I haven't been idle on this. I was unable to get my test case working
for a simple but un-obvious reason. It requires that at least one
other window be open.
Run the following, and open two windows. Edit a file in one. Open a
new line, which I assume triggers the tabline to trigger as the buf
[Modified the third solution]
On May 01, 2006, Yakov Lerner pointed out:
>On 5/2/06, Suresh Govindachar wrote:
>>
>> Yakov Lerner wondered:
>>
>>> But how do you remove #ifdef blocks? I mentioned piping
>>> because there is ready utility, 'unifdef', that removes some
>>> or al
You don't need to repeat yourself. If I could give you a reproducible
code fragment, I would. It happens as part of a relatively long
script.
It's a *data point*. A piece of information. "Setting highlighting
from the tabline function causes it to re-trigger on the next
keystroke". In this c
On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 at 4:12pm, cga2000 wrote:
> Is there any way I could use folding to do this:
>
> 1. Fold all lines in a file that contain only comments.
>
> 2. Optionally delete all the lines that have previously been folded.
>
> I have a feeling I am looking for something less sophisticated
[In reporting the third solution below, I forgot the g]
On May 01, 2006, Yakov Lerner pointed out:
>On 5/2/06, Suresh Govindachar wrote:
>>
>> Yakov Lerner wondered:
>>
>>> But how do you remove #ifdef blocks? I mentioned piping
>>> because there is ready utility, 'unifdef', t
On May 01, 2006, Yakov Lerner pointed out:
>On 5/2/06, Suresh Govindachar wrote:
>>
>> Yakov Lerner wondered:
>>
>>> But how do you remove #ifdef blocks? I mentioned piping
>>> because there is ready utility, 'unifdef', that removes some
>>> or all of #if blocks.
>>
>> I
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 05:31:47PM -0400, Steve Hall wrote:
>
> Yes, the bug is in &printencoding. With gvim -u NONE -U NONE, these
> lines produce the error:
>
> :let &printencoding = &encoding
> :hardcopy
>
> This is with the default utf-8, with :set enc=latin1 prior, it is
> avoided.
What if #if/#endif blocks are nested ?
Yakov is correct, that nested #if/#endif blocks would cause
trouble.
My first thought at a [100% untested] solution would be
something like
:g/^\s*#endif/norm dV%
which would find all of the #endif tokens and delete their
associated blocks, exploiti
On 5/2/06, Suresh Govindachar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yakov Lerner wondered:
> But how do you remove #ifdef blocks? I mentioned piping because
> there is ready utility, 'unifdef', that removes some or all of
> #if blocks.
Isn't there a way to do a multi-line substitution:
:%s/
Yakov Lerner wondered:
> But how do you remove #ifdef blocks? I mentioned piping because
> there is ready utility, 'unifdef', that removes some or all of
> #if blocks.
Isn't there a way to do a multi-line substitution:
:%s/^\s*#ifdef .*^\s*#endif//
where the *s are multi-line a
Thus spake Gerald Lai on Mon, May 01, 2006 at 04:43:55PM -0700 or thereabouts:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-01 20:16]:
[...]
> >
> >What would be the best approach to have vim do this for me?
>
> One way is to use the Visual Block. To invoke it, type Ctrl-v or Ctrl-q
> in Normal mode, when your
On 5/2/06, Gary Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thus spake Yakov Lerner on Mon, May 01, 2006 at 10:06:57PM +0300 or thereabouts:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-01 17:25]:
> > On 5/1/06, Bill Pursell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >Is it possible to completely hide lines? Something stronger t
Thus spake Pete Johns on Tue, May 02, 2006 at 09:29:25AM +1000 or thereabouts:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-01 19:32]:
> On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 19:21:52 -0400, cga2000 sent:
> >I have saved the following in a file:
> >
> >
> >> I can't give you any Mac-specific advice, since I don't use them, but
>
Thus spake Gary Johnson on Mon, May 01, 2006 at 02:52:21PM -0700 or
thereabouts: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-01 19:31]:
> On 2006-05-01, cga2000 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thus spake Yakov Lerner on Mon, May 01, 2006 at 10:06:57PM +0300 or
> > thereabouts: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-01 17:
On Mon, 1 May 2006, cga2000 wrote:
I have saved the following in a file:
I can't give you any Mac-specific advice, since I don't use them, but
I can give you a general run-down.
1. You need to have the right locale settings. Your locale should be
set to something similar to this:
$ local
On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 19:21:52 -0400, cga2000 sent:
>I have saved the following in a file:
>
>
>> I can't give you any Mac-specific advice, since I don't use them, but
>> I can give you a general run-down.
>>
>> 1. You need to have the right locale settings. Your locale should be
>> set to somethi
I have saved the following in a file:
> I can't give you any Mac-specific advice, since I don't use them, but
> I can give you a general run-down.
>
> 1. You need to have the right locale settings. Your locale should be
> set to something similar to this:
>
> $ locale
> LANG=en_US.UTF-8
[
Gene Kwiecinski wrote:
> >- Win32: Dropping a shortcut on the Vim icon edited the shortcut instead
> > of the file it refers to (old problem).
>
> Any way to actually edit the shortcut? :D
Yes, set 'binary' before editing the file. Well, that requires the "-b"
argument somehow and you can't
David Fishburn wrote:
> Though I cannot reproduce it, this has been happening to me throughout the
> betas.
>
> 70f WinXP SP2
>
> I have the Taglist window open (though I don't believe it is related).
> So my window is split vertically.
> My cursor is in normal mode in the right hand pane.
> If
Eric Arnold wrote:
> I think I've found the thing that triggers my problem with
> TabLineSet.vim where the tabline function get called for every
> keystroke: I reset the highlighting in the tabline function.
>
> Does it seem reasonable that the highlighting changes are triggering
> the tabline
On 2006-05-01, cga2000 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thus spake Yakov Lerner on Mon, May 01, 2006 at 10:06:57PM +0300 or
> thereabouts: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-01 17:25]:
> > On 5/1/06, Bill Pursell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >Is it possible to completely hide lines? Something stron
Thus spake Yakov Lerner on Mon, May 01, 2006 at 10:06:57PM +0300 or
thereabouts: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-01 17:25]:
> On 5/1/06, Bill Pursell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >Is it possible to completely hide lines? Something stronger than merely
> >folding. In particular, I'd like to be a
On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 08:39 -0400, Benji Fisher wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 09:19:01PM -0400, Steve Hall wrote:
> >
> > In every beta of gVim I've tried on Linux/GTK2 (through 70g) I get
> > the following error with :hardcopy :
> >
> > E673: Incompatible multi-byte encoding and character set
Hello again
Thanks for your opinions. I've linked txtString to Normal and works quite well.
I'll test it for few days more and probably upload a new version. If you got
some new ideas or suggestions just let me know.
Greetings,
Tomasz Kalkosiński
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 12:02 -0700, Gerald Lai wrote:
>
> Nevermind Vim, for Linux terminals (like aterm/xterm/rxvt/virtual
> framebuffer terminal), you should be able to just hit Ctrl-V followed by
> any keystroke on the command line to see its keycode.
>
> For example, doing Ctrl-V and pressin
On (21:00 01/05/06), David Woodfall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> put forth the
proposition:
> On (20:52 01/05/06), David Woodfall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> put forth the
> proposition:
> > I've recently changed my locale to en_GB.utf8 because I found some
> > characters in some emails viewed in Mutt weren't sho
On (20:52 01/05/06), David Woodfall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> put forth the
proposition:
> I've recently changed my locale to en_GB.utf8 because I found some
> characters in some emails viewed in Mutt weren't showing correctly (curly
> quotes for one so that "I'm" showed as "I???m"').
>
> But now I fin
I've recently changed my locale to en_GB.utf8 because I found some
characters in some emails viewed in Mutt weren't showing correctly (curly
quotes for one so that "I'm" showed as "I???m"').
But now I find some characters aren't correctly made in vim eg pound signs
are wrong. Since I use vim as ed
Though I cannot reproduce it, this has been happening to me throughout the
betas.
70f WinXP SP2
I have the Taglist window open (though I don't believe it is related).
So my window is split vertically.
My cursor is in normal mode in the right hand pane.
If I scroll the mouse wheel, the window in
On 5/1/06, Bill Pursell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it possible to completely hide lines? Something stronger than merely
folding. In particular, I'd like to be able to display the buffer with
all lines containing "assert" hidden, or to hide lines between and
including #ifdef/#endif pairs. C
Is it possible to completely hide lines? Something stronger than merely
folding. In particular, I'd like to be able to display the buffer with
all lines containing "assert" hidden, or to hide lines between and
including #ifdef/#endif pairs. Can that be done?
On Sun, 30 Apr 2006, Anton wrote:
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 14:33 +0300, Yakov Lerner wrote:
For me, In virtual terminal on Linux, Ctrl-F1 sends same
sequence as F1. Accordingly, vim responds to Ctrl-F1 as
if I pressed F1.
Yakov
I think the problem is really caused by this. But the binding
:m
On Mon, 1 May 2006, James Vega wrote:
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 06:45:24PM +0530, jagpreet wrote:
[snip]
Furthermore if I close(:q), either of the files and switch to another file
by selecting it from the buffer window it opens the files in black and
white("vi ") mode, like syntax off commend is
On Mon, 1 May 2006, oystercatcher wrote:
Greetings,
Sorry if this is an obvious one but I searched using a variety of
arguments and nothing was too clear. I also looked at _gvimrc
and changed the line
highlight Normal guibg=white # from gray80
which made it much easier to see the select
On Mon, 1 May 2006, Michael Naumann wrote:
On Monday 01 May 2006 07:04, Gerald Lai wrote:
On Mon, 1 May 2006, Michael Naumann wrote:
Is there a way to highlight a sequence of non-tabs followed by a sequence
of tabs (/^[^\t]\+\t\+/) differently from the next such sequence?
For example in the
On 5/1/06, oystercatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry if this is an obvious one but I searched using a variety of
arguments and nothing was too clear. I also looked at _gvimrc
and changed the line
highlight Normal guibg=white # from gray80
which made it much easier to see the selected
On 5/1/06, Eric Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think I've found the thing that triggers my problem with
TabLineSet.vim where the tabline function get called for every
keystroke: I reset the highlighting in the tabline function.
Does it seem reasonable that the highlighting changes are trig
WARNING!! WARNING!! DANGER, WILL ROBINSON!! (with apolgies to "Lost in
Space")
I just received an email from "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", which is NOT from our
beloved author of Vim. Thankfully, my virus scanner caught the virus in the
email attachment. Recommend you delete this email immediately, or
Also, with Vim7, you can use the tabline to get a lot of visual
feedback about what buffers are loaded. TabLineSet.vim can list all
loaded buffers per tab on on tabline.
Hello,
>
> Hi There,
>
> I'm using two most downloaded vim plugins MiniBufferExplorer(By bindu
> wavell) and taglist(By Yegappan Lakshmanan) for working on C++ files.
>
> When I open a file on a consol window, and use the Taglist plugin it works
> absolutely fine as documented. In the same co
Hi,
On 5/1/06, Gary Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > btw, is there any way I can direct vim to write the output of a query
> > > such as ':set' or ':ve' directly to the buffer? That would come in
> > > handy when someone asks me for more info as to how my system is
> > > configured.
I think I've found the thing that triggers my problem with
TabLineSet.vim where the tabline function get called for every
keystroke: I reset the highlighting in the tabline function.
Does it seem reasonable that the highlighting changes are triggering
the tabline to re-update (and thus creating
If you're using Vim7, you might try my WinWalker.vim script. It will
allow you to arrange the Taglist window where you want in relation to
any other windows, and the "/" find function is more or less a
buffer explorer.
(I got another version to upload which sorts the buffer list a little
bette
>- Win32: Dropping a shortcut on the Vim icon edited the shortcut
instead
> of the file it refers to (old problem).
Any way to actually edit the shortcut? :D
Seriously, I was curious if anyone came across this issue on any 95/98
systems: Highlight the file and simply bang on the return key (if
On Monday 01 May 2006 15:24, Yakov Lerner wrote:
> On 5/1/06, Michael Naumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there a way to highlight a sequence of non-tabs followed by a sequence
> > of tabs (/^[^\t]\+\t\+/) differently from the next such sequence?
> >
> > For example in the line
> > a\tb\t\tc
Greetings,
Sorry if this is an obvious one but I searched using a variety of
arguments and nothing was too clear. I also looked at _gvimrc
and changed the line
highlight Normal guibg=white # from gray80
which made it much easier to see the selected text.
Now I would like to test some ot
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 06:45:24PM +0530, jagpreet wrote:
> Hi There,
>
> I'm using two most downloaded vim plugins MiniBufferExplorer(By bindu
> wavell) and taglist(By Yegappan Lakshmanan) for working on C++ files.
>
> When I open a file on a consol window, and use the Taglist plugin it works
On Mon, 1 May 2006 08:39:25 -0400
Benji wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 09:19:01PM -0400, Steve Hall wrote:
> >
> > In every beta of gVim I've tried on Linux/GTK2 (through 70g) I get the
> > following error with :hardcopy :
> >
> > E673: Incompatible multi-byte encoding and character set.
> >
On 5/1/06, Michael Naumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there a way to highlight a sequence of non-tabs followed by a sequence
of tabs (/^[^\t]\+\t\+/) differently from the next such sequence?
>
For example in the line
a\tb\t\tc\td
I want
"a\t" to be color1,
"b\t\t" to be color2 and
"c\t
Hi There,
I'm using two most downloaded vim plugins MiniBufferExplorer(By bindu
wavell) and taglist(By Yegappan Lakshmanan) for working on C++ files.
When I open a file on a consol window, and use the Taglist plugin it works
absolutely fine as documented. In the same consol window if I open an
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 09:19:01PM -0400, Steve Hall wrote:
>
> In every beta of gVim I've tried on Linux/GTK2 (through 70g) I get the
> following error with :hardcopy :
>
> E673: Incompatible multi-byte encoding and character set.
>
> This is with utf-8 and latin1. My binary is feature-full,
On Monday 01 May 2006 07:04, Gerald Lai wrote:
> On Mon, 1 May 2006, Michael Naumann wrote:
>
> > Is there a way to highlight a sequence of non-tabs followed by a sequence
> > of tabs (/^[^\t]\+\t\+/) differently from the next such sequence?
> >
> > For example in the line
> > a\tb\t\tc\td
> >
> >
When spell checking is enabled in a perl source file (*.pl)
which contains the following fragment:
sub help {
print STDERR "some missspelled wordz ";
print STDERR <
On 5/1/06, Gary Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2006-05-01, Eric Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/1/06, Gary Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2006-05-01, cga2000 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > btw, is there any way I can direct vim to write the output of a query
> > >
On 2006-05-01, Eric Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/1/06, Gary Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2006-05-01, cga2000 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > btw, is there any way I can direct vim to write the output of a query
> > > such as ':set' or ':ve' directly to the buffer? That
On 5/1/06, Gary Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2006-05-01, cga2000 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> btw, is there any way I can direct vim to write the output of a query
> such as ':set' or ':ve' directly to the buffer? That would come in
> handy when someone asks me for more info as to how m
On 5/1/06, cga2000 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thus spake Eric Arnold on Mon, May 01, 2006 at 12:19:41AM -0600 or thereabouts:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-01 02:38]:
> Do you have these set?
>
> setlocal formatoptions+=bcroqan2t " better without w
Actually, you should look at the above opt
On 5/1/06, Meino Christian Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there a way for a script to determine, whether a certain
key-shortcut is used in any mode ?
:he mapcheck()
:he hasmapto()
Yakov
On 2006-05-01, cga2000 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> btw, is there any way I can direct vim to write the output of a query
> such as ':set' or ':ve' directly to the buffer? That would come in
> handy when someone asks me for more info as to how my system is
> configured.
:help redir
Example:
59 matches
Mail list logo
