can you point me to an article on how to configure different background
> thread for each container? is it configured in tomcat or should be
>
On 03/02/2014 11:32, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 03/02/2014 10:43, Sampers, Ruud wrote:
>> Tomcat 7.047. Default setup form web.
>>
>> Added an webapp with webdav enabled
>>
>> readonly = false;
>>
>> Windows 7:
>> Mapped a drive to the specific folder:
>> View content OK, put creating a new file/folde
On 03/02/2014 12:19, André Warnier wrote:
> André Warnier wrote:
>> Christopher Schultz wrote:
>>> Without quoting, unquoted Cookie names and values may be any US-ASCII
>>> character from 0x32 - 0x7e except for any of ("(" | ")" | "<" | ">" |
>>> "@" | "," | ";" | ":" | "\" | <"> | "/" | "[" | "]"
André Warnier wrote:
Chris,
a note :
Christopher Schultz wrote:
...
Without quoting, unquoted Cookie names and values may be any US-ASCII
character from 0x32 - 0x7e except for any of ("(" | ")" | "<" | ">" |
"@" | "," | ";" | ":" | "\" | <"> | "/" | "[" | "]" | "?" | "=" | "{"
| "}" | SP |
On Feb 3, 2014, at 3:30 AM, Maor Yosef wrote:
> Hi.
>
> 1. We are aware that 6.0.26 is old, but since there is a large operational
> impact, we wont upgrade the tomcat until we will know its definetly an
> issue in this specific version
While I understand what you’re saying, I disagree. If you
Ok, thx,
2 questions:
1) If I will have only one very large session (about 100Mb), will memory
increase only on one backup node, and on 2 other nodes in cluster memory
will not increase ?
2) On 18080 node, on which all queries where asked memory increased not too
much than 100Mb, and on each of
Chris,
a note :
Christopher Schultz wrote:
...
Without quoting, unquoted Cookie names and values may be any US-ASCII
character from 0x32 - 0x7e except for any of ("(" | ")" | "<" | ">" |
"@" | "," | ";" | ":" | "\" | <"> | "/" | "[" | "]" | "?" | "=" | "{"
| "}" | SP | HT). None of the chara
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat 8.0.1 (beta).
Apache Tomcat 8 is an open source software implementation of the Java
Servlet, JavaServer Pages, Java Unified Expression Language and Java
WebSocket technologies.
Apache Tomcat 8 is aligned with Java EE 7.
On 03/02/2014 11:31, Ja kub wrote:
> But time is not such a great problem for me. Time of execution was
> mentioned only "in addition" - there are 100 k requests.
>
> I am mainly interested in memory, and how BackupManager works.
> I hoped, that with BackupManager memory will increase on node whic
On 03/02/2014 10:43, Sampers, Ruud wrote:
> Tomcat 7.047. Default setup form web.
>
> Added an webapp with webdav enabled
>
> readonly = false;
>
> Windows 7:
> Mapped a drive to the specific folder:
> View content OK, put creating a new file/folder results in a dialog
There is a long list of t
Here the text format of the traffic
GET
/ws/ws_ext?servlet=upload_file_project_attributes&fileAttr=CompletedDTPCaptionKit&project=30452&token=1358616358&random=0.5308450920567584
HTTP/1.1
Host: td3worldserverlb.toyota-europe.com
Accept: text/html, application/xhtml+xml, */*
Accept-Language: nl-
But time is not such a great problem for me. Time of execution was
mentioned only "in addition" - there are 100 k requests.
I am mainly interested in memory, and how BackupManager works.
I hoped, that with BackupManager memory will increase on node which is
queried and ONLY on one backup node,
but
If it can't be disabled, who is then generating the issue, can it be
tomcat issue or issue application relatd, not using correct response?
Walter
From: Mark Thomas
To: Tomcat Users List ,
Date: 03/02/2014 12:10
Subject:Re: Tomcat and "Chunked Transfer-Encoding"
On 03/02/2
On 03/02/2014 11:03, Ja kub wrote:
> Good question, sorry I didn't tell earlier,
>
> its tomcat 7.0.50 on linux, zip or tgz from download page, not from rpm.
OK. Good to know it is the current release.
It is probably time to fire up a profiler and see where all the time is
being spent.
Mark
>
On 03/02/2014 10:47, walter.heesterm...@toyota-europe.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have requested the trext format. In the meantime, how can I disable the
> 'Chunked Transfer-Encoding' inside Tomcat server?
You can't.
Mark
>
> Regards
> Walter
>
>
>
>
> From: Mark Thomas
> To: Tomcat Us
Good question, sorry I didn't tell earlier,
its tomcat 7.0.50 on linux, zip or tgz from download page, not from rpm.
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 03/02/2014 08:33, Ja kub wrote:
> > I have configured no loadbalancer,
> >
> > I accessed tomcat directly
>
> Both thing
Hi,
I have requested the trext format. In the meantime, how can I disable the
'Chunked Transfer-Encoding' inside Tomcat server?
Regards
Walter
From: Mark Thomas
To: Tomcat Users List ,
Date: 03/02/2014 11:15
Subject:Re: Tomcat and "Chunked Transfer-Encoding"
On 03/02/201
Tomcat 7.047. Default setup form web.
Added an webapp with webdav enabled
readonly = false;
Windows 7:
Mapped a drive to the specific folder:
View content OK, put creating a new file/folder results in a dialog
Localhost logging:
127.0.0.1 - - [03/Feb/2014:11:40:34 +0100]
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat 6.0.39 stable.
Apache Tomcat 6.0.39 is primarily a security and bug fix release. The
notable changes include:
- Various improvements to XML configuration file validation.
- Better adherence to RFC2616 for Content-Type and
On 03/02/2014 08:33, Ja kub wrote:
> I have configured no loadbalancer,
>
> I accessed tomcat directly
Both things that it would have been useful to mention in your original
question.
Before we go any further, how about telling us which Tomcat version you
are using?
Mark
> tomcats are on 1808
On 03/02/2014 09:34, walter.heesterm...@toyota-europe.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have some weird behaviopur with one of our applications using
> apache-tomcat-6.0.37.
>
> This is the report of the newtork engineer:
> /The application (or app server - apache/coyote) is returning a response
> with "Ch
Hi,
We have some weird behaviopur with one of our applications using
apache-tomcat-6.0.37.
This is the report of the newtork engineer:
The application (or app server - apache/coyote) is returning a response
with "Chunked Transfer-Encoding", but is sending the first chunks before
giving the ht
using 64 bit
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Johan Compagner wrote:
> On 3 February 2014 09:30, Maor Yosef wrote:
>
> > 2. You are right, it was my mistake, it causes OOM and not stack
> overflow,
> > when we see high sessions count we get exceptions saying "unable to
> create
> > new native t
On 3 February 2014 09:30, Maor Yosef wrote:
> 2. You are right, it was my mistake, it causes OOM and not stack overflow,
> when we see high sessions count we get exceptions saying "unable to create
> new native thread"
>
do you use a 32 bit vm?
Because most of the time when i see this i ask the
I have configured no loadbalancer,
I accessed tomcat directly
tomcats are on 18080, 28080, 38080, 48080,
In browser I used only 18080, this is my laptop test env, nobody else
access it,
28080, 38080, 48080, where untouched by broser, but in jvisualvm their
memory has increased by the same amount
Hi.
1. We are aware that 6.0.26 is old, but since there is a large operational
impact, we wont upgrade the tomcat until we will know its definetly an
issue in this specific version
2. You are right, it was my mistake, it causes OOM and not stack overflow,
when we see high sessions count we get exc
On 02/02/2014 22:59, Ja kub wrote:
> With below BackupManager backup manager configuration in server.xml
> heap memory increases over 100MB on each of four nodes in cluster.
>
> In addition time of
> ab -c 10 -n 10 -p post.txt http://localhost:18080/petclinic/session/fill
> is about 150 second
54 matches
Mail list logo
