Daniel wrote:
>the HVX-200
definitely nice, if one can afford it
http://catalog2.panasonic.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ModelDetail?displayTab=O&storeId=11201&catalogId=13051&itemId=93120&catGroupId=14571&modelNo=AG-HVX200&surfModel=AG-HVX200
I actually think the DVC30 would be a good choice
Thanks for the new resources. I had seen the
http://www.stormforcepictures.com/howto-getthatfilmlook.php
page before but not the others. Great write-ups.
To give you (and perhaps myself) a better sense of what I want the cam
for, take a look at the F.E.M. site/project
http://www.foureyedmonste
Again, it depends on how you plan to use the camera. If you want to
only use it for videoblogging, you may want to choose a saller/less
expensive camera. However, if you plan on using it for
projects/short films, the DVX is a great choice.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Bill Streeter"
Thanks for the new resources. I had seen the
http://www.stormforcepictures.com/howto-getthatfilmlook.php
page before but not the others. Great write-ups.
To give you (and perhaps myself) a better sense of what I want the cam
for, take a look at the F.E.M. site/project
http://www.foureyedmonste
Saturday, January 21, 2006, 12:59:20 PM, Bill Streeter wrote:
> This is kind of an issue with me. The DVX 100 has 24p but I find 24p
> to be over rated when it comes to getting a "film" look. When people
> talk about getting a "film" look on video they're talking about
> getting a film transfered
I know I must be off my nut to respond to a general comment like that,
but here goes...
The comparison I was doing was they are about the same size and have
similar abilities. I wasn't getting into a my cam is better than your
cam.
Both are rather point and shoot; easy to carry and if desired ca
Bill-
When is a rant a rant and when is a rant an education?
Perhaps the latter applies here. Points well taken.
In addition, I researched what I would need to post process the 24p as
24p. Not all NLEs can handle the native format. The ones that do
tend to be on the high-end.
Thanks for the
The Sony is a much better camera than the GS 150.
Bill Streeter
LO-FI SAINT LOUIS
www.lofistl.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Rich Hand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks. I currently own a Panasonic PV-GS150 which kind of matches up
> with your Sony. A similar size. But I have
This is kind of an issue with me. The DVX 100 has 24p but I find 24p
to be over rated when it comes to getting a "film" look. When people
talk about getting a "film" look on video they're talking about
getting a film transfered to video look. The best ways to achieve this
is A) to de-interlace whic
my 2 cents. i shoot video & film for a living and so have access to
all manner of shiny stuff. in smaller format DV cameras the 100A is
hard to beat. it basically won over all the old pd-150 holdouts, and
if you want 24P it pretty much set the standard and still seems to be
the best. i've d
Thanks. I currently own a Panasonic PV-GS150 which kind of matches up
with your Sony. A similar size. But I have started doing "work" that
needs a it more quality and manual adjustments. So I thought a 24p
might provide that film - documentary look.
-- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Chris
If you have the money that's a great camera. You could do a lot worse.
But it also depends on what kind of stuff you'll be shooting. For
personal video diary stuff most people find video enabled digital
still cameras adequate. If this is the kind of stuff you plan on doing
the DVX is way over kill.
12 matches
Mail list logo
