Michele Comitini wrote:
As I have said here, flow meters tend to be a pain in the butt.
A water tank where to put outgoing water and get volume by measuring
height. I don't think he would have
many more problems with mass/volume water in liquid phase than he has
with steam...
At high power
bell soon to toll for Rossi debacle, Steven B. Krivit definitive
technical review, with able collaborators, due in a few days: Rich
Murray 2011.07.29
A fine example of how cogent, pertinent, rapid scientific
collaboration can now operate freely and for free via the Net...
The effects of the June
http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/07/29/possible-low-or-no-levels-of-excess-heat-in-rossi-device/
Our analysis shows a possible energy gain of one to two times.
end excerpt
I wonder who constitutes Our?
T
I don't know, but consider this example:
People, cats, and animals in general can fail to perform when they become
either
hypothermic or hyperthermic.
Harry
From: Damon Craig decra...@gmail.com
To: Harry Veeder hlvee...@yahoo.com
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 7:52:01 AM
Subject: Re:
2011/7/29 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
As I have said here, flow meters tend to be a pain in the butt.
You need a flow meter to do this right. In the 18-hour test they reportedly
did use a flow meter. I asked them what make and model. They never responded
so I did not include this
Terry sez:
Our analysis shows a possible energy gain of one to two times.
end excerpt
I wonder who constitutes Our?
Expanding on Terry's question:
Is there a specific link that explains these claims in more detail, or
are we going to just have to wait? All I see is advertisement. Coming
Michele Comitini wrote:
You need a flow meter to do this right. In the 18-hour test they reportedly
did use a flow meter. I asked them what make and model. They never responded
so I did not include this detail in my description.
Flow meters have to be reliable: don't we all trust the gas pump?
On Jul 29, 2011 12:29 AM, Michele Comitini michele.comit...@gmail.com
wrote:
As I said, my feeling is that he prefers steam because it proves the
thing
works at high temperature. Also, it is a little more convenient to work
with. The flow of water is lower and you can use a weight scale
Just a brief follow-up comment.
Browsing the front page of New Energy Times:
http://newenergytimes.com/
It's odd to me that the on-going Rossi saga still does not merit a
least a brief link here. I mean, golly! Regardless of whether one
believes in Rossi's claims or not, this isn't news?
http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-data-blow-gaping-hold-global-warming-alarmism-192334971.html
Frank Z
The difference between 4.4KW and 0.8KW was not visual, the former didn't
seem to put much more steam. The difference was more in the intervals
between bubbling noises. They seem to scale inversely linearly with the
power.
At 09:36 AM 7/29/2011, Rich Murray wrote:
http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/07/29/new-energy-times-report-3-on-rossi-device-coming-soon/
Careful observers have noticed that Rossi is not claiming a 1
megawatt electrical device but a 1 megawatt thermal device. They have
also noticed that
In order to resolve the disagreement between the wet steam hyposesis and the
water spill-though hypothesis it's reasonable to ask how much energy it
takes to break water into droplets and lift these a few inches before
sending them out the exit of the rossi device.
The energy requires to increase
no, it says its not as bad as worst case scenarios. Still increasing,
still holding in heat.
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 2:04 PM, fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-data-blow-gaping-hold-global-warming-alarmism-192334971.html
Frank Z
Simplest way to do convincing demonstration is to recycle large enough
volume of water, so that inlet water is pumped from the water tank and
outlet will lead back to the same tank. Then it needs only to observe rising
temperature. If Rossi wants to do really convincing demonstration he would
FWIW:
The article was written James M. Taylor is senior fellow for
environment policy at The Heartland Institute and managing editor of
Environment Climate News.
Here's some info on Harland's funding, as revealed by Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Heartland_Institute
Excerpt:
See:
http://www.theoildrum.com/node/8140
This is a respectable, widely read website. This report is completely
wrong, but it is easy to see how the author made these mistakes. Either
Defkalion or Rossi could publish correct, complete, authoritative
information to squelch this kind of thing.
Well yes. Utterly obvious to those of us who haven't adopted fear of climate
change as a religion substitute. This won't change the jumping up and down and
screaming of the true believers a whit. Don't confuse them with the facts and
please don't deprive them of their new inquisition. And the
No man is an island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the
continent, a part of the main. If a clod be washed away by the sea,
Europe is the less, as well as if a promontory were, as well as if a
manor of thy friend's or of thine own were: any man's death diminishes
me, because I am
Michele Comitini wrote:
As we here see how trivial it is to setup absolutely convincing
demonstration, then we have only one option left that Rossi does not want to
do such thing! At least not before October.
The question here is *WHY* he would not want to make such experiment?
Rossi has
Lewan still believes this stuff, hu?
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Damon Craig wrote:
Can you post it here, verbatum? Not the entire email, if you like, just
the data.
Nope. Even if I did, it would prove nothing, since anyone can write a few
2011/7/28 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Damon Craig wrote:
Can you post it here, verbatum? Not the entire email, if you like, just
the data.
Nope. Even if I did, it would prove nothing, since anyone can write a few
lines of ascii text and claim they came from an e-mail.
That is
Damon Craig decra...@gmail.com wrote:
Lewan still believes this stuff, hu?
You may be certain that if he or I knew of any reason to doubt these claims,
we would publish these reasons. I have done this already, here:
Michele Comitini michele.comit...@gmail.com wrote:
Nope. Even if I did, it would prove nothing, since anyone can write a few
lines of ascii text and claim they came from an e-mail.
That is arguable at least if you use PGP or OpenPGP to sign your
bytes. I think anyone that sends data on the
Jed,
If you search on this list there is a reference to an interview on
RAINEWS with Focardi, Celani someone else and Bardi.
Understanding Italian I can state that Bardi was always talking of
things that had little to do with the main discussion there.
He his expert and involved in classical
He did not make one comment about the video, but wrote 2 long posts about
his visit, heh.
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 5:30 AM, Damon Craig decra...@gmail.com wrote:
In order to resolve the disagreement between the wet steam hyposesis and
the water spill-though hypothesis it's reasonable to ask how much energy it
takes to break water into droplets and lift these a few inches before
At 01:27 PM 7/29/2011, Terry Blanton wrote:
http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/07/29/possible-low-or-no-levels-of-excess-heat-in-rossi-device/http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/07/29/possible-low-or-no-levels-of-excess-heat-in-rossi-device/
Our analysis shows a possible energy gain of one to
28 matches
Mail list logo
