Re: WebDav - mapping question?

2007-07-30 Thread Mark Thomas
Just to finish this thread off... The MS clients don't handle 302s at all well but this wasn't the problem in this case. Sorry for the mis-direction on my part. The default Tomcat WebDAV configuration is already set up to avoid this 302 issue. The problem in this case was that MS clients make

Re: KLUDGE: WebDav - mapping question?

2007-07-30 Thread Mark Thomas
Johnny Kewl wrote: Guys I like this so much, I couldnt wait for a patch, or possible fix. Johnny, Your patch is close but needed a few tweaks to keep the flexibility that the existing WebDAV servlet has. If you are interested you can see what changed in the commit message in the archives:

Re: KLUDGE: WebDav - mapping question?

2007-07-26 Thread Johnny Kewl
Guys I like this so much, I couldnt wait for a patch, or possible fix. The problem with the above KLUDGE is that the fix is internal to TC, and if you try incorporate it, you will find you have to pull in half of Tomcats jars to make it work. Its never a good idea to include those jars directly

Re: KLUDGE: WebDav - mapping question?

2007-07-25 Thread Johnny Kewl
Guys I like this so much, I couldnt wait for a patch, or possible fix. The problem with the above KLUDGE is that the fix is internal to TC, and if you try incorporate it, you will find you have to pull in half of Tomcats jars to make it work. Its never a good idea to include those jars directly

Re: WebDav - mapping question?

2007-07-25 Thread David Delbecq
two development efforts? ... just wondering - Original Message - From: David Delbecq [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 1:06 PM Subject: Re: WebDav - mapping question? That's strange that MS doesn't handle it. As i said, i

AW: WebDav - mapping question?

2007-07-24 Thread Konstantin Breu
- mapping question? David Delbecq wrote: Tomcat should not refuse webapp/webdav if you have a mapping to /webdav/*. It should at least dispatch to servlet mapped on /webdav/*. Tomcat doesn't reject requests of this type . For any directory resource without a trailing '/' it will do a 302 redirect

Re: WebDav - mapping question?

2007-07-24 Thread Johnny Kewl
Hi MARK... I managed to break the thread please see the KLUDGE: WebDav - mapping question post. I had a look at the code (just enuf to find a kludge) but what actually happens is that the WebDavServlet passes a GET onto the Default servlet. If its a /yada/ it treats that as a folder

Re: WebDav - mapping question?

2007-07-24 Thread David Delbecq
That's strange that MS doesn't handle it. As i said, i have a slide webdav servlet mapped to webapp/DAV/* and MS webfolder can access it throught all our company without much troubles, even without a trailing slash. (there are slight troubles that are unrelated) Mark Thomas a écrit : David

Re: WebDav - mapping question?

2007-07-24 Thread Johnny Kewl
:06 PM Subject: Re: WebDav - mapping question? That's strange that MS doesn't handle it. As i said, i have a slide webdav servlet mapped to webapp/DAV/* and MS webfolder can access it throught all our company without much troubles, even without a trailing slash. (there are slight troubles

Re: WebDav - mapping question?

2007-07-24 Thread Mark Thomas
Johnny Kewl wrote: Tomcat is Jakarta right? It was. It isn't any more. so I'm just wondering why you guys dont talk about a common webdav module Because the Tomcat one is just an example written in a single Servlet, whereas Slide is a full implementation. Just look at the difference in

Re: WebDav - mapping question?

2007-07-23 Thread Johnny Kewl
For future reference the WEBDAV problems between Microsoft and Tomcat seem to be as follows First thanks for pointing me to the MS patch, although like the other poster said... it didnt help, or maybe it did, but only on the MS side. MICROSOFT doesnt like the lagging folder

Re: WebDav - mapping question?

2007-07-23 Thread David Delbecq
Have never used the tomcat webdav servlet. I use the slide webdav servlet. I thought i needed to correct your suppositions and mistakes in handling protocol. En l'instant précis du 23/07/07 12:31, Johnny Kewl s'exprimait en ces termes: For future reference the WEBDAV problems between

Re: WebDav - mapping question?

2007-07-23 Thread Mark Thomas
David Delbecq wrote: Tomcat should not refuse webapp/webdav if you have a mapping to /webdav/*. It should at least dispatch to servlet mapped on /webdav/*. Tomcat doesn't reject requests of this type . For any directory resource without a trailing '/' it will do a 302 redirect and add '/'. The

WebDav - mapping question?

2007-07-22 Thread Johnny Kewl
Hi guys, Being using FTP, thought I would give WebDav a try, but cant get it working nicely... This is the mapping for the webdav servlet, and this I can get working with IE web folders (ms webdav client) seems to work nicely. servlet-mapping servlet-namewebdav/servlet-name

AW: WebDav - mapping question?

2007-07-22 Thread Konstantin Breu
: WebDav - mapping question? Hi guys, Being using FTP, thought I would give WebDav a try, but cant get it working nicely... This is the mapping for the webdav servlet, and this I can get working with IE web folders (ms webdav client) seems to work nicely. servlet-mapping servlet-namewebdav

Re: AW: WebDav - mapping question?

2007-07-22 Thread Mark Thomas
Konstantin Breu wrote: Hello Johnny, maybe it helps to install this Web folders update (at the clients): http://support.microsoft.com/kb/907306/en-us If you haven't tried this yet, don't bother. As far as I can tell the MS client is hopelessly broken. It used to be the case it was broken on