(gleaned from overunity.com)
US 2009/0009157 A1 : SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MEASURING ENERGY IN
MAGNETIC INTERACTIONS : An apparatus and method is provided for
measuring magnetic force response time due to the magnetic viscosity
of materials and for measuring total energy exchanged due to relative
http://www.google.com/patents?id=1dOyEBAJzoom=4pg=PA1#v=onepageq=f=true
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Esa Ruoho esaru...@gmail.com wrote:
(gleaned from overunity.com)
US 2009/0009157 A1 : SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MEASURING ENERGY IN
MAGNETIC INTERACTIONS : An apparatus and method is
You might note that these are patent applications. The patents are pending.
Terry
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Esa Ruoho esaru...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.google.com/patents?id=1dOyEBAJzoom=4pg=PA1#v=onepageq=f=true
This is great stuff! Amazing.
Summary: they are changing the color of metals by changing the
surface structure.
- Jed
On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 10:22:14 Jones Beene said
[snip] Others here on Vo - have mentioned or debated the fact that the gravity
force must grow exponentially at close dimensions - IF - grand unification
is accurate. I think it is accurate. Dufour puts some numbers to that
2009/12/28 Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net:
- but the 2 eV available
from loading alone without deuterium (contrast that to about .5 eV if the
hydrogen were burned in air) is a huge surprise -
Jones, where did you get that .5 eV figure? I did the maths and found
about 1.5 eV instead, here is
-Original Message-
From: Michel Jullian
- but the 2 eV available
from loading alone without deuterium (contrast that to about .5 eV if the
hydrogen were burned in air) is a huge surprise -
MJ: Jones, where did you get that .5 eV figure? I did the maths and found
about 1.5 eV
On 12/29/2009 11:19 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Michel Jullian
- but the 2 eV available
from loading alone without deuterium (contrast that to about .5 eV if the
hydrogen were burned in air) is a huge surprise -
MJ: Jones, where did you get that .5
2009/12/29 Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net:
-Original Message-
From: Michel Jullian
- but the 2 eV available
from loading alone without deuterium (contrast that to about .5 eV if the
hydrogen were burned in air) is a huge surprise -
MJ: Jones, where did you get that .5 eV figure?
On Dec 28, 2009, at 2:09 PM, Rick Monteverde wrote:
Saw an orange fire colored UFO last night just after nightfall. The
path was that of an object flying in a curved path at high altitude
(a u-turn, basically), definitely not a satellite, and a bit
brighter than a good space station
On Dec 28, 2009, at 2:09 PM, Rick Monteverde wrote:
Saw an orange fire colored UFO last night just after nightfall. The
path was that of an object flying in a curved path at high altitude
(a u-turn, basically), definitely not a satellite, and a bit
brighter than a good space station
2009/12/29 Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com:
On 12/29/2009 11:19 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
Since water can be split into H2 and O2 with 1.23 volts - does it stand to
reason that one could get 1.5 eV in return ? That was rhetorical; and of
course this one of nature's built-in cases of
On Dec 28, 2009, at 2:09 PM, Rick Monteverde wrote:
Saw an orange fire colored UFO last night just after nightfall. The
path was that of an object flying in a curved path at high altitude
(a u-turn, basically), definitely not a satellite, and a bit
brighter than a good space station
In case there is any doubt, the following is my final answer - unless
of course I find other mistakes! 8^)
On Dec 29, 2009, at 8:44 AM, Horace Heffner wrote:
Hi Rick,
Coincidentally, I saw something similar yesterday (Dec 28, 2009)
around noon AKST, (about 11 orbits later) west of
-Original Message-
From: Michel Jullian [
Or rather, as it turns out, exactly right. Physics works, contrary to
your suggestions :)
It works of course, but not as perfectly as you suggest, in real world
applications.
Besides, you don't have to take my word, see
For background information, the attached is a graphic showing my
derivation of the formula used below. The umbra line, shown as
horizontal, and the line segment x directly above the viewer is
roughly the same as the altitude to an object on the umbra line,
depending on the latitudinal
Horace -
My sighting wasn't just after sunset, it was just after nightfall - total
darkness. There was just a vague hint of fading light on the horizon, but
the sky surrounding the object, which was relatively low in the southwest,
was already black.
I did find something on the
Sunset at my location in Honolulu that day was 5:59 PM, sighting was at 6:58
PM. I'll look for a star chart to get the sighting angle for the object.
- R.
Heat from welding can tint steel too, but I guess with lasers the effect can be
controlled.
This topic reminds of Chromoskedasic printing, where blackwhite photographic
paper is chemically
treated so that it will scatter light and generate abstract/psychedelic colour
effects.
On Dec 29, 2009, at 10:02 AM, Rick Monteverde wrote:
Horace –
My sighting wasn’t just after sunset, it was just after nightfall
- total darkness. There was just a vague hint of fading light on
the horizon, but the sky surrounding the object, which was
relatively low in the southwest,
OK, vorticians. This is could be an important paper and topic, so let me add
one more point of clarification to Michel Jullian's point about the heat of
combustion of hydrogen, compared to the anomalous loading heat of
Kitamura's claim.
Michel correctly finds that if you only look at one-half of
How do you calculate the phonon frequency in the solid.
I get 10 exp 17 hertz..the number should be about 10 exp 12 hertz.
Is there an easy way.
Frank Z
At 06:00 AM 12/28/2009, William Beaty wrote:
Rather than focusing on some perhaps-unexpected measurement, just
close the loop. Ditch the battery. Make a perpetual wheel. Close the loop.
If it's real, then closing the loop should be easy. If it's an artifact
which misleads
The abstracts for each chapter are available here:
http://pubs.acs.org/isbn/9780841224544
- Jed
Sounds like a Fastwalker.
Terry
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
On Dec 29, 2009, at 10:02 AM, Rick Monteverde wrote:
Horace –
My sighting wasn’t just after sunset, it was just after nightfall - total
darkness. There was just a vague hint of
On Dec 29, 2009, at 12:08 PM, fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
How do you calculate the phonon frequency in the solid.
I get 10 exp 17 hertz..the number should be about 10 exp 12 hertz.
Is there an easy way.
Frank Z
Yes, from the very little information provided above I suspect there
might be.
So, how does this compare to the recombination energy of atomic
hydrogen? Here's a reference by a dubious source:
http://www.cheniere.org/misc/a_h%20reaction.htm
:-)
Terry
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
OK, vorticians. This is could be an important
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
But there is the tantalizing middle. They find that they almost close the
loop.
You're giving them the benefit of the doubt. Count how many times you
have to do that! It's very telling.
Their acting very Newman-esque and using a battery?
At 08:58 PM 12/29/2009, William Beaty wrote:
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
But there is the tantalizing middle. They find that they almost
close the loop.
You're giving them the benefit of the doubt. Count how many times
you have to do that! It's very telling.
Their
In a message dated 12/29/2009 7:33:04 PM Eastern Standard Time,
hheff...@mtaonline.net writes:
Yes, from the very little information provided above I suspect there might
be. I suspect you are using c as the speed of light instead of the speed
of sound in the medium.
Best regards,
On Dec 29, 2009, at 6:42 PM, fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 12/29/2009 7:33:04 PM Eastern Standard Time,
hheff...@mtaonline.net writes:
Yes, from the very little information provided above I suspect
there might be. I suspect you are using c as the speed of light
instead of
31 matches
Mail list logo
