Alan, I made a calculation of the output flow rate that came out much higher
than the value you have shown here. Is it possible for you to recheck your
calculation? I will do the same.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Alan Fletcher
To: vortex-l
Sent: Sun, Aug 4, 2013 6:28 pm
Subject
Robin,
Here I was referring to a measurement error in the input flow rate that is
caused by the output pressure. If the true calibrated flow matches the reading
there will be no major problem from my perspective.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: mixent
To: vortex-l
Sent: Sun, Aug 4
Do you mean your hosting service, or, ISP? Or, are they the same?
Can you tell me the name of your service?
Bummer.
On 8/4/13 2:55 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Some idiot tried to hack LENR-CANR.org. When you accessed the indexes
it displayed this message:
HACKED_kutsaL'@'localhost' (using pas
Mark, you are in good company..you just described the Haisch Modell prototype
but even they require what they describe as a lamb pinch to make the transition
asymmetrical into the cavity vs out of the cavity. The papers you cited
describe orbitals proportional to vacuum density, if the density d
It might explain when he got upset when I said his theories beat Jones in
quantity but not quality. :-)
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone
- Reply message -
From: "Jones Beene"
To:
Subject: [Vo]:Some comments by me at Mats Lewan blog
Date: Sun, Aug 4, 2013 8:02 PM
-O
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
In reply to Axil Axil's message:
>Don't let petty jealousy distort your view of history, for we are living
>during a turning point in civilization unlike any that have gone before;
>primarily brought about by efforts and genius of John Hadjich
Remember, Defkalion wanted to make a inaccurate measurement or purpose that
would drastically reduce the energy output.
2013/8/4 Alan Fletcher
>
> In any event -- lock the physicists out of the building, and hire/recruit
> a competent electrical and thermal engineer!
>
>
>
>
--
Daniel Rocha
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 2 Aug 2013 23:17:05 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>Dont let petty jealousy distort your view of history, for we are living
>during a turning point in civilization unlike any that have gone before;
>primarily brought about by efforts and genius of John Hadjichristos.
A
> From: "David Roberson"
> Sent: Sunday, August 4, 2013 1:58:16 PM
>
> This is interesting information. If the cold water input flow rate
> drops due to back pressure from the vaporized steam, then there is a
> serious problem. Most of my considerations have been based upon the
> belief that the
In reply to David Roberson's message of Sun, 4 Aug 2013 16:58:16 -0400 (EDT):
Hi,
[snip]
>This is interesting information. If the cold water input flow rate drops due
>to back pressure from the vaporized steam, then there is a serious problem.
I fail to see why. Surely a reduced flow rate woul
Some idiot tried to hack LENR-CANR.org. When you accessed the indexes it
displayed this message:
HACKED_kutsaL'@'localhost' (using password: YES)
This string was nowhere in any of the files I upload. It was in one of the
ISP configuration folders, presumably a php. The people at the ISP could
not
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <
stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote:
> But I would like to keep the discussion to the original FP experiment.
>
Ah, yes. Sounds good. It seems you are pretty familiar with the details,
then.
> There is a reason why heavy water is typically
it seems National instruments asked such doublinded test in 2012, according
to the conference of Concezz in Rome (and Brussels)...
about industrial claims, there is similar concern, not of doubleblind, but
because of suspected fraud by testers.
One big fear of industrialist is when the tester orga
Hi Eric,
I'm not up to speed with your emails. The LENR+ type of activities is still
something that if proper tests are
done and affirmative, will be much more interesting, this is clear. But I
would like to keep the discussion to the
original FP experiment.
> I think this would be an interestin
The problem is much bigger than just business or technology.
2013/8/4 blaze spinnaker
> Yes, it appears luca is concerned as well and would like to clarify before
> putting his rep on the line even more.
>
> This is tough love, but if dgt was smart, they'd realize this is healthy
> and the sign
Yes, it appears luca is concerned as well and would like to clarify before
putting his rep on the line even more.
This is tough love, but if dgt was smart, they'd realize this is healthy
and the sign of credible businessmen.
On Sunday, August 4, 2013, David Roberson wrote:
> This is interesting
I wrote:
So if the test concerns the *existence* of LENR, rather than a parameter
> that affects it, I think another control should be sought out. Whatever
> that other control is (input power turned off, a different substrate or
> cathode, or some other property), could be varied in the manner y
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/jul/29/biggest-battery-energy-technology-trial
10 MWhr lithium manganese.
You mean, misinformation:
http://22passi.blogspot.com.br/2013/08/defkalion-europa-uno-tsunami-in-arrivo.html?showComment=1375621943652#c5835292422433328267
2013/8/4 David Roberson
> This is interesting information.
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
This is interesting information. If the cold water input flow rate drops due
to back pressure from the vaporized steam, then there is a serious problem.
Most of my considerations have been based upon the belief that the flow rate
was accurately measured. Unfortunately, if that reading was red
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <
stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote:
H0: the seen effect if it's seen, does not depend on the type of water
> H1: It does depend on the type of water.
>
I think this would be an interesting test to whether there is a possible
isotope effe
Hi all, I wanted to ask you how to best do a test proving LENR.
After following this for a short time I would probably try something like
this,
I would use two teams
1. The testers, people well versed in LENR and know how to make the
classic FP experiment work.
2. The skeptics, a scientific team
Well, looks like I got to hear from him after all:
http://www.e-catworld.com/2013/08/defkalion-europe-freezes-relationship-with-defkalion-green-technologies-over-measurement-issues/
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 8:39 PM, blaze spinnaker
wrote:
> In my opinion, Luca Gamberale is the most credible memb
Fran:
I’ve always had a prob with the whole time-dilation/relativistic effects thing…
my gut tells me that this is what might be ‘perceived’ by us and our
instruments, and the physics community had to ‘fit’ data to a theoretical
framework; another contributing factor is that the ZPField was not
Dammit Fran, ya made me leave the Dimebox Saloon to go look up the refs…
Good news is that my memory isn’t fading yet!
2012: Quantum Ground States as Equilibrium Particle‐Vacuum Interaction
States
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1204.1952.pdf
And his first paper on this in ’87:
http://www.earthtech.org/pub
Terry. I disagree with your assumption that an irh atom can carry negative
energy out of the cavity.. the resonant relationship with virtual particles is
proportional to casimir geometry or lack thereof in the unbroken isotropy
outside the cavity where vacuum pressure only changes at gravitatio
26 matches
Mail list logo
