Andrea Rossi reactor, 32 day run in independent lab in Switzerland, very
high excess heat, shifted Ni and Li isotopes, no nuclear radiations, huge
mystery, Giuseppe Levi team 53 page report -- flaws...:Rich Murray
2014.10.10
http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2014/10/andrea-rossi-reactor-32-day-run-in.ht
It could just as well be that the resistive wires are what are bright and
the gaps between them are where it gets darker.
If this were the case, won't there be a double dark shadow cast on either
side of the wire with the bright wire in between.
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Eric Walker wrote
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Alan Fletcher wrote:
The "shadows" of the wires in figs 12 are problematic ... but we don't have
> enough information to figure out if they are actually the result of light,
> or if they represent zones of different thermal conductivity, as in the
> first independ
When the reactor first starts up, all the particles have a tubercle
surface. The picture of the particles with a tubercle surface look like a
hydrogen atom can penetrate deeply into the tubercle network close to the
center of the particle. This type of particle looks like it is mostly
surface and n
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Brad Lowe wrote:
If it were a clear COP of 3, it should be pretty easy to "heat a tub of
> water" or do some kind of obvious work.
>
This is the most frustrating part of following the E-Cat story. In several
years of watching, I have yet to see unequivocal calo
In reply to mix...@bigpond.com's message of Sat, 11 Oct 2014 15:02:00 +1100:
Hi,
[snip]
>Hi,
>
>17O & 18O are also potential neutron donors, interesting both because there is
>so much Oxygen, and the central charge on Oxygen is only 8. (The lower the
>central charge, the closer the nuclei can get,
>On Thursday, October 09, 2014 10:45 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Robert Ellefson wrote:
>
> >Given that the ash sample was taken at an arbitrarily-defined time point ...
> >then I believe
> >this indicates that the reaction is a cyclic one, which decays to the
> >me
Hi,
17O & 18O are also potential neutron donors, interesting both because there is
so much Oxygen, and the central charge on Oxygen is only 8. (The lower the
central charge, the closer the nuclei can get, which strongly affects the
chances of a tunneling reaction occurring.)
Regards,
Robin van Sp
I discount Goat's hypothesis for the following reasons:
As shown in figure 10 they split the reactor IR camera image into 10
segments plus the ends. They record the temperature for each segment. As
shown in the photograph, some segments were incandescent and others were
not. If incandescent segmen
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
This analysis is open to interpretation of course, since it is based on
> ratios and they state that various particles vary from place to place.
It would be risky to try to compare specific counts of specific isotopes on
different grains, befo
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 7:22 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
At 1400C all atoms are either ionized or in dipole vibrations. There is an
> electron plasma formed from which polaritons are then formed from electron
> shielded infrared photons,
>
Sometimes I wonder whether there's a correlation between the q
the alumina is outside the resistors and the reactor.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
> Rossi would nave used alumina that is transparent to infrared in his
> reactor design because he wants the heat from his primary heater that is
> imbedded in the alumina to get to the nickel
At 07:42 PM 10/10/2014, you wrote:
Rossi would nave used alumina that is transparent to infrared in his
reactor design because he wants the heat from his primary heater
that is imbedded in the alumina to get to the nickel powder. An
infrared insulator is not a good reactor design.
The report
When the gamma ray photon hits the SPP condensate the SPPs blockade the
gamma ray from a frequency above that that exists globally in the
condensate.
See
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1206.0944v2.pdf
The quantum theory of photodetection and optical coherence
as originally formulated by Glauber [1] is ce
Another related thought experiment
Consider the focusing of sunlight by a simple parabolic reflector. Why
doesn't that constitute a violation of the 2nd law of thermodynamics which
(according to one of the many equivalents formulations) says heat cannot
flow from a cold to hot region without an in
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 10 Oct 2014 21:46:43 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>There is lots of indicators over many systems that spin zero diprotons are
>involved in the initial fusion reaction. No one thinks that 4He is involved
>in the fusion reaction in LENR.
I wasn't talking about fusion re
Rossi would nave used alumina that is transparent to infrared in his
reactor design because he wants the heat from his primary heater that is
imbedded in the alumina to get to the nickel powder. An infrared insulator
is not good reactor design.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 10:19 PM, leaking pen wrote:
Page 53: it has been found that the fuel also contains rather high
concentrations of C, Ca, Cl, Fe, Mg, Mn and these are not found in the ash.
this stuff might have turned into Li-6
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 10:21 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> Table 1 Appendix 3 on page 42 of the Rossi report is the E
Mistakes happen, NASA crashed a Mars probe because they mixed up metric and
standard measurements.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 10:19 PM, leaking pen wrote:
> No, its very laughable. He uses phrases like, well know that. as in, we
> should all know this. but... he gives no sources, no numbers, and
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 3:58 AM, frobertcook
wrote:
> Eric--
>
>
> The question remains, what is the mechanism that transfers mass energy to
> thermal energy at Mev levels without gammas?
>
Superabsorbsion of a polariton (SPP) boson condensate. SPP last about 50
picoseconds, When they decay, the
Table 1 Appendix 3 on page 42 of the Rossi report is the EDS analysis of the
Fuel and Ash with natural abundance comparison. Look particularly at the
Li-6 counts in the ash.
This Table should tell us what is happening in the reaction, if it can be
believed but so far, an important detail seems to
No, its very laughable. He uses phrases like, well know that. as in, we
should all know this. but... he gives no sources, no numbers, and has
failed to notice that there are DIFFERENT types of sintered alumina, some
of which are DESIGNED to be transparent (sapphire shielding), and some
which ar
here is another graph
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 10:03 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
> [image: figure 6]
>
> From the graph, 1300C looks like a 2micron wave length, this corresponds
> to a transmittance of about .85,
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Jed Rothwell
> wrote:
>
>> A correspondent wrote t
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 9:35 PM, Alan Fletcher wrote:
> At 06:14 PM 10/10/2014, H Veeder wrote:
>
>> The issue of translucency would alter the absolute power calculations but
>> wouldn't the relative difference between input and output power remain
>> roughly the same and therefore the COP too?
>
[image: figure 6]
>From the graph, 1300C looks like a 2micron wave length, this corresponds to
a transmittance of about .85,
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> A correspondent wrote to me (not an exact quote):
>
> a quick look a the literature scrub shows transmissivity of
There is lots of indicators over many systems that spin zero diprotons are
involved in the initial fusion reaction. No one thinks that 4He is involved
in the fusion reaction in LENR.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 9:17 PM, wrote:
> In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 10 Oct 2014 20:04:12 -0400:
>
No -- the input power calculation is correct as it is. The output
power -- and hence COP (output/input+output) -- may change.
Ooops COP = (input+output)/input
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Thu, 9 Oct 2014 18:28:58 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
For a better explanation of why all the Ni in a given sample converted, see my
post in the Hydronic molecule thread.
> wrote:
>
>
>> If Rossi already knew the reaction mechanism, then it wouldn't be hard to
>> weig
At 06:14 PM 10/10/2014, H Veeder wrote:
The issue of translucency would alter the absolute power
calculations but wouldn't the relative difference between input and
output power remain roughly the same and therefore the COP too?
No -- the input power calculation is correct as it is. The output
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
> This transparency to infrared photons must be why Rossi uses this ceramic
> material to get heat unencumbered to his powder. Rossi is clever.
>
>
Or maybe it allows more infrared photons to escape unencumbered once the
reactor "ignites".
Har
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: mix...@bigpond.com
> In reply to H Veeder's message
>
> * Maybe it can all be done with shrunken lithium... Lithino
>
> ... or maybe the apparent Rossi reaction of Ni58 -> Ni 62 can be
> accomplished w
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 10 Oct 2014 20:04:12 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>When negative muons catalyze a fusion reaction the muon has a tendency to
>"stick" to the helium.
>
>Not is the helium is 2He. this type helium decays to protons in 10-22
>seconds.
...and plays no part in muon catalyz
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 10 Oct 2014 20:05:20 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>10-22 seconds
>
>should read
>
>10^^-22 seconds
1E-22 works better for ASCII text and legibility.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
The issue of translucency would alter the absolute power calculations but
wouldn't the relative difference between input and output power remain
roughly the same and therefore the COP too?
Harry
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 7:08 PM, Alan Fletcher wrote:
> At 03:48 PM 10/10/2014, you wrote:
>
>> Yes
Spelled wrong, with words left in . . .
transmissivity
A correspondent wrote to me (not an exact quote):
a quick look a the literature scrub shows transmissivity of alumina quickly
drops to zero past ~7 micron wavelength. Much of the data seems to be in
relation to the crystalline variant (e.g sapphire) vs non-crystalline.
http://www.janis.com/Libr
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Fri, 10 Oct 2014 16:56:30 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 3:29 PM, wrote:
>
>...but note that energy is required to remove the neutron from the source
>> isotope, so a lot of those 2965 isotopes will be useless, depending on
>> which
>> isotope supp
*Elforsk tar* nu initiativ till att bygga upp en samlad svensk
forskningssatsning. Mer kunskap behövs för att förstå och förklara. Låt oss
engagera fler forskare i att söka belägga fenomenet och därefter förklara
hur det fungerar.
Elforsk now takes the initiative to build a united Swedish organizat
At 05:15 PM 10/10/2014, Alan Fletcher wrote:
b) If it were perfectly transparent, then we can treat the outside
of the inner cylinder as the source.
The energy per square can be calculated, but the area is smaller (as r^2)
But what's the emissivity of the inner cylinder? Or can we
assu
At 09:10 AM 10/10/2014, Craig Haynie wrote:
They've either changed the wording on their statement, or Google
Translate does not agree with the previous translation. The
statement from Elforsk now sounds much more passive; not like they
plan to take any action.
Mats Lewan told me that the offi
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:58 AM, frobertcook
wrote:
The question remains, what is the mechanism that transfers mass energy to
> thermal energy at Mev levels without gammas?
>
As you allude, gammas were not seen in this test run. That leads me to
adopt Robin's hypothesis, that it was lithium th
At 04:34 PM 10/10/2014, Axil Axil wrote:
Jones is right...
Fundamentals of Ceramics
Michael Barsoom
The chapter on optics is mostly concerned with transparent ceramics. But
it does point out that ceramics are mostly transparent, and that they
become opaque by scattering from point sources or
10-22 seconds
should read
10^^-22 seconds
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
> When negative muons catalyze a fusion reaction the muon has a tendency to
> "stick" to the helium.
>
> Not is the helium is 2He. this type helium decays to protons in 10-22
> seconds.
>
> On Fri, Oct
When negative muons catalyze a fusion reaction the muon has a tendency to
"stick" to the helium.
Not is the helium is 2He. this type helium decays to protons in 10-22
seconds.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 7:59 PM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When negative muons catalyze a fusion reaction the muon has a tendenc
Hi,
When negative muons catalyze a fusion reaction the muon has a tendency to
"stick" to the helium. It is this sticking that is actually the limiting factor
in the number of fusion reactions that a muon can catalyze.
By analogy, when a Hydrinohydride catalyzes a neutron transfer reaction, it
wou
This transparency to infrared photons must be why Rossi uses this ceramic
material to get heat unencumbered to his powder. Rossi is clever.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
>
> http://digital.csic.es/bitstream/10261/83021/1/Sintering%20to%20transparency.pdf
>
> See page 528
>
>
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 3:29 PM, wrote:
...but note that energy is required to remove the neutron from the source
> isotope, so a lot of those 2965 isotopes will be useless, depending on
> which
> isotope supplies the neutrons.
>
Yes, this is true. I forgot to mention that the reactions were de
http://digital.csic.es/bitstream/10261/83021/1/Sintering%20to%20transparency.pdf
See page 528
Al2O3 is transparent to mid range infrared between the 2 and 5 micron
wavelengths. That is the operating temperature of the E-Cat.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
> Jones is right...
Jones is right...
If the reactor material is transparent to infrared to any degree, the
remote temperature sensor would be looking at the temperature somewhere
inside the ceramic tube. Since the amount of radiate heat is proportional
to the surface area of the radiating body at the air boundary, t
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
In reply to H Veeder's message
* Maybe it can all be done with shrunken lithium... Lithino
... or maybe the apparent Rossi reaction of Ni58 -> Ni 62 can be
accomplished with a known particle, which is halo-lithium or Li-11.
This isoto
In reply to mix...@bigpond.com's message of Sat, 11 Oct 2014 09:14:28 +1100:
Hi,
[snip]
>C13 might make an interesting replacement for the Lithium, as might Si29, if it
>works at all. If so, then it is far more abundant than any of the others[1],
>and
>like Li should allow clean reactions:-
>
>29
At 03:48 PM 10/10/2014, you wrote:
Yes and the thickness of the alumina and the "time constants" of
heat transfer dTouter/dt = K(Tinner - Touter) or similare suitable equation.
Fundamentals of Ceramics
Michael Barsoom
About 600 pages.
I found a probably bootleg copy on the web, but you'll have
Looks like his sister tried a coup d'etat:
http://www.independent.ie/world-news/asia-pacific/north-korean-leader-kim-jongun-flees-after-attempted-coup-by-sister-30652068.html
Yes and the thickness of the alumina and the "time constants" of heat
transfer dTouter/dt = K(Tinner - Touter) or similare suitable equation.
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Alan Fletcher wrote:
> Not scientific -- but a search of google images for "alumina transmission"
> indicates that you c
Not scientific -- but a search of google images for "alumina
transmission" indicates that you can get pretty much any profile you
want (Include transparent sapphires, of course), and that the actual
profiles vary wildly.
One would thus have to characterize the ceramic actually used, and
then
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Thu, 9 Oct 2014 23:22:20 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>When I
>run the numbers, I'm seeing that out of 3184 isotopes in Mathematica, 2965
>are exothermic under neutron capture versus 95 that are endothermic.
...but note that energy is required to remove the neutron from
At 03:06 PM 10/10/2014, Lennart Thornros wrote:
I am unclear of if you think there is incompetence or fraud, which
can be suspected?
Incompetence.
(I only mentioned fraud to show I thought it unlikely).
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Thu, 9 Oct 2014 23:04:12 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>don't you remember when Rossi said...
>
>He said that he tested a number of "secret sauce" element which all
>basically worked.
>
>Lithium is just one of a number of elements that do basically the same
>thing.
>
>Lithiu
Alan,
I am unclear of if you think there is incompetence or fraud, which can be
suspected?
Best Regards ,
Lennart Thornros
www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com
lenn...@thornros.com
+1 916 436 1899
202 Granite Park Court, Lincoln CA 95648
“Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of
From: Foks0904
I find it funny that anonymous GoatGuy is literally one of the best-read
"skeptics" out there and get's so much play, but in my view he deserves it
because he's pretty good and the "skeptical" community generally sucks. Still
don't think his objections discredit the report, b
Again how serious this is depends on the temperature difference between the
inner and outer shell no. If that was serious you would expect
the top edge of a picture of the hot cat to have unsharp color shade
because the top edge should represent the heat of the outer shell. I have
not find such an
Alain,
There are several answers to your question.
1. Alumina is not completely transparent and so heats to equilibrium.
2. The run with the "dummy" unfueled E-Cat takes care of any IR
measurement error.
3. I believe they did use calibrated "dots" at some point.
Adrian Ashfield
Jones, you are discussing one of the main concerns about the accuracy of the
test as far as I can ascertain. Someone needs to review the behavior of the
alumina when illuminated from within to prove that we are not being confused.
This should not be too difficult since any light source that
I hate to say it, but I'm leaning to "inconclusive" for the report as a whole.
Controls: I don't have any problems with the experimental controls as
a whole, and in particular Rossi's involvement, which was supervised
at all times. There is no chance that secret power was fed to the system.
E
At 02:22 PM 10/10/2014, Alain Sepeda wrote:
Hi,
among the skeptic argument one of the only that is not laughable is the
one of goatguy...
maybe is it because I don't understand it well...
He seems to sayÂ
- that alumina is not a grey body, but transparent, and that emissivity
must be mixed with
The 7 professors who wrote the TIP report are supposed to be answering such
criticisms. They should have set up a website for just that purpose.
Rossi did.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Foks0904 . wrote:
> I find it funny that anonymous GoatGuy is literally one of the best-read
> "skeptics"
I find it funny that anonymous GoatGuy is literally one of the best-read
"skeptics" out there and get's so much play, but in my view he deserves it
because he's pretty good and the "skeptical" community generally sucks.
Still don't think his objections discredit the report, but I wouldn't mind
seei
Hi,
among the skeptic argument one of the only that is not laughable is the one
of goatguy...
maybe is it because I don't understand it well...
He seems to say
- that alumina is not a grey body, but transparent, and that emissivity
must be mixed with translucidity when considering the radiation of
Blaze Spinnaker wrote:
> *Our* company.
>
> Exciting times!
>
> He's not relying on some report by a bunch of scientists. Tom Darden is
>> no fool, He's yale graduate / head of a billion dollar hedge fund.
>>
>
I am curious Mr. Spinnaker. Why are you so impressed by the opinions of
industri
In reply to H Veeder's message of Thu, 9 Oct 2014 22:56:00 -0400:
Hi Harry,
[snip]
>Maybe it can all be done with shrunken lithium...
>
>...Lithino
>
>harry
Yes, that thought had also occurred to me, however it doesn't explain the need
for Hydrogen. But there is another possibility...if a shrunke
H Veeder wrote:
> As far as I know the biggest source of coal pollution comes from coal
> fired electricity plants. However, Tom Darden seems to be talking
> about coal burning just for heat.
>
I believe he means burning coal and other fossil fuel for all purposes,
including process heat, elect
Gibbs also said in the above referenced message:
"If something hot in LENR comes up and anyone cares to nudge me, I’d
be grateful but until then I’ll be keeping my fingers crossed for a
breakthrough ..."
I'm sure he was nudged. ;-)
Jones Beene wrote:
> $64 question: Was Rossi present at the time the reactor was opened?
>
Yes, the reports says he was.
>
> If so, and this has been reported on E-Cat World, then that means the
> sample
> which Bianchini tested was not independently obtained – and could have been
> tampered
I have been studying this trying to figure if some of the 30,000,000 watts
of 200-800 Hz pulsed EMF @ 3GHz carrier wave from a radar station might be
collected by 1"-4" wave height in ocean and dissolve a shallow coral reef
skeleton made of CaCO3 just like this unit that gets 4 stars on amazon
htt
Yes, this mechanism is central to the way I believe that the E-Cat works.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 4:13 PM, ChemE Stewart wrote:
> Good way to induce electrical currents in nano antennas and arcing across
> gaps in powder depending on pulse frequency and carrier frequency matched
> to size of par
Good way to induce electrical currents in nano antennas and arcing across
gaps in powder depending on pulse frequency and carrier frequency matched
to size of particles/receivers
On Friday, October 10, 2014, Axil Axil wrote:
> From the TIP report on page 1
>
> The heat generating process is init
It is worth noting that some F&P cells got hot enough to boil off the
electrolytic solution and then remained hot for a while.
Harry
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
> Very perceptive and a great insight into why the test was setup the way
> that it was. Rossi has not solved hi
>From the TIP report on page 1
The heat generating process is initiated by heat from resistor coils around
the reactor tube. In addition, the resistor coils are fed with some fed with
some specific electromagnetic pulses
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
> Those good fellows
what impact does it have about the question whether the blank when powered
with more energy, is brighting much less than the one with one gram more of
magic powder ?
to the point that the things inside the reactor bright more than the
resistors ...
if the skeptics are really skeptic, they have to
I Agee. It was mentioned he uses the coil to heat as well as feed it a
pulse train, probably a square wave pattern, which is a good way to induce
EMF into the mix
On Friday, October 10, 2014, Axil Axil wrote:
> Those good fellows over at E-Cat world stated that Rossi uses a
> magnetic pulse to
James Bowery wrote:
> This is another reason why most scientists will ignore this report
>> because they see themselves as a community of equals.
>>
>
>
> The community that ignores experimental falsification of their theories
> is, indeed, a community of equals.
>
Yes! And a confederacy of du
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 2:48 PM, H Veeder wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Jed Rothwell
> wrote:
>
>>
>> I am glad they published this report. They were under no obligation to do
>> so. We are beggars and beggars cannot be choosers.
>>
>>
> This is another reason why most scientist
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
>
> I am glad they published this report. They were under no obligation to do
> so. We are beggars and beggars cannot be choosers.
>
>
This is another reason why most scientists will ignore this report because
they see themselves as a communit
As far as I know the biggest source of coal pollution comes from coal fired
electricity plants. However, Tom Darden seems to be talking about coal
burning just for heat. I suppose this is still a major problem in China.
Harry
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Blaze Spinnaker
wrote:
> Original l
Those good fellows over at E-Cat world stated that Rossi uses a
magnetic pulse to startup his reactor. I did not know this. Many of the
E-Cat World readers memorize Rossi’s every word. This is a great thing but
I confess that I cannot do it myself. Such an important revelation about
Rossi theory mi
If there is a real transparancy issue as GoatGuy suggest then the inner
must be of much higher temperature then the surface.
To get a feeling of this issue I tried to look at the published picture of
the cat and see if there was a region of lower temperature
at the upper part of the ecat in the hea
Brad Lowe wrote:
Does anyone know if there will be a press release or Q&A where the
> experimenters can answer questions?
> It would be extreme negligence to allow Levi or Rossi to open the
> reactor or handle the ash.
>
Extreme negligence toward who, under what law or what set of rules? This is
Very perceptive and a great insight into why the test was setup the way
that it was. Rossi has not solved his control issues yet.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Blaze Spinnaker
wrote:
> Brad, I think part of the problem was control. When you use the hot cat
> to actually heat something I sus
The continued use of these two remote IR temperature sensors leads me to
suspect a large output of IR radiation witch would have interfered with
directly wired instrumentation
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Brad Lowe wrote:
> Does anyone know if there will be a press release or Q&A where the
Brad, I think part of the problem was control. When you use the hot cat
to actually heat something I suspect it messes with the ability to control
the reaction. The best they can do is let it radiate, which is why the
thermal cameras.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Brad Lowe wrote:
> Does
I think you exagerrate to the point of non sense.
even if goatguy make a real point it is just changing the values of the
temperature and the power.
not the fact that COP>1, and even >>1
one reactor with less energy in, get more bright than one with more power
getting in.
maybe COP is not 3.2 bu
The microscopic photos of Rossi’s nickel particles were very revealing.
These pictures show a mix of burnt-out particles and still functional
particles. IMHO, because Rossi is running his reactor at a very high
temperature, his particles have a definite half-life based on the
operational temperatur
Does anyone know if there will be a press release or Q&A where the
experimenters can answer questions?
It would be extreme negligence to allow Levi or Rossi to open the
reactor or handle the ash.
Two things that lends credence to Jones' fear-- Rossi's constant "may
be positive or may be negative"
While I'm not nearly as optimistic as you are, I hope you're correct. The
mass-spec they promised in their past ICCF paper had me excited. I won't
hold my breath though.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
> DGT either has no more money or loads of money. I believe DGT is now well
DGT either has no more money or loads of money. I believe DGT is now well
funded. Yes as exceptional scientists and system engineers they have
developed a tool for transmutation analysis. And when DGT soon emerges from
the dark, they will take away Rossi's candy both theoretically and
commensally..
*As far as I know, the people doing these tests do not care about innuendos
or the opinions of Jones Beene, or anyone else. I believe they have good
reasons for "imposing restrictions" (as Lewan put it). These reasons
override any concerns about public relations or public opinion.*
*I am glad they
Foks0904 . wrote:
Jones -- I can't say your objections to Rossi being present when it was
> open are unfounded. I think that was a rather stupid move/agreement between
> the parties. Creates all kind of innuendo which they could/should have
> avoided.
>
As far as I know, the people doing these t
Wasn't DGT going to do something like this before they imploded?
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
> What I wanted to see in a TIP Ni/H transmutation experiment is a well
> calibration real time second by second NMR element assay as the
> transmutation proceeds. NMR resonance an
What I wanted to see in a TIP Ni/H transmutation experiment is a well
calibration real time second by second NMR element assay as the
transmutation proceeds. NMR resonance analysis is well-known in chemistry
research. This is possible to do when the associated analysis software is
written, calibra
Axil -- I don't think it's fair to keep pointing at Storms as the only one
who discounts transmutation as the mechanism -- he's only
the most vocal. There are many non-vocal, well-qualified people in the
community who don't believe it either. It's the main reason so many people
reject Widom-Larsen
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
