At 06:25 PM 9/10/2009, you wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Put it this way: If an amateur could do a cold fusion experiment
in his spare time, and produce a meaningful or even persuasive
result, that would be a remarkably easy experiment. . . .
Well, then, we know where we can sell the kit
At 03:39 PM 9/10/2009, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Terry Blanton wrote:
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/coldfusionproject/
is the URL.
I meant the sign up message bounces. Looking at it closely, that
could be because it says "grous" instead of "groups":
coldfusionproject-subscr...@yahoogrous.c
At 01:50 PM 9/10/2009, Jed Rothwell wrote:
That video is spectacular. It might mean nothing, but I doubt that
it means nothing. Focused on the back of the cathode? The video
raises more questions than are answered. What's the magnification?
What would be seen in the visible, with a microscope?
- Original Message -
From: Horace Heffner
Date: Thursday, September 10, 2009 8:02 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Michelson-Morley Interferometer experiment finally
done correctly?
>
> On Sep 10, 2009, at 2:17 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
>
> >
> > I still find the sagging beam splitter explanation i
At 10:47 AM 9/10/2009, you wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
And how we do it, I suggest, is through joining
coldfusionproj...@yahoogroups.com . . .
This does not appear to work.
No, it works. You are now subscribed, Jed. The problem is that to
prevent spammers from joining and harvesting
Mauro Lacy wrote:
>
> By the way, I have a question for you, in the form of a zen koan: "We
> know the sound of two hands clapping, but what is the sound of one
> hand clapping?" We can reformulate it for the ocassion as: "We know
> the interference pattern produced by two streams of light, but
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Horace Heffner wrote:
> I am sad to report that long term member of vortex-l, Fred Sparber, died
> yesterday morning, September, 9, 2009.
>
God bless Fred. I do hope that he has found answers he could only dream.
He was a great contributor to this list. I consi
I am sad to report that long term member of vortex-l, Fred Sparber,
died yesterday morning, September, 9, 2009. Fred was a prolific
contributor to this list, and his many contributions taught me much
physics, and continually sparked the list with creativity. His
fertile mind produced an e
>From today's Atlanta Journal --
*Vehicular homicide suspect flees hospital*
Police are searching for a woman who fled from a Gainesville hospital after
being charged with causing a deadly crash.
Dawn Satterfield, 46, of Gainesville, is wanted on nine warrants, including
driving under the influen
On Sep 10, 2009, at 2:17 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
I still find the sagging beam splitter explanation inconsistent with
what is observed.
As the beam splitter rotates into and out of the vertical
orientation this is when the supposed sagging is nil so the pattern's
movement should change direc
Jones Beene wrote:
>
> *An unfolding story- and e**legant and convincing demo** (of
> something)** :*
>
> *http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7T0d7o8X2-E*
>
> *Rotatable** Michelson-Morley Interferometer experiment.** *
>
> *P*ossible implications:* *
>
> 1) An optical gravitometer?
>
> 2) th
If the warpage is on one of the mirrors instead of the frame, the max
occurs when the mirror is perpendicular to the axis of rotation, +/-
45 degrees to the horizontal.
Or not.
Terry
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
>
> I still find the sagging beam splitter explanation inco
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Put it this way: If an amateur could do a cold fusion experiment in
his spare time, and produce a meaningful or even persuasive result,
that would be a remarkably easy experiment. . . .
Well, then, we know where we can sell the kit! Jed, I know it's
difficult, I ge
I still find the sagging beam splitter explanation inconsistent with
what is observed.
As the beam splitter rotates into and out of the vertical
orientation this is when the supposed sagging is nil so the pattern's
movement should change direction during this interval. When the beam
splitter is
Blue box on the right says "Join this group".
Terry
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> You can join from the URL site.
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
>> Terry Blanton wrote:
>>
>>> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/coldfusionproject/
>>>
>>> is th
On Sep 10, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
OH -- I see the problem.
The homopolar motor must be spun backwards to generate electricity.
This thing hasn't got a "backwards". That's the point, right?
Yes. It's all motor - born to spin!
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www
You can join from the URL site.
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Terry Blanton wrote:
>
>> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/coldfusionproject/
>>
>> is the URL.
>
> I meant the sign up message bounces. Looking at it closely, that could be
> because it says "grous" instead
There is a centrifugal method of extracting Nd from iron mine
tailings. It is proprietary at this time however.
Terry
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Pete Bogham wrote:
>
>> China is considering a ban on export of many rare-earth metals, and
>> curtailment of sales of others. This may mark th
Yes, but without the possibility of dynamic distortion of the apparatus.
Terry
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Roarty, Francis X
wrote:
> But Terry, if not geosynchronous aren't you effectively rotating it, albeit
> slowly?
> Fran
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Terry Blanton [mailto:h
Yet again replying to my own post...
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
> OH -- I see the problem.
>
> The homopolar motor must be spun backwards to generate electricity.
> This thing hasn't got a "backwards". That's the point, right?
If it's functioning as a homopolar motor, then spinning it faster
"fo
Terry Blanton wrote:
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/coldfusionproject/
is the URL.
I meant the sign up message bounces. Looking at it closely, that
could be because it says "grous" instead of "groups":
coldfusionproject-subscr...@yahoogrous.com
Hey, that's what the man said . . .
- J
There are projections of serious shortages of rare earth metals by 2017. This
may be an opportunity to turn some serious coin, dudes!
Avarf.pk may be the first (external to China) rare earth mine to achieve
production anytime soon.
OH -- I see the problem.
The homopolar motor must be spun backwards to generate electricity.
This thing hasn't got a "backwards". That's the point, right?
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
>
> Horace Heffner wrote:
>> On Sep 10, 2009, at 7:20 AM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
>>
>>> A generator which
Horace Heffner wrote:
>
> On Sep 10, 2009, at 7:20 AM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
>
>>
>> A generator which powers its own field windings won't self start,
>> right? You can spin it until you're blue in the face but nothing
>> will happen, unless you apply some external power to it to energize
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/coldfusionproject/
is the URL.
Terry
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
>
>> And how we do it, I suggest, is through joining
>> coldfusionproj...@yahoogroups.com . . .
>
> This does not appear to work.
>
> - Jed
On Sep 10, 2009, at 7:20 AM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
A generator which powers its own field windings won't self start,
right? You can spin it until you're blue in the face but nothing
will
happen, unless you apply some external power to it to energize the
field
windings and get it go
I uploaded a new version of this document:
EPRI. NSF/EPRI Workshop on Anomalous Effects in Deuterated Metals.
1989. Washington, D.C.: Electric Power Research Institute.
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/EPRInsfepriwor.pdf
I improved the file in several ways:
* Remove images of binding from left m
> China is considering a ban on export of many rare-earth metals, and
> curtailment of sales of others. This may mark the end of the era of cheap
> plentiful neodymium magnets.
>
If they can make enough Orbos before the stuff runs out, it can
then be extracted from seawater in any quantity.
Ot
On Sep 10, 2009, at 8:48 AM, Harry Veeder wrote:
What one needs is a "sag-o-meter".
At my age the invention of a sag-o-meter is less than comforting. 8^)
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
On Sep 10, 2009, at 9:58 AM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
Something else worth trying, an experiment that shouldn't be too
expensive to assemble would be to spin the apparatus while it is
set in it's horizontal position. IOW, turn the apparatus into a
spinning centrifuge. Make sur
On Sep 10, 2009, at 9:46 AM, Gibson Elliot wrote:
I would think that running the device with the axis tilted 45 deg.
off center to the left, and then to the 45 deg. off center to the
right, would allow for normalizing out the effects of mechanical
shifting or warping.
Not true. Any chan
China is considering a ban on export of many rare-earth metals, and
curtailment of sales of others. This may mark the end of the era of cheap
plentiful neodymium magnets.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/ambroseevans_pritchard/6082464/World-faces-hi-tech-crunch-as-China-eyes-ban-on-rar
Jack O Suileabhain wrote:
> .hmmessage P { margin:0px; padding:0px } body.hmmessage { font-size:
> 10pt; font-family:Verdana } The device looks flimsy: Centrifugal
> momentum at the bottom of the gravity trough 'pendulum' swing is
> going to amplify enough 'g's to simply torque the componants of
Something else worth trying, an experiment that shouldn't be too expensive
to assemble would be to spin the apparatus while it is set in it's
horizontal position. IOW, turn the apparatus into a spinning centrifuge.
Make sure it's carefully counter balanced, then spin up the RPMs to
something equiv
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
It's true, I've never seen a CR-39 chip as used in this field,
personally, but CR-39, as a material, can be very clear, optically
clear, it's used for lenses, after all . . .
Pretty sure the samples Pam Boss showed me were beige.
Cold fusion heat appears in small
I would think that running the device with the axis tilted 45 deg. off center
to the left, and then to the 45 deg. off center to the right, would allow for
normalizing out the effects of mechanical shifting or warping. This is a simple
problem to resolve. I am planning on building a small, very
The device looks flimsy: Centrifugal momentum at the bottom of the gravity
trough 'pendulum' swing is going to amplify enough 'g's to simply torque the
componants of the apparatus. To negate this the apparatus would have to be
concrete imbedded bolt-anchored to the floor & the entire structure
- Original Message -
From: OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
Date: Thursday, September 10, 2009 9:53 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Michelson-Morley Interferometer experiment finally
done correctly?
> I was speculating that my second suggestion might help deal that
> question, hopefully:
>
> > Anoth
- Original Message -
From: Horace Heffner
Date: Saturday, September 5, 2009 4:48 am
>
> Again, I say watch the videos:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A2XBPzxXtJk
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3cllaQFkxQQ
>
> The effect of the current is to slow down the stainless steel
> m
Little belated here -- didn't notice this initially.
Horace Heffner wrote:
>
> On Aug 9, 2009, at 4:37 PM, Kyle Mcallister wrote:
>
>
>> I still find the motor interesting, because everyone wrote it off as
>> a thermal thing. This seems, as you suspect, to be magnetic, albeit
>> in a different way
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
And how we do it, I suggest, is through joining
coldfusionproj...@yahoogroups.com . . .
This does not appear to work.
- Jed
At 04:22 AM 9/10/2009, you wrote:
2009/9/10 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax :
> At 03:45 PM 9/9/2009, you [Jed] wrote:
>> Ah. CR-39 is opaque. You mean looking around it, from another angle.
>
> No. There are different kinds of CR-39. It's true, I've never seen a CR-39
> chip as used in this field, personal
But Terry, if not geosynchronous aren't you effectively rotating it, albeit
slowly?
Fran
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton [mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 10:18 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Michelson-Morley Interferometer experiment fin
At 08:47 AM 9/10/2009, you wrote:
I couldn't agree more, this is well illustrated IMHO in Earthtech's
CR-39 experiments, where thanks to this "variational" method they
showed that the SPAWAR pits could be obtained in a shorter time (3
days instead of 3 weeks), or with cheaper plating metals (Cu o
At 08:25 AM 9/10/2009, Michel Jullian wrote:
The tritium producing SPAWAR experiment I was talking
about was discussed here in January:
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg29943.html
and in the ensuing discussion, where Horace was already writing (in msg 29965)
"However, it see
At 08:01 AM 9/10/2009, you wrote:
Additional thought, the protective film itself could also be made of
CR-39 (which could be of the same batch, milled down to a few microns
thickness), this would guarantee that the cathode lies on exactly the
same substrate as in a non-PACA experiment.
Is it po
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
>
> Please elabourate.
> What differences do you expect?
Instead of rotating the device I would like to see the results if it
were pointed in fixed directions relative to the ISS as it orbited the
earth.
Terry
>From Francis:
> Steven,
> Isn't it going to be difficult to identify whether the change is introduced by
> mechanical motion due to the variation in field strength or the effect on the
> photon from the same variation?
In my original comments I was concerned about certain questions you bring up.
Steven,
Isn't it going to be difficult to identify whether the change is introduced by
mechanical motion due to the variation in field strength or the effect on the
photon from the same variation?
Fran
-Original Message-
From: OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson [mailto:orionwo...@char
>From Horace
> I think the most likely explanation is that the beam splitter sags
multiple wavelengths
> when the device is at the critical angle shown, i.e. when the beam
splitter is horizontal.
> This explains maximum interference at the 180 degree opposed points, and
no interference
> when the
One other post-script. Some people think that Fleischmann is
misinformed about the J-M material, and it could not be their
standard filter palladium, because that has too much silver in it to
work well. Silver does prevent loading, but on the other hand, the
people at BARC did report a dramatic
I couldn't agree more, this is well illustrated IMHO in Earthtech's
CR-39 experiments, where thanks to this "variational" method they
showed that the SPAWAR pits could be obtained in a shorter time (3
days instead of 3 weeks), or with cheaper plating metals (Cu or Ni
instead of Pd), or without magn
2009/9/9 Harbach Jak :
...
> Its been fun Vortex! I have spoken my peace(for NOW-HA!) I'll be taking
> my leave of your great site. And yes life has made me somewhat course and a
> bit brutally direct-but a thicker skin would be good for some of you whom I
> since may have led a somewhat 'cloi
2009/9/10 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax :
> At 09:56 AM 9/9/2009, Michel Jullian wrote:
>
>> I also recall an old SPAWAR codeposition experiment claiming to
>> produce tritium, which they mentioned in a recent review of their
>> work. If that was not bogus, tritium being very easy to detect
>> unmistakably,
Additional thought, the protective film itself could also be made of
CR-39 (which could be of the same batch, milled down to a few microns
thickness), this would guarantee that the cathode lies on exactly the
same substrate as in a non-PACA experiment.
Michel
2009/9/10 Michel Jullian :
> 2009/9/1
2009/9/10 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax :
> At 03:45 PM 9/9/2009, you [Jed] wrote:
>> Ah. CR-39 is opaque. You mean looking around it, from another angle.
>
> No. There are different kinds of CR-39. It's true, I've never seen a CR-39
> chip as used in this field, personally,
See in top photograph here
http
56 matches
Mail list logo
