The excess power estimate of the test run is based on a higher
temperature reading of the outer surface of the glass as compared to a
lower temperature reading during the calibration runs
However, someone named ECCO has noticed that the temperature of the
inner glass surface is the same in the
Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/follow/177-write-up-of-eu-cell-baselines
If the higher temperature on the outer surface is not an artifact,
wouldn't you expect the inner surface temperature to be somewhat
higher as well?
Yup. I am sure it
I'm not seeing the problem. The highest temperature in the calibration
runs for T-GlassIn, at this power level, was about 125C. During this
live run, the temperature appears to be about 5 C above that.
Craig
On 12/14/2012 03:00 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
Correction! I didn't realize that they had upped the power to 54 watts.
Craig
On 12/14/2012 03:14 PM, Craig wrote:
I'm not seeing the problem. The highest temperature in the calibration
runs for T-GlassIn, at this power level, was about 125C. During this
live run, the temperature appears to
In their 12/12/12 Progress Blog posting, MFMP stated that there was a
dleliberate error in the data viewer, and challenged people to spot it.
*We have a “deliberate mistake” in the data viewer, if you are sober enough
at this time in the day, we challenge you to spot it.
*
Did anyone ever find
On 2012-12-14 21:24, Jeff Berkowitz wrote:
Did anyone ever find it?
It's Power (Red) (bar) instead of Power (Red) (W). Bars instead of
watts.
Red is the active wire.
Cheers,
S.A.
On 12/14/2012 03:24 PM, Jeff Berkowitz wrote:
In their 12/12/12 Progress Blog posting, MFMP stated that there was a
dleliberate error in the data viewer, and challenged people to spot it.
*We have a “deliberate mistake” in the data viewer, if you are sober
enough at this time in the day, we
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/follow/177-write-up-of-eu-cell-baselines
If the higher temperature on the outer surface is not an artifact,
wouldn't you expect the inner
Is everyone taking into account the fact that the graphs for T_Glassout are
actually (T_Glassout - T_Ambient), while the graph for T_Glassin is the raw
T_Glassin and is not corrected for ambient? Or at least so they are labeled.
Jeff
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Harry Veeder
On 12/14/2012 03:53 PM, Jeff Berkowitz wrote:
Is everyone taking into account the fact that the graphs for
T_Glassout are actually (T_Glassout - T_Ambient), while the graph for
T_Glassin is the raw T_Glassin and is not corrected for ambient? Or at
least so they are labeled.
Jeff
I don't
The difference between T_Mica and T_GlassIn seems to be about 5 degrees
larger than it was during calibration. I put the details in the progress
blog comments.
Jeff
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Craig cchayniepub...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/14/2012 03:53 PM, Jeff Berkowitz wrote:
Is
On 12/14/2012 05:17 PM, Jeff Berkowitz wrote:
The difference between T_Mica and T_GlassIn seems to be about 5
degrees larger than it was during calibration. I put the details in
the progress blog comments.
Jeff
Where do you see T_Mica for the calibration runs?
Craig
I spotted it, but I just thought it was a mistake made in haste.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Craig cchayniepub...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Fri, Dec 14, 2012 3:29 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:MFMP: Temperature of inner glass surface.
On 12/14/2012 03
Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com wrote:
The difference between T_Mica and T_GlassIn seems to be about 5 degrees
larger than it was during calibration.
I suppose . . . if all of the temperature sensors show an increase except
T_Glassin, that sensor might be malfunctioning. But I doubt it. When a
as
reflected in the outer glass temperature.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Fri, Dec 14, 2012 3:40 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:MFMP: Temperature of inner glass surface.
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw
David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
They need to run the power into each wire sequentially at the same level
for long enough to see if there is a difference between the two. I
suggested a 1 hour run into the inactive, immediately followed by 1 hour of
active wire drive, then followed up
-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Fri, Dec 14, 2012 5:45 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:MFMP: Temperature of inner glass surface.
David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
They need to run the power into each wire sequentially at the same
Agree. No idea what's really going on. For example, the calibration numbers
I posted came from a 1-bar 100% H calibration run. Are they now running
100%H or 75%H / 25%Ar in the cell? If the latter, is it enough to account
for the apparent 5C degree difference? I'm not making any claims, that is
18 matches
Mail list logo
