Op 27 apr 2011, om 09:43 heeft Daniele Dellafiore het volgende geschreven:
> This is also my main point to conversation. We're talking about being
> somewhere really close to a nice out of the box OSGi support. Why not take a
> little effort to make it complete? Also, having packages that span thro
Op 26 apr 2011, om 16:41 heeft Martin Grigorov het volgende geschreven:
>> [..]
>> Wicket bundles are some sort of raw jars+metadata that can be assemled in a
>> custom way to become a usable OSGI bundle. Whatever you consider the
>> uber-jar solution to go good or not, this is a flaw.
>>
> Wic
Hi Jeremy,
Nice to see more Wicket goodness!
One thing I noticed: the release tag is not (yet?) created in SVN.
Regards,
Daan van Etten
Op 24 dec 2010, om 16:14 heeft Jeremy Thomerson het volgende geschreven:
> The Wicket development team is proud to announce that we have released
>
Hi Frank,
You can use nested forms, so you can put a form inside your ModalWindow.
The tag should not make a difference, or are you experiencing other
problems?
Regards,
Daan
Op 4 nov 2010, om 12:00 heeft Frank Klein Koerkamp het volgende geschreven:
> Hi Wicketeers,
>
> does anyone know wh
Johan and Ernesto: Thanks for the info!
Regards,
Daan van Etten
Op 10 sep 2010, om 12:23 heeft Johan Haleby het volgende geschreven:
>
> I've tried numerous different drag and drop components for Wicket in the past
> (it was a while ago so I don't remember all of them).
Which ones did you use? What are the drawbacks of the other drag and drop
components?
Regards,
Daan
Op 10 sep 2010, om 08:24 heeft Johan Haleby het volgende geschreven:
>
> It works!! Thanks a lot! WicketDND is by far the best drag and drop component
> I've used for Wicket.
> --
> View this
No built-in support, as you can just use HTML.
I have not seen any external support, but someone else might have built it.
Regards,
Daan van Etten
Op 15 dec 2009, om 13:41 heeft sudhir543-...@yahoo.com het volgende geschreven:
> Any one !!
> Is there any built in (or any) suppo
I love how simple Wicket's markup is. Please keep it clean :-)
Let's keep logic in Java and markup in HTML... no mixing.
Regards,
Daan van Etten
Op 13 dec 2009, om 18:00 heeft Martin Makundi het volgende geschreven:
What about RFE for
??
**
Martin
2009/12/13 Anton Ve
Ah, I misread your original question.
Maybe you can use Wicket Fragments for each type of input.
http://wicket.apache.org/examplefragments.html
Regards,
Daan van Etten
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 10:19 +0100, Pieter Degraeuwe wrote:
> I'll go for the 'each detail' has a panel, and c
Hi,
Sidenote: I suggest you look at the LoadableDetachableModel, see:
http://wicket.apache.org/docs/wicket-1.3.2/wicket/apidocs/org/apache/wicket/model/LoadableDetachableModel.html
Regards,
Daan van Etten
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 16:20 +0800, Lester Chua wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am changing
ComplexMarkupPanel, depending on which one you want to see.
Regards,
Daan van Etten
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 10:06 +0100, Pieter Degraeuwe wrote:
> I want to avoid this, since I wanted to reuse the (complex) markup...
> Is there no way around this?
>
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Giambalv
Hi Jérôme,
Check this: http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/how-to-switch-to-ssl-mode.html
Regards,
Daan van Etten
Op 28 nov 2009, om 19:21 heeft UseTheFork het volgende geschreven:
Ok, but HOW is this integrated with Wicket? What needs to be done?
How does
it work with Wicket? How is this
aking Babies
• Wicket Q&A
Regards,
Daan van Etten
Op 3 nov 2009, om 00:11 heeft jWeekend het volgende geschreven:
We will hold our next London Wicket Event on Saturday, 21st
November, from 14:45. This time we have hired "The Gallery" at the
iconic Foyles Bookshop in central Londo
Item 2 (fail if a page has not been tested) is not in my solution, but
I'm glad I could help :-)
Regards,
Daan van Etten
On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 10:32 +0100, Pierre Goupil wrote:
> Yeah, test coverage is a big word here. But as I said I was not looking for
> a way to generate a rep
coverage. It only checks for exceptions and if the code matches the
markup at instantiation.
An exception could easily be thrown when replacing panels, clicking on a
link or submitting a form. This is not tested.
Regards,
Daan van Etten
On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 10:06 +0100, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> Spr
://stuq.nl/weblog/2009-11-01/automatically-test-your-wicket-panel-html-markup
Regards,
Daan van Etten
On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 09:23 +0100, Pierre Goupil wrote:
> I use it, and what I'm looking for is a mean to ensure my test coverage.
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 6:13 AM,
to use your solution to do this?
Thanks!
Tauren
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:18 PM, nino martinez wael
wrote:
Yeah looks like the way Tauren should go.. Did'nt know that was what
he was looking fore..
2009/4/22 Daan van Etten :
Hi Tauren,
A while ago I wrote this article, which may giv
Hi Tauren,
A while ago I wrote this article, which may give you some hints on how
to achieve this:
http://stuq.nl/weblog/2008-09-03/user-friendly-form-validation-with-wicket
Regards,
Daan
Op 21 apr 2009, om 17:36 heeft Tauren Mills het volgende geschreven:
Thanks Nino,
Actually, I want j
extensions
1.3.5
Change the 'version' according to which version of Wicket you use.
Eclipse should add Wicket extensions to your classpath when you have
this dependency. (maybe with a mvn clean eclipse command)
Regards,
Daan van Etten
Op 8 apr 2009, om 12:49 heeft Brande
rk, I don't care what its called... um... maybe I
should qualify that... I don't care what its called as long as I
won't be embarrassed when talking to my clients about it :)
- brill
On 1-Apr-09, at 10:19 AM, Daan van Etten wrote:
FX sounds just way cool.
"WicketFX. Where
FX sounds just way cool.
"WicketFX. Where function meets form. Web development in style."
Say for yourself, would you rather want to work with a framework
called Wicket, or a framework called WicketFX?!
Birthday parties and pub nights never are the same again:
"What technologies you use?
-
You could write a method that sets the visibility on the relevant
components.
The Form components have to be visible to that method though (or you
have to use a visitor).
Regards,
Daan
Op 1 apr 2009, om 08:32 heeft Boydens Joeri (OZ) het volgende
geschreven:
Hi,
I have this page whe
Some other suggestions:
Why go with the Wicket FX if you can have Wicket FX 2.0. Ready for Web
2.0!
Or... the Wacky Wicket, for inclusion in the Ubuntu Linux distro.
Or... Wicket Enterprise Release 4, the version that lags a few years
in features but is 'supported'
Or... Wicky the Wickin
Hi Ashish,
Do you use AJAX? Have you added the components to the
AjaxRequestTarget with target.addComponent() ?
If you do use AJAX, you have to override both onError and onSubmit on
the AjaxButton you use for submit. In both these methods you have to
add the relevant components to the Aja
Hi Ashis,
Do you use AJAX? Have you added the components to the
AjaxRequestTarget with target.addComponent() ?
Which version of Wicket are you using?
Can you post some code?
Regards,
Daan
Op 31 mrt 2009, om 06:59 heeft Ashis het volgende geschreven:
Actually when a submit button is click
hanks for listening!
Regards,
Daan van Etten
Op 24 mrt 2009, om 10:22 heeft Martijn Dashorst het volgende geschreven:
The Apache Wicket Meetup in Amsterdam tonight (24 March) has grown
considerably: over 70 people have already registered! Our program is
still growing and just this morning we g
What's the surprise?!
I'm very curious now, can't wait!
See you all tonight...
Regards,
Daan van Etten
Op 24 mrt 2009, om 10:22 heeft Martijn Dashorst het volgende geschreven:
The Apache Wicket Meetup in Amsterdam tonight (24 March) has grown
considerably: over 70 peop
[X] Yes, change the DropDownChoice constructor to take the
choices list as IModel> or List without the
wildcard
Regards,
Daan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Op 1 feb 2009, om 21:51 heeft Timo Rantalaiho het volgende geschreven:
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009, Phillip Rhodes wrote:
Declaring the ModalWindow from a panel did not work. The ModalWindow
would appear, but the ModalWindow contents (a panel) would be
rendered
within the parent panel after the Mo
Sure! You can for example use an abstract method to post the data back
to the parent.
A complete example is here:
http://stuq.nl/weblog/2008-06-05/wicket-how-to-write-a-reusable-modal-window-popup
- Daan
Op 2 feb 2009, om 16:53 heeft wicketworker het volgende geschreven:
Hi,
Could someone
ou know what to expect!
Al and I will also run a more concrete, general Wicket Q&A to wrap
things
up as usual.
We'll be getting in some hot Pizza for around 18:15 and then:
* http://www.jWeekend.com Cemal Bayramoglu : Welcome/
Introduction
* http://www.stuq.nl Daan van Etten :
Hi,
This is possible, I recently wrote an article about it. It does not
add a FeedbackPanel for every form component, but instead you can use
the (custom) FeedbackLabel
See http://stuq.nl/weblog/2008-09-03/user-friendly-form-validation-with-wicket
Regards,
Daan
Op 9 dec 2008, om 10:35 he
Hi James,
How does this work with a Hibernate-managed object? Did you test it
with Hibernate?
Op 8 dec 2008, om 19:45 heeft James Carman het volgende geschreven:
Sorry for the delay. A shadow model basically grabs the actual
model's
value in the beginning and caches it. You actually edit
Hi fatefree,
On 22 okt 2008, at 03:53, fatefree wrote:
Thank you very much, I didn't realize that the
AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior submitted individual components, I
guess i
got it confused with AjaxFormValidatingBehavior.
I think the only issue is when a form level validator needs to
Hi fatefree,
Check this blog post:
http://stuq.nl/weblog/2008-09-03/user-friendly-form-validation-with-wicket
I think this achieves what you want.
Regards,
Daan
On 21 okt 2008, at 15:28, fatefree wrote:
I have been trying to fulfill a requirement of a form, where each
field is
validated
Do not hesitate, Mac is great! I use it all the time.
They waited a bit too long with bringing Java 6 to Mac, but besides
that, it all works great.
We also use Mac OS X Server with Tomcat to deploy our software.
By the way, you know you have to change your nickname?
Something like 'greekmacos
Now thats *really* friendly :-)
On 15 okt 2008, at 13:11, James Carman wrote:
Right, I guess that's what I meant by "friendly" too. Friendly to
search engines, not just our eyes.
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 7:08 AM, Daan van Etten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Keeping
to someone):
http://www.amazon.com/Pragmatic-Version-Control-Using-Subversion/dp/0974514063
http://www.amazon.com/dp/0974514063
They just add in the text to make it more "friendly" I guess.
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 6:09 AM, Daan van Etten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Hbiloo,
I
oblem is that you cannot be sure that the article title is
unique.
Kind regards,
Hbiloo
<http://stuq.nl/weblog/2008-06-20/create-restful-urls-with-wicket>
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Daan van Etten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Hbiloo,
Check out the various UrlCodingStrate
Hi Hbiloo,
Check out the various UrlCodingStrategies. See
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/url-coding-strategies.html
I wrote something about RESTful urls here:
http://stuq.nl/weblog/2008-06-20/create-restful-urls-with-wicket
Regards,
Daan
On 15 okt 2008, at 11:19, Azzeddine Daddah wrote:
Hi Kaspar,
We use jBPM for our processes. We don't manage the processes from
Wicket, as there is a nice plugin Eclipse for it.
jBPM uses Java and Hibernate, so you can create any GUI you like in
Wicket and show underlying jBPM stuff (like tasks, processes, etcetera)
Regards,
Daan
On 9 okt
n 6 okt 2008, at 22:04, Cédric Thiébault wrote:
A ModalWindows is not just a DIV with a mask...
I need all the ModalWindow logic (show/hide, drag, resize, etc.) but
not the mask.
Cedric
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Daan van Etten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, it's called a DIV
Yes, it's called a DIV.
Regards,
Daan
On 6 okt 2008, at 21:08, Cédric Thiébault wrote:
Is there an equivalent of the ModalWindow but non-modal, ie without a
mask that prevent user from interacting the rest of page ?
Thanks!
Cedric
---
I'd love to be there, but it's a +700 km drive..
BTW: was surprised to see my interpretation of the Wicket logo on top
of the page :-).
Regards,
Daan
On 25 sep 2008, at 21:06, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
Hi
Remember WUG DK 15 october. We've simplified the process of signi
Hi,
You can try using abstract methods. I have made an example with demo
project here: http://stuq.nl/weblog/2008-06-05/wicket-how-to-write-a-reusable-modal-window-popup
Regards,
Daan
On 22 sep 2008, at 10:41, Eyal Golan wrote:
I thought taking out all state from the modal window to the
protected boolean wantOnSelectionChangedNotifications() {
return true;
}
});
Nothing strange... /Anders
Daan van Etten wrote:
On 17 sep 2008, at 14:55, Anders Peterson wrote:
My DropDownChoice always displays as if nothing is selected.
Using it works fine, but every time the page is (
On 17 sep 2008, at 14:55, Anders Peterson wrote:
My DropDownChoice always displays as if nothing is selected. Using
it works fine, but every time the page is (re)loaded the selection
is reset.
wantOnSelectionChangedNotifications return true.
I have an older version of my app deployed (usin
Or you can check my solution here:
http://stuq.nl/weblog/2008-09-03/user-friendly-form-validation-with-wicket
Example form: http://stuq.nl/media/image/form-usability-tutorial-invalid.png
(You can easily change the look and feel, this is just an example)
Regards,
Daan
On 16 sep 2008, at 16:54,
I really don't want to get into a 'design by committee' thing.
BTW: I've no idea about trademark or copyright issues.
I like to see a simple way for people to support Wicket or Apache,
financially or by promoting it.
Some merchandize may help with both, at least a bit with the marketing
(and
h the "official" orange as the
font colour for "Wicket" ?
Daan van Etten wrote:
Here is version 2 :-)
http://stuq.nl/media/image/apache-wicket-tshirt-black-version-2.png
On 21 aug 2008, at 15:07, Matej Knopp wrote:
I could imagine wearing that on a tshirt :)
One more sma
first for the polo, because the aspect
ratio is the same, but the resolution is much better.
Regards,
Daan
On 21 aug 2008, at 15:32, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
and could you rescale to 3.33 x 3.33 . I can put up a black polo
then:)
Daan van Etten wrote:
Thanks for the tip
ug 21, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Daan van Etten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for the tip!
They should look better now:
http://stuq.nl/media/image/apache-wicket-tshirt.png
http://stuq.nl/media/image/apache-wicket-tshirt-black.png
Regards,
Daan
On 21 aug 2008, at 14:46, Matej Knopp wrote:
The
, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Daan van Etten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for the inspiration... black looks really nice!
Imagine a black t-shirt or a black mug with this:
http://stuq.nl/media/image/apache-wicket-tshirt-black.png
Regards,
Daan van Etten
On 21 aug 2008, at 13:51, Yiannis Mavro
On 21 aug 2008, at 14:15, Uwe Schäfer wrote:
Daan van Etten schrieb:
Something like this: http://stuq.nl/media/image/apache-wicket-tshirt.png
(Just spent my lunch break time on it :-) )
good one. just a nicer font, and that´s it ;)
Do you know what the official font is?
Regards,
Daan
Thanks for the inspiration... black looks really nice!
Imagine a black t-shirt or a black mug with this:
http://stuq.nl/media/image/apache-wicket-tshirt-black.png
Regards,
Daan van Etten
On 21 aug 2008, at 13:51, Yiannis Mavroukakis wrote:
Ok my graphics skills are so pants it's embarra
Something like this: http://stuq.nl/media/image/apache-wicket-tshirt.png
(Just spent my lunch break time on it :-) )
I have this as Photoshop file (300dpi 10"x10"). It's a vector (path)
logo, so it is resizable to any size.
Suggestions are welcome.
Daan
On 21 aug 2008, at 11:29, Nino Saturn
I've read this more than once, and could not understand it.
Please try again to explain what you mean. This looks like Babelfish
gibberish.
Regards,
Daan
On 8 aug 2008, at 22:21, oriana wrote:
I need urgent one since help I have the page of begin and it don't
want me to
catch the styles
On 16 jul 2008, at 11:34, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Daan van Etten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can you elaborate a bit on your first statement? You need a lot of
data-juggling for many clients, so I'd love to learn why it gives
higher
perform
Hi Martijn,
On 16 jul 2008, at 10:19, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
It is exactly the opposite: keeping state serverside increases
performance. It makes it more expensive to scale out, but that is
about it.
Can you elaborate a bit on your first statement? You need a lot of
data-juggling for many cl
On 16 jul 2008, at 09:54, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
Daan van Etten wrote:
On 16 jul 2008, at 04:49, Ryan Sonnek wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez
Wael <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We are having the potential fun of running a sit
On 16 jul 2008, at 04:49, Ryan Sonnek wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez
Wael <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We are having the potential fun of running a site with around 1
million
users, and a lot more over time. What could be great optimizing
points?
61 matches
Mail list logo