A quote from InterActiveCorp CEO Barry Diller:
There is not that much talent in the world, and talent always outs.
There are very few really talented people in closets that don't get
out. When we are talking about mass audience, which is the system of
entertainment we have known for some time, wh
Clint,
"Everyone's an expert."
I almost said that about myself in the the last post. I still think
that have a good point, but really what the hell do I know. LOL Can't
wait to see what you guys have coming out. Markus made a really good
point that I did not think of:
i often can't count on be
On 10/7/05, aroundtheperimeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also to convince my friends to watch video it would be easier to tellthem to go to this link "www.example.c" then to tell them to downloadfireant. Just seems like people want instant gratification (you say
whats a 2 minute download...on
http://forum.videolan.org/viewtopic.php?p=39978#39978On 10/7/05, Michael Sullivan <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:good point... might as well.
i'll do it up.On 10/7/05, Lucas Gonze <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/7/05, Michael Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>we just need a XSPF video
The big fish are constantly consuming us, but the small and quick fish
do survive. Google and Yahoo will soon take their stake in video
blogging, along with Apple, and they will inherently have a large user
base. However, we all know that does not mean they'll be the best.
Look at how iTunes sto
FireAnt does kick ass for actually queuing up a bunch of videos and it
pulls them locally so you can easily do mash-ups, etc. Plus you guys
have really put together a really slick interface.
On 10/7/05, Joshua Kinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey, I have no problems with web-based readers
>>Also to convince my friends to
watch video it would be easier to tellthem to go to this link
"www.example.c" then to tell them to downloadfireant. Just seems like
people want instant gratification <<
I know what you mean. A friend of mine says she can't see my
videos. I know that i
Everyone's an expert. We have some cool stuff coming up, have some patience. This stuff doesn't get developed overnight. We know you want a web version now, so just chill and I'm sure you'll hear about it if/when we have one :).ClintOn Oct 7, 2005, at 9:01 PM, aroundtheperimeter wrote: it see
And http://MeFeedia.com is going to get better.
We have version 2 in the works and in the next little while you should
see some really great additions.
On 10/7/05, Joshua Kinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey, I have no problems with web-based readers. To each their own.
> I simply do not
for a sec i thought it was going to play in the google reader. haha
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, David Meade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I put my feed into it and it was very nice indeed. It even recognized my
> enclosure tags.
>
> my feed:
> http://www.davidmeade.com/post/post_archive
it seems to me as soon as google does a video aggregator. there will
be no need for fireant. sure they will be some die-hard fireant fans,
but the masses will go to google if it easier to use and better. i
would like to see fireant stay the leader in video aggregator's and
not become obsolete.
Al
I prefer bloglines for web based aggregators. Here is my valuable
collection of personal/rocketboom feeds:
http://www.bloglines.com/public/hamletheretoo
I could live on pizza and bloglines.
On Oct 7, 2005, at 10:34 PM, Joshua Kinberg wrote:
> Hey, I have no problems with web-based readers. To e
Hey, I have no problems with web-based readers. To each their own.
I simply do not find them very useful or efficient for watching video
or doing the things that I want to do with video.
Honestly, I hope this Google Reader gets better soon. Its very hard to use.
If you want a web-based video aggr
I put my feed into it and it was very nice indeed. It even recognized my enclosure tags.
my feed:
http://www.davidmeade.com/post/post_archive.php?tag=Video+Blog&feed=1
On 10/7/05, aroundtheperimeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I did a search on rocketboom and just text came up. could you imagi
If you want a web based aggrigator, check out MeFeedia.com. Peter Vandijck's got some good stuff going there.
I do really like that interface of the link you provided, but Ant's
huge value is it's downloading/syncing. Seems to make more sense
to request this sort of feature from MeFeedia whic
I did a search on rocketboom and just text came up. could you imagine
if a video came up!!! WOW THAT WOULD BE AWESOME!
http://www.google.com/reader/lens/
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital
THIS IS WHAT I'M talking about! Can you make a web based fireant. I
know you would still have to stream it (which I have no problem with).
Look I know I'm ignorant on all the tech stuff, but this is what I
meant by web based fireant! Check out this google link:
http://www.google.com/reader/thin
> 1. chose the image,
> 2. then Destination File Format MP4 file, Codecs MPEG-4 Video/AAC
> Audio, Browse button to the destination folder and name the movie I'm
> about to rip "xyz.mp4".
> 3. Click on Picture Settings... button and reduce the size to 320 x
> 240 also might trim if there is extra
cc anual fall fund raiser ... sounds like a great use for the rel=payment tag! :-)
The fund raiser page seems to be down atm, however.
a href="" href="http://creativecommons.org/support/">http://creativecommons.org/support/" rel="payment" title="Support Creative Commons"--
http://www.DavidMea
I think it's a great time to show our support. That is, those of us who have money. I don't.
Harold J. Johnson
audioblogs.infoOn 10/6/05, Thomas G Henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
Maybe u knew... if not... whatcha think?
"The licenses give creators a simple way to mark their creativity wi
jeez! this is not a joke
please read what they wrote *carefully* and use the proper app to open
the file
this is a photoshop file with each of the parts of Creative Commons
icons for attribution, etc
that was a very nice thing for them to have gone and done
markus
Kunga wrote:
>So is this a jo
iMovie is free with all new Macs. If you didn't get an iLife '05 DVD/
CD pack with your new PowerBook, then it's in the restore DVD
installer. If it's not there, you better call Apple and ask them to
send you a copy. It does not come with OS X. It should be pre-
installed with any new PowerBo
OK so after I have the best quality DVD image "burned", I launch
Handbrake,
1. chose the image,
2. then Destination File Format MP4 file, Codecs MPEG-4 Video/AAC
Audio, Browse button to the destination folder and name the movie I'm
about to rip "xyz.mp4".
3. Click on Picture Settings... butt
As far as I know, it does not come with OS X, but iLife '05 (which includes iMovie) does come with an iMac purchase.- Brian (http://www.rykn.com)On Oct 7, 2005, at 7:49 PM, Richard wrote: Ok ... just to prove (once again) that I'm willing to ask the dumb question ... Does iMove come free with OS
Ok ... just to prove (once again) that I'm willing to ask the dumb question ...
Does iMove come free with OS X? (I thought it did, and I can't find it
in my applications on the new power book, and, in the help it sounded
like you had to buy iLife to get it, which appears to only be $79, but,
we
So is this a joke or what? All you have posted is a message saying
you posted stuff you didn't post.
--
Taylor Barcroft http://www.blogger.com/profile/11159903
New Media Publisher, Editor, Video Journalist, Webcaster, Futurecaster
Santa Cruz CA, Beach of the Silicon Valley
URL http://FutureMedia
http://wiki.wordpress.org/Ratings%20Plugin
Found this searching Google for "wordpress rating plugin"...
http://www.google.com/search?q=wordpress+rating+plugin
There are others in that search result too.
-Matt
---
http://www.leanbackvids.com
http://www.vlogmap.org
--- In
yeah, thats a good link.
keep in mind that the vlogdir RSS2SMIL feature uses Quicktime SMIL, based on v1
sullOn 10/7/05, Lucas Gonze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/7/05, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> under the weight of the Anthology Archives Screening controversy, Im> trying to fig
good point... might as well.
i'll do it up.On 10/7/05, Lucas Gonze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/7/05, Michael Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>we just need a XSPF video player!! :-)> maybe videolan+xspfThe videolan people are on the ball, and with XSPF a sister project to
ogg I
On 10/7/05, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> under the weight of the Anthology Archives Screening controversy, Im
> trying to figure out how to make SMIL movies.
> How do i link up a bunch of movie togther.
>
> i want it easy and i want to be able to do it fast.
> i hav a list of linksth
Many posters here have a mindset favoring all of
life to be chopped up into one to four minute segments. I've seen several
stunning interviews on the Internet that completely held my attention for twenty
or thirty minutes. Steve Garfield's interview with David Pogue, the author
of "Missi
Hmm. looks like a pretty cool site, Adam. Are you involved with the IWT project?
I'm wondering things like "will each program have an RSS feed so that I can download them in ant and watch them on my own schedule rather than a set programming schedule" and "how would each episode be licensed?
On 10/7/05, Michael Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>we just need a XSPF video player!! :-)
> maybe videolan+xspf
The videolan people are on the ball, and with XSPF a sister project to
ogg I think they'll be predisposed to do it. If you or somebody
happened to file a feature request wit
we just need a XSPF video player!! :-)
maybe videolan+xspf
On 10/7/05, Lucas Gonze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/7/05, Justin Chapweske <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Is there any advantage between ASX and WPL? I noticed that WPL seems to> be a SMIL format...
They're really different, not ne
Americans, please watch this:
http://www.iwtnews.com/videoplayer/laura_flanders
Most Americans (not you guys, of course) probably don't realize how
much of the news they hear/see/read is dictated by the advertisers.
I'm not sure if this applies as much to other countries, where the news
channel
you could write your own smil markup.
you could make an rss fed of all the vids you want to show...
then add the feed url to the end of this, replacing your momentshowing feed url:
http://vlogdir.com/vlog/index.php?op=Template&show=smil&feedurl=http://feeds.feedburner.com/Momentshowing
or
under the weight of the Anthology Archives Screening controversy, Im
trying to figure out how to make SMIL movies.
How do i link up a bunch of movie togther.
i want it easy and i want to be able to do it fast.
i hav a list of linksthen what?
jay
--
Adventures in Videoblogging
http://www.mo
On 10/6/05, Chris Nolan.ca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Assignment #1 Shoot 20, 10 second stills of exterior locations using
natural light.
Chris,
The compositions of your shots are fantastic. You have an eye for
well-framed shots. I only saw one there that was iffy @
00:01:45:02. Other t
On 10/7/05, Justin Chapweske <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any advantage between ASX and WPL? I noticed that WPL seems to
> be a SMIL format...
They're really different, not necessarily better or worse.
WPL is parseable XML. ASX has a bunch of peculiarities which will
defeat XML parsers
Hello,
This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the videoblogging
group.
File: /CC TAGS/CC_PSD Files.psd
Uploaded by : livingwithfallas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description : PSD file of the 4 Creative Commons Logos.
Yo
use webjay?
Charles HOPE wrote:
Jay dedman wrote:
but Im old...32...and in the oldtime days, we just sat
and watched
long streams of uninterrrupted video...
So the problem is that SMIL editing tools
aren't popular and creators are unaware of the technology.
--
My name is Markus S
I would like to make a plea for comments about videos, (such as
"awesome" or "thanks") to not be sent to the whole groupit is just
noise...that is why we have the comment feature on blogs.
just trying to make more signal, less noise...On 10/7/05, Bill Streeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tha
Charles HOPE wrote:
> Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote:
>>
>>You can see it in many videoblogs with things such as intro
>>sequences and credits (and in the discourse, but I don't know if we should
>>go there).
>
> Let's go there. What are you seeing that is TV-like?
All of my videos (so far
Thanks for the kind comments Taylor.
Bill Streeter
LO-FI SAINT LOUIS
www.lofistl.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Kunga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Brilliant ! Genius ! Fantastic ! You are a master at shooting and
> editing Bill.
> --
> Taylor Barcroft http://www.blogger.com/profi
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 18:15:00 +0200, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>but Im old...32...and in the oldtime days, we just sat and watched
>>long streams of uninterrrupted video...and this is a throwback to that
>>time.
>
> Exactly! :o)
> It's all about
I like a quick intro sequence...I feel it is good for aggregators,
where the videos are viewed out of the web page...it is like saying
"this is a josh leo video" so that way, even if i don't appear in the
video they know the creator, not to mention that I like the little tune
in the beginning. a
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote:
You can see it in many videoblogs with things such as intro
sequences and credits (and in the discourse, but I don't know if we should
go there).
Let's go there. What are you seeing that is TV-like?
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit
> MM can eort your video as DV-AVI so you can take a high quality version of > your video if you want to burn it to DVD or whatever (or if you want to > transcode into Quicktime).
Thanks for the correction! I went digging for that option in MM and did finally find it-- good to know!
Nerissa
On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 18:15:00 +0200, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> but Im old...32...and in the oldtime days, we just sat and watched
> long streams of uninterrrupted video...and this is a throwback to that
> time.
Exactly! :o)
It's all about the difference between online media and off
� wrote:
> I can't wait to upload my "videopinion" of the great products featured
> on your site, such as:
>
> Charlton Heston presents The Bible
> "Who better than Charlton Heston to lead you on a walking tour of
> biblical history? An epic, multi-million dollar hollywood production
> shot
Jonathan_Levinson wrote:
> Anyone know if wordpress or movable type can support a "rate this
> video/post" functionality? Does this require cookies? I'd love to be
> able to offer users the ability to rate and create a ranking of the
> most popular vlog entries.
I couldn't find any plugin for
yeah add more sex and rock and roll...that is what gets the butts in
the seatsor just keep on doing what your doing because it is
kicking ass...I'm jealous of all who attended.On 10/7/05, Pete Prodoehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jay dedman wrote:>andreas wrote:>>I only made it approximately
Charles HOPE wrote:
> Jay dedman wrote:
>
>> but Im old...32...and in the oldtime days, we just sat and watched
>> long streams of uninterrrupted video...
>
> I could be mistaken, but with SMIL, that is exactly what you would experience
> in
> a QT player. So the problem is that SMIL editing to
Jay dedman wrote:
>andreas wrote:
>>I only made it approximately 60 MB into the video.
>
> i love you andreas.
> yes, i should have put a list of the links.
> and yes, i love the power of a distributed network
>
> but Im old...32...and in the oldtime days, we just sat and watched
> long stre
Jay dedman wrote:
but Im old...32...and in the oldtime days, we just sat
and watched
long streams of uninterrrupted video...
I could be mistaken, but with SMIL, that is exactly what you would
experience in a QT player. So the problem is that SMIL editing tools
aren't popular and creators are
Anyone know if wordpress or movable type can support a "rate this
video/post" functionality? Does this require cookies? I'd love to be
able to offer users the ability to rate and create a ranking of the
most popular vlog entries.
thanks,
Jon
Yahoo! Groups Sponso
I can't wait to upload my "videopinion" of the great products featured on your site, such as:Charlton Heston presents The Bible"Who better than Charlton Heston to lead you on a walking tour of biblical history? An epic, multi-million dollar hollywood production shot on film!"Lauren Hutton's Face
My Most Esteemed Video Blogging Friends and Colleagues,
Wednesday I uploaded a video and we had some issues involving blogger
and blip.tv, but through the efforts of the great people at blip.tv we
got it cleared up so it showed up yesterday.
The video is my wife imitating me and I think it's p
> I can't help wondering what made you put this monster of a file online
> when you could've done a list of links to blog entries. That's what this
> internet is great for - small pieces, loosely joined and all that. Then I
> could skip entries I'd already seen and not have to wait for a 150 MB
> d
Hey Markus...Thanks for getting back to me. I am really interested in
vlogging and am learning a lot being part of this yahoo group.
In terms of this project - Videopinions - we are looking for people
who are comfortable with video and and passionate about products.
There is a chance that the vid
On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 17:17:15 +0200, Joshua Kinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Michael Verdi and I are going to try to set up a vidoeblog film
> screening in Second Life, an online virtual world. Michael has created
> a viewing screen there and we plan to use some kind of playlist to
> show the
> There is also a support site for WMM2 users:
> http://www.windowsmoviemakers.net as well as a tun of stuff at the M$
> web sites.
>
> The minute you want to try to do something fancy or to tweek a bit of
> video faster than it can handle it will crash. When that starts to
> happen to you I can
Joshua Kinberg wrote:
> On 10/7/05, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 15:46:08 +0200, Pete Prodoehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"screw clicking" is the new thing!
>>
>>Blablabla, tv is awesome, the internets are teh suxor.
>>
>>
>>>It would be cool
> I am now convinced that exporting FCP or iMovie edited video to a new
> best quality DV file then importing that video to iDVD 5 then best
> quality burning a disk image then ripping an mpeg4 with HandBrake is
> the ONLY way I can figure out how to achieve good quality video at
> less than one MB
BTW, Andreas...
Michael Verdi and I are going to try to set up a vidoeblog film
screening in Second Life, an online virtual world. Michael has created
a viewing screen there and we plan to use some kind of playlist to
show the movies. Haven't figured out if we'll use SMIL or just put all
the URLs
It would be nice to have both, right?
A list of the URLs for the whole list in addition to the large movie file.
-Josh
On 10/7/05, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 15:46:08 +0200, Pete Prodoehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > "screw clicking" is the ne
> Yahoo Media Engine and Winamp with the Plext XSPF plugin will both do
> video.
>
> Also, we can easily transform XSPF into proprietary formats like
> Quicktime SMIL, Real SMIL and ASX.
>
Is there any advantage between ASX and WPL? I noticed that WPL seems to
be a SMIL format...
--
Justin Ch
If it works for you then fine, but I still consider the method you use
to include plenty of hocus pocus and incantation ceremonies.
I am extremely interested to see if I can create similar results, but
missing out the mpeg2/dvd steps. It shouldnt be difficult, handbrake
is using encoders that can
On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 15:46:08 +0200, Pete Prodoehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "screw clicking" is the new thing!
Blablabla, tv is awesome, the internets are teh suxor.
> It would be cool if there was some sort of playlist and a player that
> supported that playlist to make it all easier though.
I wish I could have seen this on the Big screen! It was nice seeing all vlogs together as one piece.
-Chris-- http://www.chrisdanielvideos.com
On 10/7/05, Josh Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i watched the whole thing and i love that you put it all together! screw clicking 100 times.
On 10/
Josh Leo wrote:
> On 10/7/05, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 04:31:13 +0200, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>I just uploaded the first screening at the Anthology Film Archives here:
>>>http://www.blip.tv/?id=2264;s=file
>>
>>I can't help wo
ROAD NODE NEWS
Speak to people and ask in-depth questions.
Roll tape.
Talk / listen / learn / teach media literacy issues.
Yeah.
We don't need no Jack Kerouac to tell us of the magic of the road.
Marlene, Randy's sister, is amazing. As is his mom and are his many
Lowell friends.
Lowell Tele
i watched the whole thing and i love that you put it all together! screw clicking 100 times.On 10/7/05, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 04:31:13 +0200, Jay dedman <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:> I just uploaded the first screening at the Anthology Film Archi
On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 14:39:45 +0200, Nerissa (TheVideoQueen)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Agreed. Windows Movie Maker is free and already located on Windows XP.
> But I dont recommend it. It only makes WMV files. And doesnt burn to
> DVD. It's very limted on effects, tracks, transitions, timel
On 10/6/05, Jack Olmsted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The free program from Microsoft, Windows Movie Maker, is also easyto use. But, it has issues...like crashing at the worst moment.
The latest release, available with SP2, is a lot more stable.
I also use Roxio's VideoWave, part of the Easy Cre
> Nerissa, do you know how we can create flash video from the Mac side > for free or at what cost with what?
Sorenson Squeeze and Wildform Flix Pro both have Mac versions. Both recently upgraded for Flash 8. Both cost $99 when I purchased, but not sure on new price in past two weeks due to
Agreed. Windows Movie Maker is free and already located on Windows XP.
But I dont recommend it. It only makes WMV files. And doesnt burn to DVD. It's very limted on effects, tracks, transitions, timeline and export options. In my opinion, if your going to take the time to learn a consumer sof
Message: 10 Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 23:26:14 - From: "Gena" <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Subject: Re: My first Video BlogIt is playing just fine for me.If I wanted to save the video I have to wait until it is finish. ThenI can click the drop down arrow to the right and save it as a
QuickTime movie.
A friend of mine is a professional photographer (his resume includes 30
years for National Geographic). I did a photography course with him in
which he taught us that you should always ask permission, and desist
instantly if it isn't given. I saw him miss a fantastic shot that way -
it would hav
I know a cross-platform service that costs a little that can do it, but you
know me. I hate to
shamelessly promote. ;-)
ER
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Kunga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Nerissa, do you know how we can create flash video from the Mac side
> for free or at what cos
On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 04:31:13 +0200, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I just uploaded the first screening at the Anthology Film Archives here:
> http://www.blip.tv/?id=2264;s=file
I can't help wondering what made you put this monster of a file online
when you could've done a list of lin
On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 02:57:41 +0200, Steve Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Anybody know what this means, because its in the agreement...
> "You expressly and hereby forever waive and relinquish all so-called
> "moral rights (droit moral)" associated therewith."
Wikipedia to the rescue http:
82 matches
Mail list logo
