Hi Eric,

I'm not up to speed with your emails. The LENR+ type of activities is still
something that if proper tests are
done and affirmative, will be much more interesting, this is clear. But I
would like to keep the discussion to the
original FP experiment.


> I think this would be an interesting test to whether there is a possible
> isotope effect. But there's evidence that LENR is seen in light water/light
> hydrogen systems as well.  So if the test concerns the *existence* of LENR,
> rather than a parameter that affects it, I think another control should be
> sought out.
>

To decide here one need to have a clue about,

P(FP-effect | water)  and P(FP-effect | heavy water)

There is a reason why heavy water is typically used so I would assume that
the effect seen is much stronger
(more frequent, higher energy) then when water is used. If the frequencies
are the same, I would guess that
we could measure the strength to a number and use that in stead in a test.
The FP effect itself for a skeptic
does not necessary equate to a nuclear effect. It having an isotopic effect
would be quite a strong indication
that there is a nuclear effect or am I wrong? Else wouldn't it be so
interesting that people would take notice
of this field?

Cheers!

Reply via email to