On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:04 PM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
As you can tell from my questions and comments I have a hard time
understanding how an electron can become in effect heavier in an atom
because of its circulation around a point with no evidence about the
stability of
An electron becomes heavier when it is localized( bound ) by a defect in
the lattice like a hole or a bump. This is called Anderson localization.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anderson_localization
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 1:04 AM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
Eric--
What is the
Bob,
IMHO the inertial frame is not generated by the electron or the nucleus but
rather the “umbrella” of surrounding geometry that effects the space-time that
this gas atom happens to be randomly migrating thru..hence it is a transitory
state that locally the gas atom is unaware of.. according
Dear Thornros,
Thank you- till now only you due to your technology- management-leadership
have contributed with an addition to the Probletence in LENR paper.
You already have launched interesting and useful ideas about use of ab
broad inter-disciplinar approach in LENR development - and I found
Hi Jones,
I was looking into the hydrostik in more detail. It does not appear to be
based on LaNi5, but rather TiMn2.
http://www.udomi.com/downloads/UserManualHydrostikv8.pdf
Would this affect your thoughts on the possible experiment you suggested?
Best,
Jack
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 10:34
Eric,
In posts yesterday you have raised a number of good observations - and there
is a bit more information floating around cyberspace this week about the
putative single Dirac (KG) ground state, which can refine the idea of a
stable fractional state for LENR, which is also the identical state
Jack,
Good find. It appears they have switched to TiMn2. In the earlier literature,
the penta-nickel alloy was mentioned. That would seem to change expectations.
It could still be worth the effort to try this in a low powered experiment -
since Cravens is getting good results using
Eric and Fran--
Thanks for those clariifications.
Bob
Sent from Windows Mail
From: Roarty, Francis X
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 3:25 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Bob,
IMHO the inertial frame is not generated by the electron or the nucleus but
rather the
A magnetic field increases the rate of virtual photon production in a
stationary frame because magnetism is a relativistic manifestation of
charge as seen moving in the relativistic reference frame. A strong
magnetic field will be produced by a large ensemble of charge carriers who
will produce a
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma-ray_burst
One of the energy amplification mechanisms found in LENR is energy beaming.
Like a gamma ray burst where an intense pulse of energy can be seen from a
far corner clear across the other side of the universe, a soliton can focus
charge into a tight
FWIW ... if the dark matter state of hydrogen, which is at the deep ground
state known as the DDL can be identified as a magnetic monopole then every
atom of dark matter would be mutually repulsed by every other, and
gravitational attraction would presumably be overwhelmed by magnetic
repulsion,
Finally found the citation for the errors in the Rice/Kim rejection of DDL.
As we know, the editors of Fusion Technology are still living in the dark
ages wrt to free flow of information in cyberspace...
http://www.ans.org/pubs/journals/download/a_30742
In short, there is a better than average
See:
http://techcrunch.com/2014/08/14/y-combinator-and-mithril-invest-in-helion-a-nuclear-fusion-startup/
Some points to mention:
- Three years for them to get things going is considered a long time
(cf. BLP).
- They do not appear to be using d+t, and instead are using just
Thanks Jones.
Regarding Mills and titanium fuel. Anyone have a sense the degree to which
he has specially prepared the particles with water?
I'm wondering about a relatively low cost replication attempt with a cheap
spot welder.
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Wed, 13 Aug 2014 20:16:43 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 3:05 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
However neither exist when an electron is freed from an atom, hence free
electrons have no spin, and thus spin is not an intrinsic property of the
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Wed, 13 Aug 2014 20:13:49 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 2:48 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
Why wouldn't the extra energy be lost again when the electron eventually
returns
to a higher orbital? (Since it would have to escape the strong force
Jones-
Your nice ability to instantly redirect ideas is well appreciated. The dots on
the DDL are coming together.
I agree it is time to leave the 11M from investors heading.
Rice/Kim errors were math errors in their logic regarding the DDL state? The
folks (Maly and Vavra) that
Raising another $11m is an impressive milestone for BLP. But we've seen this
before - every few years BLP makes big claims, puts on a demo, does a press
release, raises money and then vanishes for a few years until more money is
needed. I do wonder how much due diligence these investors did?
Jones,
Forgive the naive question, but I am really not informed in this; but what
is the reason why this fractional state is NOT a hydrino. Seems like it
is a fractional state like a hydrino. Is it just refusal to give credence
to the terms used by Mills; or is there a mathematical and
-Original Message-
From: Jojo Iznart
Forgive the naive question, but I am really not informed in this; but what
is the reason why this fractional state is NOT a hydrino. Seems like it
is a fractional state like a hydrino.
Yes, the hydinoT is also a fractional state, but Mills does
From: Bob Cook
Jones, do you know what they said about the possible reactions in the ref 7
document noted above? Their comments may be of interest to LENR as well as
dark matter.
Basically they said they could not confirm anything more than a modest thermal
anomaly, no gammas or
Thanks for the clarification my friend,
But can any of the Mills hydrino fractional state (fractional Rydberg
multiple) correspond to 3.7kev?
And can this explain the extent of anomalous heat in the hotcat? It seems
it can't. Am I correct in this?
Jojo
- Original Message -
Why would you assume that the investors would have done lousy due diligence?
Why is it that we always believe that we understand more than the investors
who would have been up close and personal with the people and scientists at
BLP and have seen the technologies and prototypes more closely? Why
From BLP's What's New link:
http://www.blacklightpower.com/whats-new/
8/13/14
Blacklight vigorously disputes the allegations of fraud by certain
anonymous Wikipedia editors, and has announced intentions to proceed legally
against individuals and entities that assert these false
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
7. J. A. MALY and J. VAVRA, Electron Transitions on Deep Dirac Levels
II, Fusion Technol, 27, 59 (1995).
Jones, do you know what they said about the possible reactions in the ref
7 document noted above? Their comments
We now know where part of the $11M will go. :-)
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 9:46 PM, Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
From BLP's What's New link:
http://www.blacklightpower.com/whats-new/
*8/13/14*
*Blacklight vigorously disputes the allegations of
It sounds kind of like Greg Watson.
They can put all this to rest with a simple, repeatable, defined, open
demonstration.
Craig
On 08/14/2014 09:46 PM, Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
From BLP's What's New link:
http://www.blacklightpower.com/whats-new/
*8/13/14*
**
Good for them. Someone needs to teach these wikinazis a thing or two about
objectivity.
Is there still any doubt that wikipedia is a sham pretending to be a source of
authoritative information?
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson
To:
Additional personal speculations:
* BLP is feeling embolden by the recent June and July SunCell
demonstrations. While many skeptics continue to express a number of
legitimate doubts... apparently BLP has none.
* BLP has initiated this latest legal action because they believe they will
soon
Terry sez:
We now know where part of the $11M will go. :-)
True.
BLP had originally hoped to secure 10M, but they ended up with 11M. This
suggest to me that BLP's investors must really like what they have been seeing
lately.
What to do with an extra M!
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
* BLP is feeling embolden by the recent June and July SunCell
demonstrations. While many skeptics continue to express a number of
legitimate doubts... apparently BLP has none.
I respect your
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 1:42 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
A metal is an environment where lots of charged bodies are closely packed
together. I don't think an electron in such an environment can be truly
seen as
free. I.e. perhaps electrons in the conduction band actually migrate from
one
I recall there were some similar noises being made by Rossi towards
Wikipedia when he was flush with cash. Wikipedia quickly backtracked.
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson
Hello Jojo,
Although you will not licences your machine:). I must say that your
statement about BLP and a sad envy, sometimes shining through here at
vortex, has my 100% support. Spot on.
On Aug 14, 2014 6:42 PM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com wrote:
Why would you assume that the investors
34 matches
Mail list logo
