Re: [Vo]:Defkalion: ?We have Rossi?s formula?

2011-11-29 Thread peter . heckert
it 2011 again. ;-) All serious cold fusion companies do this from time to time, some do it succesful for 20 years now. Peter - Original Nachricht Von: Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com An: vortex-l@eskimo.com Datum: 29.11.2011 12:14 Betreff: [Vo]:Defkalion: ?We have

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion: ?We have Rossi?s formula?

2011-11-29 Thread Aussie Guy E-Cat
Betreff: [Vo]:Defkalion: ?We have Rossi?s formula? Hello group, Have a read at this article posted today on NyTeknik. It's about the backstage of tomorrow's Defkalion Announcement: http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3353181.ece A short excerpt: ?Let?s say I have

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion: ?We have Rossi?s formula?

2011-11-29 Thread Daniel Rocha
@**gmail.comshirakawa.ak...@gmail.com An: vortex-l@eskimo.com Datum: 29.11.2011 12:14 Betreff: [Vo]:Defkalion: ?We have Rossi?s formula? Hello group, Have a read at this article posted today on NyTeknik. It's about the backstage of tomorrow's Defkalion Announcement: http

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion: ?We have Rossi?s formula?

2011-11-29 Thread Akira Shirakawa
On 2011-11-29 13:01, peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote: If this is true they are gangsters and Rossi has my full support. And also at University of Siena they have gangsters, if this is true. I guess if this turns out to be true, Rossi was not wrong about snakes and competitors lurking everywhere,

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion: ?We have Rossi?s formula?

2011-11-29 Thread peter . heckert
enough. Peter - Original Nachricht Von: Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com An: vortex-l@eskimo.com Datum: 29.11.2011 13:22 Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Defkalion: ?We have Rossi?s formula? Others have openly admitted in trying to get a spectrum. And joked about it how Rossi got

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion: ?We have Rossi?s formula?

2011-11-29 Thread Aussie Guy E-Cat
Are you saying you support IP theft? This is not Vulcan where the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xa6c3OTr6yA This is business and this is, if proven, theft. If I was Rossi, I would be talking to the police and asking for charges to be filled

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion: ?We have Rossi?s formula?

2011-11-29 Thread Aussie Guy E-Cat
I have no problems with the test the 2 Swedish physicists, Levi. Focardi and a hand full of other academics did. AG On 11/29/2011 11:12 PM, peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote: If it is true, then it is a case of scientific fraud and industrial spionage. If its untrue and they all collaborate

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion: ?We have Rossi?s formula?

2011-11-29 Thread Daniel Rocha
Only in this case. This invention, if true, is too precious to be kept private. 2011/11/29 Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com Are you saying you support IP theft? This is not Vulcan where the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few: http://www.youtube.com/watch?* *v=Xa6c3OTr6yA

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion: ?We have Rossi?s formula?

2011-11-29 Thread peter . heckert
, they did not got enough evidency to exclude fraud by measured facts. This is Rossi's fault. Peter - Original Nachricht Von: Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com An: vortex-l@eskimo.com Datum: 29.11.2011 13:55 Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Defkalion: ?We have Rossi?s formula? I have

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion: ?We have Rossi?s formula?

2011-11-29 Thread Aussie Guy E-Cat
If proven it is planned IP theft. Clear and simple. Those involved should go to jail and the University, if involved, should be forced to pay a very large amount of money. The courts do not consider the Needs of the Many justify theft of the IP of the one. And neither should you. Theft is

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion: ?We have Rossi?s formula?

2011-11-29 Thread Daniel Rocha
We don't know how much of Piantelli's patents Rossi used anyway. Send both to jail? :) 2011/11/29 Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com If proven it is planned IP theft. Clear and simple. Those involved should go to jail and the University, if involved, should be forced to pay a very

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion: ?We have Rossi?s formula?

2011-11-29 Thread Aussie Guy E-Cat
They acted like scientists do. We are not certain. We need to do more tests, which you can pay us for. Oh and by the way we need to do those tests in private so we can get the radiation spectrum and figure out that you have inside. I'm like Rossi, an engineer and I don't give a C**P what is

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion: ?We have Rossi?s formula?

2011-11-29 Thread Daniel Rocha
Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Defkalion: ?We have Rossi?s formula? Others have openly admitted in trying to get a spectrum. And joked about it how Rossi got angry at them for trying it on. Like it had no value. Almost suggesting Rossi had no right to withhold it from science. If true I do hope he sues

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion: ?We have Rossi?s formula?

2011-11-29 Thread Aussie Guy E-Cat
If Rossi used some Piantelli IP then Rossi will need to pay Piantelli a royalty. However that does not excuse outright IP theft, especially when the theft was arranged in advance. AG On 11/29/2011 11:41 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote: We don't know how much of Piantelli's patents Rossi used anyway.

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion: ?We have Rossi?s formula?

2011-11-29 Thread Alain dit le Cycliste
maybe is it still legal to build a similar reactor, with a pattented, or in process of patent, technology, but you have to obtain the allowance of the inventor/owner... and not steal it. normally rossi before applying for patent, should have put a document in a third-party file, that proove that

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion: ?We have Rossi?s formula?

2011-11-29 Thread peter . heckert
- Original Nachricht Von: Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com An: vortex-l@eskimo.com Datum: 29.11.2011 14:11 Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Defkalion: ?We have Rossi?s formula? We don't know how much of Piantelli's patents Rossi used anyway. Send both to jail? :) As long as he

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion: ?We have Rossi?s formula?

2011-11-29 Thread Aussie Guy E-Cat
Rossi has said his IP / trade secrets are in Escrow and if anything should happen to him they will be released, I guess to him estate. So he has dated and recorded his priority. AG On 11/29/2011 11:50 PM, Alain dit le Cycliste wrote: maybe is it still legal to build a similar reactor, with a

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion: ?We have Rossi?s formula?

2011-11-29 Thread Aussie Guy E-Cat
I suspect there was bad blood there for some time and Rossi used Krivit. Have you listened to the way Krivit asked questions? HE showed no respect at all and basically / indirectly accused most who he interviewed of lying. I know and have many good Italian friends. They would not stand to be

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion: ?We have Rossi?s formula?

2011-11-29 Thread peter . heckert
. Its so simple, why havent they done it? - Original Nachricht Von: Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com An: vortex-l@eskimo.com Datum: 29.11.2011 14:15 Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Defkalion: ?We have Rossi?s formula? They acted like scientists do. We are not certain. We need to do

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion: ?We have Rossi?s formula?

2011-11-29 Thread Aussie Guy E-Cat
On one test occasion Rossi had provided 2 holes through the 2 cm thick lead shielding. The scientists present at that test tried to switch the radiation detector from count mode to spectrum mode, despite Rossi telling them they were not allowed to record a spectrum. Rossi saw what they were

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion: ?We have Rossi?s formula?

2011-11-29 Thread Terry Blanton
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote: Only in this case. This invention, if true, is too precious to be kept private. Wasn't that the defense used by Julius and Ethel Rosenberg? T

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion: ?We have Rossi?s formula?

2011-11-29 Thread francis
All this discussion based on an August phone call to someone at Ny Teknik back in August is just unwarranted drama, I predict Xanthoulis will deny this version of the story and leave it to Rossi to make a case if there is one. If DK did get a hint from Sienna then they have had plenty of time to