I wrote:
I have not yet looked closely at Holmlid's results, but I don't write them
> off. I'm keeping a distinction in my mind between his experimental
> observations and his theoretical speculations.
>
I have now had a chance to look more closely at Leif Holmlid's 2013 paper,
"Direct observati
Axil to Ecco
Omega Z posted: As to WHY they only had a limited sample.The reason Rossi
was involved with extraction of the sample was he didn't want the
Professors to analyze the internals of the reactor. Rossi stated this at
the time. Everyone seems to have missed that.I don't have that link
but,
Right Jones. Let us switch, English is way to complicated and unstructured..
Mycket uppskattat.:) (Both switch of language and the download, which I
probably only can digest s l o w l y.
Best Regards ,
Lennart Thornros
www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com
lenn...@thornros.com
+1 916 436 1899
202 Granit
Tack !
(thanks in Swedish)
From: Jed Rothwell
I downloaded it without difficulty, and put it here:
http://lenr-canr.org/Collections/HRP01.zip
I do not intend to leave it there, so get it soon.
- Jed
I downloaded it without difficulty, and put it here:
http://lenr-canr.org/Collections/HRP01.zip
I do not intend to leave it there, so get it soon.
- Jed
Jones Beene wrote:
-Original Message-
> From: Mark Jurich
>
>
> Holmlid Archive (~27 MB):
> http://tempid.altervista.org/HRP01.zip
-Original Message-
From: Mark Jurich
Holmlid Archive (~27 MB):
http://tempid.altervista.org/HRP01.zip
I cannot download this file - for whatever reason, probably a security issue
with Firefox.
If anyone on vortex can download it and post it to where Firefox will not
complain - it wil
When 10 billion kaons are produced simultaneously and instantly after
photons from a laser arrives, how does the kaon formation process know to
break up the arriving energy into kaon sized chunks. It seems that this
creation process is the inverse of the gamma absorption process.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Axil Axil wrote:
I think that it is but is is being sent backward in time.
>
Positrons? Sounds dangerous.
Eric
8)
2015-10-26 16:43 GMT+01:00 Esa Ruoho :
> Good stuff. I wonder who the AlainCo voice of reason was.
>
>
> On 26 October 2015 at 13:56, Alain Sepeda wrote:
>
>> Just another question on Cold Fusion on reddit.
>>
>> https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/3q7qd3/eli5_can_somebody_e
That is it, tomorrow back to hard work and discovering more than info
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/10/oct-26-2015-info-and-my-birthday-photos.html
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
How true! At one time Rossi was offering hints that could actually be tested
in some manner. My thermal model using his PWM leaks would actually suggest a
decent COP could be produced with the right engineering. Unfortunately, very
little information has been emitted from that camp since IH
Holmlid is heaven compared to getting info from Rossi.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:52 PM, David Roberson wrote:
> Axil, is it possible that you are jumping to wrong conclusions? When
> observations do not seem to add up, it is time to prove that they are in
> fact valid. I think we need at leas
Yup I agree with you Axil although I am no expert on these matters I also don't
know of anyway they could be generated from the protons. I will be interested
if someone has an explanation for that.
Just to expand on the strange quark pair generation idea:
This is why I was wondering that if su
Axil, is it possible that you are jumping to wrong conclusions? When
observations do not seem to add up, it is time to prove that they are in fact
valid. I think we need at least a replication of these results before we go
way out on a limb trying to explain something that might not be happeni
I am left wondering how an electron can be accelerated by a known magnetic
field in an exact manner that corresponds to that mass being 511 keV. The same
is true for acceleration within an electric field. It would seem logical that
any extra mass that is being carried along as energy of some t
I think that it is but is is being sent backward in time.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:13 PM, David Roberson wrote:
> Is there proof that an equal amount of positive charge is not being
> produced at the same time?
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Walker
> To: vortex-l
>
LERN can be very mild. Biological based LENR works inside bugs. It should
be able to handle a cell phone.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
> To be realistic … although one microgram of dense hydrogen represents about
> 30 kWhrs of thermal energy based on the net decay energy
Is there proof that an equal amount of positive charge is not being produced at
the same time?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Eric Walker
To: vortex-l
Sent: Mon, Oct 26, 2015 10:05 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Neutral K mesons violates CPT
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:18 AM, Axil Axi
It's psychological. Rydberg matter is Holmlid's baby. He wants his baby to
succeed. Like almost all LENR experiments, Holmlid assumes that the means
of the reaction is the cause of the LENR reaction. But the cause of the
reaction is not Hydrogen Rydberg matter. This stuff only produces the
cause. J
> On Oct 26, 2015, at 9:33, "Jones Beene" wrote:
>
> Wait a minute – the end result of muon decay is an electron (or positron in
> the case of the antimuon). This is technically not “beta decay” at least not
> as taught by pedantics.
>
I'm not sold on the whole meson -> muon decay explanation.
To be realistic . although one microgram of dense hydrogen represents about
30 kWhrs of thermal energy based on the net decay energy of the nucleon
disintegration, it is clear from both theory and Holmlid's results - that
most of that energy is lost to neutrinos.
In fact the usable energy could be
Good stuff. I wonder who the AlainCo voice of reason was.
On 26 October 2015 at 13:56, Alain Sepeda wrote:
> Just another question on Cold Fusion on reddit.
>
> https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/3q7qd3/eli5_can_somebody_explain_to_me_what_cold_fusion/
>
--
---
http://twit
I don't understand how strange and antistrange quarks can come from
protons. There would need to be a quark reformatting process involved that
can turn matter into different matter and antimatter types instantly. It is
easier to accept that light energy from the laser is turned into matter and
anti
Having retired from 37 years in the portable electronics world, I hate
these scenarios where LENR are suggested for application to cellphones.
They all suffer from the same problem as the fuel cell powered cellphone -
waste heat. When a Li battery discharges in powering a phone it produces
very li
Because all the 10 billion kaons are produced instantaneously, the stuff
that produces them must be entangles. Holmlid cryptically says that
"entanglement is needed"
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Stephen Cooke
wrote:
> Good point about the delays, is there a good explanation for the differen
Could generation of +/- s quark pairs be the trigger for nucleon
disintegration. Could each pair with an up quark to form kaons and force the
disintegration of the nucleons from which the up quark comes? Each s quark has
a rest mass of 100MeV. I'm not sure if there is a meson containing an s qua
dirac said that the partner of the electron had negative mass. This
bothered people so Feynman said that the positron was just a negative
particle going backward in time. This concept of going back in time is
important somehow.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Bob Higgins
wrote:
> You ask a ve
Here is a video which is pregnant with real world ideas about where to go
with the Holmlid technique and SPR (surface plasmon resonance). I think the
"future will be small" for dense hydrogen - in the sense of merging with
microlithography for high value products.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3
Good point about the delays, is there a good explanation for the different
delays for the two sources 52ns for protium and 26 ns deuterium? Interesting
that protium takes exactly twice as long and is half the mass. I appreciate the
+/- kaon half life is about 12ns.
> On 26 Oct 2015, at 15:13,
The LENR reaction effect are long range with the detector being 3 meters
for the source of the reaction.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Axil Axil wrote:
> The reaction changes based on the color of the filter that is used on the
> laser. The time to change the filter is 60 seconds. This means
The reaction changes based on the color of the filter that is used on the
laser. The time to change the filter is 60 seconds. This means that the
Hydrogen rydberg matter is long gone on the second and third laser shot.
When Cs137 is used as a probe. the reaction produces a spike in the beta
decay
You ask a very good and hard question. As an EE, I find much of Hotson's
description much more satisfying that what I was taught in school.
However, I wish Hotson was still around (now deceased) so that I could
visit him to come to a greater understanding of his theory. He describes
that the nega
The delay or 12, 26, and 52 ns means that the kaons appear before any other
particles are produced.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
> Wait a minute – the end result of muon decay is an electron (or positron
> in the case of the antimuon). This is technically not “beta decay”
Wait a minute – the end result of muon decay is an electron (or positron in the
case of the antimuon). This is technically not “beta decay” at least not as
taught by pedantics. Beta decay is defined as a type of radioactive decay in
which a proton is transformed into a neutron, or vice versa, w
Holmlid says that the the reaction is delayed by 26ns for deuterium and 52
ns for protium. This means that the reaction is produced by a decay product
of the K mesons. The 10 billion kaons are produced simultaneously.
Positrons are seen but no gamma. This is important. This means that the
mechanism
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:18 AM, Axil Axil wrote:
In point of fact, Holmlid is producing electrons from nothing in his
> experiment. Don't get excited, we are just talking here.
>
If one applies straightforward logic, there are only three possibilities:
- Baryogenesis and tachyons are creat
Just another question on Cold Fusion on reddit.
https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/3q7qd3/eli5_can_somebody_explain_to_me_what_cold_fusion/
Well if Kaons are present on the up side we always thought something strange
was going on in this process😉.
Although energetically there is enough rest mass in Deuterium to produce a Kaon
through some kind of low energy or collective trigger for the nucleons to
trigger can it account for the fo
Yup I was also wondering about the different quarks in the Kaons. Was the
signature in their data clear? Or was there some other reason they inferred
Kaons as well as Pions?
Sent from my iPhone
> On 26 Oct 2015, at 08:03, Axil Axil wrote:
>
> K−, negatively charged (containing a strange quark
K−, negatively charged (containing a strange quark and an up antiquark) has
mass 493.667±0.013 MeV and mean lifetime (1.2384±0.0024)×10−8 s.
K+ (antiparticle of above) positively charged (containing an up quark and a
strange antiquark) must (by CPT invariance) have mass and lifetime equal to
that o
40 matches
Mail list logo
