So, I wonder if there is anything I am not seeing?
Anyone has a comparisson map of wicket vs tapestry?
Alex.
PS: I like both frameworks for their lightness I just feel that I will
need to stick with one to be pragmatic :-(
-
extend WOComponent,
> > WebPage or what ever.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I think all frameworks will use the annotations in
> > the future; the question
> > > is when is available.
> > >
> > > T5 does and it's ready.
> > >
> > &
gt;
> From my limited experiments with both, wicket and tapestry seem to be
> quite similar. So, I wonder if there is anything I am not seeing?
> Anyone has a comparisson map of wicket vs tapestry?
The best thing you can do is give them both a spin. They are quite
different really; I'm sure
milar. So, I wonder if there is anything I am not seeing?
> Anyone has a comparisson map of wicket vs tapestry?
>
> Alex.
>
> PS: I like both frameworks for their lightness I just feel that I will
> need to stick with one to be pragmatic :-(
>
> --
Hi
I have been using wicket for quite some time now. Prior to this I worked
on tapestry for a short time . (In fact i implemented the same pages
which i did in tapestry in wicket also)
I may not be able to give you the right answer but i can definitely say this
the learning curve in tapestry i
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
You can download the first chapter of Wicket In Action for free here:
http://manning.com/dashorst/ and some chapters of Tapestry In Action
Wow, Wicket In Action, we're all were waiting for it :-)
Is this early access edition mature enough to buy or it's better to wait?
il to see what the differences
> are?
>
> From my limited experiments with both, wicket and tapestry seem to be
> quite similar. So, I wonder if there is anything I am not seeing?
> Anyone has a comparisson map of wicket vs tapestry?
>
> Alex.
>
> PS: I like both frameworks for t
> Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> > You can download the first chapter of Wicket In Action for free here:
> > http://manning.com/dashorst/ and some chapters of Tapestry In Action
> >
> >
> Wow, Wicket In Action, we're all were waiting for it :-)
> Is this early access edition mature enough to buy or it's
22 August 2007 7:00 PM
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: wicket vs tapestry ?
>
> > Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> > > You can download the first chapter of Wicket In Action for free
here:
> > > http://manning.com/dashorst/ and some chapters of Tapestry In
Action
&
On 8/22/07, Chris Colman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Eelco,
>
> I saw you mention Hibernate in the intro but I've been using JPOX with
> great success with Wicket also. You might want to mention that in the
> book or new comers might think Wicket is a Hibernate only framework.
>
> I use JPOX th
You mean the wicket-phonebook?
Martijn
--
Wicket joins the Apache Software Foundation as Apache Wicket
Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta2 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta2/
-
To unsubscribe,
On 8/22/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You mean the wicket-phonebook?
Yeah.
Eelco
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
n Java. You don't need to extend WOComponent,
> > > WebPage or what ever.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I think all frameworks will use the annotations in
> > > the future; the question
> > > > is when is available.
>
You can download the first chapter of Wicket In Action for free here:
http://manning.com/dashorst/ and some chapters of Tapestry In Action
here: http://manning.com/lewisship/
Actually, Tapestry in Action is pretty old and covers only Tapestry 3. I
would advice downloading chapters 1-4 of 'En
> I personally feel more in control with Tapestry since every part of the
> framework can be tweaked, overridden and enhanced easily once you know
> your way around the framework
Wicket can be tweaked in every imaginable way either, but some things
are easier than others.
> and you have full cont
Unfortunately, that's an assumption that many people make. But say
that you're not worried about optimizing and one session means about
100kb (on the high side, as with optimizing in my experience you
should be able to bring that to 15-30kb)... That means you can support
10,000 concurrent sessio
> But since I'm currently learning, I can't help wondering at each step
> where the data gets stored magically. Likely that will go away once I
> know my way around Wicket. It's also not a complaint, just part of
> getting to know the best way of doing things.
I think it's a very good idea you hav
> On 8/22/07, Chris Colman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Eelco,
> >
> > I saw you mention Hibernate in the intro but I've been using JPOX
with
> > great success with Wicket also. You might want to mention that in
the
> > book or new comers might think Wicket is a Hibernate only framework.
> >
On 8/22/07, Onno Scheffers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > It's ok to be a control freak about it. But you should measure, not go
> > by your hunch. :)
> >
>
> You're right of course.
> But since I'm currently learning, I can't help wondering at each step
> where the data gets stored magically.
> > If you're interested, a contribution for the address book example with
> > exPOJO/ JPOX would be more than welcome.
>
> Definitely, not a problem. When do you need it by?
Whenever you feel like it.
> Where can I find the spec for the address book app?
No spec, only code :)
https://wicket-st
: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: wicket vs tapestry ?
Hi,
> 2) I like the back button support. My thinking is that extending Wicket's
> AJAX integration to also support the back button (somehow) is a must.
> Virtually everyone who uses Wicket will use it's AJAX functionalit
On 8/23/07, William Hoover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Possible starting point for a client solution for back button
> detection/support:
>
> http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2005/10/26/ajax-handling-bookmarks-and-back-button.html?page=1
Thanks for suggesting. We have discussed that and other
22 matches
Mail list logo
