This morning I translated the recent Russian paper, "The Question of Excess
Heat in Nickel-Hydrogen". If you are interested, you can get a copy of the
English version from LENR Forum or from my Google drive at:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5Pc25a4cOM2ZzVib0JtOWtyaXc
Bob Higgins
Note that this work was done in the 1990s, so it was not affected by Rossi.
- Jed
On Mon, 2015-10-19 at 17:26 -0400, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Note that this work was done in the 1990s, so it was not affected by
> Rossi.
The paper references work in the 90s, but the paper and the latest work,
is current.
Craig
>
>
I believe that the work in this paper is new, but the authors remembered
their own previous work with Ni and hydrogen where they saw unexplain-able
heat in the 1990s. What distinguishes the new work is the use of LAH in a
sealed container.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
>
What I would like to emphasize is that the first study described here was
an independent, stand-alone observation of excess heat from the Ni-H
system. There are not many studies like that. All the ones I know of were
inspired by or linked to Mills, Piantelli or Rossi. Such results might be
colored
I wonder whether they took the exothermic effects of hydrogen
absorption into account.
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> What I would like to emphasize is that the first study described here was
> an independent, stand-alone observation of excess heat from the Ni-H
> system.
It seems to me that based on the given data it is possible to interpret the
temperature difference between the empty vessel and the vessel with "fuel"
( their quotation marks) as resulting from either endothermic activity or
exothermic activity in the vessel with "fuel".
Harry
On Mon, Oct 19, 201
paper on Ni-H experiment
It seems to me that based on the given data it is possible to interpret the
temperature difference between the empty vessel and the vessel with "fuel" (
their quotation marks) as resulting from either endothermic activity or
exothermic activity in the vessel
H Veeder wrote:
It seems to me that based on the given data it is possible to interpret the
> temperature difference between the empty vessel and the vessel with "fuel"
> ( their quotation marks) as resulting from either endothermic activity or
> exothermic activity in the vessel with "fuel".
>
On Oct 20, 2015 1:41 PM, "Jed Rothwell" wrote:
>
> H Veeder wrote:
>
>> It seems to me that based on the given data it is possible to interpret
the temperature difference between the empty vessel and the vessel with
"fuel" ( their quotation marks) as resulting from either endothermic
activity or
Jed, there is contraditional info around, see:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360319914002389
(bottom of the page)
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 7:37 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> H Veeder wrote:
>
> It seems to me that based on the given data it is possible to interpret
>> the temp
>From what I saw of their experiment, the thermocouples (k-type) measuring
the two vessels were connected in series so that the measurement that came
out on the wires was the temperature difference between the two. This may
be more accurate than having two absolute thermocouples and subtracting to
Ok
Harry
On Oct 20, 2015 4:16 PM, "Bob Higgins" wrote:
>From what I saw of their experiment, the thermocouples (k-type) measuring
the two vessels were connected in series so that the measurement that came
out on the wires was the temperature difference between the two. This may
be more accurate
gnificantly better way to balance the operational
> temperature between the two vessels for comparison.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: H Veeder
> To: vortex-l
> Sent: Tue, Oct 20, 2015 11:26 am
> Subject: Re: [Vo]: Translation of Russian paper on
14 matches
Mail list logo
