Well, thankfully, Smart Men are making decisions in Washington D.C. about
things like where to put RD money. Just ask Jed.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree 100% with Alain. Very powerful anti-CF memes are circulating and
cannot be erased by
there is no hope to convince people until there is a working prototype
that we can put on the client table, and that clearly work, even roughly.
I could have sworn that was what I've been writing on and off for the last
year or so!
No one but scientists care if CF exists but isn't useful in the
The first person who goes around during a Sandy#2 and charges people's
laptops and mobile phones with a portable CF-device is going to do a lot
more to convince people it's a everyday useful energy-source than any
amount of comments on SciAm or elsewhere.
People want a real-life useful thing.
It sadly oppose to the mythology of science, of prevalence of experimental
facts compared to theories and to usefulness...
in fact if something oppose todays theories/continuity and is not so
important, it is denied.
I can translate into: I won't lose my job, for something than cannot make
me a
Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote:
However as soon as we have a machine on the client table, and that the
advantages for the client are clear, nothing can block people to use it...
no lobbies, no regulation, no fear...
I think that's incorrect. Here in the U.S. we have powerful
Let me clarify. I wrote:
After the accident, the Federal engineer who recommended this change was
fired, and the top management who refused to implement the change were
rewarded with thousands of dollars and promotions. That sort of thing
happens more often than people realize.
Before TMI,
I don't disagree with the power of lobbies.
In fact the expert I talk to said thay they will try to oppose to the
transition to maintain te problem they are the solution of.
They will learn the new technology, while blocking it, until they can
compete and establish a monopoly again.
the way to
Public sector rent-seeking could be prevented in large measure by simply
following the original intent of the US Constitution to a very limited
Federal government role. Ultimately, you want to remove discretion from
the appropriations process entirely with a CItizen's Dividend aka a
The uninformed public is getting the wrong message about LENR. Last evening I
ran into a friend that I discussed the issue of cold fusion with last winter
and he told me he had seen an article by Discover Magazine on Cold Fusion. His
take was that PF was not replicated according to the
Hello Mark,
I appreciate the fact that you are open to exploration of the subject. We who
are closely following the progress tend to become emotionally attached to the
issue and have a difficult time understanding those of the more skeptical
nature such as yourself.
Of course I very much
I would bet that a demonstration of a charger would not convince many about the
reality of CF devices. So many would suggest ways that the effect could be
faked or scammed just as we have seen before. I think Rossi has the best idea
when he says that the market place can make the final
Andrea Rossi
November 8th, 2012 at 12:30 PM
Dear Marco:
I appreciate wholeheartedly the enthusiasm of our supporters, but sometime I
have the impression that the difficulties we are fighting against are strongly
underevaluated, just like to make a LENR industrial apparatus should be a
normal
When electricity is out city-wide, it becomes real convincing real quick.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 8:06 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I would bet that a demonstration of a charger would not convince many
about the reality of CF devices. So many would suggest ways that the
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Heck ... The T-4 will need lots of current for tesseractic processing.
Not sure how Ah-nald plans to get around the little problem of Judgment Day
having past already (April 21, 2011)
I like to think (and
the sooner
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 1:06 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I would bet that a demonstration of a charger would not convince many about
the reality of CF devices. So many would suggest ways that the effect could
be faked or scammed just as we have seen before.
You don't actually
It should be noted that in the self sustaining mode the input power is applied
approximately 50 % of the time. This is consistent with my simulation and adds
credence to his report. Also, the COP of 6 is very much in line with the model.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Alan Fletcher
David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I am not sure that *everyone* can be convinced that the hypothetical CF
device is real as you suggest.
It would not have to convince everyone in the first round. We only need to
set off a chain reaction where each generation triggers more reactions
I wrote:
It would not have to convince everyone in the first round. We only need to
set off a chain reaction where each generation triggers more reactions
instead of quenching.
I mean a reaction of people, not neutrons. Each replication motivates more
than 1 other group to replicate, so the
OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
And a recent political election would suggest the fact that some of those
young whippersnappers know just how to accomplish this too. There is hope.
Right. And I happen to have a line into some of them. Especially my
daughter, who
http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/follow/109-fast-paced-progress
There is nothing new on the site today other than calibration data, which
looks good.
From: Jed Rothwell
We can hope that the Celani device, replicated by 5 or 10 labs, will
convince hundreds more researchers than
Am 07.11.2012 04:38, schrieb Ron Kita:
Greetings Vortex-L,
A water bridge defying gravity:
http://phys.org/news/2012-11-bridges-defy-gravity.html
Ron Kita, Chiralex
See here the castor oil bridge ;-)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jj7c0oWoBI
I think it is an electrodynamic effect and has
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I am not sure that everyone can be convinced that the hypothetical CF
device is real as you suggest.
It would not have to convince everyone in the first round. We only need to
Here is an example of what I was talking about before: an obsolete industry
that might have adapted the new technology but did not. I will grant, it is
a little difficult to see what role Kodak might have played in digital
photography. But they might have done something rather than simply standing
On 08/11/2012 21:43, Peter wrote:
Am 07.11.2012 04:38, schrieb Ron Kita:
Greetings Vortex-L,
A water bridge defying gravity:
http://phys.org/news/2012-11-bridges-defy-gravity.html
Ron Kita, Chiralex
See here the castor oil bridge ;-)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jj7c0oWoBI
I think it is
Don't be confused by the advertising of rags like Discover, SciAm and
Nature.
They're fashion magazines. Their writers wouldn't be caught dead in the
wrong kind of look.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:20 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
The uninformed public is getting the wrong
Those young whippersnappers have a facebook page too:
https://www.facebook.com/#!/MartinFleischmannMemorialProject
Harry
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/follow/109-fast-paced-progress
There is nothing new on the
Indeed Mark,
the problem with cold fusion is that it is almost impossible to explain to
skeptic convincingly. Sam Kean explained the problem with with cold fusion
very well in his book Disappearing Spoon. Here is an excerpt from the book
that I recommend to read. Jed does not like it, I know that
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com wrote:
I also recommend the book as general good science book, although it is not
anyway special.
The Violinist's Thumb is even better.
Jed said,
So far, so far, cold fusion has avoided any opposition from vested
interests because it has such a low profile. It is like the airplane
from 1903 to 1908. No one takes it seriously, and most people are
completely unaware that it exists.
Jed, I think there is a distinguishing feature
29 matches
Mail list logo
