Hi,
We want to use Wicket Portlets in Liferay. The first step would be that all the
wicket-example stuff is working - including Ajax. Onfortunately it does not
work as intended.
The versions to be used are:
- Liferay-5.2.2 with Tomcat 6 (currently they use 6.0.18) bundled
- Apache Wicket 1.4.5
Geschäftsführer: Ingo Kriescher
Amtsgericht Düsseldorf HRB48672
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Klaus Astner [mailto:klaus.ast...@ec3.at]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. Januar 2010 09:40
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Wicket Portlets and Liferay
Hi,
We want to use Wicket Portlets
We are running Wicket + Liferay (Webspace) in Glassfish 2, and experience no
problems; IIRC Glassfish uses the same Catalina engine as Tomcat?
For AJAX/resource requests, another supports element for mime-type
text/xml is needed.
This sounds like a Tomcat issue, our portlets use Ajax fine
On 13-1-2010 14:20, Wilhelmsen Tor Iver wrote:
We are running Wicket + Liferay (Webspace) in Glassfish 2, and experience no
problems; IIRC Glassfish uses the same Catalina engine as Tomcat?
For AJAX/resource requests, another supports element for mime-type
text/xml is needed.
This sounds
Many thanks to Andreas, now it works smoothly.
- Klaus
Am 13.01.2010 um 14:20 schrieb Wilhelmsen Tor Iver:
We are running Wicket + Liferay (Webspace) in Glassfish 2, and experience no
problems; IIRC Glassfish uses the same Catalina engine as Tomcat?
For AJAX/resource requests, another
Hello Everyone!
Im currently developing portlets with Wicket 1.4-rc2 and liferay 5.2 . They
have some compatibility issues (portlet names must be equal the wicket
filter-mappings). Does anyone know anyother issues? I saw in liferay foruns
some guys that are developing portlets (in liferay
Everyone!
Im currently developing portlets with Wicket 1.4-rc2 and liferay 5.2 . They
have some compatibility issues (portlet names must be equal the wicket
filter-mappings). Does anyone know anyother issues? I saw in liferay foruns
some guys that are developing portlets (in liferay
(portlet names must be equal the wicket
filter-mappings). Does anyone know anyother issues? I saw in liferay
foruns
some guys that are developing portlets (in liferay) with wicket, but i
dont
know if they handled compatibilty issues changing some wicket or liferay
code...
If someone that did
(in liferay) with wicket, but i
dont
know if they handled compatibilty issues changing some wicket or
liferay
code...
If someone that did this kind of job, it would be great to have some
feedback!
thanks !
Bruno Ledesma
names must be equal the
wicket
filter-mappings). Does anyone know anyother issues? I saw in liferay
foruns
some guys that are developing portlets (in liferay) with wicket, but
i
dont
know if they handled compatibilty issues changing some wicket or
liferay
code
portlets (in liferay) with wicket,
but
i
dont
know if they handled compatibilty issues changing some wicket or
liferay
code...
If someone that did this kind of job, it would be great to have
some
feedback!
thanks !
Bruno Ledesma
Hi Thijs,
thanks for your help, but you don't have to hurry. We faked the whole thing
by running our Wicket-App inside an iFrame in Liferay. It is just for a
showcase.
So we don't need it right now.
Thanks anyway,
Benjamin
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 9:14 PM, Thijs Vonk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Benjamin
I'll see if I have some time left tomorrow, otherwise hopefully before
next tuesday.
Thijs
Benjamin Ernst wrote:
Hi Thijs,
We are currently trying to integrate Liferay 5 with wicket 1.3. Can you give
us the advise you offered? That would be very nice.
Thank you in advance,
Hi Thijs,
We are currently trying to integrate Liferay 5 with wicket 1.3. Can you give
us the advise you offered? That would be very nice.
Thank you in advance,
Benjamin
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 11:33 PM, Thijs Vonk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Currently without building wicket against
]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-Portlets-in-Liferay-5-tp16995052p17077583.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
No, as described it depends on several factors
1. my/other people's time to commit to this
2. official release of the portlet 2 specifications
Thijs
Bobby Quninne schreef:
You have a rough guess estimate as to a wicket release that will address
JSR-268 compliance?
Many thanks
Thijs wrote:
-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-Portlets-in-Liferay-5-tp16995052p17078122.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Bobby Quninne schreef:
Are JSR-168 portlets also affected by this?
Not sure what you are asking. The current JSR-168 implementation in
wicket is pretty much final, and for wicket 1.3.x will probably not
change. However newer versions of wicket probably will not be backwards
compatible,
in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-Portlets-in-Liferay-5-tp16995052p17078837.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail
with Wicket and Liferay?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-Portlets-in-Liferay-5
issues
with Wicket and Liferay?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-Portlets-in-Liferay-5-tp16995052p16995052.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
Hi,
I'm working on getting wicket compatible with jsr-286 now. However while
doing this I've noticed that Liferay has still some major issues
regarding jsr-286. Especially regarding setting properties on the
response (essentially setting response headers, cookies, etc) there is
still some
/WICKET-1132
I have no clue what causes this issue or where to look. Can somebody give me
a push in the right direction?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-Portlets-in-Liferay-tf4790149.html#a13703212
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Thijs wrote:
I'm trying to get wicket portlets to work in Liferay.
As fas as I can tell there are at least 2 issues at the moment:
1.) A nullpointer exception in WebResponse due to an issue in de Liferay
code that returns null in the encodeRedirectUrl (see
Ate, your the man :)
I'll try to dive into the parameter problem this week.
Thnx
Thijs
Ate Douma wrote:
Thijs wrote:
I'm trying to get wicket portlets to work in Liferay.
As fas as I can tell there are at least 2 issues at the moment:
1.) A nullpointer exception in WebResponse due to an
() {
super.init();
getRequestCycleSettings().setRenderStrategy(IRequestCycleSettings.ONE_PASS_RENDER);
}
...
/code
Any idea?
Miso
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-portlets-on-LIferay-tf4231110.html#a12047909
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-portlets-on-LIferay-tf4231110.html#a12047909
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
().setRenderStrategy(IRequestCycleSettings.ONE_PASS_RENDER);
}
...
/code
Any idea?
Miso
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-portlets-on-LIferay-tf4231110.html#a12047909
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Yes, I'm using this experimental portlet branch.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-portlets-on-LIferay-tf4231110.html#a12051724
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Me too :)
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-portlets-on-LIferay-tf4231110.html#a12051726
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
30 matches
Mail list logo
