Yes that does it, thank you very much.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 2:09 AM sven wrote:
>
>
> Have you tried #setDefaultFormProcessing(false)?
>
>
>
> Otherwise the button will trigger new validation errors.
>
>
>
> Sven
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> > On 19.02.2019 at 10:36,wrote:
> >
> >
> > I am
I am trying to implement a "Clear" button on a form that will clear the
input fields as well as any feedback messages. The fields are clear with
form.clearInput() but the feedback messages are not. This is done with a
AjaxButton. I thought when the feedback panel is added to the target, it
will
Hi Ashley,
I actually wrote the list regarding a similar idea about a year ago. It
seems like a handy thing for RAD and for newbies struggling with keeping
simple CRUD pages in sync. However I can offer nothing but an
encurraging great idea, go for it. :)
/Casper
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
i dont
Use Lombok (http://projectlombok.org/), it allows you to generate
setters and getters through annotations:
@Getter @Setter private String name;
/Casper
David Chang wrote:
Martin,
Thanks for your input. My intention is how to get rid of these boring
setters/getters from service beans
for the browser
anyway. I did enjoy the article though, thanks for writing it. :)
/Casper
a
programming model adopted after Wicket.
/Casper
programmers happy.
/Casper
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:
huh? wicket is trying to address a completely different problem space
- which is orthogonal to what restlet and other rest-like services are
trying to achieve.
do any of these restlet-like
apologize.
/Casper
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 5:01 AM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:
yeah, you can map wicket to /* and services to /services/*. wicket
filter will let requests that do not map fallthrough, just make sure
you have no wicket mounts that are on /services/*.
i still dont get
Sounds interesting, although it would be nice if you could mention a trick or
two such as to provide us with a little more info. I'm guessing its
different from what you'd find in the wiki?!
Casper
Jonathan Locke wrote:
Well, over the break here I've started something I swore I would never
Work in Denmark, live in Canada (don't you just love technology?) and
planning my strategy for converting my JSF-masochistic colleagues over
to try Wicket. ;)
/Casper
Wadi Jalil Maluf wrote:
Argentinians working on wicket and mobile apps integration
Wadi
-Mensaje original-
De
({Administrator.class, User.class})
...rather than:
|@AuthorizeAction(action = Action.RENDER, roles = {Roles.ADMIN,
Roles.USER})|
Anyway, just my 2 cents on the topic.
/Casper
Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
If you were going to do this, it would be much better (IMHO) to use
interfaces... This gives you
and password. I assume the user table then
have to include a session field that is transferred and stored upon
initial login, and which is used to match up against on successive logins?
/Casper
Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
May I answer your question with a question?
Why would you want your
that way. I
guess what I see on java.net is browser functionality rather than
application/cookie functionality.
/Casper
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a CompoundPropertyModel. When I sniff request and response
headers, I can see that indeed the cookie info is sent around fine. I
guess it has to do with security somehow, but shouldn't this be possible
even if I am using a PasswordTextField?
Thanks in advance,
Casper
at some point to allow that kind of static modeling - it's in
the Kijaro sandbox after all
(http://freddy33.blogspot.com/search/label/abstract%20enum).
/Casper
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
this is where the classes variation comes in. class AdminRole extends
UserRole - done
-igor
On Thu, Nov 27
run into that
wicket message a lot. Anyway, just a though.
/Casper
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
that outweighs the benefits of
having code completion and static verification? (Extendability,
decoupling, transitive relationships, runs on Java 1.4 etc.)
Also, before I delve deeper into it, would it be a trivial matter to
write a type safe version?
Thanks in advance,
Casper
since it is part of a very visible and
convenient API, but I'll try to write my own Enum version instead then.
Thanks,
Casper
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
because you cannot add custom enum values without editing source code.
there is a version implemented using classes in wicketstuff somewhere
to model how an ADMIN transitively is also a USER. Sadly the Sun
compiler does not allow Enum forward referencing to itself, only the
Eclipse compiler does.
/Casper
Ned Collyer wrote:
Interestingly we used a similar approach with using classes as pseudo enums.
Not being able to extend enums
/c_component.jsp?comp=7220243ver=2
/Casper
Bruno Cesar Borges wrote:
Maybe would be a good idea if Wicket could report memory usage for
non-Wicket_Components (and non-standard Java objects, like String and
Collections) in memory. I don't know if this could ever be possible.
-Mensagem
factored into the
WASP/SWARM stuff or am I simply doing something wrong?
Thanks in advance,
/Casper
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Authorization-and-authentication-tp20629077p20629077.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
a central place with lots
of micro-examples/snippets to get you going.
/Casper
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Open-FAQ-wiki-somewhere--tp20607065p20607065.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Oh wow, that's a virtual gold mine. Thanks!.
/Casper
jWeekend wrote:
Casper,
Something like
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/how-to-do-things-in-wicket.html this ?
Regards - Cemal
http://www.jWeekend.co.uk http://jWeekend.co.uk
Casper Bang wrote:
In Wicket in Action it's
. Does this simply mean what I am doing i tied to my
session by Wicket? Is there a way ensure there's no (or just a bare
minimum) of session state between each request? In general, what is the
mission goal when it comes to statefullness/statelessness of Wicket?
Thanks in advance,
Casper
- latency and behavior somewhat more
deterministic.
/Casper
Jeremy Thomerson-5 wrote:
Tip: don't double post or some people will jump on you - it doesn't help
you
get a good answer.
Anyway, for completely stateless page transitions, etc, and how to put
data
into the URL rather than session
Yes we've experienced issues with multiple browser windows as well as
synchronization of shared session resources. Again, this has nothing to do
with optimization but everything to do with craving a solid, simple
programming model for frontend developers.
/Casper
Johan Compagner wrote:
We
tied to my
session or what exactly is going on?
Thanks in advance,
Casper
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
27 matches
Mail list logo
